Numerical simulation on progressive leakage in shield tunnel and corresponding mitigation

Abstract

Leakage disasters in shield tunnels frequently occur, leading to severe consequences such as tunnel collapse, road collapse, and building destruction. Since it is difficult to record the accident evolution process onsite, it is necessary to reproduce it through credible numerical simulations. However, traditional numerical methods face technical bottlenecks when simulating water–sand inrush in shield tunnels due to challenges such as large deformation analysis and fluid–structure coupling, making it difficult to simulate the process of disaster progression. To address this issue, a Coupled Eulerian–Lagrangian (CEL) method incorporating seepage analysis, referred to as the S-CEL method, was proposed to simulate the interaction between water, soil, and a shield tunnel during a disaster. A refined three-dimensional numerical model was developed using the S-CEL method to simulate the water–sand inrush process. The generation sequence of new leakage points at the segment joints and the mechanisms driving the progression of the disaster were revealed. New leakage points were progressively generated along the longitudinal direction of the tunnel. As the number of leakage rings increased, the amount of soil loss increased rapidly. This led to severe uneven settlement and dislocation deformation of the tunnel. A channel steel was introduced to reinforce the tunnel in the numerical simulation to mitigate or decelerate the progression of the leakage disaster. The connection method between the channel steel and tunnel segments was found to be pivotal to the strengthening effect. Employing only bolt anchoring showed limited efficacy, while enhancing the segment-steel interface with epoxy resin achieved much better performance in mitigating disaster progression.

Keywords

Leakage disaster / Water-sand inrush / Seepage Coupled Eulerian–Lagrangian (S-CEL) / Shield tunnel / Channel steel / Reinforcement / Epoxy resin

References

[1] Angang Steel Company Limited (2018). Administration of Quality Supervision Inspection and Quarantine. GB/T 1591-2018: High strength low alloy structural steels. Standard Press of China, Beijing, China (in Chinese).

[2] Bai, Y., Hu, X. D., & Xiao, X. C. (2019). Major underground engineering accidents at home and abroad and repair technology (2nd ed.). China Architecture & Building Press (in Chinese).

[3] Cui, Q., Zhang, L. L., Chen, X. Y., Cao, Z. J., Wei, X., Zhang, J., Xu, J. B., Liu, D. S., & Du, C. L. (2022). Quantitative risk assessment of landslides with direct simulation of pre-failure to post-failure behaviors. Acta Geotechnica, 17(10), 4497-4514.

[4] Guan, F., Wei, D. Q., Lei, J. S., Shi, Y. F., & Cao, C. W. (2022). Experimental study on lining response of metro shield tunnel under the influence of ground cavity. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 19(2), 461-469 (in Chinese).

[5] Huang, L. C., Ma, J. J., Lei, M. F., Liu, L. H., Lin, Y. X., & Zhang, Z. Y. (2020). Soil-water inrush induced shield tunnel lining damage and its stabilization: A case study. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 97, 103290.

[6] Investigation Committee (2018). Investigation report on "2.7" water leakage and ground collapse major accident in Project I of Foshan Metro Line 2 in Guangdong, the people’s Government of Guangdong Province of China (in Chinese).

[7] Kim, D. (2021). Large deformation finite element analyses in TBM tunnel excavation: CEL and auto-remeshing approach. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 116, 104081.

[8] Li, Z., Liu, X. Z., Lai, H. R., Yang, Z. L., & Wang, B. Z. (2023). Detailed damage mechanism of deformed shield tunnel linings reinforced by steel plates. Engineering Failure Analysis, 143, 106850.

[9] Lin, Z. J., Liu, S. M., & Wang, J. C. (2020). Longitudinal reinforcement effect of shield tunnel segments in soft soil. Journal of Ground Improvement, 2(6), 478-482.

[10] Liu, X., & Sun, Q. H. (2020). Case analysis on progressive collapse of shield tunnel linings. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2(2), 21-30 (in Chinese).

[11] Liu, X., Bai, Y., Yuan, Y., & Mang, H. A. (2016). Experimental investigation of the ultimate bearing capacity of continuously jointed segmental tunnel linings. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 12(10), 1364-1379.

[12] Liu, X., Hong, J. Y., & Liu, Z. (2025). Investigations on mechanical behavior of longitudinal joints in segmental tunnel linings reinforced with epoxy bonded-bolted steel plates. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 163, 106724.

[13] Liu, Y., Zhang, D. M., & Huang, H. M. (2013). Influence of long-term partial drainage of shield tunnel on tunnel deformation and surface settlement. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 34(1), 290-298.

[14] Masteel (Group) Holding Co., Ltd. (2016). GB/T 706-2016: Hot rolled section steel. Standard Press of China, Beijing, China (in Chinese).

[15] Meguid, M. A., & Dang, H. K. (2009). The effect of erosion voids on existing tunnel linings. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 24(3), 278-286.

[16] Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China . (2011). GB 50010-2010: Code for design of concrete structures. China Building Industry Press, Beijing, China (in Chinese).

[17] Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China . (2013). GB 50911-2013: Code for monitoring measurement of urban rail transit engineering. China Architecture & Building Press, Beijing, China. (in Chinese).

