Direct Observations of Pedestrian Unsafe Crossing at Urban Australian Level Crossings

Abstract

The number of pedestrian victims at Australian and foreign level crossings has remained stable over the past decade and it continues to be a significant problem. To examine the factors contributing to pedestrians’ unsafe crossing behaviours, direct observations were conducted at three black spot urban level crossings in Brisbane for a total of 45 h during morning and afternoon peak. In total, 129 pedestrians transgressed the active controls. More transgressions were observed at the crossings located in more populated suburbs in close proximity to large shopping centres and school zones, whereas the smallest number of transgressions were observed at the least populated locations. In addition to characteristics associated with the larger socio-economic area, the patterns of transgression could be associated with the properties of the existing safety equipment and the design of each level crossing (i.e. location of the platforms, number of rail tracks). Indeed, the largest number of crossed unoccupied but “at risk” rail tracks (where a train could have passed), was observed at the crossing with the least transgressions. Contrary to previous findings, younger adults were the most frequent transgressors. School children and elderly were most likely to transgress in groups. Potential directions for future research and more effective measures are discussed.

Keywords

Direct observations / Level crossings / Pedestrian behaviour / Transgressions

References

[1] Metaxatos P, Sriraj PS. Pedestrian/bicyclist warning devices and signs at highway-rail and pathway-rail grade crossings in civil enginneering studies, 2013, Illinois: Illinois Center for Transportation Series

[2] ATSB Australian rail safety occurrence data 1 July 2002–30 June 2012 in Australian rail safety occurrence data, 2012, Canberra: Australian Transport Safety Bureau 48

[3] Queensland Rail Level crossings near miss table (2011), 2012, Brisbane: Queensland Rail website

[4] Iorio L, De Marco S, Cosciotti E (2012) Life momentum at level crossing: human factor, road-rail safety policies, available technologies. A cross-sectorial challenge playing a rewarding role for the upgrade of safer mobility options, in Global Level Crossing and Trespass Symposium 2012. London

[5] Edquist J A literature review of human factors safety issues at Australian level crossings, 2009, Melbourne: MUARC

[6] Stefanova T System based approach to investigate pedestrian behaviour at level crossings. Acc Anal Prev, 2015, 81: 167-186

[7] Edquist J, Hughes B, Rudin-Brown CM. Pedestrian non compliance at level crossing gates, 2011, Perth: CURTIN-Monash accident research centre

[8] Khattak A, Luo Z. Pedestrian and bicyclist violations at highway-rail grade crossings. Transportation research record. J Transport Res Board, 2011, 2250(1): 76-82

[9] McPherson C, Daff M. Pedestrian behaviour and the design of accessible rail crossings, 2005, Sydney: 28th Australian Transport Research Forum

[10] Parker A (2002) Second train coming warning sign demonstration projects. In: Administration FT (ed) Transportation Research Board of the National Academies. p 39

[11] Sposato S, Bien-Aime P, Chaudhary M (2006) Public education and enforcement research study in safety of highway-railroad grade crossings series 2006. U.S Department of transportation, Federal Railroad Administration, p 110

[12] Stewart S, Brownlee R, Stewart D (2004) Second train warning at grade crossingsIn: Canada T (ed) Transportation Development Centre, p 103

[13] Basacik D, Cynk S, Flint T (2012) Spotting the signs: situation awareness at level crossings, in Global Level Crossing and Trespass Symposium, London

[14] Clancy J, Kerr W, Scott M (2006) Study of pedestrian behaviour at public railway crossings. Lloyd`s Register Rail Limited

[15] Clancy J, Dickinson S, Scott M (2007) Study of pedestrian behaviour at public railway crossings. Lloyd`s Register Rail Limited

[16] Clark HE, Perrone JA, Isler RB. An illusory size–speed bias and railway crossing collisions. Acc Anal Prev, 2013, 55: 226-231

[17] Khattak A. Comparison of driver behavior at highway-railroad crossings in two cities. Transportation research record. J Transport Res Board, 2009, 2122(1): 72-77

[18] Wullems C, Toft Y, Dell G. Improving level crossing safety through enhanced data recording and reporting: the CRC for rail innovation’s baseline rail level crossing video project. Proceedings of the institution of mechanical engineers, Part F. J Rail Rapid Transit, 2013, 227(5): 554-559

[19] Kotrlik JW, Williams HA, Jabor MK. Reporting and interpreting effect size in quantitative agricultural education research. J Agric Educ, 2011, 52(1): 132-142