Development of a prognostic nomogram and genetic insights for prostate cancer patients with secondary primary malignancies: A SEER retrospective cohort study and Mendelian randomization analysis

Qi Zhang , Lufan Liang , Ziyu Liu , Ziyang Yang , Jiahao Cheng , Xuan Li , Yueting Huang , Weisi Chen , Jiazhen Yin , Ligong Chen , Zhang Cao , Di Gu

UroPrecision ›› 2025, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (4) : 236 -253.

PDF (2813KB)
UroPrecision ›› 2025, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (4) :236 -253. DOI: 10.1002/uro2.70017
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Development of a prognostic nomogram and genetic insights for prostate cancer patients with secondary primary malignancies: A SEER retrospective cohort study and Mendelian randomization analysis

Author information +
History +
PDF (2813KB)

Abstract

Background: Prostate cancer (PCa) patients are at risk of developing second primary malignancies (SPMs), which can significantly shorten their survival. Understanding the risk of SPMs and associated factors is crucial to the optimization of patient follow-up.

Methods: This study focuses on PCa patients who were later diagnosed with SPMs using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Variables were carefully selected, and the data were analyzed using machine learning techniques combined with multivariate Cox proportional hazards modeling. Subsequently, a nomogram was generated to predict the 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates for SPMs patients. Additionally, a two-sample Mendelian randomization (TSMR) analysis was conducted to investigate the causal relationships between PCa and its top ten SPMs.

Results: Among the variables, age, marital status, SPM site, M stage, American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage, PCa surgery, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels were identified as key prognostic factors through least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and backward stepwise regression. Based on these factors, a nomogram was developed to visually represent survival predictions, complemented by a web-based calculator for easy application. This nomogram, which serves as a supplement to traditional AJCC staging, demonstrated strong predictive power for 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival, with area under the curve (AUC) values exceeding 0.85. Additionally, TSMR analysis revealed a causal link between PCa and urothelial carcinoma (UC).

Conclusion: This study developed a nomogram for predicting survival in prostate cancer patients with secondary primary malignancies, enhancing prognosis accuracy. TSMR identified a causal link between PCa and UC.

Keywords

nomogram / prostate cancer (PCa) / second primary malignancies (SPMs) / SEER database / survival prediction / two-sample Mendelian randomization (TSMR)

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Qi Zhang, Lufan Liang, Ziyu Liu, Ziyang Yang, Jiahao Cheng, Xuan Li, Yueting Huang, Weisi Chen, Jiazhen Yin, Ligong Chen, Zhang Cao, Di Gu. Development of a prognostic nomogram and genetic insights for prostate cancer patients with secondary primary malignancies: A SEER retrospective cohort study and Mendelian randomization analysis. UroPrecision, 2025, 3(4): 236-253 DOI:10.1002/uro2.70017

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Sung H , Ferlay J , Siegel RL , Laversanne M , Soerjomataram I , Jemal A , et al. Global cancer statistics 2020:GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021; 71 (3): 209- 49.

[2]

Zheng X , Li X , Wang M , Shen J , Sisti G , He Z , et al. Second primary malignancies among cancer patients. Ann Transl Med. 2020; 8: 638.

[3]

Vogt A , Schmid S , Heinimann K , Frick H , Herrmann C , Cerny T , et al. Multiple primary tumours:challenges and approaches, a review. ESMO Open. 2017; 2: e000172.

[4]

Travis LB , Wahnefried WD , Allan JM , Wood ME , Ng AK . Aetiology, genetics and prevention of secondary neoplasms in adult cancer survivors. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2013; 10: 289- 301.

[5]

Chattopadhyay S , Zheng G , Hemminki O , Försti A , Sundquist K , Hemminki K . Prostate cancer survivors: risk and mortality in second primary cancers. Cancer Med. 2018; 7: 5752- 9.

[6]

Chen T , Fallah M , Jansen L , Castro FA , Krilavicuite A , Katalinic A , et al. Distribution and risk of the second discordant primary cancers combined after a specific first primary cancer in German and Swedish cancer registries. Cancer Lett. 2015; 369: 152- 66.