[18] Sun, Y. Z., Yu, Y., Wang, J. C., Ye, Y. L., & Tan, Q. Y. (2022). Mechanical properties of linings of shield tunnel strengthened by steel plates considering interface effects. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 44(2), 343-351 (in Chinese).

[19] Tan, Y., Lu, Y., & Wang, D. L. (2021). Catastrophic failure of Shanghai metro line 4 in July, 2003: Occurrence, emergency response, and disaster relief. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 35(1), 04020125.

[20] Tongji University, & China Construction Engineering Industry Technology Research Institute Co., Ltd. (2020). T/CECS 788-2020: Technical specification for inspection of shield tunnel structures disease in urban rail transit. China Architecture & Building Press, Beijing, China (in Chinese).

[21] Wu, H. N., Chen, S., Chen, R. P., Cheng, H. Z., & Feng, D. L. (2022). Deformation behaviors and failure mechanism of segmental RC lining under unloading condition. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 130, 104687.

[22] Xu, G. W., & Lu, D. Y. (2016). Mechanical behavior of shield tunnel considering nonlinearity of flexural rigidity and leakage of joints. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 38(7), 1202-1211 (in Chinese).

[23] Ye, Z., & Liu, H. B. (2021). Investigating the relationship between erosion-induced structural damage and lining displacement parameters in shield tunnelling. Computers and Geotechnics, 133, 104041.

[24] Yu, C., Zhou, A. N., Chen, J., Arulrajah, A., & Horpibulsuk, S. (2020). Analysis of a tunnel failure caused by leakage of the shield tail seal system. Underground Space, 5(2), 105-114.

[25] Zhang, D. M., Gao, C. P., Yin, Z. Y., Wang, R. L., & Yang, T. L. (2017). Particle flow simulation of seepage erosion around shield tunnel. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 38(S1), 429-438.

[26] Zhang, Z. G., Mao, M. D., Pan, Y. T., Zhang, M. X., Ma, S. K., Cheng, Z. X., & Wu, Z. T. (2022). Experimental study for joint leakage process of tunnel lining and particle flow numerical simulation. Engineering Failure Analysis, 138, 106348.

[27] Zhao, D. B., Huang, Y. T., Chen, X. S., Han, K. H., Chen, C., Zhao, X. F., & Chen, W. T. (2023). Numerical investigations on dynamic responses of subway segmental tunnel lining structures under internal blasts. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 135, 105058.

[28] Zheng, G., Chen, Z. T., Zhang, T. Q., Qiu, H. M., Wang, K., & Diao, Y. (2024a). Particle-scale study on backward erosion of multilayer erodible medium under converging flow: Experimental tests and numerical modelling. Acta Geotechnica, 19(10), 7075-7087.

[29] Zheng, G., Chen, Z. T., Zhang, T. Q., Wang, K., & Diao, Y. (2024b). Experimental study on the erosion morphology of fine sand under converging flow considering the impact of soil effective stress. Acta Geotechnica, 19(2), 1129-1135.

[30] Zheng, G., Cui, T., Cheng, X. S., Diao, Y., Zhang, T. Q., Sun, J. B., & Ge, L. B. (2017). Study of the collapse mechanism of shield tunnels due to the failure of segments in sandy ground. Engineering Failure Analysis, 79, 464-490.

[31] Zheng, G., Qiu, H. M., Zhang, T. Q., Chen, Z. T., & Liu, M. S. (2025). Mechanism of water and sand inrush in shield tunnel based on CEL method integrating seepage analysis. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1-13 (in Chinese).

[32] Zheng, G., Qiu, H. M., Zhang, T. Q., Sun, J. B., Cheng, H. Y., & Diao, Y. (2024c). Zheng induced by developing contact loss. Engineering Failure Analysis, 155, 107748.

[33] Zheng, G., Qiu, H. M., Zhang, T. Q., Wang, T., Sun, J. B., Cui, T., & Diao, Y. (2024d). Experimental study of the effects of contact loss under a shield tunnel invert. Acta Geotechnica, 19(6), 4189-4199.

[34] Zheng, G., Sun, J. B., Zhang, T. Q., Zhang, X. K., Cheng, H. Y., Wang, H., & Diao, Y. (2023a). Mechanism and countermeasures of progressive failure in shield tunnels. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 131, 104797.

[35] Zheng, G., Sun, J. B., Zhang, T. Q., Zhang, X. K., Li, X., Cheng, H. Y., Bai, N., & Diao, Y. (2023b). Numerical study on the impact of local failure on adjacent structures in a shield tunnel. Acta Geotechnica, 18(4), 2155-2168.

[36] Zheng, G., Yao, J., Dai, X., Yang, X. Y., & Sun, J. Y. (2018). Experimental study on sand inflow under different opening widths of shield tunnel segments. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 40(6), 969-977 (in Chinese).

[37] Zheng, G., Zhang, X. K., Zhang, T. Q., Sun, J. B., Qiu, H. M., & Diao, Y. (2023c). Numerical study on mechanical behavior and ultimate bearing capacity of shield segment joints under different load conditions. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 139, 105204.