Hybrid machine learning framework for transverse cracking prediction in CRCP with PSO and GBM
Ali Alnaqbi , Ghazi G. Al-Khateeb , Waleed Zeiada
Urban Lifeline ›› 2026, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (1) : 5
Transverse cracking is a major distress mechanism in Continuously Reinforced Concrete Pavement (CRCP), affecting ride smoothness, service life, and maintenance strategies. This research introduces a hybrid predictive framework that couples Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) with Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM) to enhance the accuracy of transverse crack prediction in CRCP. The analysis utilized 395 records from 33 pavement sections obtained from the Long-Term Pavement Performance (LTPP) program, encompassing structural, environmental, traffic, and performance-related parameters. PSO was applied to fine-tune critical GBM hyperparameters, namely the number of iterations, learning rate, and tree depth. The optimized PSO–GBM model demonstrated excellent performance, yielding an average RMSE of 1.62 and an R2 of 0.99 under 5-fold cross-validation, surpassing benchmark models such as conventional GBM, Random Forest, Support Vector Regression (SVR), Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), and Linear Regression. Sensitivity analysis revealed that L3 thickness, L4 thickness, and Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) were the most significant contributors, consistent with engineering knowledge of crack development. Validation through residual distribution and equality line plots confirmed the robustness and stability of the proposed approach across varying severity levels.
Transverse cracking / Concrete pavement / Particle Swarm Optimization / Gradient Boosting Machine / Hybrid machine learning / Pavement Management Systems
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
Federal Highway Administration (2003) Distress identification manual for the long-term pavement performance program (Publication No. FHWA-RD-03-031). U.S. Department of Transportation. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/infrastructure/pavements/ltpp/reports/03031/03031.pdf |
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
Abubakar AS, Wahab MMBA, Shafiq N, Danyaro KU, Adebanjo AU (2024) Integrating life cycle cost analysis into pipeline asset integrity management: A comprehensive approach in decision support systems. J Hunan Univ Nat Sci 51(1):91–111. https://doi.org/10.55463/issn.1674-2974.51.1.10 |
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
Haddad A (2020) Machine learning based models coupled with data assimilation techniques for pavement rutting prediction, American University of Beirut |
| [14] |
Ghasemi P (2019) Application of optimization and machine learning techniques in predicting pavement performance and performance-based pavement design, Iowa State University |
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
Kotb MM (2024) Prediction of distresses in pavement networks: a machine learning approach, The American University in Cairo, Egypt |
| [20] |
Alnaqbi A, Al-Khateeb GG, Zeiada W (2025) Machine learning applications for predicting longitudinal cracking in continuously reinforced concrete pavement. Constr Econ Build 25(1) |
| [21] |
Kang J (2022) Pavement performance prediction using machine learning and instrumentation in smart pavement, University of Waterloo |
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
Rada GR, Elkins GE, Hicks RG (2018) Long-Term Pavement Performance (LTPP) program specific pavement studies (SPS)-development of experiment design: SPS-11 asphalt concrete pavement preservation study (No. FHWA-HIF-18-063). Federal Highway Administration, United States |
The Author(s)
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |