Operationalization of a spatial interaction model to estimate the impact of community structure on resilience processes
Kyle D. Buck , Justin J. Bousquin
Urban Resilience and Sustainability ›› 2025, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (4) : 208 -224.
Growing hazard exposures and deepening social disparities highlight the need for resilience frameworks that capture not only risk and vulnerability but also the processes through which communities adapt. Most existing indices rely on static indicators that describe socioeconomic or infrastructural conditions without representing the spatial and networked interactions that sustain adaptation and recovery. This paper operationalizes resilience as a process of dynamic interaction among people, infrastructure, and environment by advancing the Community Hazardscape and Amenity Placement in Provisioning of Improved Endpoints (CHAPPIE) framework. Using a production-constrained gravity model, CHAPPIE estimates potential benefit flows between households and resources within network constraints, thereby quantifying accessibility, connectivity, and equity as determinants of adaptive capacity. The paper aligns conceptual resilience capacities- education and information, basic provisioning, health and safety, and community cohesion-with measurable indicators and network metrics. By embedding spatial interaction theory within the resilience assessment, the framework provides a path toward quantifying resilience as a socio- ecological process rather than a static condition, illustrating how accessibility and structure shape adaptation potential.
resilience processes / gravity model / network accessibility / community structure / socio- ecological systems / equity
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
IPCC (2023) Climate change 2023: Synthesis report of the IPCC Sixth Assessment. Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. |
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
Adger WN (2000) Social and ecological resilience: Are they related? Prog Hum Geogr 24: 347-364. https://doi.org/10.1191/030913200701540465 |
| [9] |
Folke C (2006) Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analyses. Global Environ Change 16: 253-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002 |
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
Batty M (2013) The New Science of Cities , MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9399.001.0001 |
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
Carpenter SR, Arrow KJ, Barrett S, |
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
Berkes F, Folke C, Colding J (1998) Linking Social and Ecological Systems: Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience , Cambridge University Press. |
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
Proag V (2014) The concept of vulnerability and resilience. Procedia Econ Finance 18: 369-376. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00952-6 |
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
Choi YW, Yonn DK (2025) Exploring the role of community collaborative networks in disaster risk management in Korea. Sustain Dev 33: 7677-7693. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3543 |
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
Wellman B (1979) The community question: The intimate networks of East Yorkers. Am J Sociol 84: 1201-1231. https://doi.org/10.1086/226906 |
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
Klinenberg E (2018) Palaces for the People: How Social Infrastructure Can Help Fight Inequality, Polarization, and the Decline of Civic Life , Crown. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |