Public Perceptions of a New MRT Service: a Pre-launch Study in Jakarta

Abstract

Jakarta Mass Rapid Transit (MRT) is the first rapid transit system in Indonesia, built with the aim of alleviating the severe congestion in Jakarta by offering a travel alternative to people using private vehicles. Although Jakarta MRT is the most sophisticated inland transport mode in Jakarta, prior to its launch, there was no evidence or guarantee that the local community was willing to use it. Hence, the pre-launch study of a non-operational public transport system was introduced to better understand perceptions of the new MRT service in Jakarta from its potential future customers’ perspective as well as their willingness to use it. A survey was conducted on 516 respondents in Jakarta and three surrounding areas of Depok, Tangerang, and Bekasi. The collected data was divided into two respondent groups: ‘MRT corridor areas’ (the MRT group), which includes Central and South Jakarta residents, and ‘other areas’ (the other group), which includes residents from all the other surrounding areas. The key finding of the study is that a great majority of the respondents from both groups declared a willingness to undertake a mode shift to Jakarta MRT services in the future. Various statistically significant differences were identified between the two groups. Moreover, respondents ranked six factors in the order of priority when selecting a transport mode, with reliability and safety issues identified as the most important. A set of key recommendations, addressed to the Jakarta MRT operator, is listed in order to optimize the MRT’s role in alleviating congestion in Jakarta. The study approach presented in this paper could be applied by other cities considering introduction of a new (transport or) metro system in order to understand its potential customers’ perceptions and expectations toward the new service.

Keywords

Jakarta MRT / Public perception / Metro / Survey

References

[1] Badan Pusat Statistik (2017) Population and population growth rate by regency/city in DKI Jakarta Province, 2010, 2014, and 2015

[2] Badan Pusat Statistik (2015) Number of registered motor vehicles (Excluding Army, Police and CD) by month and kind of type

[3] Mukti I, Prambudia Y. Challenges in governing the digital transportation ecosystem in Jakarta: a research direction in smart city frameworks. Challenges, 2018, 9(1): 14

[4] Sitanggang R, Saribanon E (2017) Transportation policies for Jakarta’s congestion. Paper presented at the global research on sustainable transport (GROST 2017)

[5] PT. MRT Jakarta (2013) Shaping the milestone in Indonesian infrastructure: the first of its kind. In: PT MRT Jakarta

[6] Raharjo H. The alternative solution for traffic problem in Jakarta-Indonesia. Int J Bus Manag Stud, 2012, 1(2): 315-320.

[7] Rukmana D (2018) Rapid urbanization and the need for sustainable transportation policies in Jakarta. Paper presented at the IOP conference series: earth and environmental science

[8] Susilo YO A reflection of motorization and public transport in Jakarta metropolitan area. J Eastern Asia Soc Transp Stud, 2007, 7: 299-314.

[9] JICA (2006) The study on integrated transport master plan for JABOTABEK (Phase I): final report volume III (Review of Jakarta MRT Project) Chapter 5

[10] Flyvbjerg B. Measuring inaccuracy in travel demand forecasting: methodological considerations regarding ramp up and sampling. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract, 2005, 39(6): 522-530

[11] Dell’Olio L, Ibeas A, Cecin P. The quality of service desired by public transport users. Transp Policy, 2011, 18(1): 217-227

[12] Munawar A. Public transport reform in Indonesia, a case study in the city of Yogyakarta. World Acad Sci Eng Technol, 2007, 28(2007): 276

[13] Munira S, Sarm S, San Santoso D. Perception of public van users in Bangkok. J Eastern Asia Soc Transp Stud, 2013, 10: 1501-1515.

[14] Purba A Evaluating Trans Jogja service quality based on user perceptions and expectations. J Eastern Asia Soc Transp Stud, 2015, 11: 1173-1187.

[15] Tyrinopoulos Y, Antoniou C. Public transit user satisfaction: variability and policy implications. Transp Policy, 2008, 15(4): 260-272

[16] Birago D, Mensah SO, Sharma S. Level of service delivery of public transport and mode choice in Accra, Ghana. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav, 2017, 46: 284-300

[17] Joewono TB, San Santoso D, Susilo YO. Paratransit transport in Indonesia: characteristics and user perceptions. J Eastern Asia Soc Transp Stud, 2015, 11: 1346-1361.

[18] Sumaedi S Factors influencing public transport passengers’ satisfaction: a new model. Manag Environ Qual Int J, 2016, 27(5): 585-597

[19] Sumaedi S The integrated model of theory planned behavior, value, and image for explaining public transport passengers’ intention to reuse. Manag Environ Qual Int J, 2016, 27(2): 124-135

[20] Nelloh LAM Travel experience on travel satisfaction and loyalty of BRT public transportation. Asian J Technol Manag, 2019, 12(1): 15-30.

[21] Herdiansyah H Supporting factors and factory employee’s behaviour in the use of public transportation mode in Jakarta. Transp Probl, 2019, 14(1): 127-139

[22] Widjaja A, Astuti W, Manan A. The relationship between customer satisfaction and loyalty: evidence on online transportation services in Indonesia. Ijasre, 2019, 5(4): 214-222

[23] Yani TM, Wahyu W, Usman O (2019) The influence of quality of services, prices, locations, loyalty, product design, on the satisfaction transportation customer of Ojek online

[24] Belgiawan PF, Schmöcker J-D, Fujii S. Understanding car ownership motivations among Indonesian students. Int J Sustain Transp, 2016, 10(4): 295-307

[25] Fraszczyk A, Mulley C. Public perception of and attitude to driverless train: a case study of Sydney, Australia. Urban Rail Transit, 2017, 3(2): 100-111

[26] Danapour M Competition between high-speed rail and air transport in Iran: the case of Tehran–Isfahan. Case Stud Transp Policy, 2018, 6(4): 456-461

[27] Harvey J Public attitudes to and perceptions of high speed rail in the UK. Transp Policy, 2014, 36: 70-78

[28] PT. MRT Jakarta (2017) Sejarah MRT Jakarta. Retrieved from https://www.jakartamrt.co.id/mrt-jakarta/sejarah-mrt-jakarta/

[29] De Witte A Linking modal choice to motility: a comprehensive review. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract, 2013, 49: 329-341

[30] De Vos J, Ettema D, Witlox F. Effects of changing travel patterns on travel satisfaction: a focus on recently relocated residents. Travel Behav Soc, 2019, 16: 42-49

[31] Jain S Identifying public preferences using multi-criteria decision making for assessing the shift of urban commuters from private to public transport: a case study of Delhi. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav, 2014, 24: 60-70

[32] Javid MA Comparison of commuters’ satisfaction and preferences with public transport: a case of wagon service in Lahore. Jordan J Civ Eng, 2013, 7(4): 426-472.

[33] Kumar R. A step-by-step guide for beginners, 2005 2 New Delhi: SAGE Publications

[34] APJII (2016) Fokus Utama saatnya jadi Pokok Perhatian Pemerintah dan Industri. In: Buletin APJII, 05 edn. p 1

[35] Franke TM, Ho T, Christie CA. The Chi square test: often used and more often misinterpreted. Am J Eval, 2012, 33(3): 448-458