Development of seismic fragility curves for buried sewer pipelines and considerations of their applicability: case study on damage estimation of the sewer pipeline network in Lima, Peru

Abstract

Seismic damage data for buried sewer pipelines affected by six earthquakes in Japan were analyzed to construct fragility curves considering pipe type, pipe diameter, liquefaction occurrence, and ground conditions. To verify the applicability of these fragility curves to regions outside Japan, they were applied to anticipated interplate mega-earthquake scenarios in Lima, Peru, a region of high seismic risk, to assess the seismic vulnerability of the sewer pipeline network. Under the specific Mw 8.55 earthquake scenario with rupture of the Ba-fault, the estimated length of damaged pipelines reached 94 km in CARABAYLLO and SAN MARTIN DE PORRES, and 86 km in VENTANILLA. Seven districts exhibited high damage ratios, with particularly severe damage exceeding 0.200 km/km in MI PERU, SANTA ROSA, and PUENTE PIEDRA. Considering ten interplate mega-earthquake scenarios, high-risk coastal drainage areas in CALLAO, CHORRILLOS, VILLA EL SALVADOR, and LURIN were identified and would not be detected by a single deterministic scenario. Sensitivity analyses showed that damage estimates are influenced by mesh resolution, representative seismic intensity values, proportionality factors, and microtopographic classifications. These findings highlight the importance of spatial resolution and detailed ground condition modeling when fragility curves are applied for seismic damage assessment of buried sewer pipelines.

Keywords

Buried sewer pipeline / Fragility curve / Applicability / Seismic damage estimation / Lima, Peru

References

[1] Shoji G, Hatakeyama D, Nagata S (2018) Damage assessment of sewer buried pipes subjected to seismic ground motions and liquefaction. The 8th International Symposium on Earthquake Engineering for Lifeline and Critical Infrastructure Systems. Shenyang, Liaoning, China: International Society of Lifeline and Infrastructure Earthquake Engineering (ISLIEE)

[2] Hatakeyama D, Shoji G, Nagata S. Damage assessment of sewer buried pipes subjected to ground motions and liquefaction in previous earthquake. J Japan Soc Civil Eng Series A1, 2019, 75(4): 144-169. (in Japanese).

[3] Minakawa T, Shoji G. Damage assessment on sewer buried pipelines in the 2018 Hokkaido Iburi-Tobu earthquake. J Japan Soc Civil Eng Series A1, 2020, 76(4): 716-726. (in Japanese).

[4] Okano R, Shoji G (2024) Seismic fragility of buried pipes subject to peak ground velocity and surface fault displacement. Milan, Italy: 18th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering

[5] Maruyama Y, Ichimoto R, Nojima N, Inocente I, Gallardo J, Quiroz L. Estimation of the restoration period of the water supply system in Lima, Peru, after a scenario earthquake. J Disaster Res, 2023, 18(4): 359-365.

[6] Cao X-Y, Feng D-C, Wu G. A total probabilistic seismic loss assessment framework of structures by the KDE-based nonparametric method. Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 2026, 265. ArticleID: 111458

[7] Cao X-Y, Feng D-C, Li Y. Assessment of various seismic fragility analysis approaches for structures excited by non-stationary stochastic ground motions. Mech Syst Signal Process, 2023, 186. ArticleID: 109838

[8] E-Stat (2020) Portal site of official statistics of Japan. https://www.e-stat.go.jp/. Accessed Feb 2026

[9] Pulido N, et al.. Scenario source models and strong ground motion for future mega earthquakes: application to Lima, Central Peru. Bull Seismol Soc Am, 2015, 105(1): 368-386.

[10] Tarazona J, Aguilar Z, Pulido N, Gonzales C, Lazares F, Miyake H. Seismicity based maximum magnitude estimation of subduction earthquakes in Peru. J Disaster Res, 2023, 18(4): 308-318.

[11] Aguilar Z, Tarazona J (2024) New seismicity based seismic sources and hazard model for Peru. Milan, Italy: Proc. of the 18th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering

[12] Ministry of Housing, Construction and Sanitation (2018) Technical standard E.030: earthquake-resistant design. Issued in National Building Regulations. Lima, Peru

[13] Aguilar Z (2005) Seismic microzonation of Lima. Japan-Peru Workshop on Earthquake Disaster Mitigation, Japan-Peru Center for Earthquake Engineering and Disaster Mitigation (CISMID). Lima, Peru: Faculty of Civil Engineering, National University of Engineering

[14] Sekiguchi T, Calderon D, Nakai S, Aguilar Z, Lazares F. Evaluation of surface soil amplification for wide areas in Lima, Peru. J Disaster Res, 2013, 8(2): 259-265.

[15] National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Resilience (2020) J-SHIS: seismic hazard station, 250m mesh map of topography and geology. https://www.j-shis.bosai.go.jp/labs/wm2020/. Accessed 5 Feb 2025 (in Japanese)

[16] Ministry of Land, Infrastructure (n.d.) Transport and tourism liquefaction occurrence trends based on topographic classification. https://www.mlit.go.jp/toshi/content/001388130.pdf. Accessed 5 Feb 2025 (in Japanese)

[17] Japan Road Association (2012) Specifications for highway bridges, Part I: common (in Japanese)

[18] Jeon SS, O’Rourke TD. Northridge earthquake effects on pipelines and residential buildings. Bull Seismol Soc Am, 2005, 95(1): 294-318.

[19] Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (n.d.) Overview of sewerage damage in Kumamoto prefecture due to the 2016 Kumamoto Earthquake. https://www.mlit.go.jp/common/001187930.pdf. Accessed 22 Dec 2024 (in Japanese)

Funding

SATREPS-PERU

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)