Assessing inequalities in access to the city’s green and blue spaces through the experiences of its residents

i

This article has been updated. A Correction to this article was published on .

i

The Original Article was published on

i

The Original Article was published on

i

This article has been updated

i

This article was retracted on

i

This article has been updated

Abstract

We report on the findings of a qualitative research study exploring the benefits to mental, physical, and social well-being of regular interaction with the city’s green and blue spaces using a walking interview method to gauge the views of fifty frequent visitors to the city’s parks. This was followed by a second phase of research consisting of four focus groups exploring the experiences of those whose access to the city’s green and blue spaces is restricted, noting the effects of these limitations on their general well-being. Despite government-backed urban sustainable redesign initiatives to promote greater access to the city’s biodiversity, its elderly, disabled, and poorer socio-economic communities continue to encounter restrictions regarding their access to its green and blue spaces. By highlighting these issues, our aim is to show how a partial membership of the city’s sustainable development plan is enacted (i.e., a simultaneous inclusion of all community members rhetorically and an exclusion of the needs of many in practice) and reinforced in ways that reproduce socially embedded patterns of inequality. It calls for a more sociologically grounded analysis of the persistence of such inequalities as an important appendage to current discourse on the restorative benefits of the ‘15-minute city’ and as a corrective to current public participation measures that fail to incorporate lived experiences of unequal access to the city’s nature. It proposes a framework that addresses more effectively the distributive, recognition, and procedural dimensions of inclusive, sustainable city living.

Keywords

sustainable development / green and blue spaces / restorative benefits / the 15-minute city / unequal access

CHANGE HISTORY

A Correction to this paper has been published:
https://doi.org

The Retraction Note was updated to reflect reception of statements of disagreement from all authors.

This article has been retracted.Please see the Retraction Notice for more detail:
https://doi.org

References

[1] World Population Review. Available from: worldpopulationreview.com/world-cities/cork-population.

[2] European Commission (2024) Nature Restoration Law. Available from: https://environment.ec.europa.eu/topics/nature-and-biodiversity/nature-restoration-law_en.

[3] The National Biodiversity Data Centre, 2023. Available from: https://biodiversityireland.ie/ipbes-irelands-biodiversity-crisis/.

[4] Colding J, Gren A, Barthel S (2020) The incremental demise of urban green spaces. Land 9: 162. https://doi.org/10.3390/land9050162

[5] Ryan JC (2017) Where have all the Boronia Gone? A posthumanist model of environmental mourning, In: Mourning Nature: Hope at the Heart of Ecological Loss and Grief, Montreal: McGill Queen’s University Press, 117-143. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780773549357-009

[6] Hoover KC (2018) Sensory disruption in modern living and the emergence of sensory inequities. Yale J Biol Med 91: 53-62. PMC5872642.

[7] Moreno C (2016) La ville du quart d’heure: Pour un nouveau chrono-urbanisme. Available from: https://www.latribune.fr/regions/smart-cities/la-tribune-de-carlos-moreno/la-ville-du-quart-d-heure-pour-un-nouveau-chrono-urbanisme-604358.html.

[8] Moreno C, Allam Z, Chabaud D, et al. (2021) Introducing the “15-Minute City”: Sustainability, resilience and place identity in future post-pandemic cities. Smart Cities 4: 93-111. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities4010006

[9] Akrami M, Sliwa MW, Rynning MK (2024) Walk further and access more! Exploring the 15-minute city concept in Oslo, Norway. J Urban Mobility 5: 100077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urbmob.2024.100077

[10] Weng M, Ding N, Li J, et al. (2019) The 15-minute walkable neighbourhoods: Measurement, social inequalities and implications for building healthy communities in urban China. J Transp Health 13: 259-273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2019.05.005

[11] Khavarian-Garmsir AR, Sharifi A, Hajian Hossein Abadi M, et al. (2023) From garden city to 15-minute city: A historical perspective and critical assessment. Land 12: 512. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12020512

[12] Willberg E, Fink C, Toivonen T (2023) The 15-minute city for all?-Measuring individual and temporal variations in walking accessibility. J Transp Geogr 106: 103521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2022.103521

[13] O'Mahony P, Skillington T (1996) Sustainable development as an organizing principle for discursive democracy. Sustain Dev 4: 42-51. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1719(199603)4:1%3C42::AID-SD35%3E3.0.CO;2-E

[14] Gaston KJ, Soga M (2020) Extinction of experience: The need to be more specific. People Nat 2: 575-581. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10118

[15] Soga M, Gaston KJ (2018) Shifting baseline syndrome: Causes, consequences and implications. Front Ecol Environ 16: 222-230. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1794

[16] Pyle RM (1993) The Thunder Tree: Lessons from an Urban Wildland , Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

[17] Marty-Dugas J, Ralph BCW, Oakman JM, et al. (2018) The relation between smartphone use and everyday inattention. Psychol Conscious 5: 46-62. https://doi.org/10.1037/cns0000131

[18] Melkevik O, Torsheim T, Iannotti RJ, et al. (2010) Is spending time in screen-based sedentary behaviors associated with less physical activity: A cross national investigation. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 7: 46. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-7-46

[19] Schutte AR, Torquati JC, Beattie HL (2017) Impact of urban nature on executive functioning in early and middle childhood. Environ Behav 49: 3-30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916515603095

