Public Perception of Driverless Trains

Anna Fraszczyk , Philip Brown , Suyi Duan

Urban Rail Transit ›› 2015, Vol. 1 ›› Issue (2) : 78 -86.

PDF
Urban Rail Transit ›› 2015, Vol. 1 ›› Issue (2) : 78 -86. DOI: 10.1007/s40864-015-0019-4
Original Research Papers

Public Perception of Driverless Trains

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

The global trend for rail automation is increasing but there are very few publications on public perception of the ongoing changes in the railways. In order to fill this gap and to better understand people’s perception of driverless trains, the paper focuses on automation of metro systems with a particular interest in unattended train operation (UTO). A survey seeking a public opinion on UTO was conducted, and the results show that 93 % of female and 72 % of male respondents think that a “fake” driver room should be present on a driverless train. In terms of human error, a great majority of respondents expressed no worries about a train design or maintenance issues. However, staff communication, selected by 36 % males and 43 % females, and a technical failure, highlighted by 50 % of males and 43 % of females, were two issues that raised most safety concerns amongst the respondents. Other results related to passenger’s safety, employment, advantages and limitations of the UTO, amongst other issues, are presented and discussed in the paper.

Keywords

Metro / Automation / Driverless train / Attitudes

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Anna Fraszczyk, Philip Brown, Suyi Duan. Public Perception of Driverless Trains. Urban Rail Transit, 2015, 1(2): 78-86 DOI:10.1007/s40864-015-0019-4

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

BBC (2014) Driverless tube trains: Unions vow ‘war’ over plan. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-26381175. Accessed 9 Dec 2014

[2]

Berwell FT. Automatic railways: automation and control in transport, 1973, Oxford: Pergamon Press 177-191

[3]

Brown P (2014) Are driverless trains the future? Rail Technology Magazine, February/March 2014, p 19

[4]

Fisher E (2011) Justifying automation. In: Railway technology. http://www.railway-technology.com. Accessed 5 Dec 2014

[5]

Fraszczyk A, Magalhães da Silva J, Gwóźdź A, Vasileva G. Metro as an example of an urban rail system. Four case studies from Europe. Transp Probl, 2014, 9: 101-107.

[6]

Hasham N (2013) Driverless trains plan must overcome public scepticism. http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/driverless-trains-plan-must-overcome-public-scepticism-20130607-2nvjq.html. Accessed 9 Dec 2014

[7]

Karvonen H, Aaltonen I, Wahlström M, Salo L, Savioja P, Norros L. Hidden roles of the train driver: a challenge for metro automation. Interact Comput, 2011, 23: 289-298

[8]

Malla R (2014) Automation sets a new benchmark. Metro report, May 2014

[9]

Rumsey A (2009) Communications based train control. IRSE seminar

[10]

TransLink (2014) SkyTrain. http://www.translink.ca/en/Schedules-and-Maps/SkyTrain.aspx. Accessed 9 Dec 2014

[11]

UIC (2014) Automatic train control. Energy efficiency technologies for railways. http://www.railway-energy.org/static/Automatic_train_control_79.php. Accessed 9 Dec 2014

[12]

UITP Media backgrounder. Metro automation facts, figures and trends, 2011, Brussels: UITP

[13]

UITP (2013) Metro automation in 2013. Observatory of Automated Metros World Atlas Report. UITP, Brussels

[14]

UITP Statistics brief. World metro figure, 2014, Brussels: UITP

[15]

Vuchic V (2014) Maintaining performance with full automation. Metro report international, March 2014, pp 36–39

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

225

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/