Fusing wellness and innovation within eco-friendly structures: An exhaustive critique on tracking and enhancing interior air conditions
Anshul Jain , Hridayesh Varma
Urban Resilience and Sustainability ›› 2025, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (4) : 306 -327.
This paper illustrates how eco-friendly structures combined with resource-efficient approaches elevate interior air quality (IAQ), the broader interior environmental quality (IEQ), and overall human vitality. The increasing focus on eco-responsible lifestyles has spurred the development of environmentally sound construction practices, which are recognized to conserve power and lower expenses over time. An organized evaluation of 128 refereed articles was undertaken, encompassing investigations into structural planning, component choices, air surveillance innovations, and wellness consequences. Affordable detection units like the Dylos, Foobot, and AirVisual Pro models, alongside linkage protocols including WiFi, LoRa, Bluetooth, and visible light communication (VLC), were evaluated for their operational effectiveness, shortcomings, and applicability in ongoing IAQ supervision. Primary hurdles involve gradual sensor inaccuracies, routine servicing needs, reactions to the surrounding variables, and location-specific compliance restrictions. Sophisticated adjustment frameworks and merging techniques are delved into for improving the precision of information and the equipment’s sustainability. The analysis underscores the necessity for an integrated, vitality-centered methodology in eco-construction.
power preservation / economical detectors / IAQ sensors / natural layout features / sturdy architectures
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
EPA (2016) Green Building. Available from: https://archive.epa.gov/greenbuilding/web/html/about.html. Accessed 4 Sep 2023. |
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
Hashemi A, Dungrani M (2025) Indoor environmental quality and health implications of building retrofit and occupant behaviour in social housing. Sustainability 17: 264. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17010264 |
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
Tham KW (2016) Indoor air quality and its effects on humans-A review of challenges and developments in the last 30 years. Energy Build 130: 637-650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.08.071 |
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
Guan H, Hu S, Lu M, |
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
Nakaoka H, Suzuki N, Eguchi A, |
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
Karimi H, |
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
Licina D, Langer S (2021) Indoor air quality investigation before and after relocation to WELL-certified office buildings. Build Environ 204: 108182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108182 |
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
Sadrizadeh S, Yao R, Yuan F, |
| [54] |
|
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
|
| [58] |
|
| [59] |
|
| [60] |
|
| [61] |
|
| [62] |
|
| [63] |
|
| [64] |
|
| [65] |
|
| [66] |
|
| [67] |
|
| [68] |
|
| [69] |
Dai H, Imani S, |
| [70] |
|
| [71] |
Dion H, Evans M (2024) Strategic frameworks for sustainability and corporate governance in healthcare facilities; approaches to energy-efficient hospital management. Benchmarking: Int J 31: 353-390. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-04-2022-0219 |
| [72] |
|
| [73] |
|
| [74] |
|
| [75] |
|
| [76] |
|
| [77] |
Chiesa G, Vigliotti M (2024) Comparing mechanical ventilation control strategies for indoor air quality: Monitoring and simulation results of a school building in northern Italy. Energy Build 322: 114665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2024.114665 |
| [78] |
|
| [79] |
|
| [80] |
|
| [81] |
|
| [82] |
|
| [83] |
|
| [84] |
Siemens (2023) Building technologies. Available from: https://www.siemens.com/global/en/products/buildings.html. |
| [85] |
|
| [86] |
|
| [87] |
|
| [88] |
|
| [89] |
|
| [90] |
|
| [91] |
|
| [92] |
|
| [93] |
|
| [94] |
|
| [95] |
|
| [96] |
|
| [97] |
|
| [98] |
|
| [99] |
|
| [100] |
|
| [101] |
|
| [102] |
|
| [103] |
|
| [104] |
|
| [105] |
|
| [106] |
|
| [107] |
|
| [108] |
Kang X, Chia YK, Sun S, |
| [109] |
|
| [110] |
|
| [111] |
|
| [112] |
Rocha Á, Adeli H, Reis LP, |
| [113] |
Marques G, Pitarma R (2019) A cost-effective air quality supervision solution for enhanced living environments through the internet of things. Electronics 8: 170. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics8020170 |
| [114] |
|
| [115] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |