GIS and remote sensing based analysis for monitoring urban growth dynamics in Western Himalayan city of Dharamshala, India

Nishant Mehra , Janaki Ballav Swain

Urban Lifeline ›› 2025, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (1)

PDF
Urban Lifeline ›› 2025, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (1) DOI: 10.1007/s44285-024-00033-0
Research

GIS and remote sensing based analysis for monitoring urban growth dynamics in Western Himalayan city of Dharamshala, India

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Ill-managed and unregulated urban sprawl has posed critical environmental and social challenges in the developing nations. There is an inherent need to monitor and measure the LULC changes to balance socio-economic development pressures and conservation measures. Integrating remote sensing and GIS has markedly helped frame intervention strategies in the fragile Himalayan regions. The research proposes establishing intervention strategies by monitoring LULC transitions occurring in Dharamshala, India, from 2016 to 2022. Maximum Likelihood Classification was performed on three Landsat 8 OLI images for 2016, 2019, and 2022 to prepare LULC thematic maps. The geographical and topographical complexities of the region necessitated the use of spectral vegetation indices, ancillary data, and the Strahler order algorithm to accurately represent LULC classes in the form of post-classification correction measures. The overall accuracy was found to be 88.06%, 87.02%, and 91.09% for the years 2016, 2019, and 2022. The study revealed a 140% increase in built-up areas from 2016 to 2022. The findings indicate increased developmental pressures in the 1500 m elevation and the progression of the urban sprawl towards higher altitudes, thereby increasing the risk of environmental degradation and posing a significant danger to the ecological susceptibility of the region. The tourism sector was a key factor driving LULC transitions in the area.

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Nishant Mehra, Janaki Ballav Swain. GIS and remote sensing based analysis for monitoring urban growth dynamics in Western Himalayan city of Dharamshala, India. Urban Lifeline, 2025, 3(1): DOI:10.1007/s44285-024-00033-0

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Lillesand T, Kiefer RW, Chipman J. Remote sensing and image interpretation, 2015 John Wiley & Sons

[2]

Mehra N, Swain JB. Geospatial assessment of urban sprawl using remote sensing and GIS: a case study of Western Himalayan City of Dharmashala, Himachal Pradesh, India. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci, 2024, 1327(1): 012031.

[3]

Belgiu M, Drăguţ L. Random forest in remote sensing: A review of applications and future directions. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens, 2016, 114: 24-31.

[4]

Rwanga SS, Ndambuki JM. Accuracy assessment of land use/land cover classification using remote sensing and GIS. Int J Geosci, 2017, 08(04): 611-622.

[5]

Mzava P, Nobert J, Valimba P. Land cover change detection in the urban catchments of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania using remote sensing and GIS techniques. Tanzania J Sci, 2019, 45(3): 315-329

[6]

Butt A, Shabbir R, Ahmad SS, Aziz N. Land use change mapping and analysis using Remote Sensing and GIS: A case study of Simly watershed, Islamabad Pakistan. Remote Sens Sp Sci, 2015, 18(2): 251-259

[7]

Foody GM. Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment. Remote Sens Environ, 2002, 80: 185-201.

[8]

Tiwari PC, Tiwari A, Joshi B. Urban growth in Himalaya: understanding the process and options for sustainable development. J Urban Reg Stud Contemp India, 2018, 4(2): 15-27

[9]

Kumar A. Analysing urban sprawl and land consumption patterns in major capital cities in the Himalayan region using geoinformatics. Appl Geogr, 2017, 89: 112-123.

[10]

Kumar M, Denis DM, Singh SK, Szabó S, Suryavanshi S. Landscape metrics for assessment of land cover change and fragmentation of a heterogeneous watershed. Remote Sens Appl Soc Environ, 2018, 10: 224-233

[11]

Nie Y, Sheng Y, Liu Q, Liu L, Liu S, Zhang Y, Song C. A regional-scale assessment of Himalayan glacial lake changes using satellite observations from 1990 to 2015. Remote Sens Environ, 2017, 189: 1-13.

[12]

Rawat JS, Kumar M. Monitoring land use/cover change using remote sensing and GIS techniques: A case study of Hawalbagh block, district Almora, Uttarakhand, India Egypt. J Remote Sens Sp Sci, 2015, 18(1): 77-84

[13]

Deka J, Tripathi OP, Khan ML, Srivastava VK. Study on land-use and land-cover change dynamics in Eastern Arunachal Pradesh, NE India using remote sensing and GIS. Trop Ecol, 2019, 60(2): 199-208.

[14]

Gupta V, Ram BK, Kumar S, Sain K. A case study of the 12 July 2021 Bhagsunath (McLeod Ganj) flash flood in Dharamshala, Himachal Pradesh: a warning against constricting natural drainage. J Geol Soc India, 2022, 98(5): 607-610.

[15]

Atef I, Ahmed W, Abdel-Maguid RH. Future land use land cover changes in El-Fayoum governorate: a simulation study using satellite data and CA-Markov model. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess, 2024, 38(2): 651-664.

