Pedestrian Safety at Rail Grade Crossings: Focus Areas for Research and Intervention

Paul Metaxatos , P. S. Sriraj

Urban Rail Transit ›› 2015, Vol. 1 ›› Issue (4) : 238 -248.

PDF
Urban Rail Transit ›› 2015, Vol. 1 ›› Issue (4) : 238 -248. DOI: 10.1007/s40864-016-0030-4
Original Research Papers

Pedestrian Safety at Rail Grade Crossings: Focus Areas for Research and Intervention

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Contrary to the declining number of fatalities due to train–vehicle collisions at highway-rail grade crossings, the number of pedestrian and bicycle fatalities at highway- and pathway-rail grade crossings has increased in the last dozen years. While engineering solutions and education and enforcements initiatives have been proposed and implemented, little is known as to their effectiveness to mitigate such incidents. This paper reports on findings from the literature and discussions with professionals in the public and private sectors involved in safety at rail grade crossings. Major areas found in need for improvement include (a) advancing consistent standards for warning devices and treatments; (b) advancing consistent approaches for managing non-motorist risk; and (c) continuing commitment to education, engineering, enforcement, and evaluation efforts by enabling stakeholders to provide adequate resources. The paper highlights the multitude of factors related to pedestrian safety in this context, and provides an informed discussion for researchers and practitioners involved in advancing safety initiatives.

Keywords

Pedestrian safety / Rail grade crossings / State of practice / Expert opinion

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Paul Metaxatos, P. S. Sriraj. Pedestrian Safety at Rail Grade Crossings: Focus Areas for Research and Intervention. Urban Rail Transit, 2015, 1(4): 238-248 DOI:10.1007/s40864-016-0030-4

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

American Public Transportation Association (2007) Standard for rail transit grade crossing warning system design criteria, installation and operation. Revision approved February 7, 2007. Report APTA RT-S-RGC-004-03

[2]

American Railway Engineering and Maintenance of Way Association (2010) Communications & Signal Manual, vol 1, Sect 3

[3]

Barlow JM, Bentzen BL, Tabor L (2003) Accessible pedestrian signals: Synthesis and guide to best practice. National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Research Results Digest, July 2003—Number 278. Transportation Research Board, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC

[4]

Blasch B (1999) Effectiveness of accessible pedestrian signals. Final Report. Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Rehabilitation Research and Development Center, Atlanta

[5]

California Public Utilities Commission (2008) Pedestrian-rail crossings in California: a report compiling the designs and devices currently utilized at pedestrian-rail crossings within the state of California, May 2008

[6]

CalTrain (2007) Design criteria. April 15, 2007

[7]

Carroll AA, daSilva MP, Ngamdung T (2010) U.S. DOT Federal Railroad Administration’s third research needs workshop on highway-rail grade crossing safety and trespass prevention: vol I—summary of results. U.S. Department of Transportation, Research and Innovative Technology Administration, John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center. Report Number DOT-VNTSC-FRA-10-02, January 2010

[8]

Cleghorn D, Clavelle A, Boone J, Masliah M, Levinson HS (2009) Improving pedestrian and motorist safety along light rail alignments. TCRP Report 137. Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC

[9]

Delmonte E, Tong S (2011) Improving safety and accessibility at level crossings for disabled pedestrians. Report Number T650. Rail Safety and Standards Board, London, February 2011

[10]

Fitzpatrick K, Warner J, Brewer MA, Bentzen BL, Barlow JM, Sperry B (2015) Guidebook on pedestrian crossings of public transit rail services. TCRP Report 175. Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC

[11]

Ford G, Heneker D (2004) The Australian level crossing assessment model. In: International rail safety conference, Perth 24–27 October, 2004, Queensland, Australia

[12]

Goldberg BA, Mootha RK, Lindsey RW. Train accidents involving pedestrians, motor vehicles and motorcycles. Am J Orthop, 1998, 27(4): 315-320.

[13]

Harkey DL, Carter DL, Barlow JM, Bentzen BL (2007) Accessible pedestrian signals: a guide to best practices. NCHRP Web-Only Document 117a. National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC

[14]

Harkey DL, Carter DL, Barlow JM, Bentzen BL, Myers L, Scott A (2007) Guidelines for accessible pedestrian signals. Final Report. NCHRP Web-Only Document 117b. National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C

[15]

Harkey DL, Carter DL, Barlow JM, Bentzen BL (2009) Accessible pedestrian signals: A guide to best practices (workshop edition 2010). NCHRP Web-Only Document 150. National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC

[16]

Ishak SZ, Yue WL, Somenahalli S. Level crossing modelling using petri nets approach and π-tool. Asian Transp Stud, 2010, 1(2): 107-121.

