Model test on cutterhead-soil interaction during shield tunneling and its theoretical model

Xiang Shen , Dajun Yuan , Dalong Jin , Xiangsheng Chen , Weiping Luo , Yuansheng Peng , Kai Duan

Underground Space ›› 2025, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (1) : 46 -68.

PDF (6648KB)
Underground Space ›› 2025, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (1) :46 -68. DOI: 10.1016/j.undsp.2024.03.006
Research article
research-article

Model test on cutterhead-soil interaction during shield tunneling and its theoretical model

Author information +
History +
PDF (6648KB)

Abstract

This study aims to develop a rational theoretical model for cutterhead-soil interaction. The cutterhead-soil interaction mechanism is divided into two components: the cutting action of the cutter on the soil and the extrusion of the cutterhead on the soil. By enhancing the Mckyes-Ali model, we analyze and deduce the force state of the cutter during shield tunneling, obtaining a calculation method for determining the force on the cutter. Additionally, we conduct an in-depth analysis of the extrusion effect of the cutterhead on the soil during shield tunneling, utilizing the fundamental solution of the Kelvin problem. Based on these theoretical calculations, we validate the tunneling thrust and cutterhead torque of the shield using our self-developed multi-functional large-scale shield tunneling test platform. The test results demonstrate that the tunneling thrust and cutterhead torque derived from the established cutterhead-soil interaction model in this paper are relatively close to the experimental monitoring values. This provides a theoretical foundation for establishing reasonable shield tunneling loads.

Keywords

Shield machine / Cutterhead / Tunneling load / Model test / Interaction

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Xiang Shen, Dajun Yuan, Dalong Jin, Xiangsheng Chen, Weiping Luo, Yuansheng Peng, Kai Duan. Model test on cutterhead-soil interaction during shield tunneling and its theoretical model. Underground Space, 2025, 20(1): 46-68 DOI:10.1016/j.undsp.2024.03.006

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Xiang Shen: Writing - review & editing, Conceptualization. Dajun Yuan: Supervision. Dalong Jin: Methodology. Xiangsheng Chen: Supervision, Funding acquisition. Weiping Luo: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology. Yuansheng Peng: Writing - review & editing. Kai Duan: Data curation.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgement

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 52378404 and 52108377), Foundation for Basic and Applied Basic Research of Guangdong Province, China (Grant No. 2023A1515010060), and Open Project Foundation of the Key Laboratory of Urban Underground Engineering of Ministry of Education, China (Beijing Jiaotong University) (Grant No. TUL2023-03).

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

[1]

Ates, U., Bilgin, N., & Copur, H. (2014). Estimating torque, thrust and other design parameters of different type TBMs with some criticism to TBMs used in Turkish tunneling projects. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 40, 46-63.

[2]

Chen, R. P., Liu, Y., Tang, L. J., & Zhou, B. S. (2012). Research on calculation of thrust and cutter head torque on shield in complex strata. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 8(1), 26-32 (in Chinese).

[3]

Chen, X. S. (2018). Research on combined construction technology for cross-subway tunnels in underground spaces. Engineering, 4(1), 103-111.

[4]

González, C., Arroyo, M., & Gens, A. (2016). Thrust and torque components on mixed-face EPB drives. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 57, 47-54.

[5]

Guo, K., Xu, Y. P., & Li, J. F. (2018). Thrust force allocation method for shield tunneling machines under complex load conditions. Automation in Construction, 96, 141-147.

[6]

Han, M. D., Cai, Z. X., Qu, C. Y., & Jin, L. S. (2017). Dynamic numerical simulation of cutterhead loads in TBM tunnelling. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 70, 286-298.

[7]

Hasanpour, R., Rostami, J., Thewes, M., & Schmitt, J. (2018). Parametric study of the impacts of various geological and machine parameters on thrust force requirements for operating a single shield TBM in squeezing ground. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 73, 252-260.

[8]

Jin, Y. R., Qin, C. J., Tao, J. F., & Liu, C. L. (2022). An accurate and adaptative cutterhead torque prediction method for shield tunneling machines via adaptative residual long-short term memory network. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 165, 108312.

[9]

Kong, X. X., Ling, X. Z., Tang, L., Tang, W. C., & Zhang, Y. F. (2022). Random forest-based predictors for driving forces of earth pressure balance (EPB) shield tunnel boring machine (TBM). Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 122, 104373.

[10]

Krause, H. (1976). Geological experience in the use of tunnel tunnelling machines in Baden-Württemberg. In New findings in cavity construction— Foundations in the rock/latest findings in the construction of underground excavations—Rock foundations (pp.49-60). Vienna: Springer (in German).

[11]

Li, J., Zhang, B., Lyu, D., Guo, J. B., Su, K., & Hu, B. (2022). Fatigue reliability analysis of tunnelling boring machine cutterhead with cracks. Engineering Failure Analysis, 141, 106669.

