Understanding the Impact of Street Patterns on Pedestrian Distribution: A Case Study in Tianjin, China

Abstract

This paper investigates the impact of street pattern, metro stations, and density of urban functions on pedestrian distribution in Tianjin, China. Thirteen neighborhoods are selected from the city center and suburbs. Pedestrian and vehicle volumes are observed through detailed gate count from 703 street segments in these neighborhoods. Regression models are constructed to analyze the impact of the street pattern, points of interest (POIs), and vehicle and metro accessibility on pedestrian volumes in each neighborhood and across the city. The results show that when analyzing all neighborhoods together, local street connectivity and POIs had a strong influence on pedestrian distribution. Proximity to metro stations and vehicle accessibility had a minor impact. When analyzing each neighborhood separately, both local- and city-scale street patterns affect pedestrian distributions. These findings suggest that the street pattern provides a base layer for metro stations to attract both the emergence of active urban functions and pedestrian movement.

Keywords

Pedestrian volume / Street pattern / Point of Interest / Space syntax

References

[1] Hess PM, Moudon AV, Snyder MC Site design and pedestrian travel. Transp Res Rec, 1999, 1674: 9-19

[2] Krizek KJ. Pretest-posttest strategy for researching neighborhood-scale urban form and travel behavior. Transp Res Rec, 2000, 1722: 48-55

[3] Alfonzo M, Boarnet MG, Day K. The relationship of neighborhood built environment features and adult parents’ walking. J Urban Des, 2008, 13(1): 29-51

[4] Siksna A (1997)The effects of block size and form in North American and Australian City Centres. Urban Morphol 1.19-33.

[5] Read S (2005) Flat city: a space syntax derived urban movement network model. In Ness A (ed) the 5th Space Syntax Symposium proceedings. Delft University Press, Delft.

[6] Borst HC. Influence of environmental street characteristics on walking route choice of elderly people. J Environ Psychol, 2009, 29(4): 477-484

[7] Zacharias J, Ted S, Wu H. Microclimate and downtown open space activity. Environ Behav, 2001, 33(2): 296-315

[8] Cervero R. Mixed land uses and commuting: Evidence from the American housing survey. Transp Res, 1996, 30(5): 361-377.

[9] Cervero R, Kockelman K. Travel demand and the 3Ds: density, diversity, and design. Transp Res Part D, 1997, 2: 199-219

[10] Ozbil A, Peponis J, Stone B. Understanding the link between street connectivity, land use and pedestrian flows. Urban Des Int, 2011, 16(2): 125-141

[11] Chen Y, Wang Q, Xi W, Mao J. Influence of spatial form on pedestrians. Planner, 2017, 33(2): 74-80.

[12] Frank LD, Schmid TL, Sallis JF, Chapman J Linking objectively measured physical activity with objectively measured urban form. Am J Prevent Med, 2005, 28: 117-125

[13] Lee C, Moudon AV. The 3Ds+R: Quantifying land use and urban form correlates of walking. Transp Res Part D, 2006, 11(3): 204-215

[14] Kerr J, Frank L, Sallis JF Urban form correlates of pedestrian travel in youth: differences by gender, race-ethnicity and household attributes. Transp Res Part D, 2007, 12(3): 177-182

[15] Handy S, Paterson R G, Butler K (2003) Planning for street connectivity: getting from here to there. Plann Advis Serv Rep Chicago 515.

[16] Hess PM. Measures of connectivity. Places, 1997, 2(11): 58-65.

[17] Aultman-Hall L, Roorda M, Baetz B. Using GIS for evaluation of neighborhood pedestrian accessibility. J Urban Plan Dev, 1997, 1(123): 10-17

[18] Hillier B, Penn A, Hanson J Natural movement: or, configuration and attraction in urban pedestrian movement. Environ Plan B Plan Des, 1993, 20: 29-66

[19] Hillier B, Iida S (2005) Network effects and psychological effects: a theory of urban movement. In Ness A (ed) the 5th space syntax symposium proceedings. Delft University Press, Delft

[20] Read S. Space Syntax and the Dutch City. Environ Plan B Plan Des, 1999, 26: 251-264

[21] Chiaradia A (2007) Emergent route choice behaviour, motorway and trunk road network: the Nantes conurbation. In: Proceedings of 6th international space syntax symposium, Istanbul, pp 78.1–78.18

[22] Chiaradia, AJ (2007) Speed and European city urbanism. In: International seminar on urbanism and urbanization

[23] Peponis J, Ross C, Rashid M. The structure of urban space, movement and co-presence: the case of Atlanta. Geoforum, 1997, 28(3–4): 341-358

[24] Scoppa MD, Peponis J. Distributed attraction: the effects of street network connectivity upon the distribution of retail frontage in the City of Buenos Aires. Environ Plan B Plan Des, 2015, 42(2): 354-378

[25] Dhanani A, Tarkhanyan L, Vaughan L. Estimating pedestrian demand for active transport evaluation and planning. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract, 2017, 103: 54-69

[26] Karimi K (1998) Continuity and change in old cities: an analytical investigation of the spatial structure in Iranian and English historic cities before and after modernisation. J Dermatol Sci.

[27] Sheng Q, Liu N (2015) Comparing the use of actual space and virtual space: a case study on Beijing’s Wangfujing area. In: Proceedings of the tenth space syntax symposium, UCL, London, p 50

[28] Omer I, Jiang B. Can cognitive inferences be made from aggregate urban flow data?. Comput Environ Urban Syst, 2015, 54: 219-229

[29] Hillier B, Yang T, Turner A. Normalising least angle choice in DepthMap and how it opens up new perspectives on the global and local analysis of city space. J Space Syntax, 2012, 3: 155-193.