Comparative study on dynamic response and probabilistic seismic fragility of underground caverns under near-fault and far-field mainshock–aftershock sequences

Pengfei Chen , Quan Jiang , Yong Xia , Zhijun Liu , Long Li

Underground Space ›› 2026, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (2) : 236 -258.

PDF (7700KB)
Underground Space ›› 2026, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (2) :236 -258. DOI: 10.1016/j.undsp.2025.11.002
Research Paper
research-article
Comparative study on dynamic response and probabilistic seismic fragility of underground caverns under near-fault and far-field mainshock–aftershock sequences
Author information +
History +
PDF (7700KB)

Abstract

Actual seismic events typically exhibit mainshock–aftershock sequence characteristics, and source characteristics have a significant impact on cavern response. Currently, the influence of near-fault mainshock–aftershock sequences (NFMA) and far-field mainshock–aftershock sequences (FFMA) on underground caverns is generally ignored. This study aims to establish a framework for evaluating the dynamic response characteristics and seismic fragility of large-scale underground caverns under NFMA/FFMA. The response laws of residual displacement and rock fracture degree of cavern under NFMA/FFMA are comparatively studied, and the failure probability of different damage states is quantified by the fragility function. The results show that the surrounding rock of underground caverns exhibits significant cumulative damage effects and non-uniform failure characteristics under mainshock–aftershock sequences. Aftershock fragility is strongly related to the mainshock-damaged state for underground caverns. The collapse probability of underground caverns after 0.9g aftershocks in NFMA increased from 0.76% in slight damage to 21.12% in moderate damage and 53.51% in severe damage. This study can provide a probabilistic basis for seismic design, aftershock risk warning, and post-earthquake emergency assessment in underground engineering.

Keywords

Near-fault ground motion / Far-field ground motion / Mainshock–aftershock sequence / Rock fracture degree / Cumulative damage / Fragility analysis

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Pengfei Chen, Quan Jiang, Yong Xia, Zhijun Liu, Long Li. Comparative study on dynamic response and probabilistic seismic fragility of underground caverns under near-fault and far-field mainshock–aftershock sequences. Underground Space, 2026, 27 (2) : 236-258 DOI:10.1016/j.undsp.2025.11.002

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

An, X. H., Shawky, A. A., & Meaekawa, K. (1997). The collapse mechanism of a subway station during the great hanshin earthquake. Cement and Concrete Composites, 19(3), 241-257.

[2]

Antoniou, M., Mantakas, A., Nikitas, N., & Fuentes, R. (2023). A numerical case study on the long-term seismic assessment of reinforced concrete tunnels in corrosive environments. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 15(3), 551-572.

[3]

Bath, M . (1965). Lateral inhomogeneities of the upper mantle.pdf. Tectonophysics, 2(6), 483-514.

[4]

Bigdeli, A., Vosoughi, S., Tsavdaridis, K. D., Eslamnia, H., & Farajian, M. (2025). Seismic risk assessment of steel volumetric modular buildings under the mainshock-aftershock ground motions. Structures, 76, 108960.

[5]

Chen, P. F., Jiang, Q., Liu, J., Li, S. J., Chen, T., & He, B. G. (2024). Global stability coefficient of large underground caverns under static loading and earthquake wave condition. Journal of Central South University, 31(8), 2826-2843.

[6]

Chen, P. F., Jiang, Q., Xiang, T. B., Xia, Y., & Hou, D. Q. (2025). Seismic impact of mainshock-aftershock sequences on underground caverns: A case study of dynamic response. Engineering Failure Analysis, 167, 109072.

[7]

Chen, P. L., Geng, P., Chen, J. B., & Gu, W. Q. (2023). The seismic damage mechanism of Daliang tunnel by fault dislocation during the 2022 Menyuan Ms6.9 earthquake based on unidirectional velocity pulse input. Engineering Failure Analysis, 145, 107047.

[8]

Cui, C. Y., Xu, M. Z., Xu, C. S., Zhang, P., & Zhao, J. T. (2023). An ontology-based probabilistic framework for comprehensive seismic risk evaluation of subway stations by combining Monte Carlo simulation. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 135, 105055.

[9]

Cui, C. Y., Zhao, J. T., Xu, M. Z., Xu, C. S., Liu, H. L., & Wang, K. P. (2025). Multidimensional seismic fragility analysis of subway station structures using the adaptive bandwidth kernel density estimation and Copula function. Underground Space, 22, 110-123.

