Wicked problems of early-COVID-19 response: A content analysis of public emergent norms

i

This article has been updated. A Correction to this article was published on .

i

The Original Article was published on

i

The Original Article was published on

i

This article has been updated

i

This article was retracted on

i

This article has been updated

Abstract

COVID-19 acted as a “Disease X”, challenging governments around the world in early 2020. Rightly or wrongly, a local government in China handled the pandemic response with great uncertainty, triggering immediate consequences. While the world has entered the post-COVID era, it is still unknown how residents perceived the governmental responses in aligning policies to the public needs under such a great level of uncertainty. This study reevaluated the public’s perception of the earliest Chinese government response to the COVID-19 pandemic using the interpretivist paradigm and content analysis. The qualitative and inductive research design used a snowball sampling method and collected 111 semi-structured questionnaire responses in February 2020. A framework of three themes, eight categories, and forty-five codes was developed from the findings, covering knowledge of the virus, information sources, information reliability, quarantine communication, quarantine support, needs during quarantine, improvement recommendations, and hopes and questions. Built from the lived experiences of the Chinese public during the first COVID-19 lockdowns, the posited framework encapsulated the public’s perception of the government’s response to this pandemic. To conclude, we drew three policy recommendations based on the three key themes to improve preparedness for future health crises and pandemics-disaster communication, integrated pandemic preparedness system, and hope and uncertainty. In particular, (1) a government-developed public information system can promote two-way communication and reduce information asymmetry; (2) an integrated system can better coordinate resource allocation; (3) the warning messages can correspond to the hope and positive feelings in the public norms.

Keywords

emergent norms / pandemic / government response / public perception / content analysis

CHANGE HISTORY

A Correction to this paper has been published:
https://doi.org

The Retraction Note was updated to reflect reception of statements of disagreement from all authors.

This article has been retracted.Please see the Retraction Notice for more detail:
https://doi.org

References

[1] Qiu W, Chu C, Mao A, et al. (2018) The impacts on health, society, and economy of SARS and H7N9 outbreaks in China: A case comparison study. J Environ Public Health 2018: 2710185. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2710185

[2] French PE (2011) Enhancing the legitimacy of local government pandemic influenza planning through transparency and public engagement. Public Adm Rev 71: 253-264. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02336.x

[3] Longstaff PH, Yang SU (2008) Communication management and trust: Their role in building resilience to “surprises” such as natural disasters, pandemic flu, and terrorism. Ecol Soc 13: 3. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/26267909.

[4] Sachs JD, Karim SSA, Aknin L, et al. (2022) The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic. Lancet 400: 1224-1280. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01585-9

[5] Chen W, Shi Y, Fan L, et al. (2021) Influencing factors of public satisfaction with covid-19 prevention services based on structural equation modeling (Sem): A study of Nanjing, China. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18: 13281. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182413281

[6] Bigo D, Guild E, Kuskonmaz EM (2021) Obedience in times of COVID-19 pandemics: a renewed governmentality of unease? Glob Discourse 11: 471-489. https://doi.org/10.1332/204378921X16158113910675

[7] Khosrawipour V, Lau H, Khosrawipour T, et al. (2020) A Failure in initial stage containment of global COVID‐19 epicenters. J Med Virol 92: 863-867. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.25883

[8] Kickbusch I (1999) Global + local = glocal public health. J Epidemiol Community Health 53: 451-452. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.53.8.451

[9] Unruh L, Allin S, Marchildon G, et al. (2022) A comparison of 2020 health policy responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada, Ireland, the United Kingdom and the United States of America. Health Policy 126: 427-437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.06.012

[10] Haldane V, De Foo C, Abdalla SM, et al. (2021) Health systems resilience in managing the COVID-19 pandemic: Lessons from 28 countries. Nat Med 27: 964-980. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-021-01381-y

[11] Habersaat KB, Betsch C, Danchin M, et al. (2020) Ten considerations for effectively managing the COVID-19 transition. Nat Hum Behav 4: 677-687. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0906-x

[12] Rittel HWJ, Webber MM (1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci 4: 155-169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730

[13] Conklin J (2005) Dialogue Mapping: Building Shared Understanding of Wicked Problems . Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.

[14] Marcel Karré P, van der Steen M, van Twist M (2011) Chapter 5 steering societal resilience: An empirical exploration of trends and challenges in government-citizen collaboration, In: Groeneveld, S., Van De Walle, S. Author, New Steering Concepts in Public Management (Research in Public Policy Analysis and Management) , Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 21: 57-70. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0732-1317(2011)0000021009

[15] Ferlie E, Fitzgerald L, McGivern G, et al. (2013) Wicked Problems Governable? The Case of Managed Networks in Health Care . Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

[16] Zhao T, Wu Z (2020) Citizen-state collaboration in combating COVID-19 in China: Experiences and lessons from the perspective of co-production. Am Rev Public Adm 50: 777-783. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074020942455

[17] SteelFisher GK, Blendon RJ, Ward JRM, et al. (2012) Public response to the 2009 influenza A H1N1 pandemic: A polling study in five countries. Lancet Infect Dis 12: 845-850. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(12)70206-2

[18] Marston C, Renedo A, Miles S (2020) Community participation is crucial in a pandemic. Lancet 395: 1676-1678. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31054-0

[19] Rosenfeld LA, Etkind P, Grasso A, et al. (2011) Extending the reach: Local health department collaboration with community pharmacies in Palm Beach County, Florida for H1N1 influenza pandemic response. J Public Health Manage Pract 17: 439-448. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0b013e31821138ae

[20] Newman J (2005) Bending bureaucracy: Leadership and multi-level governance, In: du Gay, P. Author, The Values of Bureaucracy, New York: Oxford University Press, 191-210. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199275458.003.0009

[21] Versluis E, Asselt M, Kim J (2019) The multilevel regulation of complex policy problems: uncertainty and the swine flu pandemic. Eur Policy Anal 5: 80-98. https://doi.org/10.1002/epa2.1064

[22] Frost M, Li R, Moolenaar R, et al. (2019) Progress in public health risk communication in China: Lessons learned from SARS to H7N9. BMC Public Health 19: 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6778-1

[23] Gao X, Yu J (2020) Public governance mechanism in the prevention and control of the COVID-19: Information, decision-making and execution. J Chin Governance 5: 178-197. https://doi.org/10.1080/23812346.2020.1744922

[24] Kunreuther H, Slovic P (1996) Science, values, and risk. Ann Am Acad Polit Soc Sci 545: 116-125. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716296545001012

[25] Lindell MK (2018) Communicating imminent risk, In: Rodríguez, H., Donner, W., Trainor, J.E. Author, Handbook of Disaster Research, Cham: Springer International Publishing, 449-477. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63254-4-22

[26] Norman P, Boer H, Seydel ER, et al. (2015) Protection motivation theory, In: Conner, M., Norman, P. Author, Predicting and Changing Health Behavior: Research and Practice with Social Cognition Models, Berkshire: Open University Press, 3: 70-106.

[27] Kurata YB, Prasetyo YT, Ong AKS, et al. (2022) Factors affecting perceived effectiveness of Typhoon Vamco (Ulysses) flood disaster response among Filipinos in Luzon, Philippines: An integration of protection motivation theory and extended theory of planned behavior. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 67: 102670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102670

[28] Tang JS, Feng JY (2018) Residents’ disaster preparedness after the Meinong Taiwan earthquake: A test of protection motivation theory. Int J Environ Res Public Health 15: 1434. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15071434

[29] Westcott R, Ronan K, Bambrick H, et al. (2017) Expanding protection motivation theory: Investigating an application to animal owners and emergency responders in bushfire emergencies. BMC Psychol 5: 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-017-0182-3

[30] Yoo CW, Lee J, Yoo C, et al. (2021) Coping behaviors in short message service (SMS)-based disaster alert systems: From the lens of protection motivation theory as elaboration likelihood. Inf Manage 58: 103454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2021.103454

[31] Schneider SK (1992) Governmental response to disasters: The conflict between bureaucratic procedures and emergent norms. Public Adm Rev 52: 135-145. https://doi.org/10.2307/976467

[32] National People’s Congress (2011) The first session of the 13th National People’s Congress . Available from: http://www.npc.gov.cn/zgrdw/npc/dbdhhy/13_1/index.htm.

[33] Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (2002). Available from: http://www.chinacdc.cn/jgxx/zxjj/.

