Passenger Stability Within Moving Railway Vehicles: Limits on Maximum Longitudinal Acceleration

Abstract

Increasing the acceleration and deceleration of trains within a railway network can improve the performance of the system. However, the risk of passengers losing their balance and falling is also increased. The purpose of this paper is therefore to examine the effect of longitudinal vehicle accelerations on passenger safety and comfort. The literature review brings together two separate disciplinary areas, considering the effects of acceleration on balance from a physiological/kinesiological perspective, as well as looking at the results of previous empirical studies on the levels of acceleration that railway passengers will tolerate. The paper also describes an experiment carried out on the Tyne and Wear Metro, which gathered data on typical acceleration levels to compare against the findings of the literature review. It was found that both the magnitude of the accelerations and their rate of change (jerk) are important. The results also suggest that there may be scope to improve the trade-off between journey times, energy consumption and passenger comfort by fine control of the acceleration/jerk profile. This is particularly relevant to urban rail systems, as they typically feature relatively high acceleration and deceleration. However, the findings for passenger comfort are equally applicable to conventional regional and intercity services.

Keywords

Passenger safety / Passenger comfort / Longitudinal acceleration / Braking / Jerk

References

[1] Abernethy CN, Jacobs HH, Plank GR, Stoklosa JH, Sussman ED. Maximum deceleration and jerk levels that allow retention of unrestrained, seated transit passengers. Transp Res Rec, 1980, 774: 45-51.

[2] Allum JHJ. Organization of stabilizing reflex responses in tibialis anterior muscles following ankle flexion perturbations of standing man. Brain Res, 1983, 264(2): 297-301

[3] Browning AC (1972) The tolerance of the general public to horizontally accelerating floors, with special reference to pedestrian conveyors. Technical Report TR71105, Royal Aircraft Establishment, Ministry of Defense

[4] Carpenter RHS. Neurophysiology, 2003 4 London: Arnold

[5] Cole C. Iwnicki S. Longitudinal train dynamics. Handbook of railway vehicle dynamics, 2006, Boca Raton: CRC/Taylor & Francis 239-277

[6] Cope GH. British railway track: design, construction and maintenance, 1993 6 Barnsley: Permanent Way Institution

[7] De Graaf B, Van Weperen W. The retention of balance: an exploratory study into the limits of acceleration the human body can withstand without losing equilibrium. Hum Factors: J Hum Factors Ergon Soc, 1997, 39(1): 111-118

[8] Dorn MR (1998) ‘Jerk, acceleration and the safety of passengers’ Technology for Business Needs. Birmingham, 24th–26th November

[9] Gebhard JW (1970) Acceleration and comfort in public ground transportation. Transportation Programs Report 002, The Johns Hopkins University

[10] Halpern P, Siebzehner MI, Aladgem D, Sorkine P, Bechar R. Non-collision injuries in public buses: a national survey of a neglected problem. Emerg Med J, 2005, 22(2): 108-110

[11] Hiroaki S. Ability to withstand sudden braking. Railw Res Rev, 1995, 52(5): 18-21.

[12] Hirshfeld CF (1932) Disturbing effects of horizontal acceleration. Bulletin No. 3, Electric Railway President’s Conference Committee

[13] Hoberock LL (1976) A survey of longitudinal acceleration comfort studies in ground transportation vehicles. Research Report 40, Council for Advanced Transportation Studies

[14] Kamper D, Parnianpour M, Barin K, Adams T, Linden M, Hemami H. Postural stability of wheelchair users exposed to sustained, external perturbations. J Rehabil Res Dev, 1999, 36(2): 121-132.

[15] Koji O, Hiroharu E, Hiroaki S, Hiroshi S. Ride evaluation during high deceleration braking. Railw Res Rev, 2007, 64(7): 26-29.

[16] Loach JC, Maycock MG. Recent developments in railway curve design. ICE Proc: Eng Div, 1952, 1(5): 503-541.

[17] Maki BE, Fernie GR. Pompeiano O, Allum JHJ. A system identification approach to balance testing. Progress in brain research, 1988, Oxford: Elsevier 297-306.

[18] Matsudaira T (1960) Dynamics of high speed rolling stock, Railway Technical Research Institute, Quarterly Reports, (Special Issue), pp 57–65

[19] Matsui S. Comfort limits of retardation and its changing rate for train passengers. Jpn Railw Eng, 1962, 3(11): 25-27.

[20] Profillidis VA. Railway management and engineering, 2006 3 Aldershot: Ashgate

[21] RSSB (2014) Annual Safety Performance Report 2013/14. Rail Safety and Standards Board

[22] SAR (1948) Superelevations and maximum permissible speeds on curves. Research Circular No. 25.027, South African Railways

[23] Sari MH (2012) Postural stability when walking and exposed to lateral oscillations. Doctoral thesis, University of Southampton

[24] Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott MH. Motor control: theory and practical applications, 2001, Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

[25] Simoneau M, Corbeil P. The effect of time to peak ankle torque on balance stability boundary: experimental validation of a biomechanical model. Exp Brain Res, 2005, 165(2): 217-228

[26] Sone S, Ashiya M (1998) An innovative traction system from the viewpoint of braking, International Conference on Developments in Mass Transit Systems. London, 20th–23rd April

[27] Thompson JT. Railway track-work for high speeds. J ICE, 1939, 10(3): 405-407

[28] Urabe S, Nomura Y (1964) Evaluations of train riding comfort under various decelerations, Railway Technical Research Institute, Quarterly Reports 5(2):28–34

[29] Vuchic VR. Urban transit systems and technology, 2007, Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons

[30] Watkins J (1983) An introduction to mechanics of human movement. Boston, [Mass.]; Lancaster: MTP Press

[31] Zigmond MJ. Fundamental neuroscience, 1999, San Diego: Academic