Highway Vehicle Emissions Avoided by Diesel Passenger Rail Service Based on Real-World Data

Abstract

Avoided emissions attributable to the reduction in personal automobile trips for passenger rail riders are quantified based on real-world measurements. The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) sponsors the Piedmont passenger rail service between Raleigh and Charlotte, NC. Per passenger-kilometer locomotive emissions were quantified based on portable emissions measurement system measured exhaust concentrations and duty cycles, or the fraction of trip time spent in each throttle notch setting of the prime mover engine, from 68 one-way trips of six Tier 0+ and Tier 1+ locomotives, and actual ridership data. Motor Vehicle Emissions Simulator (MOVES) software was used to estimate light-duty gasoline vehicle (LDGV) emission factors. Moving a passenger from an LDGV to a Piedmont train would lead to a net reduction in carbon dioxide (CO₂) and carbon monoxide (CO) emissions by 44–94 %, respectively, between Raleigh and Charlotte, based on the assumption that the driver is the only LDGV passenger. However, locomotive nitrogen oxides (NO _x), hydrocarbons (HC), and particulate matter (PM) emission factors were 4–11 times higher than for the LDGV, respectively. Delays for either the train or highway vehicles did not substantially alter the key findings. If a Tier 4 locomotive was used, NO _x, PM, and HC emission rates would be 90–99 % lower than current NCDOT locomotives. The use of real-world data representative of actual train operations provides an accurate basis for comparing rail and personal vehicle energy use and emissions and for identifying key factors affecting variability in the comparison.

Keywords

Intercity rail / Energy intensity / Emissions / Carbon dioxide / Nitrogen oxides / Particulate matter

References

[1] Davis SC, Diegel SW, Boundy RG (2015) Transportation energy data book, 34th edn. Report no. ORNL-6990, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge

[2] International Agency for Research on Cancer (2012) Diesel engine exhaust carcinogenic. World Health Organization. http://www.iarc.fr/en/media-centre/pr/2012/pdfs/pr213_E.pdf. Accessed 21 Mar 2016

[3] United States environmental protection agency (2008) EPA finalizes more stringent emissions standards for locomotives and marine compression-ignition engines. Document no. EPA-420-F-08-004, US. EPA, Ann Arbor

[4] National primary and secondary ambient air quality standards (2013) Code of federal regulations, part 50, title 40

[5] United States environmental protection agency (2013) 2013 Final report: integrated science assessment of ozone and related photochemical oxidants. Report no. EPA600-R-10-076F, US. EPA, Washington DC

[6] United States environmental protection agency (2009) 2009 Final report: integrated science assessment for particulate matter. Report no. EPA600-R-08-139F, US. EPA, Washington DC

[7] Barth MJ, Tadi RR. Emissions comparison between truck and rail: case study of California I-40. Trans Res Rec, 1996, 1520: 44-52

[8] Facanha C, Horvath A. Evaluation of life-cycle air emission factors of freight transportation. Environ Sci Technol, 2007, 41(20): 7138-7144

[9] Facanha C, Horvath A. Environmental assessment of freight transportation in the US. Int J Life Cycle Ass, 2006, 11(4): 229-239

[10] Kim NS, Van Wee B. Assessment of CO₂ emissions for truck-only and rail-based intermodal freight systems in Europe. Trans Plan Technol, 2009, 32(4): 313-333

[11] Kolb A, Wacker M. Calculation of energy consumption and pollutant emissions on freight transport routes. Sci Total Environ, 1995, 169(1–3): 283-288

[12] Komor P. Reducing energy use in US freight transport. Transp Policy, 1995, 2(2): 119-128

[13] Matei MC, Nes CS. Extensive use of the railway system—an efficient way of reducing co₂ emissions in the transportation sector. J Environ Prot Ecol, 2012, 13(2A): 844-851.

[14] You S, Lee G, Ritchie SG, Saphores JD, Sangkapichai M, Ayala R. Air pollution impacts of shifting freight from truck to rail at California’s San Pedro Bay ports. Transp Res Rec, 2010, 2162: 25-34

[15] United States environmental protection agency (1998) Locomotive emission standards: regulatory support document. Report no. EPA420-R-98-101, US. EPA, Washington DC

[16] Delucchi M (1996) Emissions of criteria pollutants, toxic air pollutants, and greenhouse gases from the use of alternative transportation modes and fuels. Report no. UCD-ITS-RR-96-12, University of California, Davis Institute of Transportation Studies, Davis

[17] Chester M, Horvath A. High-speed rail with emerging automobiles and aircraft can reduce environmental impacts in California’s future. Environ Res Lett, 2012, 7(3): 034012

[18] Chester M, Horvath A. Life-cycle assessment of high-speed rail: the case of California. Environ Res Lett, 2010, 5(1): 014003

[19] Barth MJ, Younglove T, Tadi RR. Emissions analysis of southern California metrolink commuter rail. Transport Res Rec, 1996, 1520: 53-62

[20] Tang NW, Apte JS, Martien PT, Kirchstetter TW. Measurement of black carbon emissions from in-use diesel-electric passenger locomotives in California. Atmos Environ, 2015, 115(2015): 295-303

[21] National Cooperative Rail Research Program (2015) Comparison of passenger rail energy consumption with competing modes. Report No. 3, Transportation Research Board, Washington DC

