Human Error Risk Management Methodology for Rail Crack Incidents

Abstract

The paper presents an innovative approach to modelling the causal relationships of human errors in rail crack incidents (RCI) from a managerial perspective. A Bayesian belief network is developed to model RCI by considering the human errors of designers, manufactures, operators and maintainers (DMOM) and the causal relationships involved. A set of dependent variables whose combinations express the relevant functions performed by each DMOM participant is used to model the causal relationships. A total of 14 RCI on Hong Kong’s mass transit railway (MTR) from 2008 to 2011 are used to illustrate the application of the model. Bayesian inference is used to conduct an importance analysis to assess the impact of the participants’ errors. Sensitivity analysis is then employed to gauge the effect the increased probability of occurrence of human errors on RCI. Finally, strategies for human error identification and mitigation of RCI are proposed. The identification of ability of maintainer in the case study as the most important factor influencing the probability of RCI implies the priority need to strengthen the maintenance management of the MTR system and that improving the inspection ability of the maintainer is likely to be an effective strategy for RCI risk mitigation.

Keywords

Bayesian network / Human error / Hong Kong / Importance analysis / Rail crack incidents / Sensitivity analysis

References

[1] Dampier A, Marinov M. A study of the feasibility and potential implementation of metro-based freight transportation in newcastle upon tyne. Urban Rail Transit, 2015, 1(3): 164-182

[2] Kumar S. A study of the rail degradation process to predict rail breaks, doctoral dissertation, division of operation and maintenance engineering, 2006, Luleå: Luleå University of Technology

[3] Wang J, Xu Y, Lian S, Wang L. Probabilistic prediction model for initiation of RCF cracks in heavy-haul railway. Int J Fatigue, 2011, 33(2): 212-216

[4] Ringsberg JW, Loo-Morrey M, Josefson BL, Kapoor A, Beynon JH. Prediction of fatigue crack initiation for rolling contact fatigue. Int J Fatigue, 2000, 22(3): 205-215

[5] Legislative Council, subcommittee on matters relating to railways. Railway service performance (2005–2009), 2011. http://www.legco.gov.hk/english/index.htm

[6] Jeong DY (2001) Progress in rail integrity research (No. DOT-VNTSC-FRA-01-03), Federal Railroad Administration, Office of Research and Development

[7] Skyttebol A, Josefson BL, Ringsberg JW. Fatigue crack growth in a welded rail under the influence of residual stresses. Eng Fract Mech, 2005, 72(2): 271-285

[8] Aglan HA, Fateh M. Fracture and fatigue crack growth analysis of rail steels. J Mech Mater Struct, 2007, 2(2): 335-346

[9] Reason J, Parker D, Free R. Bending the rules: the varieties, origins and management of safety violations, 1994, Leiden: University of Leiden

[10] Trucco P, Cagno E, Ruggeri F, Grande O. A Bayesian belief network modelling of organisational factors in risk analysis: a case study in maritime transportation. Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 2008, 93(6): 845-856

[11] Sajuri Z, Alang NA, Razak NA, Aziman MA. Fracture toughness and fatigue crack growth behavior of rail track material. Key Eng Mater, 2011, 462: 1109-1114

[12] Zhong W, Hu J, Li Z, Liu Q, Zhou Z. A study of rolling contact fatigue crack growth in U75 V and U71Mn rails. Wear, 2011, 271(1): 388-392

[13] Lu Y, Li Q, Hinze J. Subway system safety risk analysis based on Bayesian network, in modeling risk management in sustainable construction, 2011, Berlin: Springer 219-227

[14] Marsh W, Bearfield G (2004) Using Bayesian networks to model accident causation in the UK railway industry. In: International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management, PSAM7, Berlin

[15] Medina-Oliva G, Weber P, Simon C, Iung B (2009) Bayesian networks applications on dependability, risk analysis and maintenance. In: 2nd IFAC workshop on dependable control of discrete system, DCDS’09, pp. 245–250

[16] Pearl J (1985) Bayesian networks: a model of self-activated: memory for evidential reasoning, Computer Science Department, University of California. ftp://ftp.cs.ucla.edu/pub/stat_ser/r43-1985.pdf

[17] Trucco P, Di Giulio A, Randazzo G, Pedrali M (2003) Towards a systematic organisational analysis for improving safety assessment of the maritime transport system In: Bedford T, Van Gelder PHAJM (eds) Safety and reliability, Swets & Zeitlinger, Lisse, ESREL 3, pp 513–521

[18] Cannon DF, Edel KO, Grassie SL, Sawley K. Rail defects: an overview. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct, 2003, 26(10): 865-886

[19] Heinrich HW, Granniss ER. Industrial accident prevention, 1959, New York: McGraw Hill

[20] Haslam RA, Hide SA, Gibb AG, Gyi DE, Pavitt T, Atkinson S, Duff AR. Contributing factors in construction accidents. Appl Ergon, 2005, 36(4): 401-415

[21] Bedford T, Cooke R. Probabilistic risk analysis: foundations and methods, 2001, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Funding

the Postdoctoral Science Foundation of China(043261005)