Multi-modelling for Decarbonisation in Urban Rail Systems

Abstract

This paper demonstrates a methodology for flexible, dynamic systems modelling relevant to urban rail decarbonisation. Decarbonisation of urban rail is a vital component of policy and strategy to minimize anthropogenic emissions. Decarbonisation is a systems problem, however, that needs to reflect the interaction between components and processes. Dynamic computer modelling of systems for decarbonisation involves interfacing multiple models together and running them in parallel in order to observe and predict systems-level effects. This is challenging due to the diverse nature of models, achieving parallel model integration and concerns around intellectual property (IP). One solution is the multi-modelling paradigm, which supports integrated, diverse, secure interfacing of models. This paper demonstrates the application of the multi-modelling approach, using the INTO-CPS tool chain. A multi-model was developed comprising key components required for urban rail decarbonisation problems. This multi-model was tested for power consumption in four different scenarios with an example drawn from the Tyne and Wear Metro in Newcastle-upon-Tyne in the United Kingdom. These scenarios compared combinations of decarbonisation intervention (baseline rolling stock versus lightweight, regenerative braking rolling stock and baseline driving style versus energy-efficient defensive driving style), generating different power consumption profiles for each. As such, this serves as a proof of the application of the multi-modelling approach and demonstrates a number of benefits for flexible and rapid systems modelling. This paper fills a knowledge gap by demonstrating a potentially valuable tool for future systems-level decarbonisation challenges in urban rail.

Keywords

Dynamic modelling / Multi-modelling / Power optimisation / Decarbonisation / Railway

References

[1] UNFCCC (2015) Adoption of the Paris Agreement. Report No. FCCC/CP/2015/L.9/Rev.1, http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop21/eng/l09r01.pdf. Accessed 20 Sept 2019

[2] IEA and UIC (2012) Railway handbook 2012—energy consumption and CO₂ emissions, International Energy Agency. http://www.uic.org/IMG/pdf/iea-uic_energy_consumption_and_co2_emission_of_world_railway_sector.pdf. Accessed 20 Sept 2019

[3] González-Gil A, Palacin R, Batty P, Powell JP. A systems approach to reduce urban rail energy consumption. Energy Convers Manag, 2014, 80: 509-524

[4] RSSB (2019). T1145 Options for traction energy decarbonisation in rail: Final Report July 2019. https://www.rssb.co.uk/Pages/research-catalogue/T1145.aspx. Accessed 20 Sept 2019

[5] Transport for London (2018) The Mayor’s Transport Strategy, March 2018. https://www.london.gov.uk/what-we-do/transport/ourvision-transport/mayors-transport-strategy-2018?intcmp=46686. Accessed 20 Sept 2019

[6] Department for Transport (2018) Transcript of Minister of State at the Department for Transport, 12 February 2018. https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/lets-raise-our-ambitions-for-a-cleaner-greenerrailway. Accessed 20 Sept 2019

[7] International Energy Agency (2019) The future of rail. Opportunities for energy and the environment. IEA Publications. https://webstore.iea.org/the-future-of-rail

[8] European Rail Research Advisory Council (2017) Rail 2050 Vision: Rail—The Backbone of Europe’s mobility. http://www.errac.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/122017_ERRAC-RAIL-2050.pdfRSSBstrategy. Accessed 20 Sept 2019

[9] Shift2Rail (2015) Shift2Rail Joint Undertaking: Multi-Annual Action Plan, 15 November 2015. https://shift2rail.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/S2R-JU-GB_Decision-N-15-2015-MAAP.pdf. Accessed 20 Sept 2019

[10] UN (United Nations) 2018 revision of world urbanisation prospects, 2018, New York: UN Population Division

[11] Graver BM, Frey HC. Highway vehicle emissions avoided by diesel passenger rail service based on real-world data. Urban Rail Transit, 2016, 2(3–4): 153-171

[12] Yang N, Zhang X, Shang B, Li G. Unbalanced discharging and aging due to temperature differences among the cells in a lithium-ion battery pack with parallel combination. J Power Sources, 2016, 306: 733-741

[13] Hayashiya H. Recent trend of regenerative energy utilization in traction power supply system in Japan. Urban Rail Transit, 2017, 3(4): 183-191

