Analysis of Wheel-Roller Contact and Comparison with the Wheel-Rail Case

Abstract

Full-scale roller rigs are recognized as useful test stands to investigate wheel-rail contact/damage issues and for developing new solutions to extend the life and improve the behaviour of railway systems. The replacement of the real track by a pair of rollers on the roller rig causes, however, inherent differences between wheel-rail and wheel-roller contact. In order to ensure efficient utilization of the roller rigs and correct interpretation of the test results with respect to the field wheel-rail scenarios, the differences and the corresponding causes must be understood a priori. The aim of this paper is to derive the differences between these two contact cases from a mathematical point of view and to find the influence factors of the differences with the final aim of better translating the results of tests performed on a roller rig to the field case.

Keywords

Wheel-rail contact / Wheel-roller contact / Creepage / Contact patch / Roller rig

References

[1] Keylin A, Ahmadian M (2012) Wheel-rail contact characteristics on a tangent track vs a roller rig. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2012 rail transportation division fall technical conference, Omaha

[2] Jaschinski A, Chollet H, Iwnicki S, Wickens AH, Würzen JV. The application of the roller rigs to railway vehicle dynamics. Veh Syst Dyn, 1999, 31: 345-392

[3] Meymand SZ, Craft MJ, Ahmadian M (2013) On the application of roller rigs for studying rail vehicle systems. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2013 rail transportation division fall technical conference, Altoona

[4] Zhang W, Dai H, Shen Z, Zeng J. Iwnicki S. Roller rigs. Handbook of railway vehicle dynamics, 2006, Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis Group 458-504.

[5] Allen PD. Iwnicki S. Scaling testing. Handbook of railway vehicle dynamics, 2006, Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis Group 507-525

[6] Yan M (1993) A study of the inherent errors in a roller rig model of railway vehicle dynamic behaviour. ME thesis, Manchester Metropolitan University

[7] Taheri M, Ahmadian M (2012) Contact patch comparison between a roller rig and tangent track for a single wheelset. In: Proceedings of the 2012 joint rail conference, Philadelphia

[8] Zeng Y, Shu X, Wang C, Yu W (2013) Study on three-dimensional wheel/rail contact geometry using generalized projection contour method. In: Zhang W (ed) proceedings of the IAVSD 2013 international symposium on dynamics of vehicles on roads and tracks, Qingdao

[9] Bruni S, Cheli F, Resta F. A model of an actively controlled roller rig for tests on full size wheelsets. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F: J Rail Rapid Transit, 2001, 215: 277-288

[10] Liu B, Bruni S. A method for testing railway wheel sets on a full-scale roller rig. Veh Syst Dyn, 2015, 53(9): 1331-1348

[11] Shabana AA, Zaazaa KE, Sugiyama H. Railroad vehicle dynamics: a computational approach, 2007, Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis Group, LLC

[12] Bosso N, Spiryagin M, Gugliotta A, Somá A. Mechatronic modeling of real-time wheel-rail contact, 2013, London: Springer

[13] Kalker JJ. A fast algorithm for the simplified theory of rolling contact. Veh Syst Dyn, 1982, 11: 1-13

[14] PomboJ Ambrósio J, Silva M. A new wheel-rail contact model for railway dynamics. Veh Syst Dyn, 2007, 45(2): 165-189

[15] Yang G (1993) Dynamic analysis of railway wheelsets and complete vehicle systems. Doctoral dissertation, Delft University of technology, Delft

[16] Hertz H. Über die berührung fester elastische körper. J Für Die Reine U Angew Math, 1882, 92: 156-171.

[17] Damme S, Nackenhorst U, Wetzel A, Zastrau B (2002) On the numerical analysis of the wheel-rail system in rolling contact. In: Popp S (ed): system dynamics and long-term behaviour of railway vehicles, track and subgrade. Lecture Notes in applied mechanics, vol 6, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 155–174

[18] Vo KD, Zhu HT, Tieu AK, Kosasih PB. FE method to predict damage formation on curved track for various worn status of wheel/rail profiles. Wear, 2015, V322–323: 61-75

[19] Kalker JJ. Three-dimensional elastic bodies in rolling contact. Solid mechanics and its applications, 1990, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers

[20] Knothe K, Le The H. A contribution to calculation of contact stress distribution between elastic bodies of revolution with non-elliptical contact area. Comput Struct, 1984, 18(6): 1025-1033

[21] Kik W, Piotrowski J (1996) A fast, approximate method to calculate normal load at contact between wheel and rail and creep forces during rolling. In: Zobory I (ed.), proceedings of 2nd mini-conference on contact mechanics and wear of rail/wheel systems, Budapest

[22] Piotrowski J, Chollet H. Wheel–rail contact models for vehicle system dynamics including multi-point contact. Veh Syst Dyn, 2005, 43(6–7): 455-483

[23] Piotrowski J, Kik W. A simplified model of wheel/rail contact mechanics for non-Hertzian problems and its application in rail vehicle dynamic simulations. Veh Syst Dyn, 2008, 46(2): 27-48

[24] Ayasse J, Chollet H. Determination of the wheel rail contact patch in semi-Hertzian conditions. Veh Syst Dyn, 2005, 43: 161-172

[25] Linder Ch (1997) Verschleiss von Eisenbahnrädern mit Unrundheiten. Diss. Techn. Wiss. ETH Zürich, Nr. 12342

[26] Sichani MS, Enblom R, Berg M. Comparison of non-elliptic contact models: towards fast and accurate modelling of wheel–rail contact. Wear, 2014, 314: 111-117

[27] Vollebregt EAH, Wilders P. FASTSIM2: a second-order accurate frictional rolling contact algorithm. Comput Mech, 2011, 47: 105-116

[28] Ullrich D, Luke M. Simulating rolling-contact fatigue and wear on a wheel/rail simulation test rig, 2001, Cologne: World Congress on Railway Research

[29] Braghin F, Bruni S, Resta F (2001) Wear of railway wheel profiles: a comparison between experimental results and a mathematical model. In: Ture H (ed.), 17th international symposium on dynamics of vehicles on roads and tracks, pp 478–489