[7]

Keegan THM , Bleyer A , Rosenberg AS , Li Q , Goldfarb M . Second primary malignant neoplasms and survival in adolescent and young adult cancer survivors. JAMA Oncol. 2017; 3: 1554- 7.

[8]

Ghiasvand R , Green AC , Veierød MB , Robsahm TE . Incidence and factors associated with second primary invasive melanoma in Norway. JAMA Dermatol. 2024; 160: 402.

[9]

Yan Y , Liu H , Mao K , Zhang M , Zhou Q , Yu W , et al. Novel nomograms to predict lymph node metastasis and liver metastasis in patients with early colon carcinoma. J Transl Med. 2019; 17: 193.

[10]

Balachandran VP , Gonen M , Smith JJ , DeMatteo RP . Nomograms in oncology: more than meets the eye. Lancet Oncol. 2015; 16: e173- 80.

[11]

Zhang Y , Hong Y , Zhuang D , He X , Lin M . Bladder cancer survival nomogram:development and validation of a prediction tool, using the SEER and TCGA databases. Medicine. 2019; 98: e17725.

[12]

Wang C , Yang C , Wang W , Xia B , Li K , Sun F , et al. A prognostic nomogram for cervical cancer after surgery from SEER database. J Cancer. 2018; 9: 3923- 8.

[13]

Feng SS , Li H , Fan F , Li J , Cao H , Xia ZW , et al. Clinical characteristics and disease-specific prognostic nomogram for primary gliosarcoma: a SEER population-based analysis. Sci Rep. 2019; 9: 10744.

[14]

Ding Q , Wang K , Li Y , Peng P , Zhang D , Chang D , et al. Clinical characteristics and survival analysis of patients with second primary malignancies after hepatocellular carcinoma liver transplantation: a SEER-based analysis. Am J Clin Oncol. 2023; 46: 284- 92.

[15]

Deng R , Zhou J , Qiu J , Cai L , Gong K . Clinical characteristics analysis and prognostic nomogram for predicting survival in patients with second primary prostate cancer: a population study based on SEER database. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023; 149: 11791- 806.

[16]

Davey Smith G , Hemani G . Mendelian randomization:genetic anchors for causal inference in epidemiological studies. Hum Mol Gen. 2014; 23: R89- 98.

[17]

Skrivankova VW , Richmond RC , Woolf BAR , Davies NM , Swanson SA , VanderWeele TJ , et al. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology using Mendelian randomisation (STROBE-MR):explanation and elaboration. BMJ. 2021; 375: n2233.

[18]

Rashkin SR , Graff RE , Kachuri L , Thai KK , Alexeeff SE , Blatchins MA , et al. Pan-cancer study detects genetic risk variants and shared genetic basis in two large cohorts. Nat Commun. 2020; 11: 4423.

[19]

Warren S , Gates O . Multiple primary malignant tumors: a survey of the literature and statistical study. Am J Cancer. 1932; 16: 1358- 414.

[20]

Elliott M , et al. Regression methods in biostatistics:Linear, logistic, survival, and repeated measures models, Edited by Vittinghoff, E., Glidden, D. V., Shiboski, S. C., and Mcculloch, C. E. Biometrics. 2006; 62: 1271- 2.

[21]

Burgess S , Butterworth A , Thompson SG . Mendelian randomization analysis with multiple genetic variants using summarized data. Genet Epidemiol. 2013; 37: 658- 65.

[22]

Campbell , Jr. LV Multiple primary malignant neoplasms. Arch Surg. 1969; 99: 401- 5.

[23]

Sartor O , De Bono JS . Metastatic prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018; 378 (7): 645- 57.

[24]

Liu Y , Zhang P , Zhang Y , Zheng L , Xu W , Hou D , et al. Clinical characteristics and overall survival nomogram of second primary malignancies after prostate cancer, a SEER population-based study. Sci Rep. 2021; 11: 1293.

[25]

Lawlor DA , Tilling K , Davey Smith G . Triangulation in aetiological epidemiology. Int J Epidemiol. 2016; 45: 1866- 86.

[26]

Singh A , Kinoshita Y , Rovito Jr. PM , Landas S , Silberstein J , Nsouli I , et al. Higher than expected association of clinical prostate and bladder cancers. J Urol. 2008; 179: S2- 5.