[14] Hoffrichter A, Silmon J, Schmid F, Hillmansen S, Roberts C. Feasibility of discontinuous electrification on the Great Western Main Line determined by train simulation. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit, 2013, 227(3): 296-306

[15] Marin GD, Naterer GF, Gabriel K. Rail transportation by hydrogen vs. electrification–case study for Ontario Canada, I: propulsion and storage. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2010, 35(12): 6084-6096

[16] Rahn K, Bode C, Albrecht T (2013) Energy-efficient driving in the context of a communications-based train control system (CBTC). In: 2013 IEEE international conference on intelligent rail transportation proceedings, pp 19–24. IEEE

[17] Botte M, D’Acierno L. Dispatching and rescheduling tasks and their interactions with travel demand and the energy domain: models and algorithms. Urban Rail Transit, 2018, 4(4): 163-197

[18] Milford R, Allwood J. Assessing the CO₂ impact of current and future rail track in the UK. Transp Res Part D, 2010, 15: 61-72

[19] Ortega A, Blainey S, Preston J. Assessing whole-life carbon footprint of under sleeper pad installation for ballasted track. J Transp Eng Part A Syst, 2018, 144(12): 04018073

[20] Roskilly AP, Palacin R, Yan J. Novel technologies and strategies for clean transport systems. Appl Energy, 2015, 157: 563-566

[21] Marinov M (2014) An intensive programme in railway and logistics. Res Transp Econ 41

[22] Rail Industry Association (2019) RIA cost challenge electrification report. https://www.riagb.org.uk/RIA/Newsroom/Stories/Electrification_Cost_Challenge_Report.aspx. Accessed 20 Sept 2019

[23] Powell JP, Palacín R. A comparison of modelled and real-life driving profiles for the simulation of railway vehicle operation. Transp Plan Technol, 2015, 38(1): 78-93

[24] González-Gil A, Palacin R, Batty P. Optimal energy management of urban rail systems: key performance indicators. Energy Convers Manag, 2015, 90: 282-291

[25] Staffell I. Measuring the progress and impacts of decarbonising British electricity. Energy Policy, 2017, 102: 463-475

[26] Robinson S. Simulation: the practice of model development and use, 2004, New York: Wiley

[27] Marinov MV, Viegas JM. Tactical management of rail freight transportation services: evaluation of yard performance. Transp Plan Technol, 2011, 34(4): 363-387

[28] Kamrani M, Abadi SMHE, Golroudbary SR. Traffic simulation of two adjacent unsignalized T-junctions during rush hours using Arena software. Simul Model Pract Theory, 2014, 49: 167-179

[29] Wales J, Marinov M. Analysis of delays and delay mitigation on a metropolitan rail network using event based simulation. Simul Model Pract Theory, 2015, 52: 52-77

[30] Wang Q, Lu J, Wang Q, Duan J (2017) Transient overvoltage study of auto-passing neutral section in high-speed railway. In: 2017 IEEE transportation electrification conference and expo, Asia-Pacific (ITEC Asia-Pacific), pp 1–5. IEEE

[31] Chen L, James P, Kirkwood D, Nguyen HN, Nicholson GL, Roggenbach M (2016) Towards integrated simulation and formal verification of rail yard designs-an experience report based on the UK East Coast Main Line. In: 2016 IEEE international conference on intelligent rail transportation (ICIRT), pp 347–355. IEEE

[32] Golightly D, Easton JM, Roberts C, Sharples S. Applications, value and barriers of common data frameworks in the rail industry of Great Britain. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit, 2013, 227(6): 693-703

[33] Winnett J, Iraklis A, Keating EM, McGordon A, Ridler T, Hughes DJ (2017). Automotive to rail: can technologies cross the gap? In: Proceedings of the Stephenson Conference

[34] Palacin R, Golightly D, Ramdas V, Dadashi N. Evaluating the impact of rail research: principles to maximise innovation uptake. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit, 2016, 230(7): 1673-1686

[35] Fitzgerald J, Larsen PG, Verhoef M. Collaborative design for embedded systems: co-modelling and co-simulation, 2014, Berlin: Springer

[36] Foldager F, Larsen PG, Green O (2017) Development of a driverless lawn mower using co-simulation. In: Workshop on formal co-simulation of cyber-physical systems (CoSim-CPS)

