Potential of eNose Technology for Monitoring Biological CO₂ Conversion Processes

Abstract

Electronic nose (eNose) is a modern bioelectronic sensor for monitoring biological processes that convert CO₂ into value-added products, such as products formed during photosynthesis and microbial fermentation. eNose technology uses an array of sensors to detect and quantify gases, including CO₂, in the air. This study briefly introduces the concept of eNose technology and potential applications thereof in monitoring CO₂ conversion processes. It also provides background information on biological CO₂ conversion processes. Furthermore, the working principles of eNose technology vis-à-vis gas detection are discussed along with its advantages and limitations versus traditional monitoring methods. This study also provides case studies that have used this technology for monitoring biological CO₂ conversion processes. eNose-predicted measurements were observed to be completely aligned with biological parameters for R² values of 0.864, 0.808, 0.802, and 0.948. We test eNose technology in a variety of biological settings, such as algae farms or bioreactors, to determine its effectiveness in monitoring CO₂ conversion processes. We also explore the potential benefits of employing this technology vis-à-vis monitoring biological CO₂ conversion processes, such as increased reaction efficiency and reduced costs versus traditional monitoring methods. Moreover, future directions and challenges of using this technology in CO₂ capture and conversion have been discussed. Overall, we believe this study would contribute to developing new and innovative methods for monitoring biological CO₂ conversion processes and mitigating climate change.

References

[1.] BorazjaniZ, AzinR, OsfouriS. Kinetics studies and performance analysis of algae hydrothermal liquefaction process. Biomass Convers Biorefin, 2023

[2.] DuttaN, MondalP, GuptaA. Optimization of process parameters using response surface methodology for maximum liquid yield during thermal pyrolysis of blend of virgin and waste high-density polyethylene. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag, 2022, 24(3): 1182-1193

[3.] Okoye-ChineCG, OtunK, ShibaN, et al. . Conversion of carbon dioxide into fuels—a review. J CO2 Util, 2022, 62: 102099

[4.] GavalaHN, Grimalt-AlemanyA, AsimakopoulosK, et al. . Gas biological conversions: the potential of syngas and carbon dioxide as production platforms. Waste Biomass Valoriz, 2021, 12(10): 5303-5328

[5.] HuangZ, GrimRG, SchaidleJA, et al. . The economic outlook for converting CO₂ and electrons to molecules. Energy Environ Sci, 2021, 14(7): 3664-3678

[6.] KondaveetiS, Abu-ReeshIM, MohanakrishnaG, et al. . Advanced routes of biological and bio-electrocatalytic carbon dioxide (CO₂) mitigation toward carbon neutrality. Front Energy Res, 2020, 8: 94

[7.] KrajewskaB. Urease-aided calcium carbonate mineralization for engineering applications: a review. J Adv Res, 2018, 13: 59-67

[8.] GuptaR, MishraA, ThirupathaiahY, et al. . Biochemical conversion of CO2 in fuels and chemicals: status, innovation, and industrial aspects. Biomass Convers Biorefin, 2024, 14(3): 3007-3030

[9.] ZabedHM, AkterS, RupaniPF, et al. . Biocatalytic gateway to convert glycerol into 3-hydroxypropionic acid in waste-based biorefineries: fundamentals, limitations, and potential research strategies. Biotechnol Adv, 2023, 62: 108075

[10.] DeshmukhS, BandyopadhyayR, BhattacharyyaN, et al. . Application of electronic nose for industrial odors and gaseous emissions measurement and monitoring–an overview. Talanta, 2015, 144: 329-340

[11.] JohnAT, MurugappanK, NisbetDR, et al. . An outlook of recent advances in chemiresistive sensor-based electronic nose systems for food quality and environmental monitoring. Sensors, 2021, 21(7): 2271

[12.] WilsonAD. Applications of electronic-nose technologies for noninvasive early detection of plant, animal and human diseases. Chemosensors, 2018, 6(4): 45

[13.] Krishanga B (2023) Electronic nose: applications, advantages, and future trends in sensory analysis. https://www.medindia.net/patientinfo/electronic-nose-applications-advantages-and-future-trends-in-sensory-analysis.htm#

[14.] Tavares F (2023) NASA’s e-nose device advanced to “Sniff” COVID-19 from human breath. https://www.nasa.gov/science-research/nasas-e-nose-device-advanced-to-sniff-covid-19-from-human-breath/

[15.] HuW, WanL, JianY, et al. . Electronic noses: from advanced materials to sensors aided with data processing. Adv Mater Technol, 2019, 4(2): 1800488

[16.] BorowikP, AdamowiczL, TarakowskiR, et al. . Odor detection using an E-nose with a reduced sensor array. Sensors, 2020, 20(12): 3542

[17.] WuZ, WangH, WangX, et al. . Development of electronic nose for qualitative and quantitative monitoring of volatile flammable liquids. Sensors, 2020, 20(7): 1817

[18.] LängeK. Bulk and surface acoustic wave sensor arrays for multi-analyte detection: a review. Sensors, 2019, 19(24): 5382

[19.] Palla-PapavluA, VoicuSI, DinescuM. Sensitive materials and coating technologies for surface acoustic wave sensors. Chemosensors, 2021, 9(5): 105