[16]

Chowdhury M, Hasan ME, Abdullah-Al-Mamun MM. Land use/land cover change assessment of Halda watershed using remote sensing and GIS. Egypt J Remote Sens Sp Sci, 2020, 23(1): 63-75

[17]

Seyam MMH, Haque MR, Rahman MM. Identifying the land use land cover (LULC) changes using remote sensing and GIS approach: A case study at Bhaluka in Mymensingh. Bangladesh Case Stud Chem Environ Eng, 2023, 7: 100293.

[18]

Otukei JR, Blaschke T. Land cover change assessment using decision trees, support vector machines and maximum likelihood classification algorithms. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf, 2010, 12(1): 27-31

[19]

Rimal B, Rijal S, Kunwar R. Comparing support vector machines and maximum likelihood classifiers for mapping of urbanization. J Indian Soc Remote Sens, 2020, 48(1): 71-79.

[20]

Buğday E, Buğday SE. Modeling and simulating land use/cover change using artificial neural network from remotely sensing data. Cerne, 2019, 25(2): 246-254.

[21]

Darem AA, Alhashmi AA, Almadani AM, Alanazi AK, Sutantra GA. Development of a map for land use and land cover classification of the Northern Border Region using remote sensing and GIS. Egypt J Remote Sens Sp Sci, 2023, 26(2): 341-350

[22]

Das S, Sarkar R. Predicting the land use and land cover change using Markov model: a catchment level analysis of the Bhagirathi-Hugli River. Spat Inf Res, 2019, 27(4): 439-452.

[23]

Dwivedi RS, Sreenivas K, Ramana KV. Cover: land-use/land-cover change analysis in part of Ethiopia using landsat thematic mapper data. Int J Remote Sens, 2005, 26(7): 1285-1287.

[24]

Onur I, Maktav D, Sari M, Kemal Sönmez N. Change detection of land cover and land use using remote sensing and GIS: a case study in Kemer. Turkey Int J Remote Sens, 2009, 30(7): 1749-1757.

[25]

Thakkar AK, Desai VR, Patel A, Potdar MB. Post-classification corrections in improving the classification of Land Use/Land Cover of arid region using RS and GIS: The case of Arjuni watershed, Gujarat, India. Egypt J Remote Sens Sp Sci, 2017, 20(1): 79-89

[26]

Chowdhury MS. Comparison of accuracy and reliability of random forest, support vector machine, artificial neural network and maximum likelihood method in land use/cover classification of urban setting. Environ Challenges, 2024, 14: 100800.

[27]

Debnath J, Pan ND, Ahmed I, Bhowmik M. Channel migration and its impact on land use/land cover using RS and GIS: a study on Khowai River of Tripura, North-East India. Egypt J Remote Sens Sp Sci, 2017, 20(2): 197-210

[28]

Meshesha TW, Tripathi SK, Khare D. Analyses of land use and land cover change dynamics using GIS and remote sensing during 1984 and 2015 in the Beressa Watershed Northern Central Highland of Ethiopia. Model Earth Syst Environ, 2016, 2: 1-12.

[29]

Gupta M, Srivastava PK. Integrating GIS and remote sensing for identification of groundwater potential zones in the hilly terrain of Pavagarh, Gujarat. India Water Int, 2010, 35(2): 233-245.

[30]

Bahadur KC. Improving Landsat and IRS image classification: evaluation of unsupervised and supervised classification through band ratios and DEM in a mountainous landscape in Nepal. Remote Sens, 2009, 1(4): 1257-1272.

[31]

Weidinger JT. Predesign, failure and displacement mechanisms of large rockslides in the Annapurna Himalayas. Nepal Eng Geol, 2006, 83(1–3): 201-216.

[32]

Srivastava P, Tripathi JK, Islam R, Jaiswal MK. Fashion and phases of late Pleistocene aggradation and incision in the Alaknanda River Valley, western Himalaya India. Quat Res, 2008, 70(1): 68-80.

[33]

Strahler AN. Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. Eos, Trans Am Geophys Union, 1957, 38(6): 913-920.

[34]

Passy P, Théry S. The use of SAGA GIS modules in QGIS. QGIS Generic Tools, 2018, 1: 107-149.

[35]

Pella H, Ose K. Network analysis and routing with QGIS. QGIS Appl Water Risks, 2018, 4: 105-144.

[36]

Magesh NS, Chandrasekar N. GIS model-based morphometric evaluation of Tamiraparani subbasin, Tirunelveli district, Tamil Nadu, India. Arab J Geosci, 2014, 7: 131-141.

[37]

Huete AR. Vegetation indices, remote sensing and forest monitoring. Geogr Compass, 2012, 6(9): 513-532.

[38]

Zha Y, Gao J, Ni S. Use of normalized difference built-up index in automatically mapping urban areas from TM imagery. Int J Remote Sens, 2003, 24(3): 583-594.

