PDF
Abstract
Transit-oriented development, as initially conceptualized (TOD 1.0), aims to re-engineer the built environment to promote transit and walking and curb car-oriented sprawl. While widely adopted and practiced, TOD 1.0 faces increasing challenges amid growing societal concerns over inequality and climate crisis. TOD-advocated development densification and diversification could adversely affect neighborhood affordability, residential stability, and microclimate conditions. The emergence of disruptive transportation technologies has also brought both threats and opportunities to transit. This article calls for a paradigm shift, transforming TOD 1.0 to Next-Gen TOD in three aspects. First, Next-Gen TOD shifts the spatial focus from TOD nodes to corridors or networks to harness the network effects of transit systems. Second, Next-Gen TOD shifts the planning/policy focus from prescribing the attributes of 3-Ds (Density, Diversity, and Design) to balancing the outcome of 3-Es (Efficiency, Equity, and Eco-Adaptivity). Third, by including additional 2-Es, Evaluative and Educative, Next-Gen TOD operates as an analytical and engagement platform to support participatory process and informed choice of planning/policy options. The article presents two examples, Hong Kong West Kowloon HSR-TOD and TOD-based affordable housing modeling in Austin, TX, to illustrate the application of Next-Gen TOD.
Keywords
Corridor/network TOD
/
Equitable TOD
/
Eco-adaptive design
/
Performance-based planning
/
Multi-objective modeling
Cite this article
Download citation ▾
Ming Zhang.
Next-Gen TOD: Transforming Transit Oriented Development to Embrace New Challenges and Opportunities.
Urban Rail Transit 1-14 DOI:10.1007/s40864-025-00242-y
| [1] |
CalthorpePThe next American metropolis, 1993New YorkPrinceton Architectural Press23
|
| [2] |
Ahamad Z (2014) Planning for transit oriented development in Malaysia. In: Presentation at the Japan-OECD policy forum on urban development and green growth, Tokyo, October, pp 14–16
|
| [3] |
IbraevaA, de Almeida CorreiaGH, SilvaC, AntunesAP. Transit-oriented development: a review of research achievements and challenges. Transp Res Part A Policy Pr, 2020, 132: 110-130.
|
| [4] |
AbdiMH, Lamíquiz-DaudénPJ. Transit-oriented development in developing countries: a qualitative meta-synthesis of its policy, planning and implementation challenges. Int J Sustain Transp, 2022, 163195-221.
|
| [5] |
ZhouJ. The transit metropolis of Chinese characteristics? Literature review, interviews, surveys and case studies. Transp Policy, 2016, 51: 115-125.
|
| [6] |
ITDP (2017) TOD standard 3.0. New York: institute for transportation & development policy. http://tod.itdp.org/tod-standard.html. Accessed 30 Oct 2024
|
| [7] |
SalatS, OllivierGTransforming the urban space through transit-oriented development: the 3V approach, 2017New YorkThe World Bank.
|
| [8] |
Lung-AmamW, PendallR, KnaapE. Mi casa no es su casa: the fight for equitable transit-oriented development in an inner-ring suburb. J Plan Educ Res, 2019, 394442-455.
|
| [9] |
MuellerEJ, HildeTW, TorradoMJ. Methods for countering spatial inequality: incorporating strategic opportunities for housing preservation into transit-oriented development planning. Landsc Urban Plan, 2018, 177: 317-327.
|
| [10] |
Thomas R, Bertolini L, Thomas R, Bertolini L (2020) Persistent challenges and potential solutions: equitable TOD. Transit-Oriented Dev Learn Int Case Stud, 73–93
|
| [11] |
Stuart AL, Gurram S (2018) Impacts of transit-oriented compact-growth on air pollutant concentrations and exposures in the tampa region. Center for transportation, environment, and community health (CTECH) final report. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/35553. Accessed 30 Oct 2024
|
| [12] |
KamruzzamanM, DeilamiK, YigitcanlarT. Investigating the urban heat island effect of transit oriented development in Brisbane. J Transp Geogr, 2018, 66: 116-124.
|
| [13] |
CerveroR, KockelmanK. Travel demand and the 3Ds: density, diversity, and design. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ, 1997, 23199-219.
|
| [14] |
EwingR, CerveroR. Travel and the built environment: a meta-analysis. J Am Plann Assoc, 2010, 763265-294.
|
| [15] |
JammeHT, RodriguezJ, BahlD, BanerjeeT. A twenty-five-year biography of the TOD concept: from design to policy, planning, and implementation. J Plan Educ Res, 2019, 394409-428.
|
| [16] |
KnowlesRD, FerbracheF, NikitasA. Transport's historical, contemporary and future role in shaping urban development: re-evaluating transit oriented development. Cities, 2020, 99: 102607.
|
| [17] |
WangF, ZhengY, WuW, WangD. The travel, equity and wellbeing impacts of transit-oriented development in global south. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ, 2022, 113: 103512.
|
| [18] |
WangL, XiaH. A comprehensive review of the development characteristics and future trends of TOD in Chinese urban rail transit. Urban Rail Transit, 2024.
|
| [19] |
SmithJJ, GihringTA. Financing transit systems through value capture: an annotated bibliography. Am J Econ Sociol, 2006, 653751-786.
|
| [20] |
KresseK, KangM, KimSI, Van der KrabbenE. Value capture ideals and practice–development stages and the evolution of value capture policies. Cities, 2020, 106: 102861.
|
| [21] |
PadeiroM, LouroA, Da CostaNM. Transit-oriented development and gentrification: a systematic review. Transp Rev, 2019, 396733-754.
|
| [22] |
Delmelle EC (2021) Transit-induced gentrification and displacement: the state of the debate. In: Advances in transport policy and planning, vol 8, Academic Press, pp 173–190
|
| [23] |
BakerDM, LopezE, GreenleeAJ. Transit development and housing displacement: the case of the Chicago red line extension. Cities, 2021, 115: 103212.
|
| [24] |
HeSY, TaoS, CheungYH, PuczkowskyjN, LinZ. Transit-oriented development, perceived neighbourhood gentrification and sense of community: a case study of Hong Kong. Case Stud Transp Policy, 2021, 92555-566.
|
| [25] |
LiangC, HuangY, YipTL, LiVJ. Does rail transit development gentrify neighborhoods? Evidence from Hong Kong. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract, 2022, 155: 354-372.
|
| [26] |
MatsuyukiM, AizuN, NakamuraF, LeeruttanawisutK. Impact of gentrification on travel behavior in transit-oriented development areas in Bangkok Thailand. Case stud Transp policy, 2020, 841341-1351.
|
| [27] |
ChavaJ, NewmanP, TiwariR. Gentrification in new-build and old-build transit-oriented developments: the case of Bengaluru. Urban Res Pract, 2019, 123247-263.
|
| [28] |
ZukinS, TrujilloV, FraseP, JacksonD, RecuberT, WalkerA. New retail capital and neighborhood change: boutiques and gentrification in New York City. City Commun, 2009, 8147-64.
|
| [29] |
ErnstO, DoucetB. A window on the (changing) neighbourhood: the role of pubs in the contested spaces of gentrification. Tijdschr Econ Soc Geogr, 2014, 1052189-205.
|
| [30] |
Chapple, K., Loukaitou-Sideris, A., Gonzalez, S. R., Kadin, D., & Poirer, J. (2018). Transit Oriented Development and Commercial Gentrification: Exploring the Linkages.
|
| [31] |
LiuC, BardakaE. Transit-induced commercial gentrification: causal inference through a difference-in-differences analysis of business microdata. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract, 2023, 175: 103758.
|
| [32] |
LinJJ, YangSH. Proximity to metro stations and commercial gentrification. Transp Policy, 2019, 77: 79-89.
|
| [33] |
Webber K (2022) Exploring the relationship between transit-induced intensification and retail gentrification in a mid-sized Canadian city, Master's thesis, University of Waterloo
|
| [34] |
GlaeserEL, KahnME, RappaportJ. Why do the poor live in cities? The role of public transportation. J Urban Econ, 2008, 6311-24.
|
| [35] |
PathakR, WyczalkowskiCK, HuangX. Public transit access and the changing spatial distribution of poverty. Reg Sci Urban Econ, 2017, 66: 198-212.