[20.] WilsonA. Diverse applications of electronic-nose technologies in agriculture and forestry. Sensors, 2013, 13(2): 2295-2348

[21.] Jiménez-CadenaG, RiuJ, RiusFX. Gas sensors based on nanostructured materials. Analyst, 2007, 132(11): 1083

[22.] ZaporotskovaIV, BorozninaNP, ParkhomenkoYN, et al. . Carbon nanotubes: sensor properties. A review. Mod Electron Mater, 2016, 2(4): 95-105

[23.] ReimannP, SchützeA. KohlCD, WagnerT. Sensor arrays, virtual multisensors, data fusion, and gas sensor data evaluation. Springer series on chemical sensors and biosensors, 2013BerlinSpringer67-107

[24.] BalabinRM, LomakinaEI. Support vector machine regression (SVR/LS-SVM)—an alternative to neural networks (ANN) for analytical chemistry? Comparison of nonlinear methods on near infrared (NIR) spectroscopy data. Analyst, 2011, 136(8): 1703-1712

[25.] HameedMM, AlOmarMK, BaniyaWJ, et al. . Incorporation of artificial neural network with principal component analysis and cross-validation technique to predict high-performance concrete compressive strength. Asian J Civ Eng, 2021, 22(6): 1019-1031

[26.] LiZ, JunY, DianD, GuanyuY, GuanfengW, AixiangH, HaoW, HuichaoZ, ZhengxingH, ZheanT. E-nose based on a high-integrated and low-power metal oxide gas sensor array. Sens Actuators, B Chem, 2023, 380: 133289

[27.] TanJ, XuJ. Applications of electronic nose (e-nose) and electronic tongue (e-tongue) in food quality-related properties determination: a review. Artif Intell Agric, 2020, 4: 104-115

[28.] PalacínJ, RubiesE, ClotetE, et al. . Classification of two volatiles using an eNose composed by an array of 16 single-type miniature micro-machined metal-oxide gas sensors. Sensors, 2022, 22(3): 1120

[29.] FareaMA, MohammedHY, ShirsatSM, et al. . Hazardous gases sensors based on conducting polymer composites: review. Chem Phys Lett, 2021, 776: 138703

[30.] WongYC, AngBC, HaseebASMA, et al. . Review—conducting polymers as chemiresistive gas sensing materials: a review. J Electrochem Soc, 2019, 167(3): 037503

[31.] AlanaziN, AlmutairiM, AlodhaybAN. A review of quartz crystal microbalance for chemical and biological sensing applications. Sens Imag, 2023, 24(1): 10

[32.] MandalD, BanerjeeS. Surface acoustic wave (SAW) sensors: physics, materials, and applications. Sensors, 2022, 22(3): 820

[33.] LiuL, MorganSP, CorreiaR, et al. . A single-film fiber optical sensor for simultaneous measurement of carbon dioxide and relative humidity. Opt Laser Technol, 2022, 147: 107696

[34.] WilsonAD, BaiettoM. Advances in electronic-nose technologies developed for biomedical applications. Sensors, 2011, 11(1): 1105-1176

[35.] MerlettiR, CeroneGL. Tutorial. Surface EMG detection, conditioning and pre-processing: best practices. J Electromyogr Kinesiol, 2020, 54: 102

[36.] YeZ, LiuY, LiQ. Recent progress in smart electronic nose technologies enabled with machine learning methods. Sensors, 2021, 21(22): 7620

[37.] MahmudMM, SeokC, WuX, et al. . A low-power wearable E-nose system based on a capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducer (CMUT) array for indoor VOC monitoring. IEEE Sens J, 2021, 21(18): 19684-19696

[38.] AboughalyM, Rizwanul FattahIM. Environmental analysis, monitoring, and process control strategy for reduction of greenhouse gaseous emissions in thermochemical reactions. Atmosphere, 2023, 14(4): 655

[39.] Maroto EstradaP, de LimaD, BauerPH, et al. . Deep learning in the development of energy management strategies of hybrid electric Vehicles: a hybrid modeling approach. Appl Energy, 2023, 329: 120231

[40.] JohnAT, MurugappanK, NisbetDR, et al. . An outlook of recent advances in chemiresistive sensor-based electronic nose systems for food quality and environmental monitoring. Sensors, 2021, 21(7): 2271

[41.] HaworthJJ, PitcherCK, FerrandinoG, et al. . Breathing new life into clinical testing and diagnostics: perspectives on volatile biomarkers from breath. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci, 2022, 59(5): 353-372

[42.] YoosefianSH, EbrahimiR, BakhshipourA, et al. . Real-time monitoring of agricultural waste conversion to bioethanol in a pneumatic system by optimized electronic nose. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag, 2024, 26(1): 421-434

[43.] AnyfantisA, BlionasS. Proof of concept apparatus for the design of a simple, low cost, mobile e-nose for real-time victim localization (human presence) based on indoor air quality monitoring sensors. Sens Bio Sens Res, 2020, 27: 100312

[44.] De CesareF, Di MattiaE, PantaleiS, et al. . Use of electronic nose technology to measure soil microbial activity through biogenic volatile organic compounds and gases release. Soil Biol Biochem, 2011, 43(10): 2094-2107

[45.] de VriesR, FarzanN, FabiusT, et al. . