Real-time estimation of the structural utilization level of segmental tunnel lining

Abstract

Over the last decades, an expansion of the underground network has been taking place to cope with the increasing amount of moving people and freight. As a consequence, it is of vital importance to guarantee the full functionality of the tunnel network by means of preventive maintenance and the monitoring of the tunnel lining state over time. A new method has been developed for the real-time prediction of the utilization level in tunnel segmental linings based on input monitoring data. The new concept is founded on a framework, which encompasses an offline and an online stage. In the former, the generation of feedforward neural networks is accomplished by employing synthetically produced data. Finite element simulations of the lining structure are conducted to analyze the structural response under multiple loading conditions. The scenarios are generated by assuming ranges of variation of the model input parameters to account for the uncertainty due to the not fully determined in situ conditions. Input and target quantities are identified to better assess the structural utilization of the lining. The latter phase consists in the application of the methodological framework on input monitored data, which allows for a real-time prediction of the physical quantities deployed for the estimation of the lining utilization. The approach is validated on a full-scale test of segmental lining, where the predicted quantities are compared with the actual measurements. Finally, it is investigated the influence of artificial noise added to the training data on the overall prediction performances and the benefits along with the limits of the concept are set out.

Keywords

Segmental lining / Artificial neural networks / Structural utilization level / Real-time prediction / Structural health monitoring / Monitoring data

Declaration of competing interest

Günther Meschke is an editorial board member for Underground Space and was not involved in the editorial review or the decision to publish this article. All authors declare that there are no competing interests.

Acknowledgement

This research is funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation, Project No. 77309832) within Subprojects C1 and B2 of the Collaborative Research Center SFB 837 “Interaction Modeling in Mechanised Tunnelling”, sited at the Ruhr University Bochum, Germany.

References

[1] Adeli, H. (2001). Neural networks in civil engineering: 1989-2000. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 16, 126-142.

[2] Basheer, I., & Hajmeer, M. (2000). Artificial neural networks: Fundamentals, computing, design, and application. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 43, 3-31.

[3] Bishop, C. (2006). Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

[4] Blom, C. (2002). Design philosophy of concrete linings for tunnels in soft soils. [PhD thesis, Delft University].

[5] Blom, C., & van Oosterhout, G. (2001). Full-scale laboratory tests on a segmented lining Summary report. Delft University of Technology.

[6] Cao, B., Obel, M., Freitag, S., Heußner, L., Meschke, G., & Mark, P. (2022). Real-time risk assessment of tunneling-induced building damage considering polymorphic uncertainty. ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering, 8(1), 04021069.

[7] Cividini, A., Jurina, L., & Gioda, G. (1981). Some aspects of ‘characterization’ problems in geomechanics. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, 18(6), 487-503.

[8] Dadvand, P., Rossi, R., & Oñate, E. (2010). An object-oriented environment for developing finite element codes for multi-disciplinary applications. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 17, 253-297.

[9] Do, N.-A., Oreste, P., Dias, D., Antonello, C., Djeran-Maigre, I., & Livio, L. (2014). Stress and strain state in the segmental linings during mechanized tunnelling. Geomechanics and Engineering, 7(1), 75-85.

[10] Erharter, G., Marcher, T., & Reinhold, C. (2019). Application of artificial neural networks for underground construction - chances and challenges - insights from the bbt exploratory tunnel Ahrental Pfons. Geomechanics and Tunneling, 12(5), 472-477.

[11] Fabozzi, S., Bilotta, E., & Russo, G. (2017). Numerical back-calculation of strain measurements from an instrumented segmental tunnel lining. In EURO:TUN 2017: Proceedings of the IV International Conference on Computational Methods in Tunneling and Subsurface Engineering,

[12] Innsbruck, Austria. Freitag, S. (2015). Artificial neural networks in structural mechanics. Computational Technologies Reviews, 12, 1-26.

[13] French, S. (1995). Uncertainty and imprecision: Modelling and analysis. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 46(1), 70-79.

[14] Gioda, G., & Maier, G. (1980). Direct search solution of an inverse problem in elastoplasticity: Identification of cohesion, friction angle and in situ stress by pressure tunnel tests. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 15(12), 1823-1848.

[15] Gottardi, N., Freitag, S., & Meschke, G. (2023a). Safety level assessment of segmental lining in rock. In Anagnostou, G., Benardos, A., and Marinos, V., editors, Expanding Underground - Knowledge and Passion to Make a Positive Impact on the World: Proceedings of the ITA-AITES World Tunnel Congress 2023 (WTC 2023), 12-18 May 2023, Athens, Greece, volume 1 of (1st ed.), pages 2693-2700, London. CRC Press.

[16] Gottardi, N., Freitag, S., & Meschke, G. (2023b). tructural stress prediction based on deformations using artificial neural networks trained with artificial noise. In SProceedings in Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 22(1).

[17] Gudzulic, V., Neu, G. E., & Meschke, G. (2020). Numerical analysis of plain and fiber reinforced concrete structures during cyclic loading: Influence of frictional sliding and crack roughness. In Proceedings in Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, Wiley-VCH GmbH.

[18] Haykin, S. (1999). Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation. Upper Saddle River, NJ, United States: Prentice Hall PTR.

[19] Hellmich, C., Pichler, B., Heissenberger, R., & Moritz, B. (2020). 150 years reliable railway tunnels - extending the hybrid method for the long-term safety assessment. Geomechanics and Tunnelling, 13(5), 538-546.

[20] Saadallah, A., Egorov, A., Cao, B.T., Freitag, S., Morik, K., & Meschke, G. (2019). Active learning for accurate settlement prediction using numerical simulations in mechanized tunneling. Procedia CIRP, 81,1052-1058.

[21] Sakurai, S. (2017). Back Analysis in Rock Engineering. London: CRC Press.

[22] Schäfer, N., Gudzulic, V., Breitenbücher, R., & Meschke, G. (2021). Experimental and numerical investigations on High Performance SFRC: Cyclic tensile loading and fatigue. Materials., 14(24), 7593.

[23] Snozzi, L., & Molinari, J.-F. (2013). A cohesive element model for mixed mode loading with frictional contact capability. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 93(5), 510-526.

[24] Zhang, J.-L., Vida, C., Yuan, Y., Hellmich, C., Mang, H. A., & Pichler, B. (2017). A hybrid analysis method for displacement-monitored segmented circular tunnel rings. Engineering Structures, 148(Supplement C), 839-856.

[25] Zhang, J.-L., Schlappal, T., Yuan, Y., Mang, H. A., & Pichler, B. (2019). The influence of interfacial joints on the structural behavior of segmental tunnel rings subjected to ground pressure. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 84, 538-556.

[26] Zhang, J., Liu, X., Yuan, Y., Mang, H., & Pichler, B. (2020). Transfer relations: useful basis for computer-aided engineering of circular arch structures. Engineering Computations, ahead-of-print.