Late chordee correction after tubularized incised plate repair for proximal hypospadias: An underreported problem

Abstract

Background: Repair of proximal hypospadias remains a challenge with no consensus on the best surgical approach. Several reports have shown recurrence of chordee after plate‐preserving techniques. In this report, we present our experience in managing cases who presented with persistent/recurrence of chordee after tubularized incised plate (TIP) repair for proximal hypospadias.

Methods: Between 2015 and 2023, the study included eight patients who presented with ventral penile curvature after previous hypospadias repair in infancy (TIP urethroplasty). Reoperation to correct persistent ventral curvature was performed several years after the primary TIP repair (3–15 years; mean 7.9 years; median 7.5 years). The reoperation was a two‐stage procedure: the first stage comprised transection of the urethra and grafting (lower lip mucosal graft); the second stage (6 months later) was a Thiersch‐Duplay urethroplasty.

Results: Complications included poor taking of the graft after the first stage in one case (12.5%), which was regrafted using buccal (cheek) mucosa. Complications after second stage included urethro‐cutaneous fistulae in five (62.5%) that were successfully surgically treated at a later stage. Follow‐up after second stage ranged between 6 months and 7 years (mean 2.4 years; median 1 year). Satisfaction with reoperation to correct penile curvature was noted by parents as well as older children (adolescents) who appreciated better cosmesis by increasing ventral penile length and improved curvature.

Conclusion: Preservation of the urethral plate in proximal hypospadias may result in shortened penile length, mostly on the ventral aspect. A two‐stage reoperation to increase the length of the penile urethra can successfully reverse this complication.

Keywords

complications / hypospadias / proximal / severe / ventral curvature

References

[1] Snodgrass W . Tubularized incised plate urethroplasty for distal hypospadias. J Urol. 1994; 151: 464- 5.

[2] Baskin LS , Ebbers MB . Hypospadias: anatomy, etiology, and technique. J Pediatr Surg. 2006; 41: 463- 72.

[3] Snodgrass W , Yucel S . Tubularized incised plate for mid shaft and proximal hypospadias repair. J Urol. 2007; 177: 698- 702.

[4] Bhat A . Extended urethral mobilization in incised plate urethroplasty for severe hypospadias: a variation in technique to improve chordee correction. J Urol. 2007; 178: 1031- 5.

[5] Pippi Salle JL , Sayed S , Salle A , Bagli D , Farhat W , Koyle M , et al. Proximal hypospadias: a persistent challenge. Single institution outcome analysis of three surgical techniques over a 10‐year period. J Pediatr Urol. 2016; 12: 28.e1- 28.e7.

[6] Long CJ , Chu DI , Tenney RW , Morris AR , Weiss DA , Shukla AR , et al. Intermediate-term follow up of proximal hypospadias repair reveals high complication rate. J Urol. 2017; 197: 852- 8.

[7] Springer A , Krois W , Horcher E . Trends in hypospadias surgery: results of a worldwide survey. Eur Urol. 2011; 60: 1184- 9.

[8] Baskin LS , Duckett JW , Ueoka K , Seibold J , Snyder HM . Changing concepts of hypospadias curvature lead to more onlay island flap procedures. J Urol. 1994; 151: 191- 6.

[9] AbouZeid AA . Modified Byars’ flaps for securing skin closure in proximal and mid-penile hypospadias. Ther Adv Urol. 2011; 3 (6): 251- 6.

[10] AbouZeid A . Tubularized incised plate urethroplasty for primary hypospadias repair: versatility versus limitations. J Genital Surg. 2017; 1: 1- 9.

[11] Castagnetti M , El-Ghoneimi A . Surgical management of primary severe hypospadias in children: systematic 20-year review. J Urol. 2010; 184: 1469- 75.

[12] Cloutier AM . A method for hypospadias repair. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1962; 30: 368- 73.

[13] Nicolle FV . Improved repairs in 100 cases of penile hypospadias. Br J Plast Surg. 1976; 29: 150- 7.

[14] Bracka A . Hypospadias repair: the two‐stage alternative. Br J Urol. 1995; 76 (Suppl 3): 31- 41.

[15] Castagnettu M , Zhapa E , Rigamonti W . Primary severe hypospadias: comparison of reoperation rates and parental perception of urinary symptoms and cosmetic outcomes among 4 repairs. J Urol. 2012; 189: 1508- 13.

[16] Grosos C , Bensaid R , Gorduza DB , Mouriquand P . Is it safe to solely use ventral penile tissues in hypospadias repair? Longterm outcomes of 578 Duplay urethroplasties performed in a single institution over a period of 14 years. J Pediatr Urol. 2014; 10: 1232- 7.

[17] Long CJ , Canning DA . Hypospadias: Are we as good as we think when we correct proximal hypospadias? J Pediatr Urol. 2016; 12: 196.e1- 196.e5.

[18] Wali IM , AbouZeid AA , Radwan NA , GadAllah MAS , Ghanem WA , El-Naggar O . Preoperative topical testosterone for penile hypospadias repair ‘a comparative study’. Ann Pediatr Surg. 2020; 16: 38.

[19] Winship BB , Rushton HG , Pohl HG . In pursuit of the perfect penis: hypospadias repair outcomes. J Pediatr Urol. 2017; 13: 285- 8.

[20] AbouZeid AA , Medhat Shahin AE , Elsadek M , Dahab MM , Amra HS , Shokry SS . Urethral plate substitution in two-stage hypospadias repair: grafts versus flaps. J Pediatr Surg. 2023; 58: 2027- 33.

[21] Babu R , Chandrasekharam VVS . A meta-analysis comparing dorsal plication and ventral lengthening for chordee correction during primary proximal hypospadias repair. Pediatr Surg Int. 2022; 38: 389- 98.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 2024 The Author(s). UroPrecision published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Higher Education Press.