|
| [36] |
HeilmannK. Transit access and neighborhood segregation. Evidence from the Dallas light rail system. Reg Sci Urban Econ, 2018, 73: 237-250.
|
| [37] |
MakarewiczC, DantzlerP, AdkinsA. Another look at location affordability: understanding the detailed effects of income and urban form on housing and transportation expenditures. Hous Policy Debate, 2020, 3061033-1055.
|
| [38] |
SingerME. How affordable are accessible locations? Neighborhood affordability in US urban areas with intra-urban rail service. Cities, 2021, 116: 103295.
|
| [39] |
Schilling J, Fu S, Freemark Y (2024) Promoting equitable development in communities. Urban institute. https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/2024-06/Promoting_Equitable_Development_in_Communities.pdf. Accessed 30 Oct 2024
|
| [40] |
WaltersJ, EwingR. Measuring the benefits of compact development on vehicle miles and climate change. Environ Pract, 2009, 113196-208.
|
| [41] |
SalonD, BoarnetMG, HandyS, SpearsS, TalG. How do local actions affect VMT? A critical review of the empirical evidence. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ, 2012, 177495-508.
|
| [42] |
Rodier C, Alemi F, Johnston RA (2015) Exploring unintended environmental and social-equity consequences of transit oriented development. A Research report from the national center for sustainable transportation. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/88d8236t. Accessed 30 Oct 2024
|
| [43] |
ZhangM. Can transit-oriented development reduce peak-hour congestion?. Transp Res Rec, 2010, 21741148-155.
|
| [44] |
AgrawalS, LotfiG, WelegedaraN. Urban heat islands in transit-oriented development designated areas in a high-latitude city-Edmonton Canada. Can J Urban Res, 2023, 32244-58
|
| [45] |
MukhamedjanovA, KidokoroT, SetaF, YangY. Reshaping the concept of transit-oriented development in response to public space overheating near the transit nodes of Tokyo. Cities, 2021, 116: 103240.
|
| [46] |
Cervero R (2004) Transit-oriented development in the United States: Experiences, challenges, and prospects. TCRP Report 102. Transportation Research Board
|
| [47] |
AarhaugJ, FearnleyN, JohnssonE. E-scooters and public transport–complement or competition?. Res Transp Econ, 2023, 98: 101279.
|
| [48] |
MoinseD, L'HostisA. Optimizing intermodal commuting by way of detours and breaks: Evidence of micromobility users in France. J Transp Geogr, 2024, 116: 103821.
|
| [49] |
OeschgerG, CarrollP, CaulfieldB. Micromobility and public transport integration: the current state of knowledge. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ, 2020, 89: 102628.
|
| [50] |
JinH, JinF, WangJE, SunW, DongL. Competition and cooperation between shared bicycles and public transit: a case study of Beijing. Sustainability, 2019, 1151323.
|
| [51] |
DongX. Trade Uber for the bus? An investigation of individual willingness to use ride-hail versus transit. J Am Plann Assoc, 2020, 862222-235.
|
| [52] |
YoungM, AllenJ, FarberS. Measuring when Uber behaves as a substitute or supplement to transit: an examination of travel-time differences in Toronto. J Transp Geogr, 2020, 82: 102629.
|
| [53] |
ErhardtGD, MucciRA, CooperD, SanaB, ChenM, CastiglioneJ. Do transportation network companies increase or decrease transit ridership? Empirical evidence from San Francisco. Transportation, 2022, 492313-342.
|
| [54] |
CTOD (2013) TOD 206: Intercity rail and transit-oriented development: making connections, building communities. Center for TOD. https://todresources.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/TOD206.pdf. Accessed 30 Oct 2024
|
| [55] |
PurvisB, MaoY, RobinsonD. Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins. Sustain Sci, 2019, 14: 681-695.
|
| [56] |
CurtisC, ScheurerJPlanning for public transport accessibility: an international sourcebook, 2016Milton ParkRoutledge.
|
| [57] |
Ferrell CE, Appleyard BS, Taecker M, Allen C, Armusewicz C, Schroder C (2016) Livable transit corridors: methods, metrics, and strategies
|
| [58] |
Zhang M (2022) Corridor transit oriented development: concept, practice, and research needs. In: Advances in transport policy and planning, vol 9, Academic Press, pp 277–299
|
| [59] |
SorensenE, TorfingJComptonM, HartP. The copenhagen metropolitan ‘finger plan’: a robust urban planning success based on collaborative governance. Great policy successes, 2019OxfordOxford University Press
|
| [60] |
RodriguezD, Vergel-TovarCE. Urban development around bus rapid transit stops in seven cities in Latin-America. J Urban Int Res Placemak Urban Sustain, 2017, 112175-201.
|
| [61] |
BertoliniL. Spatial development patterns and public transport: the application of an analytical model in the Netherlands. Plan Pract Res, 1999, 142199-210.
|
| [62] |
CNT (2015) H+T index methods. Center for neighborhood technology. https://htaindex.cnt.org/about/HTMethods_2016.pdf. Accessed 30 Oct 2024
|
| [63] |
ZhaoY, HuS, ZhangM. Evaluating equitable transit-oriented development (TOD) via the node-place-people model. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract, 2024, 185: 104116.
|
| [64] |
WanT, LuW, NaX, RongW. Non-linear impact of economic performance on social equity in rail transit station areas. Sustainability, 2024, 16156518.
|
| [65] |
ZhouM, ZhouJ, ZhouJ, LeiS, ZhaoZ. Introducing social contacts into the node-place model: a case study of Hong Kong. J Transp Geogr, 2023, 107: 103532.
|
| [66] |
Wan T, Lu W, Na X (2024) Quantifying the social equity of economic performance for different groups of residents in rail transit station areas. Urban Rail Transit, 1–25
|
| [67] |
CerveroR, SullivanC. Green TODs: marrying transit-oriented development and green urbanism. Int J Sust Dev World, 2011, 183210-218.
|
| [68] |
LinJJ, LiCN. A grey programming model for regional transit-oriented development planning. Pap Reg Sci, 2008, 871119-139.
|
| [69] |
SinghYJ, HePENGWEI, FlackeJOHANNES, Van MaarseveenMFAM. Measuring TOD over a region using GIS based multiple criteria assessment tools. Space, 2015, 191–21-22
|
| [70] |
SahuA. A methodology to modify land uses in a transit oriented development scenario. J Environ Manag, 2018, 213: 467-477.
|
| [71] |
LiuL, ZhangM, XuT. A conceptual framework and implementation tool for land use planning for corridor transit oriented development. Cities, 2020, 107: 102939.
|
| [72] |
CerveroRThe transit metropolis: a global inquiry, 1997WashingtonIsland Press
|
| [73] |
Loho P (2019) Hong Kong’s new high-speed rail station aims to become a vibrant public space. Metropolis. https://metropolismag.com/projects/west-kowloon-rail-station-aedas/. Accessed 30 Oct 2024
|
| [74] |
CerveroR, MurakamiJ. Rail and property development in Hong Kong: experiences and extensions. Urban stud, 2009, 46102019-2043.
|
| [75] |
Leong L (2016). The “rail plus property” model: Hong Kong’s Successful self-financing formula. McKinsey Insights, McKinsey & Company, Washington
|
| [76] |
XueCQ, ZhaiH, RobertsJ. An urban island floating on the MTR station: a case study of the West Kowloon development in Hong Kong. Urban Des Int, 2010, 15: 191-207.
|
| [78] |
Pan H, Gao Y (2019) Development of high-speed rail in the People’s Republic of China. ADBI Working Paper Series, N. 959. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/222726/1/1666326097.pdf. Accessed 30 Oct 2024
|
| [79] |
City of Austin. (2017). Austin Strategic Housing Blueprint. City of Austin. https://www.austintexas.gov/sites/default/files/files/StrategicHousingBlueprint_Final_September_2017.pdf. Accessed 30 October 2024.
|
| [80] |
City of Austin (2023) Equitable transit-oriented development policy plan. https://publicinput.com/Customer/File/Full/97a3315a-15ce-4dd2-b94c-0633abc49671. Accessed 30 Oct 2024
|
| [81] |
CapMetro (2024) CapMetro performance dashboard. https://www.capmetro.org/about/performance-dashboard. Accessed 30 Oct 2024
|
Funding
US Department of Transportation(69A3552348325)
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
The Author(s)