Rail Transportation Lead Urban Form Change: A Case Study of Beijing

Abstract

In the background of rapid urban metro transit construction in China, rail transportation becomes an important factor in shaping urban form. This case study focuses on the urban form changes caused by urban rail transportation development in Beijing and especially explores the synergetic links between urban planning and transportation from the perspective of a transportation–population–economy research framework. Based on population census surveys and basic economic unit census surveys on street district level, combined with digital urban metro lines on street district level, findings show that the population spatial distribution tends to disperse along the metro lines, and concentrates around metro network connections. The employment distribution turns to be more concentrated in high accessibility areas around metro intersections. The population and employment distributions indicate a job–housing mismatch, where the employment centers are concentrated in the central city, while residential centers are concentrated in suburban areas. The consequence of this mismatch is that regions with extreme job–housing imbalance also see higher degrees of imbalance in urban metro volume. This paper aims to provide insights on how to improve job accessibility and creating a more sustainable urban form, as well as promoting a synergetic development between urban planning and transportation.

Keywords

Urban rail transportation / Urban form / Job accessibility / Job–housing spatial relationship / Beijing

References

[1] Goodstadt V (2008) European perspectives on megaregions and spatial planning. In: Metropolitan area and space planning seminar, Lincoln Research Center, Peking University, Beijing

[2] Pain K, Hall P (2006) People and places: interrelating the space of flows and the space of places. In: Hall P, Pain K (eds) The polycentric metropolis: learning from mega-city regions in Europe. Earthscan, London, pp 113–121

[3] Hall P (2006) Firms and places: inside the mega-city regions. In: Hall P, Pain K (eds) The polycentric metropolis: Learning from mega-city regions in Europe. Earthscan, London, pp 57–94

[4] Lang R, Lefurgy J, Nelson AC et al (2006) The six suburban eras of the United States research note. Opolis Int J Suburban Metrop Stud 2006(1)

[5] Wang J, Lin Z (2011)The impact of high-speed railway on urban spatial evolution: an analysis based on China's characteristics [J]. Int Urban Planning 2011(1):16–23

[6] Todorovich P, Schned D, Lane R. High speed rail: international lessons for U.S. policy makers. Doc De Treball, 2011, 76(2): 537-553.

[7] Clifton K, Ewing R, Knaap G-J, Song Y. Quantitative analysis of urban form: a multidisciplinary review. J Urban Int Res Placemak Urban Sustain, 2008, 1(1): 17-45

[8] Frank L, Pivo G (1994) Relationships between land use and travel behavior in the Puget sound region. Single Occupant Vehicles 86(10):1361–1362

[9] Cervero R. Transit-based housing in California: evidence on ridership impacts. Transp Policy, 1994, 1(3): 174-183

[10] Messenger T, Ewing R. Transit-oriented development in the sun belt. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board, 1996, 1552(1): 145-153

[11] Kain JF. Housing segregation, negro employment, and metropolitan decentralization. Q J Econ, 1968, 82(2): 175-197

[12] Ellwood DT. Freeman RB, Holzer HJ. The spatial mismatch hypothesis: are there teenage jobs missing in the ghetto?. The black youth employment crisis, 1986, Chicago: University of Chicago Press 147-190.

[13] Ley D. Social geography of the city, 1993, New York: Harper & Row Press

[14] Mattingly DJ. Job search, social networks, and local labor-market dynamics: the case of paid household work in San Diego, California. Urban Geogr, 1999, 20(1): 46-74

[15] Grengs J. Job accessibility and the modal mismatch in Detroit. J Transp Geogr, 2010, 18(1): 42-54

[16] Weitz J, Schindler T (1997) Are Oregon’s communities balanced? A test of the jobs–housing balance policy and the impact of balance on mean commute times. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Urban Studies and Planning, Portland State University

[17] Hu L (2015) How does job access affect the employment outcomes of different income groups? In: Transportation Research Board annual meeting

[18] Zhang C, Man J. Examining job accessibility of the urban poor by urban metro and bus: a case study of Beijing. Urban Rail Transit, 2015, 1(4): 183-193

[19] Loutzenheiser D. Pedestrian access to transit: model of walk trips and their design and urban form determinants around Bay area rapid transit stations. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board, 1997, 1604: 40-49

[20] Handy SL, Niemeier DA. Measuring accessibility: an exploration of issues and alternatives. Environ Plan A, 1997, 29(7): 1175-1194

[21] Hansen WG. How accessibility shapes land use. J Am Inst Plan, 1959, 25(2): 73-76

[22] Huff DL. A probabilistic analysis of shopping center trade areas. Land Econ, 1963, 39(1): 81-90

[23] Wachs M, Kumagai TG. Physical accessibility as a social indicator. Socio Econ Plan Sci, 1973, 7(5): 437-456

[24] Vickerman R. Is transport infrastructure effective?. J Transp Geogr, 1999, 7(3): 230-231

[25] Zhang C, He C. Metropolitan area and spatial planning: international experience. Int Urban Plann, 2010, 4: 85-91.

[26] Boarnet M, Crane R. The influence of land use on travel behavior: specification and estimation strategies. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract, 2001, 35(9): 823-845

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China(41401651)

the China Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2016JBWZ002)