Investigation of the spatial distribution of tunnel seepage under varying drainage capacities in water-abundant regions

Qing Xu , Pengfei Li , Chongbang Xu , Siqing Wang , Sulei Zhang

Underground Space ›› 2025, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (4) : 343 -261.

PDF (8497KB)
Underground Space ›› 2025, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (4) :343 -261. DOI: 10.1016/j.undsp.2025.02.010
Research article
research-article

Investigation of the spatial distribution of tunnel seepage under varying drainage capacities in water-abundant regions

Author information +
History +
PDF (8497KB)

Abstract

Effective control of the tunnel seepage field is crucial in water-abundant regions to ensure the safety and stability of underground structures. Therefore, it is imperative to investigate the effects of the geological factors and tunnel permeability parameters on the drainage capacities of such structures. The Tongzi Tunnel was subjected to model tests using a self-developed testing apparatus to investigate the spatial distribution of tunnel seepage under varying conditions of sand permeability, number of primary support layers, and number of primary support openings. Subsequently, numerical models were developed to validate the observed tunnel seepage field based on experimental conditions. On this basis, an effective water pressure ratio is proposed to evaluate the hydraulic safety of the tunnel spatial distribution. The results indicated a positive correlation between the tunnel water discharge and sand permeability, primary support layers, and primary support openings. Among these factors, the primary support openings exhibited the highest sensitivity to tunnel water discharge, whereas the impact of the primary support layers was relatively low. Additionally, the external water pressure in the tunnel exhibited a negative correlation with sand permeability, primary support layers, and primary support openings. The sensitivity ranking of the structural water pressure fluctuations to the parameters is as follows: primary support openings > sand permeability > primary support layers. Furthermore, the longitudinal water pressure values in the tunnel gradually increase from Section A (circular drainage section) to Section B (middle circular drainage section). Model tests and numerical simulations were performed to demonstrate the data reliability. Finally, with the increase of sand permeability and the number of primary support openings, the effective drainage area (η < 0.6) around the tunnel spatial gradually expands. Besides, the tunnel longitudinal effective drainage interval progressively degrades from the vault (A1 area) to the tunnel bottom (A7 area), and even the tunnel bottom areas are not effectively drained (η > 0.6).

Keywords

Tunnel seepage field / Model test / Numerical simulation / Tunnel drainage capacity / Effective water pressure ratio

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Qing Xu, Pengfei Li, Chongbang Xu, Siqing Wang, Sulei Zhang. Investigation of the spatial distribution of tunnel seepage under varying drainage capacities in water-abundant regions. Underground Space, 2025, 23(4): 343-261 DOI:10.1016/j.undsp.2025.02.010

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Qing Xu: Writing - original draft, Software, Project administration, Methodology, Data curation. Pengfei Li: Writing - review & editing, Project administration, Funding acquisition. Chongbang Xu: Validation, Conceptualization. Siqing Wang: Methodology, Investigation, Data curation. Sulei Zhang: Supervision, Project administration.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgement

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support provided by the Natural Science Foundation of Beijing (Grant No. 8222004) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 52278383).

References

[1]

Ai, Q., Yuan, Y., Jiang, X. M., Wang, H., Han, C. J., Huang, X. C., & Wang, K. (2022). Pathological diagnosis of the seepage of a mountain tunnel. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 128, 104657.

[2]

Arjnoi, P., Jeong, J. H., Kim, C. Y., & Park, K. H. (2009). Effect of drainage conditions on porewater pressure distributions and lining stresses in drained tunnels. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 24(4), 376-389.

[3]

Bao, T., Zhang, S. L., Liu, C., & Xu, Q. (2022). Experimental study on the effect of hydraulic deterioration of different drainage systems on lining water pressure. Processes, 10(10), 1975.

[4]

Chen, Z. Q., Li, Z., He, C., Ma, C. C., Li, X., Chen, K. P., Zhang, H., & Liu, M. Y. (2023). Investigation on seepage field distribution and structural safety performance of small interval tunnel in water-rich region. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 138, 105172.

[5]

Chen, Z. Q., Zhuang, D. Y., Yu, B. X., Ning, Z. X., Zhan, H. X., & He, C. (2024). Seepage interaction mechanism of crossing tunnels and existing tunnels: Model test and numerical analysis. Transportation Geotechnics, 46, 101269.

[6]

Di, Q. G., Li, P. F., Zhang, M. J., & Cui, X. P. (2022). Investigation of progressive settlement of sandy cobble strata for shield tunnels with different burial depths. Engineering Failure Analysis, 141, 106708.

