Revealing the Promoting Effect of CeO₂ on the Cu/ZnO Catalyst for Methanol Steam Reforming

Abstract

Cu-based catalysts have been extensively used in methanol steam reforming (MSR) reactions because of their low cost and high efficiency. ZnO is often used in commercial Cu-based catalysts as both a structural and an electronic promoter to stabilize metal Cu nanoparticles and modify metal–support interfaces. Still, the further addition of chemical promoters is essential to further enhance the MSR reaction performance of the Cu/ZnO catalyst. In this work, CeO₂-doped Cu/ZnO catalysts were prepared using the coprecipitation method, and the effects of CeO₂ on Cu-based catalysts were systematically investigated. Doping with appropriate CeO₂ amounts could stabilize small Cu nanoparticles through a strong interaction between CeO₂ and Cu, leading to the formation of more Cu⁺–ZnO _x interfacial sites. However, higher CeO₂ contents resulted in the formation of larger Cu nanoparticles and an excess of Cu⁺–CeO _x interfacial sites. Consequently, the Cu/5CeO₂/ZnO catalyst with maximal Cu–ZnO interfaces exhibited the highest H₂ production rate of ${94}{\text{.6}}\;{\text{mmol}}_{{{\text{H}}_{{2}} }} {\text{/(g}}_{{{\text{cat}}}} \cdot {\text{h)}}$, which was 1.5 and 10.2 times higher than those of Cu/ZnO and Cu/CeO₂, respectively.

Keywords

Methanol steam reforming / Cu/ZnO catalyst / CeO₂ promoter / Metal–support interaction / Interfacial site

References

[1] Ross MB. Carbon dioxide recycling makes waves. Joule, 2019, 3(8): 1814-1816

[2] Thomas JM, Edwards PP, Dobson PJ, et al. Decarbonising energy: the developing international activity in hydrogen technologies and fuel cells. J Energy Chem, 2020, 51: 405-415

[3] Chandrasekhar K, Kumar S, Lee BD, et al. Waste based hydrogen production for circular bioeconomy: current status and future directions. Bioresour Technol, 2020, 302

[4] Ferraren-De Cagalitan DDT, Abundo MLS. A review of biohydrogen production technology for application towards hydrogen fuel cells. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2021, 151

[5] Liguras DK, Kondarides DI, Verykios XE. Production of hydrogen for fuel cells by steam reforming of ethanol over supported noble metal catalysts. Appl Catal B Environ, 2003, 43(4): 345-354

[6] de la Piscina PR, Homs N. Use of biofuels to produce hydrogen (reformation processes). Chem Soc Rev, 2008, 37(11): 2459-2467

[7] Staffell I, Scamman D, Velazquez Abad A, et al. The role of hydrogen and fuel cells in the global energy system. Energy Environ Sci, 2019, 12(2): 463-491

[8] Hren R, Vujanović A, Van Fan Y, et al. Hydrogen production, storage and transport for renewable energy and chemicals: an environmental footprint assessment. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2023, 173

[9] Osman AI, Mehta N, Elgarahy AM, et al. Hydrogen production, storage, utilisation and environmental impacts: a review. Environ Chem Lett, 2022, 20(1): 153-188

[10] Zhai W, Ma Y, Chen D, et al. Recent progress on the long-term stability of hydrogen evolution reaction electrocatalysts. InfoMat, 2022, 4(9):

[11] Ajamein H, Haghighi M. On the microwave enhanced combustion synthesis of CuO–ZnO–Al₂O₃ nanocatalyst used in methanol steam reforming for fuel cell grade hydrogen production: effect of microwave irradiation and fuel ratio. Energy Convers Manag, 2016, 118: 231-242

[12] Chen LN, Hou KP, Liu YS, et al. Efficient hydrogen production from methanol using a single-site Pt₁/CeO₂ catalyst. J Am Chem Soc, 2019, 141(45): 17995-17999

[13] Lin L, Zhou W, Gao R, et al. Low-temperature hydrogen production from water and methanol using Pt/α-MoC catalysts. Nature, 2017, 544(7648): 80-83

[14] Onishi N, Himeda Y. Homogeneous catalysts for CO₂ hydrogenation to methanol and methanol dehydrogenation to hydrogen generation. Coord Chem Rev, 2022, 472

[15] Deng Y, Li S, Appels L, et al. Producing hydrogen by catalytic steam reforming of methanol using non-noble metal catalysts. J Environ Manage, 2022, 321

[16] Li L, Ouyang W, Zheng Z, et al. Synergetic photocatalytic and thermocatalytic reforming of methanol for hydrogen production based on Pt@TiO₂ catalyst. Chin J Catal, 2022, 43(5): 1258-1266

[17] Azenha CSR, Mateos-Pedrero C, Queirós S, et al. Innovative ZrO₂-supported CuPd catalysts for the selective production of hydrogen from methanol steam reforming. Appl Catal B Environ, 2017, 203: 400-407

[18] Li H, Tian H, Chen S, et al. Sorption enhanced steam reforming of methanol for high-purity hydrogen production over Cu-MgO/Al₂O₃ bifunctional catalysts. Appl Catal B Environ, 2020, 276

[19] Lunkenbein T, Schumann J, Behrens M, et al. Formation of a ZnO overlayer in industrial Cu/ZnO/Al₂O₃ catalysts induced by strong metal-support interactions. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl, 2015, 54(15): 4544-4548

[20] Kuld S, Thorhauge M, Falsig H, et al. Quantifying the promotion of Cu catalysts by ZnO for methanol synthesis. Science, 2016, 352(6288): 969-974

[21] Wang H, Wang L, Lin D, et al. Strong metal–support interactions on gold nanoparticle catalysts achieved through Le Chatelier’s principle. Nat Catal, 2021, 4: 418-424

[22] van Deelen TW, Hernández Mejía C, de Jong KP. Control of metal-support interactions in heterogeneous catalysts to enhance activity and selectivity. Nat Catal, 2019, 2: 955-970

[23] Cui X, Liu Y, Yan W, et al. Enhancing methanol selectivity of commercial Cu/ZnO/Al₂O₃ catalyst in CO₂ hydrogenation by surface silylation. Appl Catal B Environ, 2023, 339

[24] Liu H, Chang Z, Fu J, et al. A CuZn-BTC derived stable Cu/ZnO@SiO₂ catalyst for ethanol dehydrogenation. Appl Catal B Environ, 2023, 324

[25] Zhang F, Chen Z, Fang X, et al. Catalytic activity of Cu/ZnO catalysts mediated by MgO promoter in hydrogenation of methyl acetate to ethanol. J Energy Chem, 2021, 61: 203-209

[26] Xie G, Jin R, Ren P, et al. Boosting CO₂ hydrogenation to methanol by adding trace amount of Au into Cu/ZnO catalysts. Appl Catal B Environ, 2023, 324

[27] Jiang H, Guan B, Peng X, et al. Influence of synthesis method on catalytic properties and hydrothermal stability of Cu/SSZ-13 for NH₃-SCR reaction. Chem Eng J, 2020, 379

[28] Jones SD, Hagelin-Weaver HE. Steam reforming of methanol over CeO₂- and ZrO₂-promoted Cu-ZnO catalysts supported on nanoparticle Al₂O₃. Appl Catal B Environ, 2009, 90(1–2): 195-204

[29] Jiang H, Wang L, Kaneko H, et al. Light-driven CO₂ methanation over Au-grafted Ce_0.95Ru_0.05O₂ solid-solution catalysts with activities approaching the thermodynamic limit. Nat Catal, 2023, 6: 519-530

[30] Lee K, Anjum U, Araújo TP, et al. Atomic Pd-promoted ZnZrO solid solution catalyst for CO₂ hydrogenation to methanol. Appl Catal B Environ, 2022, 304

[31] Jin S, Li D, Wang Z, et al. Dynamics of the Cu/CeO₂ catalyst during methanol steam reforming. Catal Sci Technol, 2022, 12(23): 7003-7009

[32] Zhu J, Ciolca D, Liu L, et al. Flame synthesis of Cu/ZnO-CeO₂ catalysts: synergistic metal-support interactions promote CH₃OH selectivity in CO₂ hydrogenation. ACS Catal, 2021, 11(8): 4880-4892

[33] Venkataswamy P, Jampaiah D, Mukherjee D, et al. CuO/Zn-CeO₂ nanocomposite as an efficient catalyst for enhanced diesel soot oxidation. Emiss Contr Sci Technol, 2019, 5(4): 328-341

[34] Jin S, Zhang Z, Li D, et al. Alcohol-induced strong metal-support interactions in a supported copper/ZnO catalyst. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl, 2023, 62(21):

[35] Dong F, Meng Y, Han W, et al. Morphology effects on surface chemical properties and lattice defects of Cu/CeO₂ catalysts applied for low-temperature CO oxidation. Sci Rep, 2019, 9(1): 12056

[36] Zhang Y, Su X, Li L, et al. Ru/TiO₂ catalysts with size-dependent metal/support interaction for tunable reactivity in Fischer-Tropsch synthesis. ACS Catal, 2020, 10(21): 12967-12975

[37] Hu J, Li Y, Zhen Y, et al. In situ FTIR and ex situ XPS/HS-LEIS study of supported Cu/Al₂O₃ and Cu/ZnO catalysts for CO₂ hydrogenation. Chin J Catal, 2021, 42(3): 367-375

[38] Zhang Z, Chen X, Kang J, et al. The active sites of Cu-ZnO catalysts for water gas shift and CO hydrogenation reactions. Nat Commun, 2021, 12(1): 4331