[39]

Mathew A, Chaudhary R, Gupta N, Khandelwal S, Kaul N. Study of urban heat island effect on Ahmedabad City and its relationship with urbanization and vegetation parameters. Int J Comput Math Sci, 2015, 4: 126-135

[40]

Ferreira LS, Duarte DHS. Exploring the relationship between urban form, land surface temperature and vegetation indices in a subtropical megacity. Urban Clim, 2019, 27: 105-123.

[41]

Vijith H, Dodge-Wan D. Applicability of MODIS land cover and Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI) for the assessment of spatial and temporal changes in strength of vegetation in tropical rainforest region of Borneo. Remote Sens Appl Soc Environ, 2020, 18: 100311.

[42]

Xu H. Modification of normalised difference water index (NDWI) to enhance open water features in remotely sensed imagery. Int J Remote Sens, 2006, 27(14): 3025-3033.

[43]

Mehra N, Swain JB. Assessment of land use land cover change and its effects using artificial neural network-based cellular automation. J Eng Appl Sci, 2024, 71(1): 70.

[44]

Weng Q, Fu P. Modeling annual parameters of clear-sky land surface temperature variations and evaluating the impact of cloud cover using time series of Landsat TIR data. Remote Sens Environ, 2014, 140: 267-278.

[45]

Saha AK, Arora MK, Csaplovics E, Gupta RP. Land cover classification using IRS LISS III image and DEM in a rugged terrain: a case study in Himalayas. Geocarto Int, 2005, 20(2): 33-40.

[46]

Kumar D. Monitoring and assessment of land use and land cover changes (1977–2010) in kamrup district of Assam, India using remote sensing and GIS techniques. Appl Ecol Environ Res, 2017, 15(3): 221-239.

[47]

Mishra PK, Rai A, Rai SC. Land use and land cover change detection using geospatial techniques in the Sikkim Himalaya, India. Egypt J Remote Sens Sp Sci, 2020, 23(2): 133-143

[48]

Zaz SN, Romshoo SA. Assessing the geoindicators of land degradation in the Kashmir Himalayan region India. Nat Hazards, 2012, 64(2): 1219-1245.

[49]

Ahmad A, Quegan S. Analysis of maximum likelihood classification on multispectral data. Appl Math Sci, 2012, 6(129): 6425-6436

[50]

Strahler AH. The use of prior probabilities in maximum likelihood classification of remotely sensed data. Remote Sens Environ, 1980, 10(2): 135-163.

[51]

Sisodia PS, Tiwari V, Kumar A. Analysis of supervised maximum likelihood classification for remote sensing image. Int Conf Recent Adv Innov Eng ICRAIE, 2014, 2014: 1-4

[52]

Vivek, Shafi Mir M, Sehgal R. Studies of modulus of resilience on unpaved roads reinforced with untreated/treated coir geotextiles. J Nat Fibers, 2022, 19(16): 13563-13573.

[53]

Vivek DRK, Parti R. Application potential of treated coir geotextiles in unpaved roads. J Nat Fibers, 2020, 17(10): 1454-1467.

[54]

Vivek SM, M, Sehgal R, . Study on bearing capacity of unpaved roads reinforced with coir geotextiles using finite element method (FEM). J Nat Fibers, 2022, 19(15): 11735-11748.

[55]

Bagwan WA, Gavali RS (2018) Image processing based vegetation cover monitoring and its categorization using differential satellite imageries for Urmodi River watershed in Satara District, Maharashtra, India. Int Conf Rec Trends Image Proces and Pattern Recog 1037:329–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9187-3_29

[56]

Mehra N, Swain JB. Use of enhanced vegetation index (EVI) as a land cover classification tool and its suitability in urban development studies. AIP Conf Proc, 2023, 2852(13004): 1-9.

[57]

Kumar B, Patra KC, Lakshmi V. Error in digital network and basin area delineation using d8 method: a case study in a sub-basin of the Ganga. J Geol Soc India, 2017, 89: 65-70.

[58]

Dewan AM, Yamaguchi Y. Using remote sensing and GIS to detect and monitor land use and land cover change in Dhaka Metropolitan of Bangladesh during 1960–2005. Environ Monit Assess, 2009, 150: 237-249.

[59]

Olofsson P, Foody GM, Herold M, Stehman SV, Woodcock CE, Wulder MA. Good practices for estimating area and assessing accuracy of land change. Remote Sens Environ, 2014, 148: 42-57.

[60]

Congalton RG. A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data. Remote Sens Environ, 1991, 37(1): 35-46.

[61]

Singh RB, Hietala R. Livelihood security in northwestern Himalaya. Springer Tokyo Heidelberg New York Dordrecht London, 2014, 10: 978-984

[62]

Sharma S, Mahajan AK. Comparative evaluation of GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using statistical and heuristic approach for Dharamshala region of Kangra Valley, India. Geoenviron Dis, 2018, 5: 1-16

[63]

Abdelkarim A, Gaber AF, Youssef AM, Pradhan B. Flood hazard assessment of the urban area of Tabuk City, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia by integrating spatial-based hydrologic and hydrodynamic modeling. Sensors, 2019, 19(5): 1024.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

438

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/