[7]

Fan, H. B., Zhu, Z. G., Song, Y. X., Zhang, S. Y., Zhu, Y. Q., Gao, X. Q., Hu, Z. N., Guo, J. Q., & Han, Z. M. (2021). Water pressure evolution and structural failure characteristics of tunnel lining under hydrodynamic pressure. Engineering Failure Analysis, 130, 105747.

[8]

Fang, X. H., Yang, J. S., Xiang, M. L., Zhang, X. M., & Li, L. Y. (2022). Model test and numerical simulation on the invert heave behaviour of high-speed railway tunnels with rainstorm. Transportation Geotechnics, 37, 100891.

[9]

Farhadian, H., & Nikvar-Hassani, A. (2019). Water flow into tunnels in discontinuous rock: a short critical review of the analytical solution of the art. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 78, 3833-3849.

[10]

Fu, H. L., An, P. T., Wu, Y. M., Li, J., & Chen, L. (2022a). Influence of asymmetric blockage of the drainage system of a deep-buried tunnel on water gushing. Journal of Mountain Science, 19, 2075-2085.

[11]

Fu, H. L., An, P. T., Cheng, G. W., Wen, S. J., & Li, J. (2022b). Calculation of the allowable drainage of parallel tunnels based on ecological environment protection. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 26(5), 2420-2427.

[12]

Fu, H. L., An, P. T., Wu, Y. M., Li, J., Chen, L., & Yin, L. J. (2022c). Experimental study on the interaction between the reservoir and tunnel during the construction and operation period. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 47, 13593-13601.

[13]

Gattinoni, P., & Scesi, L. (2017). The groundwater rise in the urban area of Milan (Italy) and its interactions with underground structures and infrastructures. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 62, 103-114.

[14]

Jiang, H. M., Li, L., Rong, X. L., Wang, M. Y., Xia, Y. P., & Zhang, Z. C. (2017). Model test to investigate waterproof-resistant slab minimum safety thickness for water inrush geohazards. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 62, 35-42.

[15]

Jin, Y. H., Han, L. J., Guo, H., Yang, S., Su, S. J., Liu, Z. J., & Wang, S. C. (2022). Mechanical and macro-microscopic failure characteristics of grouted mudstone considering grout dehydration effect. Engineering Failure Analysis, 142, 106662.

[16]

Kim, B. J., Jung, J. H., Jang, Y. S., & Chun, B. S. (2012). A study on the lining stability of old tunnel using groundwater flow modelling and coupled stress-pore water pressure analysis. Journal of the Korean Geotechnical Society, 28(4), 101-113.

[17]

Li, L. Y., Yang, J. S., Fu, J. Y., Wang, S. Y., Zhang, C., & Xiang, M. L. (2022a). Experimental investigation on the invert stability of operating railway tunnels with different drainage systems using 3D printing technology. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 14(5), 1470-1485.

[18]

Li, P. F., Liu, H. C., Zhao, Y., & Li, Z. (2018a). A bottom-to-up drainage and water pressure reduction system for railway tunnels. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 81, 296-305.

[19]

Li, P. F., Wang, F., Long, Y. Y., & Zhao, X. (2018b). Investigation of steady water inflow into a subsea grouted tunnel. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 80, 92-102.

[20]

Li, P. F., Wei, Y. J., Zhang, M. J., Huang, Q. F., & Wang, F. (2022b). Influence of non-associated flow rule on passive face instability for shallow shield tunnels. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 119, 104202.

[21]

Li, S. C., Liu, B., Xu, X. J., Nie, L. C., Liu, Z. Y., Song, J., Sun, H. F., Chen, L., & Fan, K. R. (2017). An overview of ahead geological prospecting in tunneling. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 63, 69-94.

[22]

Li, S. C., Liu, C., Zhou, Z. Q., Li, L. P., Shi, S. S., & Yuan, Y. C. (2021). Multi-sources information fusion analysis of water inrush disaster in tunnels based on improved theory of evidence. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 113, 103948.

[23]

Li, T., Mei, T. T., Sun, X. H., Lyu, Y. G., Sheng, J. Q., & Cai, M. (2013). A study on a water-inrush incident at Laohutai coalmine. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 59, 151-159.

[24]

Li, Z., Chen, Z. Q., He, C., Chen, K. P., Zhang, H., Ma, C. C., Li, X., & Liu, M. Y. (2023). Experimental simulation of seepage field distribution for small interval tunnel under varying-head infiltration. Transportation Geotechnics, 41, 101029.

[25]

Li, Z., Chen, Z. Q., He, C., Ma, C. C., & Duan, C. R. (2022c). Seepage field distribution and water inflow laws of tunnels in water-rich regions. Journal of Mountain Science, 19, 591-605.