[22] Frey HC, Graver BM (2012) Measurement and evaluation of fuels and technologies for passenger rail service in North Carolina. Final report no. HWY-2010-12, North Carolina Department of Transportation, Raleigh

[23] Graver BM, Frey HC. Comparison of locomotive emissions measured during dynamometer versus rail yard engine load tests. Transp Res Rec, 2013, 2341: 23-33

[24] Graver BM, Frey HC. Comparison of over-the-rail and rail yard measurements of diesel locomotives. Environ Sci Technol, 2015, 49(21): 13031-13039

[25] Dunn R, Eggleton P (2002) Influence of duty cycles and fleet profile on emissions from locomotives in Canada. Report no. TP 13945E, Transport Canada Transportation Development Centre, Montreal

[26] Frey HC, Zhang K, Rouphail NM. Fuel use and emissions comparisons for alternative routes, time of day, road grade, and vehicles based on in-use measurements. Environ Sci Technol, 2008, 42(7): 2483-2489

[27] Unal A, Rouphail NM, Frey HC. Effect of arterial signalization and level of service on measured vehicle emissions. Transp Res Rec, 2003, 1842: 47-56

[28] Liu B, Frey HC. Variability in light-duty gasoline vehicle emission factors from trip-based real-world measurements. Environ Sci Technol, 2015, 49(20): 12525-12534

[29] Emission standards for locomotives and locomotive engines (2013) Code of federal regulations, part 92, title 40

[30] Clean Air Technologies, Inc. OEM-2100AX axion system operation manual, 2008, Buffalo: GlobalMRV

[31] Burgard DA, Bishop GA, Stadtmuller RS, Dalton TR, Stedman DH. Spectroscopy applied to on-road mobile source emissions. Appl Spectrosc, 2006, 60(5): 135A-148A

[32] Vojtisek-Lom M, Cobb JT (1997) Vehicle mass emissions measurement using a portable 5-gas exhaust analyzer and engine computer data. In: Proceedings of the EPA and A&WMA Emissions Inventory Conference, Research Triangle Park NC, 1 october 1997

[33] Myers J, Kelly T, Dindal A, Willenberg Z, Riggs K. Environmental technology verification report: Clean Air Technologies International, Inc. REMOTE On-Board Emissions Monitor, 2003, NC: Prepared for United States Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park

[34] Hu J, Graver BM, Frey HC (2015) Comparison of nitrogen oxides and hydrocarbon exhaust concentration detection methods for portable emission measurement systems applied to locomotive engines. In: Proceedings of the 108th Annual Meeting of the Air & Waste Management Association, Raleigh NC, 24 June 2015

[35] Vojtisek-Lom M, Allsop JE (2001) Development of heavy-duty diesel portable, on-board mass exhaust emissions monitoring system with NO_x, CO₂, and qualitative PM capabilities. Report no. 2001-01-3641, Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrenton

[36] Frey HC, Unal A, Rouphail NM, Colyar JD. On-road measurement of vehicle tailpipe emissions using a portable instrument. J Air Waste Manag, 2003, 53(8): 992-1002

[37] Frey HC, Choi HW, Kim K. Portable emission measurement system for emissions of passenger rail locomotives. Transp Res Rec, 2012, 2289: 56-63

[38] Sandhu GS, Frey HC. Effects of errors on vehicle emission factors from portable emissions measurement systems. Transp Res Rec, 2013, 2340: 10-19

[39] United States environmental protection agency (2010) Technical highlights: emission factors for locomotives. Report no. EPA420-F-09-025, U.S. EPA Office of Transportation and Air Quality, Ann Arbor MI

[40] United States environmental protection agency (2010) Motor Vehicle Emission Simulator (MOVES): User Guide for MOVES2010a. Report no. EPA420-B-10-036, US EPA Office of Transportation and Air Quality, Ann Arbor

[41] Amtrak (2014) Amtrak Ridership and Revenues Continue Strong Growth in FY 2014. National Passenger Rail Corporation: https://www.amtrak.com/ccurl/238/481/Amtrak-FY2014-Ridership-and-Revenue-ATK-14-096%20.pdf. Accessed 31 Mar 2016

[42] Bureau of transportation statistics (2016) National Transportation Statistics Table 4–26—Energy Intensity of Amtrak Services (updated July 2014). US. Department of Transportation: http://www.bts.gov/publications/national_transportation_statistics/. Accessed 23 May 2016

[43] Amtrak (2012) Amtrak Fleet Strategy Version 3.1. National Passenger Rail Corporation: https://www.amtrak.com/ccurl/36/921/2012-Amtrak-Fleet-Strategy-v3.1-%2003-29-12.pdf. Accessed 23 May 2016

[44] United States environmental protection agency (2012) In-Depth Information for Motorcycle Owners on EPA’s New Emission Standards for Highway Motorcycles (Rev 9/2012). Report no. EPA420-F-03-045, U.S. EPA Office of Transportation and Air Quality, Ann Arbor

[45] Frey HC, Boroujeni B, Hu J, Sandhu GS, Liu B, Jiao W, Graver BM (2013) Measurements of 1996 to 2013 Model year Light Duty Gasoline Vehicles. In: Proceedings of 106th Annual Conference of the Air & Waste Management Association, Chicago, 25–28 June 2013

Funding

Federal Railroad Administration (US)(FR-RRD-0023-11-01-00)