Reframing collaborative planning theory and practice

i

This article has been updated. A Correction to this article was published on .

i

The Original Article was published on

i

The Original Article was published on

i

This article has been updated

i

This article was retracted on

i

This article has been updated

CHANGE HISTORY

A Correction to this paper has been published:
https://doi.org

The Retraction Note was updated to reflect reception of statements of disagreement from all authors.

This article has been retracted.Please see the Retraction Notice for more detail:
https://doi.org

References

[1] Arnstein SR (1969) A ladder of citizen participation. J Am Inst Plann 35: 216-224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225

[2] Davidoff P (1965) Advocacy and pluralism in planning. J Am Inst Plann 31: 331-338. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366508978187

[3] Habermas J (1984) The Theory of Communicative Action (Vol. 1: Reason and rationalization of society) , Boston: Beacon Press.

[4] Habermas J (1987) The Theory of Communicative Action (Vol. 2: Lifeworld and system: A critique of functionalist reason) , Boston: Beacon Press.

[5] Giddens A (1984) The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration , Cambridge: Polity.

[6] Friedmann J (1987) Planning in the Public Domain: From Knowledge to Action , New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

[7] Healey P (1992) A planner’s day: Knowledge and action in communicative practice. J Am Plann Assoc 58: 9-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369208975531

[8] Healey P (1997) Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies , London: MacMillan Press.

[9] Innes JE (1995) Planning theory’s emerging paradigm: Communicative action and interactive practice. J Plan Educ Res 14: 183-189. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X9501400307

[10] Innes JE (1996) Planning through consensus building: A new view of the comprehensive planning ideal. J Am Plann Assoc 62: 460-472. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369608975712

[11] Booher DE, Innes JE (2002) Network power in collaborative planning. J Plan Educ Res 21: 221-236. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X0202100301

[12] Innes JE, Booher DE (2010) Planning with Complexity: An introduction to collaborative rationality for public policy , London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203864302

[13] Fainstein SS (2010) The Just City , Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

[14] Forester J (1982) Planning in the face of power, J Am Plann Assoc 48: 67-80. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944368208976167

[15] Forester J (1999) The Deliberative Practitioner: Encouraging Participatory Planning Processes , Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

[16] Lee D, Feiertag P, Unger L (2024) Co-production, co-creation or co-design of public space? A systematic review. Cities 154: 105372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2024.105372

[17] Schmitt P, Wiechmann T (2018) Unpacking spatial planning as the governance of place: Extracting potentials for future advancements in planning research. disP-Plann Rev 54: 21-33. https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2018.1562795

[18] Hendriks F, Lidström A, Loughlin J (2010) The Oxford Handbook of Local and Regional Democracy in Europe , Oxford: Oxford University Press.

[19] Piletić A (2021) The role of the urban scale in anchoring authoritarian neoliberalism: A look at post-2012 neoliberalization in Belgrade, Serbia. Globalizations 19: 285-300. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2021.1882817

[20] Yuan Y, Chen Y, Cao K (2021) The third sector in collaborative planning: Case study of Tongdejie community in Guangzhou, China. Habitat Int 109: 102327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2021.102327

[21] Ataöv A, Kahraman ZEH (2009) Constructing collaborative processes through experiential learning: Participatory planning in Kaymaklı, Turkey. Habitat Int 33: 378-386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2008.11.001

[22] Atkinson R, Zimmermann K (2018) Area-based initiatives-a facilitator for participatory governance?, In: Heinelt, H. Author, Handbook on Participatory Governance, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 267-290. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781785364358.00019

[23] Bragaglia F, Janin Rivolin U, Berisha E, et al. (2024) How is urban co-production conveyed in European cities?. Eur Plan Stud 32: 1613-1631. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2024.2339933

[24] Fiket I, Markov Č, Ilić V, et al. (2024) Participatory Democratic Innovations in Southeast Europe: How to Engage in Flawed Democracies , London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003426103

[25] Knaap G, Nedovic-Budic Z, Carbonell A (2015) Planning for States and Nation States in the U.S. and Europe , Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.

[26] Knieling J, Othengrafen F, Allmendinger P, et al. (2015) Soft Spaces in Europe: Re-negotiating Governance, Boundaries and Borders , London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315768403

[27] Huxley M, Yiftachel O (2000) New paradigm or old myopia? Unsettling the communicative turn in planning theory. J Plan Educ Res 19: 333-342. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X0001900402

[28] Hillier J (2003) Agonizing over consensus: Why Habermasian ideals cannot be ‘Real’. Plan Theory 2: 37-59. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095203002001005

[29] Ruming K (2018) Post-political planning and community opposition: Asserting and challenging consensus in planning urban regeneration in Newcastle, New South Wales. Geogr Res 56: 181-195. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-5871.12269

[30] Swyngedouw E (2009) The antinomies of the postpolitical city: In search of a democratic politics of environmental production. Int J Urban Reg Res 33: 601-620. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2009.00859.x

[31] Flyvbjerg B (2001) Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and How It Can Succeed Again , Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511810503

[32] Mouffe C (2000) The Democratic Paradox , London: Verso Books.

[33] Purcell M (2009) Resisting neoliberalization: Communicative planning or counter-hegemonic movements?. Plann Theory 8: 140-165. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095209102232

[34] Albrechts L, Barbanente A, Monno V (2020) Practicing transformative planning: The territory-landscape plan as a catalyst for change. City Territ Archit 7: 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40410-019-0111-2

[35] Healey P (2012) The universal and the contingent: Some reflections on the transnational flow of planning ideas and practices. Plan Theory 11: 188-207. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095211419333

[36] Bächtiger A, Dryzek JS (2024) Deliberative Democracy for Diabolical Times , Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009261845

[37] Savini F, Aalbers MB (2016) The de-contextualization of land use planning through financialisation: Urban redevelopment in Milan. Eur Urban Reg Stud 23: 878-894. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776415585887

[38] Davies J (2021) Between Realism and Revolt: Governing Cities in the Crisis of Neoliberal Globalism , Bristol: Bristol University Press. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3818743

[39] Othengrafen F (2010) Spatial planning as expression of culturised planning practices: The examples of Helsinki, Finland and Athens, Greece. Town Plann Rev 81: 83-110. https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2009.25

[40] Özdemir E, Tasan-Kok T (2019) Planners’ role in accommodating citizen disagreement: The case of Dutch urban planning. Urban Stud 56: 741-759. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098017726738