[27]

Kirby RS , Lowe D , Bultitude MI , Shuttleworth KED . Intra-prostatic urinary reflux: an aetiological factor in abacterial prostatitis. Br J Urol. 1982; 54: 729- 31.

[28]

Platz EA , De Marzo AM . Epidemiology of inflammation and prostate cancer. J Urol. 2004; 171: S36- 40.

[29]

Shariat SF , Tokunaga H , Zhou J , Kim J , Ayala GE , Benedict WF , et al. p53, p21, pRB, and p16 expression predict clinical outcome in cystectomy with bladder cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2004; 22: 1014- 24.

[30]

Hopkinson NS . Smoking and lung cancer-70 long years on. BMJ. 2024; 384: q443.

[31]

Singal AG , Kanwal F , Llovet JM . Global trends in hepatocellular carcinoma epidemiology:implications for screening, prevention and therapy. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2023; 20: 864- 84.

[32]

Pu N , Li J , Xu Y , Lee W , Fang Y , Han X , et al. Comparison of prognostic prediction between nomogram based on lymph node ratio and AJCC 8th staging system for patients with resected pancreatic head carcinoma: a SEER analysis. Cancer Manag Res. 2018; 10: 227- 38.

[33]

Uno H , Tian L , Cai T , Kohane IS , Wei LJ . A unified inference procedure for a class of measures to assess improvement in risk prediction systems with survival data. Stat Med. 2013; 32: 2430- 42.

[34]

Pencina MJ , D'Agostino Sr. RB , Steyerberg EW . Extensions of net reclassification improvement calculations to measure usefulness of new biomarkers. Stat Med. 2011; 30: 11- 21.

[35]

Vickers AJ , Elkin EB . Decision curve analysis: a novel method for evaluating prediction models. Med Decis Making. 2006; 26: 565- 74.

[36]

Fitzgerald M , Saville BR , Lewis RJ . Decision curve analysis. JAMA. 2015; 313: 409- 10.

[37]

Droz JP , Albrand G , Gillessen S , Hughes S , Mottet N , Oudard S , et al. Management of prostate cancer in elderly patients: recommendations of a Task Force of the International Society of Geriatric Oncology. Eur Urol. 2017; 72: 521- 31.

[38]

Bergengren O , Pekala KR , Matsoukas K , Fainberg J , Mungovan SF , Bratt O , et al. 2022 update on prostate cancer epidemiology and risk factors-a systematic review. Eur Urol. 2023; 84: 191- 206.

[39]

Chen ZH , Yang KB , Zhang Y , Wu CF , Wen DW , Lv JW , et al. Assessment of modifiable factors for the association of marital status with cancer-specific survival. JAMA Netw Open. 2021; 4: e2111813.

[40]

Nam RK , Toi A , Klotz LH , Trachtenberg J , Jewett MAS , Appu S , et al. Assessing individual risk for prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007; 25: 3582- 8.

[41]

Stephenson AJ , Kattan MW , Eastham JA , Bianco Jr. FJ , Yossepowitch O , Vickers AJ , et al. Prostate cancer-specific mortality after radical prostatectomy for patients treated in the prostate-specific antigen era. J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27: 4300- 5.

[42]

Chabner BA , Roberts TG . Chemotherapy and the war on cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2005; 5: 65- 72.

[43]

Baumann M , Krause M , Overgaard J , Debus J , Bentzen SM , Daartz J , et al. Radiation oncology in the era of precision medicine. Nat Rev Cancer. 2016; 16: 234- 49.

[44]

Hellerstedt BA , Pienta KJ . The current state of hormonal therapy for prostate cancer. CA Cancer J Clin. 2002; 52: 154- 79.

[45]

Howlader NNA , Krapcho M , Garshell D , Miller D , Kosary F . SEER cancer statistics review, 1975-2017. Bethesda, MD:National Cancer Institute.

[46]

Duggan MA , Anderson WF , Altekruse S , Penberthy L , Sherman ME . The surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) program and pathology: toward strengthening the critical relationship. Am J Surg Pathol. 2016; 40 (12): e94- e102.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s). UroPrecision published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Higher Education Press.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (2813KB)

30

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/