A short-term traffic flow prediction network using filter-genetic feature selection method
Bo Wang , Pinzheng Qian , Yang Cheng , Yu Qian , Jian Zhang
Urban Lifeline ›› 2025, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (1) : 16
A short-term traffic flow prediction network using filter-genetic feature selection method
Accurate selection of spatial-temporal features is key to the short-term traffic flow prediction model outputting higher quality results, which can effectively reduce the difficulty of constructing the prediction model. The spatial-temporal feature selection of most existing short-term traffic flow prediction models mainly relies on empirical knowledge methods and lacks interpretability. The proposed short-term traffic flow prediction network, named STFP-FGFS, utilizes a filter-genetic feature selection method to better explain the results of short-term traffic flow predictions. It consists of three stages: initial generation of temporal-spatial feature set, filtering, and feature optimization, as well as the predicted model. The initial spatial features are generated based on effective travel time, target time granularity, and vehicle type; that is, original spatial features are replaced by standardized spatial features. Four widely used feature selection methods for short-term traffic flow prediction are applied and compared, evaluating three experimental targets and four types of time granularity using four evaluation indexes. The results show that the STFP-FGFS proposed method has overall superior performance, good interpretability, and readability for selected spatial-temporal features.
Feature selection / Short-term traffic flow prediction / Artificial neural network / GRU
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
Duan P, Mao G, Zhang C, Wang S (2016) STARIMA-based traffic prediction with time-varying lags. in Proc. IEEE 19th International Conference Intelligent Transportation Systems 1610–1615. https://doi.org/arxiv-1701.00977 |
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
Jan Hauke and Kossowski Tomasz. Comparison of values of Pearson's and Spearman's correlation coefficients on the same sets of data. Quaest Geogr, 2011, 30(2): 87-93. |
| [48] |
Cho K, Merrienboer B, Gulcehre C (2014) Learning phrase representations using RNN encoder-decoder for statistical machine translation. arXiv:1406.1078. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1406.1078 |
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
|
The Author(s)
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |