Bridging aortic valve surgery to 21st century: what can a surgeon do?

Abstract

Aortic valve stenosis is the most clinically relevant valvular heart disease in the elderlies. Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) represented, for decades, the standard of care for the treatment of severe aortic stenosis. Although SAVR still represents a valid option in this clinical scenario, transcatheter aortic valve implantation proved to be superior to medical therapy and comparable to SAVR in several randomized trials in patients at high or intermediate operative risk. At the same time, the growing aging population carrying on greater morbidities and high risk profiles has led to the development of minimally invasive technologies, as rapid deployment aortic valve replacement or Sutureless, to minimize surgical impact on patients. The Heart Team is nowadays tasked to determine the best option tailored for each patient considering patient-related factors and mastering all the surgical options in terms of both different techniques and types of available valves. Nevertheless, some open issues need to be already answered as: which has the longest durability, which the lower complication rate and the lower overall mortality. The aim of this review is to briefly resume the main features of these different options and explore what kind of open questions these newer-generation prosthetic valves and delivery devices carry.

Keywords

Aortic valve surgery / aortic valve stenosis / cardiac surgery / sutureless / transcatheter aortic valve implantation / new-generation devices / minimally invasive technologies

References

[1] Bonow RO.Population-wide trends in aortic stenosis incidence and outcomes..Circulation2015;131:969-71

[2] Cribier A,Bash A,Tron C.Percutaneous transcatheter implantation of an aortica valve prosthesis for calcific aortic stenosis: first human case description..Circulation2002;106:3006-8

[3] Gilard M,Iung B,Chevreul K.Registry of trancatheter aortic valve implantation in high-risk patients..N Eng J Med2012;366:1705-15

[4] Thomas M,Walther T,Lefèvre T.Thirty-day results of the SAPIEN aortic Bioprosthesis European Outcome (SOURCE) Registry. A European registry of transcatheter aortic valve implantation using the Edwards SAPIEN valve..Circulation2010;122:62-9

[5] Cribier A.Commemorating the 15-year anniversary of TAVI: insights into the early stages of development, from concept to human application, and perspectives..EuroIntervention2017;13:29-37

[6] Gatto L,Romagnoli E,Prati F.New-generation devices for transcatheter aortic valve implantation..Minerva Cardioangiol2018;66:747-61

[7] Leon MB,Mack MJ,Svensson LG.Transcatheter or surgical aortic-valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients..N Eng J Med2016;374:1609-20

[8] Baumgartner H,Bax JJ,Hamm C.2017 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease..Eur Heart J2017;38:2739-91

[9] Chirichilli I,Rose D,Greco E.Port Access (Thru-Port System) video-assisted mitral valve surgery..J Thorac Dis.2013;5 Suppl 6:S680-5 PMCID:PMC3831830

[10] Biondi-Zoccai G,Frati G.Our preoccupation with renal artery disease in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: much ado about nothing?.J Am Coll Cardiol2014;63:317-20

[11] Hamm CW,Mack MJ.The future of transcatheter aortic valve implantation..Eur Heart J2016;37:803-10

[12] Ando T,Grines CL.Transfemoral, transapical and transcatheter aortic valve implantation and surgica aortic valve replacement: a meta analysis f direct and adjusted indirect comparisons of early and mid term deaths..Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg2017;25:484-92

[13] Biondi-Zoccai G,Abbate A,Benedetto U.Network meta-analysis on the comparative effectiveness and safety of transcatheter aortic valve implantation with CoreValve or Sapien devices versus surgical replacement..Heart Lung Vessel2014;6:232-43 PMCID:PMC4246842

[14] Takagi H,Umemoto T.A meta-analysis of effects of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement on left ventricualr ejection fraction and mass..Int J Cardiol2017;238:31-6

[15] Witberg G,Yahav D.Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients at low surgical risk: a meta-analysis of randomized trials and propensity score matched observational studies..Catheter Cardiovasc Interv2018;92:408-16

[16] Leipsic J,Webb JG,Blanke P.Trials testing the value of imaging use in valve disease and in transcatheter valvular interventions..JACC Cardiovasc Imaging2017;10:286-95

[17] Tam DY,Fremes SE,Hancock-Howard RL.A cost-utility analysis of transcatheter versus surgical aorticvalve replacement for the treatment of aortic stenosis in the population with intermediate surgical risk..J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2018;155:1978-88

[18] Villablanca PA,Thourani VH,Bangalore S.A meta-analysis and meta-regression of long-term outcomes of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis..Int J Cardiol2016;225:234-43

[19] Rahmanian PB,Eghbalzadeh K,Madershahian N.Rapid deployment aortic valve replacement: excellent results and increased effective orifice areas..Ann Thorac Surg2018;105:24-30

[20] Hurley ET,Segurado R.A meta-analysis examining differences in short-term outcomes between sutureless and conventional aortic valve prostheses..Innovations (Phila)2015;10:375-82

[21] Ferrari E,Salamin P,Demertzis S.Rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement versus standard bioprosthesis implantation..J Card Surg2017;32:322-7

[22] Ensminger S,Bauer T,Beckmann A.Rapid deployment versus conventional bioprosthetic valve replacement for aortic stenosis..J Am Coll Cardiol2018;71:1417-28

[23] Meco M,Montisci A,Cirri S.Sutureless aortic valve replacement versus transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a meta-analysis of comparative matched studies using propensity score matching..Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg2018;26:202-9

[24] Shinn SH,Deo SV,Markowitz AH.A systematic review and meta analysis of suturless aortic valve replacement versus transcatheter aortic valve implantation..Ann Thorac Surg2018;106:924-9

[25] Takagi H,Umemoto T.Direct and adjusted indirect comparisons of perioperative mortality after sutureless or rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement versus transcatheter aortic valve implantation..Int J Cardiol2017;228:327-34

[26] D’Onofrio A,Rubino AS,Filippini C.The rise of new technologies for aortic valve stenosis: a comparison of sutureless and transcatheter aortic valve implantation..J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2016;152:99-109