[34] Li X, Huang J, Zhang H (2008) An analysis of hospital preparedness capacity for public health emergency in four regions of China: Beijing, Shandong, Guangxi, and Hainan. BMC Public Health 8: 319. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-8-319

[35] Sun M, Xu N, Li C, et al. (2018) The public health emergency management system in China: Trends from 2002 to 2012. BMC Public Health 18: 474. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5284-1

[36] Gong ZY, Lin JF, He F, et al. (2009) Discussion of public health emergency response after natural disasters. Chin J of Prev Med 43: 4-7. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-9624.2009.01.002

[37] Wang J, Yuan B, Li Z, et al. (2019) Evaluation of public health emergency management in China: A systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 16: 3478. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16183478

[38] Wang X, Zhang X, He J (2020) Challenges to the system of reserve medical supplies for public health emergencies: Reflections on the outbreak of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) epidemic in China. Biosci Trends 14: 3-8. https://doi.org/10.5582/bst.2020.01043

[39] Stephens KK, Jahn JLS, Fox S, et al. (2020) Collective sensemaking around COVID-19: Experiences, concerns, and agendas for our rapidly changing organizational lives. Manag Commun Q 34: 426-457. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318920934890

[40] Moon MJ (2020) Fighting against COVID‐19 with agility, transparency, and participation: Wicked policy problems and new governance challenges. Public Adm Rev 80: 651-656. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13214

[41] Gregor S (2006) The nature of theory in information systems. MIS Q 30: 611-642. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148742

[42] Bell E, Bryman A, Harley B (2019) Business Research Methods. UK: Oxford University Press.

[43] Nida EA, Taber CR (1974) The Theory and Practice of Translation . Netherlands: Brill Archive.

[44] Mayes BT, Finney TG, Johnson TW, et al. (2017) The effect of human resource practices on perceived organizational support in the People’s Republic of China. Int J Hum Resour Manage 28: 1261-1290. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2015.1114768

[45] Iqbal M (2024) WeChat revenue and usage statistics. Available from: https://www.businessofapps.com/data/wechat-statistics/.

[46] Silver C, Lewins A (2014) Using Software in Qualitative Research: A Step-by-Step Guide . London, UK: Sage.

[47] Maxwell JA (2012) Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach . Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage.

[48] Saunders B, Sim J, Kingstone T, et al. (2018) Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Qual Quant 52: 1893-1907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8

[49] McAleavy T, Dement C, Murphy H (2024) Inductive qualitative content analysis: From research design to presenting your findings, In: Cary, D.P. Author, Content Analysis: Methods and Practices, Nova Science Publishers, 1-30. Available from: https://novapublishers.com/shop/content-analysis-methods-and-practices/.

[50] Erlingsson C, Brysiewicz P (2017) A Hands-on guide to doing content analysis. Afr J Emerg Med 7: 93-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.afjem.2017.08.001

[51] Qiu W, Chu C, Hou X, et al. (2018) A comparison of China’s risk communication in response to SARS and H7N9 using principles drawn from international practice. Disaster Med Public Health Prep 12: 587-598. https://doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2017.114

[52] Di Gennaro F, Pizzol D, Marotta C, et al. (2020) Coronavirus diseases (COVID-19) current status and future perspectives: A narrative review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 17: 2690. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17082690

[53] Qi F, Hu L (2020) Including people with disability in the COVID-19 outbreak emergency preparedness and response in China. Disabil Soc 35: 848-853. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2020.1752622

[54] Tu F (2016) WeChat and civil society in China. Commun Public 1: 343-350. https://doi.org/10.1177/2057047316667518

[55] Zhang Z, Negro G (2013) Weibo in China: Understanding its development through communication analysis and cultural studies. Commun Polit Cult 46: 199-216. Available from: https://www.sci-hub.ee/10.3316/ielapa.533304086986808.

[56] Kimura AH (2018) Fukushima ETHOS: post-disaster risk communication, affect, and shifting risks. Sci Cult 27: 98-117. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2017.1325458

[57] What’s Needed Now to Protect Health Workers: WHO COVID-19 Briefing. Cologny, Switzerland: World Economic Forum, 2020. Available from: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/04/10-april-who-briefing-health-workers-covid-19-ppe-training/.

[58] Ng K, Poon BH, Kiat Puar TH, et al. (2020) COVID-19 and the risk to health care workers: A case report. Ann Intern Med 172: 766-767. https://doi.org/10.7326/L20-0175

[59] Lo D, De Angelis M (2020) COVID-19: Protecting health-care workers. Lancet 395: 922. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30645-0

[60] U.S. Department of Labor (2020) Healthcare workers and employers. Available from: https://www.osha.gov/SLTC/covid-19/healthcare-workers.html.