[39] Zhang Z, Wang SS, Song R, et al. The most active Cu facet for low-temperature water gas shift reaction. Nat Commun, 2017, 8(1): 488

[40] Chen A, Yu X, Zhou Y, et al. Structure of the catalytically active copper–ceria interfacial perimeter. Nat Catal, 2019, 2: 334-341

[41] Ren P, Tu W, Wang C, et al. Mechanism and sites requirement for CO hydrogenation to CH₃OH over Cu/CeO₂ catalysts. Appl Catal B Environ, 2022, 305

[42] Zhu J, Su Y, Chai J, et al. Mechanism and nature of active sites for methanol synthesis from CO/CO₂ on Cu/CeO₂. ACS Catal, 2020, 10(19): 11532-11544

[43] Ploner K, Watschinger M, Kheyrollahi Nezhad PD, et al. Mechanistic insights into the catalytic methanol steam reforming performance of Cu/ZrO₂ catalysts by in situ and operando studies. J Catal, 2020, 391: 497-512

[44] Li H, Tian FX, Liu Q, et al. Promotional effect of indium on CuO–CeO₂ catalysts for low-temperature CO oxidation. Catal Sci Technol, 2022, 12(21): 6590-6598

[45] Cao J, Ma Y, Guan G, et al. Reaction intermediate species during the steam reforming of methanol over metal modified molybdenum carbide catalysts. Appl Catal B Environ, 2016, 189: 12-18

[46] Ding Y, Zhang T, Ge Z, et al. High-efficiency steam reforming of methanol on the surface of a recyclable NiO/NaF catalyst for hydrogen production. Compos Part B Eng, 2022, 243

[47] Dreyer JAH, Li P, Zhang L, et al. Influence of the oxide support reducibility on the CO₂ methanation over Ru-based catalysts. Appl Catal B Environ, 2017, 219: 715-726

[48] Wang B, Zhang H, Xu W, et al. Nature of active sites on Cu–CeO₂ catalysts activated by high-temperature thermal aging. ACS Catal, 2020, 10(21): 12385-12392

[49] Yan H, Yang C, Shao WP, et al. Construction of stabilized bulk-nano interfaces for highly promoted inverse CeO₂/Cu catalyst. Nat Commun, 2019, 10(1): 3470

[50] Gao J, Guo J, Liang D, et al. Production of syngas via autothermal reforming of methane in a fluidized-bed reactor over the combined CeO₂–ZrO₂/SiO₂ supported Ni catalysts. Int J Hydrog Energy, 2008, 33(20): 5493-5500

[51] Borges LR, Braga AH, Zanchet D, et al. CeO₂/Pt/Al₂O₃ catalysts for the WGS reaction: improving understanding of the Pt-O-Ce-O _x interface as an active site. Appl Catal B Environ, 2023, 325

[52] Tong Y, Song L, Ning S, et al. Photocarriers-enhanced photothermocatalysis of water-gas shift reaction under H₂-rich and low-temperature condition over CeO₂/Cu_1.5Mn_1.5O₄ catalyst. Appl Catal B Environ, 2021, 298: 120551

[53] Li Z, Wang M, Jia Y, et al. CeO₂/Cu₂O/Cu tandem interfaces for efficient water-gas shift reaction catalysis. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2023, 15(26): 31584-31594

[54] May YA, Wang WW, Yan H, et al. Insights into facet-dependent reactivity of CuO–CeO₂ nanocubes and nanorods as catalysts for CO oxidation reaction. Chin J Catal, 2020, 41(6): 1017-1027

[55] Liu X, Jia S, Yang M, et al. Activation of subnanometric Pt on Cu-modified CeO₂ via redox-coupled atomic layer deposition for CO oxidation. Nat Commun, 2020, 11: 4240

[56] Yang B, Deng W, Guo L, et al. Copper-ceria solid solution with improved catalytic activity for hydrogenation of CO₂ to CH₃OH. Chin J Catal, 2020, 41(9): 1348-1359

[57] Poto S, Vico van Berkel D, Gallucci F, et al. Kinetic modelling of the methanol synthesis from CO₂ and H₂ over a CuO/CeO₂/ZrO₂ catalyst: the role of CO₂ and CO hydrogenation. Chem Eng J, 2022, 435

[58] Moncada J, Chen X, Deng K, et al. Structural and chemical evolution of an inverse CeO _x/Cu catalyst under CO₂ hydrogenation: tunning oxide morphology to improve activity and selectivity. ACS Catal, 2023, 13(23): 15248-15258

[59] Li Y, Zhang Y, Qian K, et al. Metal–support interactions in metal/oxide catalysts and oxide–metal interactions in oxide/metal inverse catalysts. ACS Catal, 2022, 12(2): 1268-1287