Design Optimization of a Composite Rail Vehicle Anchor Bracket

Daniel Lang , Donald W. Radford

Urban Rail Transit ›› 2021, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (2) : 84 -100.

PDF
Urban Rail Transit ›› 2021, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (2) : 84 -100. DOI: 10.1007/s40864-021-00144-9
Original Research Papers

Design Optimization of a Composite Rail Vehicle Anchor Bracket

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

The rail transportation sector is currently seeking to decrease greenhouse gas emissions by incorporating composite materials that can reduce the mass of vehicles. During early adoption of composites in the rail transportation industry, these materials have predominantly been applied to simple design geometries and lightly loaded structures, have been optimized only through modification of composite thickness and composite layer shape, and have only been constrained with respect to a single mechanical performance metric. This study investigates the use of finite element analysis software in the simulation of fiber-reinforced composite materials applied to, and optimized for, a complex and heavily loaded rail vehicle anchor bracket. The research assesses the applicability of optimization methodologies to a complex and heavily loaded structure and advances established practices by constraining the solution with respect to multiple design requirements: manufacturing, compliance, and failure criterion. The optimization process successfully developed a composite structure with a predicted mass reduction of 33% compared to an existing steel design, and simultaneously met compliance, manufacturing, and failure criteria constraints.

Keywords

Composites / Topology optimization / Carbon fiber / Glass fiber

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Daniel Lang, Donald W. Radford. Design Optimization of a Composite Rail Vehicle Anchor Bracket. Urban Rail Transit, 2021, 7(2): 84-100 DOI:10.1007/s40864-021-00144-9

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Wu C, Gao Y, Fang J Discrete topology optimization of ply orientation for a carbon fiber reinforced plastic (CFRP) laminate vehicle door. Mater Des, 2017, 128: 9-19

[2]

Renton J, Olcott BR, Batzer R, Baron B, Velicki A. Future of flight vehicle structures (2000 to 2023). J Aircr, 2004, 41: 986-998

[3]

Marannano G, Mariotti GV. Structural optimization and experimental analysis of composite material panels for naval use. Meccanica, 2008, 43: 251-262

[4]

Slayton R, Spinardi G. Radical innovation in scaling up: Boeing’s Dreamliner and the challenge of socio-technical transitions. Technovation, 2016, 47: 47-58

[5]

Ulbricht A. Rail vehicle in CFRP-intensive design. Lightweight Design worldwide, 2019, 12: 36-41

[6]

Schwab Castella P, Blanc I, Gomez Ferrer M Integrating life cycle costs and environmental impacts of composite rail car-bodies for a Korean train. Int J Life Cycle Assess, 2009, 14: 429-442

[7]

Cho JG, Koo JS, Jung HS. A lightweight design approach for an EMU carbody using a material selection method and size optimization. J Mech Sci Technol, 2016, 30: 673-681

[8]

Kim JS, Kim NP, Han SH. Optimal stiffness design of composite laminates for a train carbody by an expert system and enumeration method. Compos Struct, 2005, 68: 147-156

[9]

Botkin ME (2000) Structural optimization of automotive body components based upon parametric solid modeling. 8th Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization. 109–115. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2000-4707

[10]

Cao JL, Li JY, Wan CY. Topology optimization for the light rail vehicle body based on sub-structure technology. Appl Mech Mater, 2013, 367: 145-150

[11]

Kim DH, Kim HG, Kim HS. Design optimization and manufacture of hybrid glass/carbon fiber reinforced composite bumper beam for automobile vehicle. Compos Struct, 2015, 131: 742-752

[12]

Martensson P, Zenkart D, Ankermo M. Effects of manufacturing constraints on the cost and weight efficiency of integral and differential automotive composite structures. Compos Struct, 2015, 134: 572-578

[13]

Rohani SM, Vafaeesefat A, Esmkhani M Composite locomotive frontend analysis and optimization using genetic algorithm. Struct Eng Mech, 2013, 47: 729-740

[14]

Kuczek T, Szachniewicz B (2014) Topology optimization of passenger wagon composite structure. In: 1st International Conference on Engineering and Applied Sciences Optimization, Proceedings. Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, Krakow, pp 1–9

[15]

Becker FG. Lightweight design of automotive composite bumper system using modified particle swarm optimizer. Compos Struct, 2015, 140: 630-643.

[16]

Toropov V v, Jones R, Willment T, Funnell M (2005) Weight and manufacturability optimization of composite aircraft components based on a genetic algorithm. 6th World Congresses of Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization

[17]

Wennberg D (2011) Light-weighting methodology in rail vehicle design through introduction of load carrying sandwich panels. Dissertation, KTH Royal Institute of Technology

[18]

Wennberg D (2013) Multi-Functional Composite Design Concepts for Rail Vehicle Car Bodies. Stockholm. Dissertation, KTH Royal Institute of Technology

[19]

Wennberg D, Stichel S, Wennhage P. Optimisation of sandwich panels for the load carrying structure of high-speed rail vehicles. Int J Aerosp Lightweight Struct (IJALS), 2012, 02: 19

[20]

Teli RM, Lakshminarayana H, Kaup V. Analysis and design optimization of composite floor panel of mass transit. Int J Eng Res Technol, 2014, 3: 874-882

[21]

Kim JS. Development of a user-friendly expert system for composite laminate design. Compos Struct, 2007, 79: 76-83

[22]

Railway applications (2011) Wheelsets and bogies - Method of specifying the structural requirements of bogie frames. European Committee for Standardization

[23]

Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas TCRP Report 57: Track Design Handbook for Light Rail Transit, 2000, VA: Herndon

[24]

Yi S. Strengthening of the Railway Transport Capacity, 2018 Academic Press

[25]

Rong Y, Zhang G, Huang Y. Study on deformation and residual stress of laser welding 316L T-joint using 3D/shell finite element analysis and experiment verification. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2017, 89: 2077-2085

[26]

Bauccio M. ASM Metals Reference Book, 1993 3 Materials Park: ASM International

[27]

Bharath VG, Ranjith SSM. Topology and size optimization of composite ply cargo door. Int J Eng Res Technol, 2013, 2: 2095-2100.

[28]

Marlett K, Ng Y, Tomblin J, et al (2011) Hexcel 8552 AS4 Unidirectional Prepreg at 190 gsm & 35 % RC Qualification Material Property Data Report FAA Special Project Number: SP4614WI-Q NCAMP Test Report Number: CAM-RP-2010-002 Rev A Prepared by:: Reviewed by: Testing Facility: Wichita

[29]

Radford DW (1989) PC-LAMINATE, Educational and Engineering Design Tool for use in Field of Laminated Composites. Technomic Publishing Co.

[30]

Galvez P, Quesada A, Martinez MA Study of the behaviour of adhesive joints of steel with CFRP for its application in bus structures. Compos B Eng, 2017, 129: 41-46

[31]

Lee JM, Min BJ, Park JH Design of lightweight CFRP automotive part as an alternative for steel part by thickness and lay-up optimization. Mater, 2019, 12: 2309-2321

[32]

Talreja R. Assessment of the fundamentals of failure theories for composite materials. Composites Sci Technol, 2017, 105: 190-201

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

189

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/