Technical Comparison of Commercially Available Trams and Review of Standardization Frame and Design Principles

Gianluca Megna , Andrea Bracciali

Urban Rail Transit ›› 2022, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (1) : 16 -31.

PDF
Urban Rail Transit ›› 2022, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (1) : 16 -31. DOI: 10.1007/s40864-021-00163-6
Original Research Papers

Technical Comparison of Commercially Available Trams and Review of Standardization Frame and Design Principles

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Tram manufacturers have different ways of approaching the design of low-floor trams with compact and reliable running gears, and therefore several tram architectures can still be found. A complete standardization of trams is nearly impossible, and technical innovations can be more easily introduced if compared to conventional railway vehicles, but the trend towards large-scale standardization based on vehicle “platforms” can be seen in recent years. However, the current “standard” tram architecture, which includes only non-pivoting bogies, is not able to solve some typical problems of tram operations, such as high wheel and rail wear and high-pitched tonal noise (squeal) in sharp curves, which are described in the present paper. This research analyses the tram market with the aim of describing the state of the art of currently available products and comparing their main technical parameters. The analysis is based on information available from the literatures (journals, web) where data about the vehicles can be found, while a new designation code (tram architecture designation, TAD for short) is specifically introduced for easier identification of the different tram architectures. Even if the complete low floor is still one of the main requested features, several solutions combining pivoting and non-pivoting bogies are commercially available, showing a tendency to give more relevance to running quality performance with respect to the recent past.

Keywords

Light rail vehicle / Tram / Urban vehicles / Low floor / Steering vehicles / Tram architecture designation

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Gianluca Megna, Andrea Bracciali. Technical Comparison of Commercially Available Trams and Review of Standardization Frame and Design Principles. Urban Rail Transit, 2022, 8(1): 16-31 DOI:10.1007/s40864-021-00163-6

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Görçün ÖF. Evaluation of the selection of proper metro and tram vehicle for urban transportation by using a novel integrated MCDM approach. Sci Prog, 2021, 104: 1-18

[2]

Kulesz B, Sikora A. Comparison of different tram cars in Poland basing on drive type, rated power and energy consumption. MATEC Web Conf, 2018, 180: 02006

[3]

Xiao Z, Sun P, Wang Q, Zhu Y, Feng X. Integrated optimization of speed profiles and power split for a tram with hybrid energy storage systems on a signalized route. Energies, 2018, 18: 478

[4]

Liu J, Wu X, Li H, Qi L. An optimal method of the energy consumption for fuel cell hybrid tram. Int J Hydrog Energy, 2020, 45: 20304-20311

[5]

Pyrgidis C, Tsipi D, Doliantis A, Barbagli M. An overview of metros, trams and monorails in revenue service and under construction worldwide at the end of 2019. Ingegner Ferrov, 2021, 2: 101-122.

[6]

Standardization in the field of Urban Rail—UITP information session. https://www.cencenelec.eu/news/brief_news/Pages/TN-2012-003.aspx. Accessed 24 July 2021

[7]

Verordnung über den Bau und Betrieb der Straßenbahnen (BOStrab). https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/strabbo_1987/index.html#BJNR026480987BJNE000902124. Accessed on 24 July 2021

[8]

UNI 11174:2014 Rolling stock for tramway and light rail systems—General requirements and performances

[9]

UNI 11378:2017 Rolling stock for metropolitan railways—general requirements and performances

[10]

Viganò S (2010) Pavimento tutto basso, ne vale sempre la pena? 4° Convegno Nazionale Sistema Tram. http://www.tramroma.com/common/letteratura/docs/vigano.htm. Accessed 28 July 2021

[11]

Hondius H. The development of low-floor trams. J Adv Transp, 1993, 27: 79-102

[12]

Kolar J. Design of a wheelset drive. Trans Electr Eng, 2015, 4: 11-19.

