Analysis of the Spatial Accessibility of Addis Ababa’s Light Rail Transit: The Case of East–West Corridor

Abstract

In this paper, spatial and statistical analysis methods were integrated to analyze the spatial accessibility, user population, and coverage of the Light Rail Transit of Addis Ababa. Stations were found to be the least accessible due to five types of land use and road network-related causes: government and social institutions with large area compounds, low road network density, open spaces devoid of road network, natural barriers such as water courses and large area public squares. The study explicitly revealed stations with overlaps in their service areas as well as stations having neighborhoods which are uncovered with the current service areas, i.e., 4.7 km² and 19.9 km² uncovered areas are found within walking distances of 1200–1500 m and 1500–2000 m, respectively; nonetheless, stations have fairly adequate coverage within 400 m and 800 m walking distance. Depending on the causes, stations were grouped into three categories. Service area-based determination of potential users is estimated to be 888,502, while the total number of the daily average actual users is around 67,624. Generally an increase in the accessible population is associated with an increase in the service area coverage. However, the population accessibility and service area coverage do not directly imply more number of actual users. Stations with large overlap of service area have reduced number of actual users due to the fact that the accessible population is divided between shared stations. Therefore, unnecessary large service area overlap is a wastage that does not contribute to more number of users. Future studies in the current study area might focus on considering the nexus between the accessibility and modal share as well as the long-term dynamics of the population of users.

Keywords

Accessibility / LRT / Public transport / GIS / Network analysis / Land use / Walking distance

References

[1] Maguire DJ, Smith R, Jones S. GIS on the move: some transportation applications of GIS. Proc Thirteen Annu ESRI User Conf, 1993, 3: 39-46.

[2] Simmonds DC, Still BG (1998) DELTA/START: adding land-use analysis to integrated transport models. In: Presented to the world conference on transport research, antwerp. proceedings of the world conference on transport research, vol 4

[3] Social Exclusion Unit (2003) Making the connections: final report on transport and social exclusion, Office of the Deputy Prime Minister

[4] Wibowo SS, Olszewski P. Modeling walking accessibility to public transport terminals: case study of Singapore mass raid transit. J East Asia Soc Trans Stud, 2005, 6: 147-156.

[5] Yigitcanlar T, Sipe Nell, Evans Rick, Pitot Matt. A GIS-based land use and public transport accessibility indexing model. Aust Plan, 2007, 44(3): 30-37

[6] Curl A, Nelson JD, Anable J. Does accessibility planning address what matters? A review of current practice and practitioner perspectives. Res Trans Bus Manag, 2011, 2: 3

[7] Church A, Frost M, Sullivan K. Transport and social exclusion in London. Trans Policy, 2000, 7(3): 195-205

[8] Bhat C, Handy S, Kockelman K, Mahmassani H, Chen Q, Weston L (2000) Development of an urban accessibility index: literature review. Research project conducted for the Texas Department of Transportation. Center for Transportation Research, University of Texas, Austin (TX), USA

[9] Baradaran S, Ramjerdi F (2001) Performance of accessibility measures in Europe. J Trans Stat 4(23)

[10] Nettleton M, Pass DJ, Walters GW, White RC. Public transport accessibility map of access to general practitioners surgeries in Longbridge, Birmingham, UK. J Maps, 2007, 2007: 64-75.

[11] Casas I. Social exclusion and the disabled: an accessibility approach. Prof Geogr, 2007, 59(4): 463-477

[12] Escalona-Orcao A, Díez-Cornago C. Accessibility to basic services in one of the most sparsely populated areas in Europe: the province of Teruel (Spain). Area, 2007, 39(3): 295-309

[13] Bertolini L, le Clercq F, Kapoen L. Sustainable accessibility: a conceptual framework to integrate transport and land use plan-making. Two test-applications in the Netherlands and a reflection on the way forward. Trans Policy, 2005, 12(3): 207-220

[14] Geertman SCM, Van Eck JRR. GIS and models of accessibility potential: an application in planning. Int J Geogr Inf Sci, 1995, 9(1): 67-80

[15] Knox PL. Retail geography and social well-being: a note on the changing distribution of pharmacies in Scotland. Geoforum, 1981, 12(3): 255-264

[16] Hansen WG. How accessibility shapes land use. J Am Plan Assoc, 1959, 25(2): 73-76.

[17] Bohnet M, Gertz C (2008) Mode specific accessibility and car ownership, mobil.TUM 2008 In: International conference on mobility and transport. (http://www.vsl.tuharburg.de/Archiv/Bohnet_mobilTUM2008_Paper_Final.pdf)

[18] Niemeier DA. Accessibility: an evaluation using consumer welfare. Transportation, 1997, 24(4): 377-396

[19] Buliung RN, Kanaroglou PS. A GIS toolkit for exploring geographies of household activity/travel behavior. J Trans Geogr, 2006, 14(1): 35-51

[20] Casas I. Social exclusion and the disabled: an accessibility approach. Prof Geogr, 2007, 59(4): 463-477

[21] Farber S, Páez A. My car, my friends, and me: a preliminary analysis of automobility and social activity participation. J Trans Geogr, 2009, 17(3): 216-225

[22] Yang Z, Hayashi Y (2002) GIS-based analysis of railway’s origin/destination path-selecting behavior 2002. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering by Blackwell Publishing, 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148, USA, and 108 Cowley Road, Oxford OX4 1JF, UK

[23] Kesik OA, Aydinoglu AC, Sağlam D (2015) GIS based accessibility assessment for public services: istanbul case. FIG working week 2015 from the Wisdom of the Ages to the Challenges of the Modern World Sofia, Bulgaria, 17–21 May 2015

[24] Liu S, Zhu X (2004) An integrated GIS approach to accessibility analysis. Transactions in GIS, 2004, 8(1): 45–62. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 2004. 9600 Garsington Road,Oxford OX4 2DQ, UK and 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148, USA

[25] Albacete X, Olaru D, Paül V, Biermann S. Measuring the accessibility of public transport: a critical comparison between methods in Helsinki. Appl Spat Anal, 2017, 10: 161-188

[26] Andersen JLE, Landex A (2009) GIS-based approaches to catchment area analyses of mass transit. In: ESRI international user conference

[27] El-Geneidy A, Grimsrud M, Wasfi R, Tétreault P, Surprenant-Legault J. New evidence on walking distances to transit stops: identifying redundancies and gaps using variable service areas. Transportation, 2014, 41(1): 193-210

[28] All Africa (2015) Ethiopia: addis light rail eases transportation problem. Retrieved 23 September 2015

[29] Addis Ababa Online (2012) Addis Ababa light rail transit project reaches implementation. Availableathttp://addisababaonline.com/addis-ababa light-rail-transit-project-reaches implementation

[30] Alshalalfah B, Shalaby A. Case study: relationship of walk access distance to transit with service, travel, and personal characteristics. J Urban Plan Dev, 2007, 133: 114-118

[31] Gutierrez J, Garcia-Palomares JC. Distance-measure impacts on the calculation of transport services areas using GIS. Environ Plan B Plan Des, 2008, 35: 480-503

[32] UITP and UATP (2010) Report on statistical indicators of public transport performance in Africa. Version 1.3-Final version. Trans Africa

Funding

Ethiopian Civil Service University