[17]

Jennings LS. Compilation of state laws and regulations affecting highway-rail grade crossings, 2009 5 Washington, DC: Department of Transportation, Federal Railroad Administration

[18]

Khattak A, Luo Z. Pedestrian and bicyclist violations at highway-rail grade crossings. Transp Res Rec Board, 2011, 2250: 76-82

[19]

Khawani V. “Second Train Coming” warning sign demonstration project. Transp Res Rec, 2001, 1762: 32-36

[20]

Korve Engineering (2007) Appendixes to TCRP RRD 84: audible signals for pedestrian safety in LRT environments. TCRP Web-Only Document 35. Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC

[21]

Korve HW, Ogden BD, Siques JT, Mansel DM, Richards HA, Gilbert S, Boni E, Butchko M, Stutts, JC, Hughes, RG (2001). Light rail service: pedestrian and vehicular safety. TCRP Report 69. Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC

[22]

Little AD (2007a) Use of risk models and risk assessments for level crossings by other railways. Final Report to Rail Safety and Standards Board. Rail Safety and Standards Board, London, March 2007

[23]

Korve HW, Farran JI, Mansel DM, Levinson HS, Chira-Chavala T, Ragland DR (1996) Integration of light rail transit into city streets. TCRP Report 17. Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC

[24]

Little AD (2007b) Analysis of research ideas from recent international level crossing conferences. Report Number T527 to Rail Safety and Standards Board. Cambridge, June 2007

[25]

Lobb B. Trespassing on the tracks: a review of railway pedestrian safety research. J Saf Res, 2006, 37(4): 359-365

[26]

Metaxatos P, Sriraj PS (2013). Pedestrian/bicyclist warning devices and signs at highway-rail and pathway-rail grade crossings. Research Report FHWA-ICT-13-013. Illinois Center for Transportation, April 2013

[27]

Ogden BD (2007) Railroad-highway grade crossing handbook—revised second edition 2007. Report No. FHWA-SA-07-010. Office of Safety Design Federal Highway Administration

[28]

Petit B (2001) Breakdown of current highway-rail grade crossing system costs. In: Proceedings of the national highway-rail grade crossing safety conference, Texas Transportation Institute, Dallas, TX

[29]

Rail Safety and Standards Board (2010) Road-rail interface special topic report, London, April 2010

[30]

Roop SS, Roco CE, Olson LE, Zimmer RA (2005) An analysis of low-cost active warning devices for highway-rail grade crossings. NCHRP Project No. HR 3-76B, Task Order 4. Final Report, March 2005

[31]

SCRRA (2009) SCRRA highway-rail grade crossings recommended design practices and standards manual, 30 Jun 2009

[32]

Spicer T (2007) Implementing the Australian level crossing assessment model (ALCAM) in Victoria. In: Proceeding of the 30th Australasian Transport Research Forum (ATRF 2007), Langham Hotel, Melbourne, 25–27 Sep 2007

[33]

Sposato S, Bien-Aime P Chaudhary M (2006) Public Education and Enforcement Research Study. Report DOT-VNTSC-FRA-06-03. U.S. Department of Transportation, Research and Innovative Technology Administration, John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center, Cambridge

[34]

U.K. Department for Transport—Rail Accident Investigation Branch (2006) Rail accident report—investigation into station pedestrian crossings. Report 23/2006, December 2006

[35]

U.S. Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board (2005) Notice of availability of draft public rights-of-way accessibility guidelines. Washington, DC

[36]

U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration (2009) Manual on uniform traffic control devices

[37]

U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Railroad Administration (2008) A compilation of pedestrian safety devices in use at grade crossings. Office of Safety, Federal Railroad Administration, January 2008

[38]

U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Railroad Administration (2010) Railroad trespassing, vandalism, and highway-rail grade crossing warning device violation prevention strategies. Office of Railroad Safety, December 2010

Funding

Illinois Center for Transportation Grant(IDOT R27-96)

USDOT(DTRT12-G-UTC18)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

117

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/