Large-scale shaking table tests on seismic mitigation effect of a novel flexible joint and buffer layer on TBM pipeline tunnels

Abstract

In high-intensity earthquake zones, seismic mitigation for pipeline tunnels passing through soft-hard strata is of importance to the safe operation of pipeline systems. This study proposed a combined seismic mitigation approach integrating novel flexible joints and buffer layers for tunnel boring machine (TBM) pipeline tunnels. Large-scale (1∶5) shaking table tests were conducted to simulate TBM pipeline tunnels passing through soft-hard strata, with realistic modeling of bolt-connected segmental structures and consideration of buried pipelines within tunnels. Dynamic response and failure mechanism investigation verified the efficacy of the proposed mitigation measures. Test results indicated that the buffer layer effectively reduced peak acceleration and high-frequency components in the Fourier spectrum of the tunnel, while promoting greater consistency in its dynamic responses in soft and hard rocks. The novel flexible joints demonstrated superior deformability to adapt to forced displacements induced by soft-hard strata, thereby alleviating deformation in conventional circumferential joints near the interface. The combined measures reduced the maximum bolt axial forces of the tunnel under seismic motion, with reduction rates ranging from 14.47% to 23.71% in the soft rock and 11.91% to 23.08% in the hard rock. The peak ground acceleration (PGA) threshold for tensile strain of the tunnel exceeding failure limits increased from 0.4g to 0.8g. Furthermore, seismic damage was substantially mitigated or eliminated, including backfill cracking, bolt hole fractures, concrete spalling, and segment dislocation. Although pipeline strains exhibited an increasing trend due to the flexible joint deformation compared to the unmitigated case, measured strains remained well below allowable limits, confirming ample safety margins for the tunnel-protected pipeline system.

Keywords

TBM pipeline tunnel / Soft-hard strata / Seismic mitigation / Novel flexible joint / Buffer layer / Shaking table test

References

[1] Chen, Z. Y., Liang, S. B., Shen, H., & He, C. (2018). Dynamic centrifuge tests on effects of isolation layer and cross-section dimensions on shield tunnels. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 109, 173-187.

[2] Cui, G. Y., & Ma, J. F. (2021). Shaking table test on the seismic response of the portal section in soft and hard rock junction. Science Progress, 104.

[3] Ding, X. M., Feng, L., Wang, C. L., Chen, Z. X., & Han, L. (2020). Shaking table tests of the seismic response of a utility tunnel with a joint connection. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 133, 106133.

[4] Du, X. L., Han, J. Y., & Li, L. Y. (2013). Selection of shaking table test similarity relations for long-distance buried pipeline. Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Engineering, 33, 246-252.

[5] Fan, K. X., Shen, Y. S., Wang, S. S., Gao, B., Zheng, Q., Yan, G. M., & Min, P. (2020). Dynamic Response of Composite Lining Tunnel with Buffer Layer: An Analytical and Experimental Investigation. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2020, 5453138.

[6] Han, L., Liu, H. L., Zhang, W. A., Ding, X. M., Chen, Z. X., Feng, L., & Wang, Z. Y. (2022). Seismic behaviors of utility tunnel-soil system: With and without joint connections. Underground Space, 7, 798-811.

[7] Hong, J. L., Huang, X. Y., Lu, J. H., Luo, J. J., & Zhou, F. L. (2025a). Study on seismic response of a large-scale shield tunnel with an innovative loading device based on shaking table test. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 188, 109054.

[8] Hong, J. L., Luo, J. J., Huang, X. Y., Lu, J. H., Liu, Y. H., & Zhou, F. L. (2025b). Shaking table test of a large-scale shield tunnel based on an innovative loading device: Theory and validation. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 54, 1698-1716.

[9] Huang, D. L., Zong, Z. L., Tang, A. P., Huang, Z. Y., & Liu, Q. (2022). Dynamic response and vibration isolation of pipes inside a utility tunnel passing through nonhomogeneous soil under seismic action. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 163, 107522.

[10] Li, J., Chen, J. Y., Xu, Q., & Zheng, Y. (2016). Study on influencing factors of nonlinear failure model test on shaking table. Journal of Vibration, Measurement and Diagnosis, 36(1), 62-67+197-198 (in Chinese).

[11] Li, S. M., Cudmani, R., Xiao, M. Q., Guo, Z. M., & Yuan, Y. (2023a). Ground motion amplification pattern with TBM tunnels crossing soil-rock interface: Shaking table test. Underground Space, 12, 202-217.

[12] Li, S. M., Yuan, Y., Yu, H. T., Zhang, J. H., & Cudmani, R. (2023b). Shaking table test on a segmental tunnel crossing soil-rock interface under transverse sinusoidal excitations. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 140, 105325.

[13] Liang, J. W., Xu, A. Q., Ba, Z. N., Chen, R. D., Zhang, W., & Liu, M. G. (2021). Shaking table test and numerical simulation on ultra-large diameter shield tunnel passing through soft-hard stratum. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 147, 106790.

