Risk Analysis for Train Collisions Using Fault Tree Analysis: Case Study of the Hanoi Urban Mass Rapid Transit

Abstract

The urban mass rapid transit (UMRT) Line HN2A is the first light rail transit line in Vietnam. It is also the first time the operational safety assessment for the whole life cycle of a railway project is applied and assessed by an applicable scientific tool. While various industry standard methods have been deployed in many countries, their application is not appropriate for assessing the outdated railway infrastructure in Vietnam. This article proposes a method for generating safety risk models for train collisions using the fault tree analysis (FTA) technique. The FTA method comprehensively evaluates the fundamental error and failure probability that could potentially lead to accidents in general and train collisions in particular on Line HN2A. The study describes the procedure for establishing FTA and determining assumptions based on technical specifications and similar railway systems. Compared with the statistical failure results using data from operational tests and commissioning (2018–2021) of the metro line, the results here indicate that this is a reasonable theoretical model applicable to UMRT in Vietnam. The theoretical model will be processed to generate the first-ever scientific risk assessment system based on empirical evidence. In addition, real-time accident and operation data will continue to be collected and compared to the theoretical model to improve its accuracy. The findings of this study could serve as a starting point for risk management on current and future freight, passenger, and metro lines in Vietnam.

Keywords

Train collisions / Risk assessment / Fault tree analysis / Human errors / Safety risk function

References

[1] Ayyub BM (2003) Risk analysis in engineering and economics, Chapman & Hall/CRC.

[2] Anderson R, Barkan C (2004) Railroad accident rates for use in transportation risk analysis. Transport Research Board, No. 1863, pp.88-98. National Research Council: Washington DC

[3] BEU (2020) Bundesstelle für Eisenbahnunfalluntersuchung: Jahresbericht 2019, Bonn, 2020

[4] Bearfield G, Marsch W (2005) Generalising event trees using bayesian networks with a case study of train derailment. In: Conference paper in lecture notes in computer science, September 2005

[5] Boyle T. Health and safety: risk management, 2002, England: IOSH Services Ltd.

[6] Braband J (2012) Semi-quantitative risk assessment of technical systems on european railways. In: Flammini F (eds) Railway safety, reliability and security – technologies and systems engineering, pp 54–64

[7] Britton M, Asnaashari S, Read G. Analysis of train derailment cause and outcome in Victoria, Australia, between 2007 and 2013: Implications for regulation. J Trans Saf Secur, 2017, 9(1): 45-63.

[8] BUEDRI (Beijing Urban Engineering Design & Research Institute Co., Ltd) (2012) Hanoi urban railway project: Cat Linh – Ha Dong Line. Volume 2: Traffic Organization and Operation Management. October 2012

[9] BUEDRI (Beijing Urban Engineering Design & Research Institute Co., Ltd) (2014) Hanoi urban railway project: Cat Linh – Ha Dong Line. Volume 4: Signal System. December 2014

[10] BUEDRI (Beijing Urban Engineering Design & Research Institute Co., Ltd) (2015) Hanoi urban railway project: Cat Linh – Ha Dong Line. Volume 8: Risk Assessments and Safety Management. December 2015

[11] CSM (2016) Common safety method on risk evaluation and assessment – amending implementation regulation (EU) No 402/2013

[12] Dindar S, Kaewunruen S, An M, Gigante-Barrera A. Derailment-based fault tree analysis on risk management of railway turnout systems. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng, 2017, 245: 042020

[13] Dingus T, Feng G, Lee S, Antin J, Perez M, Buchanan-King M, Hankey J. Driver crash risk factors and prevalence evaluation using naturalistic driving data. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2016, 113(10): 2636-2641

[14] Dinmohammadi F, Alkali B, Shafiee M. Risk evaluation of railway rolling stock failures using FMECA technique: a case study of passenger door system. Urban Rail Transit, 2016, 2: 128-145

[15] Dodgson J, Spackman M, van der Veer J, Maunder S (2003) Train protection - review of economic aspects of the work of the ERTMS programme team. Health and Safety Executive 2003

[16] Doytchev D, Szwillus G. Combining task analysis and fault tree analysis for accident and incident analysis: a case study from Bulgaria. Accident Anal Prevent, 2008, 41(6): 1172-1179

[17] Elms D. Rail safety. Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 2014, 7: 291-297.

[18] EN (1999) EN 50126 – 1999: railway applications: the specification and demonstration of reliability. Railway Application RAMS

[19] ERA European Railway Agency Report pm railway safety and interoperability in the EU, 2020, 2020, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union

[20] Evans AW (2011a) Fatal train accidents on Europe’s railways: 1980–2009. 43(1), 391–401

[21] Evans AW (2011b). Fatal accidents at railway level crossing in Great Britain 1946-2009. In: Accidents analysis and prevention , No. 43, pp 1837–1845

[22] Evans AW. Fatal train accidents on Europe’s railways: an update to 2019. Accid Anal Prevent, 2021, 158

[23] Flammini F, Gaglione A, Mazzocca N, Pragliola C. (2009). Quantitative security risk assessment and management for railway transportation infrastructures. In: CRITIS’08 3rd international workshop on critical information infrastructures security, pp 180–189. Springer, Berlin

[24] FRA (Federal Railroad Administration) (2016) FRA accident investigation fact sheet

[25] FRAOSA (2021) Federal Railroad Administration Office of Safety Analysis Web Site

[26] Fumiaki I (2014) Comparison of safety between Japan and EU railways. JR-EAST Technical Review No.30, p. 17-20. https://www.jreast.co.jp/e/development/tech/pdf_30/tec-30-17-20eng.pdf〹

[27] Galante E, Bordalo D, Nobrega M. Risk assessment methodology: quantitative HAZOP. J Saf Eng, 2014, 3: 31-36.

[28] Ghosh S. Identifying and assessing the critical risk factors in an underground rail project in Thailand: a factor analysis approach. Int J Project Manag, 2004, 22(8): 633-643

[29] Haimes YY. Risk modeling, assessment and management, 2009 3 New York: Wiley

[30] Hong E-S, Lee I-M, Shin H-S, Nam S-W, Kong J-S. Quantitative risk-evaluation based on event tree analysis technique: application to the design of shield TBM. Tunnel Undergr Space Technol, 2009, 24: 269-277

[31] IEC (2006) International electrotechnical commission: IEC 61025: international standard, fault tree analysis (FTA). Geneva, Switzerland. December 2006.

[32] IRICEN (Indian Railways Institute of Civil Engineering) (2014). Investigation of derailments. Pune 411001

[33] JTSB (Japan National Safety Board) (2022) Statistics of railway accident and statistics of railway serious accident. https://www.mlit.go.jp/jtsb/statistics_rail.html

[34] Jurtz S. Untersuchung zur Einführung von ETCS im Kernnetz der S-Bahn Stuttgart: Abschlussbericht, 2019, Frankfurt am Main: WSP Infrastructure Engineering GmbH

[35] Leitner B. A general model for railway systems risk assessment with the use of railway accident scenarios analysis. Procedia Eng, 2017, 187: 150-159

[36] Lin C, Saat M, Barkan C. Analysis of causes of major train derailment and their effect on accidents rates. Transp Res Rec J Transp Board, 2012, 2289: 154-163

[37] Lin CY, Saat MR, Barkan CP. Fault tree analysis of adjacent track accidents on shared-use rail corridors. Transp Res Rec, 2016, 2546(1): 129-136

[38] Hou L, Peng Y, Sun D. Dynamic analysis of railway vehicle derailment mechanism in train-to-train collision accidents. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit, 2020, 235(8): 1022-1034

[39] Li Y, Mi J, Huang H, Zhu S, Xiao N. Fault tree analysis of train rear-end collision accident considering common cause failure. Maintenance Reliabil, 2013, 15(4): 403-408.