[13]

Capek J, Kolar J (2007) Optimal design of low-floor tram. In: Proceedings of From horse-drawn railway to high-speed transportation systems, April 17–19, Prague, Czech Republic, pp 27–30

[14]

Richter W, Vemmer F (2007) Gute laufeigenschaften – nur eine drehgestellfrage? Einfluss des fahrzeugkonzepts am beispiel der neuen budapester niederflur-strassenbahn. In: Proceedings of 7th international conference on railway bogies and running gears, Sept. 3–6, Budapest, pp 33–42

[15]

Panulinová E, Harabinová S, Argalášová L. Tram squealing noise and its impact on human health. Noise Health, 2016, 18: 329-337.

[16]

FTA Report No. 0123, Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual, September 2018

[17]

Fidler PRA, Hartley S, Talbot JP (2017) Project VIMTO: a new system for the vibration and impact monitoring of tram operations. In: Proceedings of 8th international conference on structural health monitoring of intelligent infrastructure, December 5–8, Brisbane, Australia

[18]

Suarez B, Chover JA, Rodriguez P, Gonzalez FJ. Effectiveness of resilient wheels in reducing noise and vibrations. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit, 2011, 225: 545-565

[19]

Cik M, Lienhart M, Lercher P. Analysis of psychoacoustic and vibration-related parameters to track the reasons for health complaints after the introduction of new tramways. Appl Sci, 2016, 6(12): 398

[20]

Kummer M, Krause S (1993) “Cobra”—ein neues Konzeptfür Niederflur-Straßenbahnfahrzeuge. Schweiz Eisenb Rev 4:174–183

[21]

Siemens AG (2013) Tram System—ULF Vienna. Siemens AG product brochure. https://assets.new.siemens.com/siemens/assets/api/uuid:bab137c522d71edd55d4aafaf7e50f07656ba37a/ulf-brochure-en.pdf. Accessed 28 July 2021

[22]

Mattersdorfer P, Niederflurstraßenbahn ULF, Bahn-im-Film-Videoproduktion, C. Pühringer, 2009. ISBN: 3950225072

[23]

UIC Leaflet 650. Standard designation of axle arrangement on locomotives and multiple-unit sets. 5th edition of 1.1.83

[24]

ATM Class 1500. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ATM_Class_1500. Accessed on 24 July 2021

[25]

Metro Report International. https://www.railwaygazette.com/metro-report. Accessed 28 July 2021

[26]

Swanson J, Smatlak J (2015) State of the art in light rail alternative power supplies. APTA/TRB Light Rail Conference. http://www.heritagetrolley.org/images/State_of_the_Art_in_Light_Rail_Alternate_Power_Supply_11-13-15.pdf. Accessed 28 July 2021

[27]

Guerrieri M. Catenary-free tramway systems: functional and cost-benefit analysis for a metropolitan area. Urban Rail Transit, 2019, 5: 289-309

[28]

Hondius H (2021) ForCity Family spreads its wing. Metro Report International. Spring 2021

[29]

New Polish tram debuts in Poznan. https://www.railtech.com/rolling-stock/2019/08/05/new-polish-tram-debuts-in-poznan/. Accessed 28 July 2021

[30]

First autonomous tram tested in Poland. https://www.railtech.com/digitalisation/2020/01/30/first-autonomous-tram-tested-in-poland/. Accessed 28 July 2021

[31]

Schnaas J, Karl B (2016) Avenio T1—the new tram for Munich. Siemens AG technical article. https://assets.new.siemens.com/siemens/assets/api/uuid:d3d852aaaf03a04ac459ef4b97f3802e22b527fc/aveniot1-munich-technical-article-en.pdf. Accessed 28 July 2021

[32]

Späth J, Walcher M (2016) Avenio M. Technical article for Eurotransport. Siemens AG technical article. https://assets.new.siemens.com/siemens/assets/api/uuid:c92813ee7bbb340ac1677f1ecdb2934ab8989177/avenio-m-technical-article-en.pdf. Accessed 28 July 2021

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

424

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/