[37] Neghina M, Zamfirescu C-B, Pierce K (xxxx) Early-stage analysis of cyber-physical production systems through collaborative modelling. In: Software and systems modeling (SoSyM), Springer, Berlin (in press)

[38] Pedersen N, Lausdahl K, Sanchez EV, Larsen PG, Madsen J (2017) Distributed co-simulation of embedded control software with exhaust gas recirculation water handling system using INTO-CPS. In: International conference on simulation and modeling methodologies, technologies and applications

[39] Laughery K, Lebiere C, Archer S. Modeling human performance in complex systems in handbook of human factors and ergonomics, 2006 3 New York: Wiley 965-996

[40] Axelsson J (2015) Systems-of-systems for border-crossing innovation in the digitized society-A strategic research and innovation agenda for Sweden, SICS Technical Report T2015:07

[41] Larsen PG, Fitzgerald J, Woodcock J, Gamble C, Payne R, Pierce K. Cerone A, Roveri M. Features of integrated model-based co-modelling and co-simulation technology. Software engineering and formal methods (SEFM), 2018, Cham: Springer

[42] Blochwitz T, Otter M, Arnold M, Bausch C, Elmqvist H, Junghanns A, Mauß J, Monteiro M, Neidhold T, Neumerkel D, Olsson H (2011) The Functional Mockup Interface for tool independent exchange of simulation models. In: Proceedings of the 8th international modelica conference; March 20th–22nd; Technical Univeristy; Dresden; Germany, No. 063, pp 105–114. Linköping University Electronic Press

[43] Thule C, Lausdahl K, Gomes C, Meisl G, Larsen PG. Maestro: The INTO-CPS co-simulation framework. Simul Modell Pract Theory, 2019, 92: 45-61

[44] Larsen PG, Lausdahl K, Battle N, Fitzgerald J, Wolff S, Sahara S, Verhoef M, Tran-Jørgensen PWV, Oda T (2013) VDM-10 language manual. Technical Report TR-001, The Overture Initiative. http://www.overturetool.org/. Accessed 20 Sept 2019

[45] Verhoef M, Larsen PG (2006) Enhancing VDM ++ for modeling distributed embedded real-time systems. Technical Report, Radboud University Nijmegen

[46] Broenink JF. 20-sim software for hierarchical bond-graph/block-diagram models. Simul Pract Theory, 1999, 7(5–6): 481-492

[47] Young A. Suburban railways of Tyneside, 1999, UK: Bairstow

[48] Priemus H, Konings R. Light rail in urban regions: what Dutch policymakers could learn from experiences in France, Germany and Japan. J Transp Geogr, 2001, 9(3): 187-198

[49] Powell JP, Palacín R. Passenger stability within moving railway vehicles: limits on maximum longitudinal acceleration. Urban Rail Transit, 2015, 1(2): 95-103

[50] Powell JP, Fraszczyk A, Cheong CN, Yeung HK. Potential benefits and obstacles of implementing driverless train operation on the Tyne and Wear Metro: a simulation exercise. Urban Rail Transit, 2016, 2(3–4): 114-127

[51] Mansfield M (2019) A systematic approach to model-based engineering of cyber-physical system of systems. Doctoral dissertation, Newcastle University

[52] Luijt RS, van den Berge MP, Willeboordse HY, Hoogenraad JH. 5 years of Dutch eco-driving: managing behavioural change. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract, 2017, 98: 46-63

[53] Large DR, Golightly D, Taylor EL (2014) The effect of driver advisory systems on train driver workload and performance. In: Contemporary ergonomics and human factors 2014: proceedings of the international conference on ergonomics and human factors 2014, Southampton, UK, p 335

[54] Rjabovs A, Palacin R. The influence of system design-related factors on the safety performance of metro drivers. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit, 2017, 231(3): 317-328

[55] Chapman J, Siebers PO, Robinson D. On the multi-agent stochastic simulation of occupants in buildings. J Build Perform Simul, 2018, 11(5): 604-621

[56] Qian Z (2017) Integrated evaluation of air flow and gas dispersion for underground station safety strategies based on subway climatology, Doctoral dissertation, Newcastle University

[57] Ryan B, Qu R, Schock A, Parry T. Integrating human factors and operational research in a multidisciplinary investigation of road maintenance. Ergonomics, 2011, 54(5): 436-452

Funding

Rail Safety and Standards Board (RSSB)(RSSB2782)