Soil conditioning of clay based on interface adhesion mechanism: Microscopic simulation and laboratory experiment

Yong Fang , Bin Zhuo , Ruyue Zhang , Yubo Wang , Liupan Dou , Yuxiang Yao

Underground Space ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (5) : 239 -255.

PDF (3711KB)
Underground Space ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (5) :239 -255. DOI: 10.1016/j.undsp.2023.12.007
Research article
research-article

Soil conditioning of clay based on interface adhesion mechanism: Microscopic simulation and laboratory experiment

Author information +
History +
PDF (3711KB)

Abstract

Clogging frequently occurs in the cutter head, excavation chamber or screw conveyor when an earth pressure balance (EPB) shield machine is tunneling in soft or silty clay ground with high clay mineral content. In this paper, montmorillonite, kaolinite, and illite were selected as research objects, and molecular dynamics simulation and laboratory experiment were adopted. At the microscopic scale, dynamic contact behavior and interfacial mechanical behavior of the interface between clay minerals and water/surfactant solution was simulated and the interfacial adhesion and conditioning mechanism between clay minerals and water/surfactant solution was revealed. Thus, sodium dodecyl benzene sulfonate surfactant was selected as the main composition of the soil conditioner. Then, the adhesion stress before and after soil conditioning and the contact angles between clay minerals and water/surfactant solution were tested and analyzed at the macroscopic scale. The result shows that the contact angle between droplet and clay mineral surface is an important parameter to characterize soil adhesion. The simulation rules of the microscopic contact angle are consistent with the experiment results. Furthermore, the adsorption energy between microscopic substances is dominated by electrostatic force, which can reflect the adhesion stress between macroscopic substances. Soil adhesion stress can be effectively decreased by adding the surfactant to the soil conditioner.

Keywords

EPB clogging / Clay minerals / Microscopic simulation / Mechanism analysis / Laboratory experiment / Adhesion stress

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Yong Fang, Bin Zhuo, Ruyue Zhang, Yubo Wang, Liupan Dou, Yuxiang Yao. Soil conditioning of clay based on interface adhesion mechanism: Microscopic simulation and laboratory experiment. Underground Space, 2024, 18(5): 239-255 DOI:10.1016/j.undsp.2023.12.007

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgement

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 52078428) and the Sichuan Outstanding Young Science and Technology Talent Project (Grant No. 2020JDJQ0032).

References

[1]

Baier, R., Shafrin, E., & Zisman, W. (1968). Adhesion: mechanisms that assist or impede it: an interdisciplinary approach relates present knowledge of adhesion to bioadhesional problems. Science, 162(3860), 1360-1368.

[2]

Barzegari, G., Tirkhooni, M., & Khabbazi, A. (2020). Experimental assessment of clayey layers for clogging of TBM in Tabriz subway lines, Iran. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 105, 103560.

[3]

Basmenj, A. K., Ghafoori, M., Cheshomi, A., & Azandariani, Y. K. (2016). Adhesion of clay to metal surface; Normal and tangential measurement. Geomechanics and Engineering, 10(2), 125-135.

[4]

Basmenj, A. K., Mirjavan, A., Ghafoori, M., & Cheshomi, A. (2017). Assessment of the adhesion potential of kaolinite and montmorillonite using a pull-out test device. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 76(4), 1507-1519.

[5]

Bish, D. L. (1993). Rietveld refinement of the kaolinite structure at 1.5 K. Clays and Clay Minerals, 41(6), 738-744.

[6]

Botan, A., Marry, V., Rotenberg, B., Turq, P., & Noetinger, B. (2013). How electrostatics influences hydrodynamic boundary conditions: poiseuille and electro-osmostic flows in clay nanopores. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 117(2), 978-985.

[7]

Bravais, A. (1866). Etudes cristallographiques. Paris: Gauthier-Villars.

[8]

de Oliveira, D. G. G., Thewes, M., & Diederichs, M. S. (2019). Clogging and flow assessment of cohesive soils for EPB tunnelling: Proposed laboratory tests for soil characterisation. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 94, 103110.

[9]

Donnay, J. D. H., & Harker, D. (1937). A new law of crystal morphology extending the law of Bravais. American Mineralogist, 22(5), 446-467.

[10]

Drits, V. A., Zviagina, B. B., McCarty, D. K., & Salyn, A. L. (2010). Factors responsible for crystal-chemical variations in the solid solutions from illite to aluminoceladonite and from glauconite to celadonite. American Mineralogist, 95(2-3), 348-361.

[11]

Ebnesajjad, S. (2010). Handbook of adhesives and surface preparation: technology, applications and manufacturing.

[12]

Elsevier. Fan, C. F., & Caǧin, T. (1995). Wetting of crystalline polymer surfaces: A molecular dynamics simulation. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 103 (20), 9053-9061.

[13]

Feinendegen, M., Ziegler, M., Spagnoli, G., & Fernández-Steeger, T. (2011). Evaluation of the clogging potential in mechanical tunnel driving with EPB-shields. In Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering (pp.1633-1638).