[20] Twenge JM, Spitzberg BH, Campbell WK (2019) Less in-person social interaction with peers among US adolescents in the 21st century and links to loneliness. J Soc Pers Relat 36: 1892-1913. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407519836170

[21] Smalley A (2022) Forest 404: Using a BBC drama series to explore the impact of nature’s changing soundscapes on human wellbeing and behavior. Glob Environ Change 74: 102497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2022.102497

[22] Gaston KJ, Soga M (2020) Extinction of experience: The need to be more specific. People Nat 2: 575-581. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10118

[23] Rosa H (2013) Social acceleration: A New Theory of Modernity , New York: Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/rosa14834-018

[24] Dyar OJ, Haglund BJA, Melder C, et al. (2022) Rainbows over the world’s public health: determinants of health models in the past, present and future. Scand J Public Health 50: 1047-1058. https://doi.org/10.1177/14034948221113147

[25] Bromley RDF, Matthews DL, Thomas CJ (2007) City centre accessibility for wheelchair users: The consumer perspective and the planning implications. Cities 24: 229-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2007.01.009

[26] Shanahan DF, Lin BB, Gaston KJ, et al. (2014) Socio-economic inequalities in access to nature on public and private lands: A case study from Brisbane, Australia. Landsc Urban Plan 130: 14-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.06.005

[27] Hoffman JS, Shandas V, Pendleton N (2020) The effects of historical housing policies on resident exposure to intra-urban heat: A study of 108 US urban areas. Climate 8: 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli8010012

[28] Colley K, Irvine KN, Currie M (2022) Who benefits from nature? A quantitative intersectional perspective on inequalities in contact with nature and the gender gap outdoors. Landsc Urban Plan 223: 104420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104420

[29] Skillington T (2017) Climate Justice and Human Rights , New York: Palgrave. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-02281-3

[30] HelpAge International (2016) Making urban spaces work for older people. Available from: https://www.helpage.org/silo/files/ageing-and-the-city-making-urban-spaces-work-for-older-people.pdf.

[31] World Bank Group (2023) Disability inclusion. Available from: https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/disability.

[32] Nissen S, Prendergast K, Aoyagi M, et al. (2020) Young people and environmental affordances in urban sustainable development: Insights into transport and green and public space in seven cities. Sustain Earth 3: 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42055-020-00039-w

[33] Hoerning KH (1971) Power and social stratification. Sociol Q 12: 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.1971.tb02085.x

[34] Nussbaum MC (2003) Capabilities as fundamental entitlements: Sen and social justice. Fem Econ 9: 33-59. https://doi.org/10.1080/1354570022000077926

[35] May V (2011) Self, belonging and social change. Sociology 45: 363-378. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038511399624

[36] Cuttell J (2015) Arguing for an immersive method: Reflexive meaning making, the visible researcher and moral responses to gameplay. J Comp Res Anthropol Sociol 6: 55-75. Available from: https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=289530.

[37] Herzog H (2005) On home turf: Interview location and its social meaning. Qual Sociol 28: 25-47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-005-2629-8

[38] Rubin HJ, Rubin IS (2011) Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data , Sage Publications.

[39] Cork City Council (2024) Services. Available from: https://www.corkcity.ie/en/council-services/services/.

[40] Back L (2012) Live sociology: Social research and its futures. Sociol Rev 60: 18-39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02115.x

[41] Law J, Urry J (2004) Enacting the social. Econ Soc 33: 390-410. https://doi.org/10.1080/0308514042000225716

[42] Gagnon M, Jacob JD, McCabe J (2015) Locating the qualitative interview: Reflecting on space and place in nursing research. J Res Nurs 20: 203-215. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987114536571

[43] Albanesi C (2014) Focus groups, In: Encyclopaedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research, Dordrecht: Springer, 2310-2313. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_1066

[44] Hartig T, Mitchell R, De Vries S, et al. (2014) Nature and health. Annu Rev Public Health 35: 207-228. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182443

[45] Kaplan S (1995) The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. J Environ Psychol 15: 169-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-4944(95)90001-2

[46] Barboza EP, Cirach M, Khomenko S, et al. (2021) Green space and mortality in European cities: A health impact assessment study. Lancet Planet Health 5: e718-e730. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(21)00229-1

[47] Addas A (2023) The importance of urban green spaces in the development of smart cities. Front Environ Sci 11: 1206372. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1206372

[48] Hassell and the Irish Institutional Property Group (2021) Close to home-exploring 15-minute urban living in Ireland (and beyond). Available from: htps://www.hassellstudio.com/research/close-to-home-exploring-the-15-minute-urban-living-in-ireland-and-beyond.

[49] European Commission (2023) EU Mission: Climate-neutral and smart cities. Available from: https://www.google.com/search?q=EC+cimate+smart+100+cities&oq=EC+cimate+smart+100+cities&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i64.6457j0j15&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8.

[50] UN Environment Programme (2021) Equitable future cities hold answers to pollution, climate and nature breakdown. Available from: https://www.unep.org/news-and-stories/press-release/equitable-future-cities-hold-answers-pollution-climate-and-nature.

[51] Nilsson A, Vanhuyse F, Arra V, et al. (2021) Citizen participation for sustainable cities. Available from: https://www.sei.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/factsheet-citizen-participation-for-sustainable-cities.pdf.