Risk Evaluation of Railway Rolling Stock Failures Using FMECA Technique: A Case Study of Passenger Door System

Abstract

Railway transport consists of two main asset classes of infrastructure and rolling stock. To date, there has been a great deal of interest in the study and analysis of failure mechanisms for railway infrastructure assets, e.g. tracks, sleepers, bridges, signalling system, electrical units, etc. However, few attempts have been made by researchers to develop failure criticality assessment models for rolling stock components. A rolling stock failure may cause delays and disruptions to transport services or even result in catastrophic derailment accidents. In this paper, the potential risks of unexpected failures occurring in rolling stock are identified, analysed and evaluated using a failure mode, effects and criticality analysis-based approach. The most critical failure modes in the system with respect to both reliability and economic criteria are reviewed, the levels of failure criticality are determined and possible methods for mitigation are provided. For the purpose of illustrating the risk evaluation methodology, a case study of the Class 380 train’s door system operating on Scotland’s railway network is provided and the results are discussed. The data required for the study are partly collected from the literature and unpublished sources and partly gathered from the maintenance management information system available in the company. The results of this study can be used not only for assessing the performance of current maintenance practices, but also to plan a cost-effective preventive maintenance (PM) programme for different components of rolling stock.

Keywords

Railway rolling stock / Failure mode, Effects and criticality analysis (FMECA) / Risk evaluation / Preventive maintenance (PM)

References

[1] http://www.telegraph.co.uk. Accessed 18 June 2016

[2] Office of Rail and Road (ORR) (2015) Passenger rail usage 2014–2015, Quarter 4. http://orr.gov.uk. Accessed 5 Feb 2016

[3] Network Rail (2014) Delivering a better railway for a better Britain. http://www.networkrail.co.uk. Accessed 5 Feb 2016

[4] Dinmohammadi F, Shafiee M. A fuzzy-FMEA risk assessment approach for offshore wind turbines. Int J Progn Health Manage, 2013, 4: 59-68.

[5] Shafiee M, Dinmohammadi F. An FMEA-based risk assessment approach for wind turbine systems: a comparative study of onshore and offshore. Energies, 2014, 7(2): 619-642

[6] International Standard Organization (ISO) 31000 (2009) Risk management—principles and guidelines http://www.iso.org/iso/home/standards/iso31000.htm. Accessed 5 Feb 2016

[7] Haile JP. Quantified risk assessment in railway system design and operation. Qualit Reliab Eng Int, 1995, 11(6): 439-443

[8] Carretero J, Pérez JM, Garcı́a-Carballeira F Applying RCM in large scale systems: a case study with railway networks. Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 2003, 82: 257-273

[9] Garcia Marquez FP, Schmid F, Conde Collado J. A reliability centered approach to remote condition monitoring. a railway points case study. Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 2003, 80: 33-40

[10] Pedregal DJ, Garcı́a FP, Schmid F. RCM² predictive maintenance of railway systems based on unobserved components models. Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 2004, 83(1): 103-110

[11] Podofillini L, Zio E, Vatn J. Risk-informed optimisation of railway tracks inspection and maintenance procedures. Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 2006, 91(1): 20-35

[12] Zio E, Marella M, Podofillini L. Importance measures-based prioritization for improving the performance of multi-state systems: application to the railway industry. Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 2007, 92: 1303-1314

[13] Kumar K, Gupta S, Ghodrati B An approach for risk assessment of rail defects. Int J Reliab Qual Saf Eng, 2010, 17(4): 291-311

[14] Macchi M, Garetti M, Centrone D Maintenance management of railway infrastructures based on reliability analysis. Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 2012, 104: 71-83

[15] Cheng X, Xing Z, Qin Y Reliability analysis of metro door system based on FMECA. J Intell Learn Syst Appl, 2013, 5: 216-220.

[16] Kim J, Jeong H-Y. Evaluation of the adequacy of maintenance tasks using the failure consequences of railroad vehicles. Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 2013, 117: 30-39

[17] Ahbar M, Bagheri M. Risk assessment framework for the rail transport of hazardous materials formulation and solution. Transp Res Rec, 2014, 2411: 90-95

[18] Andrews JJ, Moss B. Reliability and risk assessment, 2002, Hoboken: Wiley

[19] Labib A, Read M. A hybrid model for learning from failures: the Hurricane Katrina disaster. Expert Syst Appl, 2015, 42: 7869-7881

[20] Shafiee M, Patriksson M, Chukova S. An optimal age-usage maintenance strategy containing a failure penalty for application to railway tracks. Proc Ins Mech Eng Part F, 2016, 230(2): 407-417

[21] Scarf P, Alkali BM, Cavalcante C et al (2012) A study of the efficacy of inspection of railway rolling stock. In: Proceedings of the 11th international probabilistic safety assessment and management (PSAM) conference and the annual European safety and reliability (ESREL) Conference, pp 335–340

[22] Dinmohammadi F, Alkali BM, Shafiee M et al (2016) Failure mode, effects and criticality analysis of railway rolling stock assets. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on railway technology: research, development and maintenance, Cagliari, 5–8 April 2016 doi:10.4203/ccp.110.256

[23] http://www.datasys.co.uk/products-rail-management-solutions/rail-performance-management/

[24] Macdonald G (2012) Application of reliability centered maintenance on class 380 passenger doors. Dissertation, Glasgow Caledonian University

[25] Finkelstein M, Shafiee M, Kotchap AN. Classical optimal replacement strategies revisited. ieee trans Reliab, 2016, 65(2): 540-546