[14] Liang, J. W., Xu, A. Q., Ba, Z. N., Wu, Z. Q., Yan, Q. C., & Zhu, Y. T. (2023). Seismic response of ultra-large diameter shield tunnel in upper-soft and lower-hard site: Shaking table tests and numerical simulations. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 164, 107634.

[15] Ma, X., Wang, F. M., Guo, C. C., Zhang, J. C., Chu, X. X., & Yang, M. (2023). Dynamic centrifuge test of shield tunnels with non-water reacting two-component polymer buffer layer. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 139, 105116.

[16] General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China (AQSIQ), & Standardization Administration of the People’s Republic of China (SAC) (2016). GB/T 1222-2016: Spring steels. Beijing: Standards Press of China (in Chinese).

[17] Psyrras, N., Kwon, O., Gerasimidis, S., & Sextos, A . (2019). Can a buried gas pipeline experience local buckling during earthquake ground shaking? Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 116, 511-529.

[18] Shahidi, A. R., & Vafaeian, M. (2005). Analysis of longitudinal profile of the tunnels in the active faulted zone and designing the flexible lining (for Koohrang-III tunnel). Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 20, 213-221.

[19] Shen, Y. S., Luo, Y., Huang, H. F., Liu, J., Zuo, L. B., & Wang, H. K. (2025). Shaking table test on pipeline tunnel with straight walls crossing soft-hard strata under strong earthquake action. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 196, 109454.

[20] Shen, Y. S., Wang, Z. Z., Yu, J., Zhang, X., & Gao, B. (2020). Shaking table test on flexible joints of mountain tunnels passing through normal fault. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 98, 103299.

[21] Shi, J. W., Chen, Y. H., Kong, G. Q., Lu, H., Chen, G., & Shi, C. (2024a). Deformation mechanisms of an existing pipeline due to progressively passive instability of tunnel face: Physical and numerical investigations. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 150, 105822.

[22] Shi, J. W., Zhong, X. C., Lu, H., Ni, X. D., & Shi, C. (2024b). Influence of joint stiffness on three-dimensional deformation mechanisms of pipelines under tunnel active face instability. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 62, 1-18.

[23] Song, S. S., Shen, Y. S., Yu, Y. L., Li, C., Zeng, J. L., Yang, C. L., & Liu, T. (2026). Shaking table test on seismic response and failure characteristics of buried pipeline-tunnel structure crossing fault fracture zone. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 167, 107006.

[24] Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China (MOHURD), & General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China (AQSIQ) (2017). GB/T 50470-2017: Seismic technical code for oil and gas transmission pipeline engineering. Beijing: China Planning Publishing House (in Chinese).

[25] Wang, D. Y., Yuan, J. X., Cui, G. Y., Liu, J., & Wang, H. F. (2020). Experimental Study on Characteristics of Seismic Damage and Damping Technology of Absorbing Joint of Tunnel Crossing Interface of Soft and Hard Rock. Shock and Vibration, 2020.

[26] Wang, S. M., Ma, X. B., Wang, Y., & Liu, C. (2025). Research on the prestress Regulation of double-layer lining of shield water tunnel under high internal water pressure. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 155, 106133.

[27] Xin, C. L., Wang, Z., Hajirasouliha, I., Yang, F., Li, W. H., Chen, T., & Gao, B. (2022). Seismic response mechanisms of casing-shape composite tunnel lining: Theoretical analysis and shaking table test verification. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 162, 107440.

[28] Yan, G. M., & Zhao, B. M. (2022). Analytical solution and shaking table test on tunnels through soft-hard stratum with a transition tunnel and flexible joints. Applied Sciences-Basel, 12, 3151.

[29] Zhang, X., Shen, Y. S., Qiu, J. T., Chang, M. Y., Zhou, P. F., Huang, H. F., & Zhu, P. L. (2024). Failure and deformation mode for soil and tunnel structure crossing multiple slip surfaces of strike-slip fault in model test. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 179, 108541.

[30] Zhao, X., Li, R. H., Yuan, Y., Yu, H. T., Zhao, M., & Huang, J. Q. (2022). Shaking table tests on fault-crossing tunnels and aseismic effect of grouting. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 125, 104511.

[31] Zhou, G. X., Sheng, Q., Zhang, C. J., Yan, T. Y., Cui, Z., Li, J. H., & Wang, T. Q. (2022). Study on action mechanism of anti-dislocation design parameters of a tunnel with flexible joint crossing strike-slip faults. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 41, 941-953 (in Chinese).

[32] Zhou, H. Z., Liu, S. A., Li, B., Chen, W. Y., Su, L., Zheng, J. J., & Zheng, Y. W. (2023). Analytical solution for longitudinal seismic response of immersed tunnel connecting artificial islands crossing different strata. Computers and Geotechnics, 164, 105836.