[26]

Li, Z., He, C., Chen, Z. Q., Yang, S. Z., Ding, J. J., & Pen, Y. (2018c). Study of seepage field distribution and its influence on urban tunnels in water-rich regions. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 78, 4035-4045.

[27]

Liang, D. X., Jiang, Z. Q., Zhu, S. Y., Sun, Q., & Qian, Z. W. (2015). Experimental research on water inrush in tunnel construction. Natural Hazards, 81, 467-480.

[28]

Liu, C., Zhang, D. L., & Zhang, S. L. (2021). Characteristics and treatment measures of lining damage: A case study on a mountain tunnel. Engineering Failure Analysis, 128, 105595.

[29]

Liu, J. H., & Li, X. J. (2021). Analytical solution for estimating groundwater inflow into lined tunnels considering waterproofing and drainage systems. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 80, 6827-6839.

[30]

Liu, K., Liu, X. R., Zhong, Z. L., & Yi, L. (2017). Analysis on stress and stability of lining in partially-blocked tunnel drainage system. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Review, 10(3), 139-149.

[31]

Teng, Z. L., Liu, Y. M., Zhou, Y. H., Li, Y. X., Mei, S. L., Chen, Q. Z., Chen, L. Q., & Du, B. T. (2024). Investigation of a new reverse drainage construction and the pressure-reducing effect of a tunnel in a water-rich karst location. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 145, 105580.

[32]

Wang, F., & Li, P. F. (2018). An analytical model of seepage field for symmetrical underwater tunnels. Symmetry, 10(7), 273.

[33]

Xu, C. B., Chen, Y., Yang, Y. X., Li, P. F., Wang, S. Q., & Li, L. (2022a). Experimental investigation of crystal blocking in drainage pipes for tunnels in the karst region. Applied Sciences, 12(21), 10928.

[34]

Xu, Q., Zhang, S. L., Li, P. F., Liu, C., & Bao, T. (2023). Lining failure performance of highway tunnels induced by the drainage system deterioration. Engineering Failure Analysis, 149, 107236.

[35]

Xu, S. S., Ma, E. L., Lai, J. X., Yang, Y. T., Liu, H. T., Yang, C. P., & Hu, Q. (2022b). Diseases failures characteristics and countermeasures of expressway tunnel of water-rich strata: a case study. Engineering Failure Analysis, 134, 106056.

[36]

Yoo, C. (2005). Interaction between tunneling and groundwaternumerical investigation using three dimensional stress-pore pressure coupled analysis. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 131(2), 240-250.

[37]

Yoo, C. (2016). Hydraulic deterioration of geosynthetic filter drainage system in tunnels - its impact on structural performance of tunnel linings. Geosynthetics International, 23(6), 463-480.

[38]

Yoo, C. (2017). Effect of water leakage in tunnel lining on structural performance of lining in subsea tunnels. Marine Georesources & Geotechnology, 35(3), 305-317.

[39]

Yu, B. X., Chen, Z. Q., Li, Z., Chen, K. P., Zhang, H., & He, C. (2024). Analysis of water pressure distribution and optimization of water-proof-drainage system for tunnels in water-rich region. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 83, 137.

[40]

Yu, J., Li, D. K., Zheng, J. F., Zhang, Z. Z., He, Z., & Fan, Y. (2023). Analytical study on the seepage field of different drainage and pressure relief options for tunnels in high water-rich areas. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 134, 105018.

[41]

Zhang, S. L., Xu, Q., Yoo, C., Min, B., Liu, C., Guan, X. M., & Li, P. F. (2022). Lining cracking mechanism of old highway tunnels caused by drainage system deterioration: A case study of Liwaiao Tunnel, Ningbo, China. Engineering Failure Analysis, 137, 106270.

[42]

Zhang, X. F., Zhou, Y. F., Zhang, B., Zhou, Y. J., & Liu, S. Y. (2018). Investigation and analysis on crystallization of tunnel drainage pipes in chongqing. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2018, 7042693.

[43]

Zhang, Y., Zhang, D. L., Fang, Q., Xiong, L. J., Yu, L., & Zhou, M. Z. (2020). Analytical solutions of non-Darcy seepage of grouted subsea tunnels. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 96, 103182.

[44]

Zhao, D. P., Fan, H. B., Jia, L. L., & Song, Y. X. (2021). Research on waterproofing and drainage optimization scheme for karst tunnel lining in water-rich areas. Environment and Earth Science, 80, 150.

[45]

Zhao, X., & Yang, X. H. (2019). Experimental study on water inflow characteristics of tunnel in the fault fracture zone. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 12, 399.

PDF (8497KB)

42

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/