[12]

Lin, S. S., Shen, S. L., & Zhou, A. N. (2022). Real-time analysis and prediction of shield cutterhead torque using optimized gated recurrent unit neural network. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 14(4), 1232-1240.

[13]

Liu, X. X., Shen, S. L., Xu, Y. S., & Zhou, A. (2021). Non-linear spring model for backfill grout-consolidation behind shield tunnel lining. Computers and Geotechnics, 136, 104235.

[14]

Maciej, M. (2005). A torque evaluation for a rotary subsoiler. Soil and Tillage Research, 84(2), 175-183.

[15]

Mckyes, E., & Ali, O. S. (1977). The cutting of soil by a narrow blade. Journal of Terramechanics, 14(2), 43-58.

[16]

Mckyes, E., & Desir, F. L. (1984). Prediction and field measurements of tillage tool draft forces and efficiency in cohesive soil. Soil and Tillage Research, 4(5), 459-490.

[17]

Ministry of Water Resources of the People’s Republic of China (2019). GB/T 50123—2019: Standard for geotechnical testing method. Beijing: China Planning Press (in Chinese).

[18]

Qian, Q. H., & Lin, P. (2016). Safety risk management of underground engineering in China: Progress, challenges and strategies. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 8(4), 423-442.

[19]

Qin, C. J., Shi, G., & Tao, J. F. (2021). Precise cutterhead torque prediction for shield tunneling machines using a novel hybrid deep neural network. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 151, 107386.

[20]

Ramoni, M., & Anagnostou, G. (2010). Thrust force requirements for TBMs in squeezing ground. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 25(4), 433-455.

[21]

Reilly, B. J. (1999). EPBMs for the North East Line Project. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 14(4), 491-508.

[22]

Shen, S. L., Yan, T., & Zhou, A. N. (2023a). Estimating locations of soil- rock interfaces based on vibration data during. Automation in Construction, 150, 104813.

[23]

Shen, X., Chen, Y. F., Cao, L. Q., Chen, X. S., Fu, Y. B., & Hong, C. Y. (2024). Prediction of the slurry pressure and inversion of formation characteristics based on a machine learning algorithm during tunnelling in a fault fracture zone. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 144, 105514.

[24]

Shen, X., Yuan, D. J., Jin, D. L., & Cao, C. Y. (2022). A new calculation method of cutterhead torque considering shield rolling angle. Applied Sciences, 12, 396.

[25]

Shen, X., Yuan, D. J., Lin, X. T., Chen, X. S., & Peng, Y. S. (2023b). Evaluation and prediction of earth pressure balance shield (EPBS) performance in complex rock strata: A case study in Dalian, China. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 15(6), 1491-1505.

[26]

Shi, H., Yang, H. Y., Gong, G. F., & Wang, L. T. (2011). Determination of the cutterhead torque for EPB shield tunneling machine. Automation in Construction, 20(8), 1087-1095.

[27]

Shi, G., Qin, C. J., Tao, J. F., & Liu, C. L. (2021). A VMD-EWT-LSTMbased multi-step prediction approach for shield tunneling machine cutterhead torque. Knowledge-Based Systems, 228, 107213.

[28]

Silvestri, V. (2003). A limit equilibrium solution for bearing capacity of strip foundations on sand. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 40(2), 351-361.

[29]

Sun, W., Shi, M. L., Zhang, C., Zhao, J. H., & Song, X. G. (2018). Dynamic load prediction of tunnel boring machine (TBM) based on heterogeneous in-situ data. Automation in Construction, 92, 23-34.

[30]

Tong, J., & Moayad, B. Z. (2006). Effeets of rake angle of chisel plough on soil cutting factors and power requirements: A Computer Simulation. Soil and Tillage Research, 88, 55-64.

[31]

Wang, L. T., Gong, G. F., Shi, H., & Yang, H. Y. (2012). Modeling and analysis of thrust force for EPB shield tunneling machine. Automation in Construction, 27, 138-146.

[32]

Wang, X. Y., Yuan, D. J., Jin, D. L., Jin, H., Yang, Y., & Wu, J. (2022). Determination of thrusts for different cylinder groups during shield tunneling. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 127, 104579.

[33]

Zhang, Q., Qu, C. Y., Cai, Z. X., Kang, Y. L., & Huang, T. (2014). Modeling of the thrust and torque acting on shield machines during tunneling. Automation in Construction, 40, 60-67.

[34]

Zhao, Y., Gong, Q. M., Tian, Z. Y., Zhou, S. H., & Jiang, H. (2019). Torque fluctuation analysis and penetration prediction of EPB TBM in rock-soil interface mixed ground. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 91, 103002.

[35]

Zhou, X. P., & Zhai, S. F. (2018). Estimation of the cutterhead torque for earth pressure balance TBM under mixed-face conditions. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 74, 217-229.

PDF (6648KB)

42

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/