[10]

Feng, X. T., Yang, C. X., Kong, R., Zhao, J., Zhou, Y. Y., Yao, Z. B., et al. (2022). Excavation-induced deep hard rock fracturing: Methodology and applications. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 14(1), 1-34.

[11]

Fu, J., Chen, Y. G., Nie, Q. X., Lv, Z. P., & Li, J. W. (2025). Source modeling of the 2023 Herat earthquake sequence determined from InSAR observations. Geodesy and Geodynamics, 16(5), 624-634.

[12]

Guo, Z. K., Han, J. Y., El Naggar, M. H., Bi, Y. S., Xu, C. S., & Du, X. L. (2024). Vector-valued fragility analysis of subway station structures subjected to the Kahramanmaras earthquake. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 182, 108739.

[13]

Huang, Z. K., Zhang, D. M., Zhang, W. Y., & Li, Y. B. (2025). Impact of ground motion characteristics on the seismic fragility of circular tunnels. Underground Space, 24, 180-196.

[14]

Jaramillo, C. A. (2017). Impact of seismic design on tunnels in rock - Case histories. Underground Space, 2(2), 106-114.

[15]

Jiang, Q., Feng, X. T., Li, S. J., Su, G. S., & Xiao, Y. X. (2019). Cracking-restraint design method for large underground caverns with hard rock under high geostress condition and its practical application. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 38(6), 1081-1101.

[16]

Jiang, Q., Yang, Y., Yan, F., Zhou, J. B., Li, S. J., Yang, B., et al. (2021). Deformation and failure behaviours of rock-concrete interfaces with natural morphology under shear testing. Construction and Building Materials, 293, 123468.

[17]

Liu, C. X., Zhang, F. S., Wang, Q., Wang, B., Zhang, Q., & Xu, B. (2023). Evaluation of fault stability and seismic potential for Hutubi underground gas storage due to seasonal injection and extraction. Underground Space, 13, 74-85.

[18]

Liu, J. C., Meng, X. R., Tian, L., Yang, M., Jin, Q. T., & Shao, G. D. (2024). Multi-metric evaluation of the optimal intensity measure for mainshock-aftershock fragility analysis of transmission towers. Engineering Structures, 308, 118020.

[19]

Liu, Q., Zhang, X. W., Jiang, Q., Xia, Y., Hou, D. Q., & Li, L. (2025). Effects of nano-Al2O3 nano-MgO and nano-Fe2O3 on the properties of cement-based 3D printing: A comparative study . Journal of Building Engineering, 111, 113322.

[20]

Lozos, J. C., & Harris, R. A. (2020). Dynamic rupture simulations of the M6.4 and M7.1 July 2019 ridgecrest, California, Earthquakes. Geophysical Research Letters, 47(7).

[21]

Lv, T., Li, H. B., Yang, J. H., Zhou, Q. Q., & Li, J. R. (2009). Comparison between 2D and 3D numerical analysis for seismic response of Xiluodu underground caverns. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 30(3), 7211-7729 (in Chinese).

[22]

Ma, X., Chen, D. D., Xie, S. R., Zou, J., Wu, H. D., Sun, A. G., et al. (2025). Failure mechanism of severe deformation in gob-side entry rib and unloading-supporting coupling control technology. Engineering Failure Analysis, 167, 108973.

[23]

Meng, S. B., Li, W. X., Liu, Z. X., Liu, J. Q., He, W. G., Yang, C. W., et al. (2024). Rapid resilience assessment framework for mountain tunnels subjected to near-fault seismic ground motions. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 182, 108746.

[24]

Nouri, G., Rayegani, A., Lavasani, H. H., Tavakoli, L., Nasiri, M., & Soureshjani, O. K. (2023). Seismic performance of the RBS connection with trapezoidal corrugated web (TCW-RBS). Structures, 56, 105003.

[25]

Pu, W. C., & Li, Y. H. (2023). Evaluating structural failure probability during aftershocks based on spatiotemporal simulation of the regional earthquake sequence. Engineering Structures, 275, 115267.

[26]

Qiu, D. P., Chen, J. Y., & Xu, Q. (2019). 3-D numerical analysis on seismic responses of the underground large scale frame structure under near-fault ground motions. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 91, 103020.