[40] Lindqvist L, Jadhav R. Application of communication based Moving Block systems on existing metro lines. WIT Trans Built Environ, 2006, 88: 391-400.

[41] Liu P, Yang L, Gao Z, Li S, Gao Y. Fault tree analysis combined with quantitative analysis for high-speed railway accidents. Saf Sci, 2014, 79: 344-357

[42] Luong TA, Kunze M, Trinckauf J. Human factor and safety culture in Vietnamese urban railway. J East Asia Soc Transp Stud, 2019, 13: 1905-1926.

[43] Martani C, Papathanasiou N, Adey TB. A review of the state-of-the-art in railway risk management. IJR Int J Railway, 2017, 10(1): 5-11

[44] Matsumoto A, Michitsuji Y, Tobita Y. Analysis of train-overturn derailments caused by excessive curving speed. Int J Railway Technol, 2016, 5: 27-45

[45] Milius B (2010) Construction of a semi-quantitative risk graph, PhD thesis. TU Braunschweig

[46] NTC National Transport Commission National standard for health assessment of rail safety workers, 2017 3 NTC: Melbourne

[47] ORR (Office of Rail Regulation) (2013). Common safety method for risk evaluation and assessment. Guidance on the application of Commission Regulation (EU) 402/2013

[48] PMURV (Project Management Unit – Rail Vietnam) (2020) Materials of the UMRT line HN2A

[49] Profillidis VA (2014) Railway management and engineering. 4th ed. Surrey, United Kingdom: Ashgate Publishing Company

[50] Rausand M, Haugen S. Risk assessment: theory, methods, and applications, 2020 Wiley

[51] Redmill F. Risk analysis – a subjective process. Eng Manag J, 2002, 12: 91-96.

[52] Ruijters EJJ (2018) Zen and the art of railway maintenance: analysis and optimization of maintenance via fault trees and statistical model checking. University of Twente

[53] Sadeghi J, Hasheminezhad A, Essmayil Kaboli M. Investigation of the influences of track superstructure parameters on ballasted railway track design. Civil Eng Infrast J, 2015, 48(1): 157-174.

[54] Souza A, Tavares F, Bonikowski R, Pereira V (2019) Reduction of number of railroad accidents with locomotive as the main cause. Final Project of Confederação Nacional dos Transportes. Brasilia

[55] Sun YQ. Mitigating train derailments due to sharp curve and overspeed. Front Mech Eng, 2018, 4: 8

[56] USDT United Stated Department of Transportation A practical risk assessment methodology for safety-critical train control systems, 2009, Washington DC: Office of Research and Development

[57] UIC International Union of Railways UIC safety report 2021, 2021, Paris: International Union of Railways

[58] VMoT (Vietnam Ministry of Transport) (2016) Circular 16/2016/TT-BGTVT: assessment, certification of urban railway safety

[59] VMoT (Vietnam Ministry of Transport) (2018) Circular 16/2016/TT-BGTVT: Procedure, contents, methods for resolving railways incidents, accidents

[60] VR (Vietnam Railway Company) (2021) Safety statistic report of Vietnam Railways 2017-2020. July 2021

[61] Vu H Tr, Nguyen Th HA (2019) Ensuring safety in urban railway (UMRT) operation in Hanoi. J Transp, Special Issue.

[62] Yan J, Wang X. Reliability and safety analysis of automatic train protection system. IFAC Proc , 2000, 33(9): 615-619

[63] Wang J (2014) Reliability analysis for CRH2 EMU brake system based on dynamic fault tree. Master thesis. Beijing Jiaotong University

[64] Wu C, Cao C, Sun Y, Li K (2015) Modeling and analysis of train rear-end collision accidents based on stochastic petri nets. Special Isssue: Mathematical Problems in Petri Nests Theory and Applications. Mathematical Problems in Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/602126

Funding

University of Transport and Communications(T2020 – KT-001TĐ)