[14]

Fountaine, E. R. (1954). Investigations into the mechanism of soil adhesion. European Journal of Soil Science, 5(2), 251-263.

[15]

Friedel, G. (1907). Eó tudes sur la loi de Bravais. Bulletin de Minéralogie, 30 (9), 326-455 (in French).

[16]

Guo, J. Y., Zhang, L., Liu, S. Y., & Li, B. (2018). Effects of hydrophilic groups of nonionic surfactants on the wettability of lignite surface: Molecular dynamics simulation and experimental study. Fuel, 231, 449-457.

[17]

Hautman, J., & Klein, M. L. (1991). Microscopic wetting phenomena. Physical Review Letters, 67(13), 1763-1766.

[18]

Heinz, H. (2010). Computational screening of biomolecular adsorption and self-assembly on nanoscale surfaces. Journal of Computational Chemistry, 31(7), 1564-1568.

[19]

Heepe, L., & Gorb, S. N. (2014). Biologically inspired mushroom-shaped adhesive microstructures. Annual Review of Materials Research, 44, 173-203.

[20]

Hollmann, F. S., & Thewes, M. (2013). Assessment method for clay clogging and disintegration of fines in mechanised tunnelling. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 37, 96-106.

[21]

Kerisit, S., & Liu, C. X. (2014). Molecular dynamics simulations of uranyl and uranyl carbonate adsorption at aluminosilicate surfaces. Environmental Science & Technology, 48(7), 3899-3907.

[22]

Li, L., Li, Z. H., Ma, C. D., Wang, J. X., Cao, X. Q., Wang, P., & You, X. F. (2019). Molecular dynamics simulations of nonionic surfactant adsorbed on subbituminous coal model surface based on XPS analysis. Molecular Simulation, 45(9), 736-742.

[23]

Liu, P. F., Wang, S. Y., Ge, L., Thewes, M., Yang, J. S., & Xia, Y. M. (2018). Changes of Atterberg limits and electrochemical behaviors of clays with dispersants as conditioning agents for EPB shield tunnelling. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 73, 244-251.

[24]

Peila, D., Picchio, A., Martinelli, D., & Dal Negro, E. (2016). Laboratory tests on soil conditioning of clayey soil. Acta Geotechnica, 11(5), 1061-1074.

[25]

Ren, L. Q. (2009). Progress in the bionic study on anti-adhesion and resistance reduction of terrain machines. Science in China (Series E: Technological Sciences), 52(2), 273-284.

[26]

Sánchez-Martıón, M. J., Dorado, M. C., del Hoyo, C., & Rodrıóguez-Cruz, M. S. (2008). Influence of clay mineral structure and surfactant nature on the adsorption capacity of surfactants by clays. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 150(1), 115-123.

[27]

Spagnoli, G., Feinendegen, M., & Heuser, M. (2011). A study on the adhesion of clays during mechanized tunnel excavation. In Proceedings of the XXIV Convegno Nazionale di Geotecnica (AGI). Napoli.

[28]

Spagnoli, G., Stanjek, H., Fernández-Steeger, T., Feinendegen, M., & Azzam, R. (2009). Modification of mechanical behavior of clays for improving TBM tunnel driving. In Proceedings of the Underground Space Seminar/Rock Engineering Seminar (pp.217-224).

[29]

Thewes, M., & Burger, W. (2004). Clogging risks for TBM drives in clay. Tunnels & Tunnelling International, 36(6), 28-31.

[30]

Thewes, M., & Hollmann, F. (2016). Assessment of clay soils and clay-rich rock for clogging of TBMs. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 57, 122-128.

[31]

Tohry, A., Dehghan, R., Oliveira, A. V., Chelgani, S. C., & Leal, L. D. (2020). Enhanced Washburn Method (EWM): A comparative study for the contact angle measurement of powders. Advanced Powder Technology, 31(12), 4665-4671.

[32]

Viani, A., Gaultieri, A. F., & Artioli, G. (2002). The nature of disorder in montmorillonite by simulation of X-ray powder patterns. American Mineralogist, 87(7), 966-975.

[33]

Wang, S. Y., Liu, P. F., Hu, Q. X.,& Zhong, J. Z. (2020). Effect of dispersant onthe tangentialadhesionstrengthbetweenclayandmetal forEPBshield tunnelling. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 95, 103144.

[34]

Zhang, L. H., Lu, X. C., Liu, X. D., Zhou, J. H., & Zhou, H. Q. (2014). Hydration and mobility of interlayer ions of (Na-x, Ca-y)-montmorillonite: a molecular dynamics study. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 118(51), 29811-29821.

[35]

Zimnik, A. R., Van Baalen, L. R., Verhoef, P. N., & Ngan-Tillard, D. J. M. (2000). The adherence of clay to steel surfaces. In Proceedings of the ISRM International Symposium 2000 (IS 2000). Melbourne, Australia.

[36]

Zumsteg, R., Puzrin, A. M., & Anagnostou, G. (2016). Effects of slurry on stickiness of excavated clays and clogging of equipment in fluid supported excavations. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 58, 197-208.

PDF (3711KB)

34

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/