[27]

Rayegani, A., Soureshjani, O. K., Alaee, S. A. M., Mualla, I. H., & Nemati, F. (2024). Seismic performance of buildings equipped with four-joint rotational friction dampers in mainshock-aftershock sequences. Journal of Structural Engineering, 150(3), 04023235.

[28]

Sasmi, A. T., Nugraha, A. D., Muzli, M., Widiyantoro, S., Syuhada, S., Muttaqy, F., et al. (2023). Shear wave splitting of the 2018 lombok earthquake aftershock area. Indonesia. Geoscience Letters, 10(1).

[29]

Shen, Y. S., Gao, B., Yang, X. M., & Tao, S. J. (2014). Seismic damage mechanism and dynamic deformation characteristic analysis of mountain tunnel after Wenchuan earthquake. Engineering Geology, 180, 85-98.

[30]

Shimizu, M., Suzuki, T., Kato, S., Kojima, Y., Yashiro, K., & Asakura, T. (2007). Historical earthquake damage to tunnels in Japan and case studies of railway tunnels in the 2004 Niigataken-Chuetsu earthquake. Quarterly Report of RTRI, 48(3), 136-141.

[31]

Soureshjani, O. K., & Lavassani, S. H. H. (2023). Performance of tuned particle impact damper and tuned mass damper seismic control systems considering mainshock-aftershock. Structures, 56, 104924.

[32]

Soureshjani, O. K., & Massumi, A. (2019). Effect of near and far-field earthquakes on RC bridge with and without damper. Earthquakes and Structures, 17(6), 533-543.

[33]

Stewart, J. P., Chiou, S. J., Bray, J. D., Graves, R. W., Somerville, P. G., & Abrahamson, N. A. (2002). Ground motion evaluation procedures for performance-based design. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 22(9/10/11/12), 765-772.

[34]

Sun, B. B., Zhang, S. R., Deng, M. J., & Wang, C. (2020). Nonlinear dynamic analysis and damage evaluation of hydraulic arched tunnels under mainshock-aftershock ground motion sequences. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 98, 103321.

[35]

Sun, R. F., Xu, H., Yan, Q. X., Yang, K., & Zhang, C. (2024). Effects of seismic buffer thickness on a circular rock tunnel considering seismic damage form and failure state. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 183, 105892.

[36]

Wang, Z. Z., Gao, B., Jiang, Y. J., & Yuan, S. (2009). Investigation and assessment on mountain tunnels and geotechnical damage after the Wenchuan earthquake. Science in China Series E: Technological Sciences, 52(2), 546-558.

[37]

Xu, M. Z., Cui, C. Y., Zhao, J. T., Xu, C. S., & Meng, K. (2025). A novel approach to seismic fragility evaluation of underground structures considering hybrid epistemic uncertainties of both seismic demand and capacity. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 156, 106278.

[38]

Xu, M. Z., Cui, C. Y., Zhao, J. T., Xu, C. S., Zhang, P., & Su, J. (2024). Fuzzy seismic fragility analysis of underground structures considering multiple failure criteria. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 145, 105614.

[39]

Xue, Y. D., Zhang, S., Zhou, M. L., & Zhu, H. H. (2021). Novel SfM-DLT method for metro tunnel 3D reconstruction and Visualization. Underground Space, 6(2), 134-141.

[40]

Yu, H., & Chen, G. (2021). Pseudo-static simplified analytical solution for seismic response of deep tunnels with arbitrary cross-section shapes. Computers and Geotechnics, 137, 104306.

[41]

Zhang, L. X., Zhu, B. J., Xue, Y. Q., & Ma, J. L. (2019). Cumulative damage effects of mainshock-aftershock sequences on RC-frame structures. Earthquake Science, 32(3/4), 157-169.

[42]

Zhao, D. P., & Liu, X. (2016). Crack mystery of the damaging Kumamoto earthquakes. Science Bulletin, 61(11), 868-870.

[43]

Zhu, R. Z., Guo, T., Xu, G., Zhang, R. J., & Tesfamariam, S. (2025). XGBoost-based probabilistic residual displacement demand prediction for self-centering viscous systems under near-fault ground motions. Journal of Building Engineering, 111, 113572.

PDF (7700KB)

13

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/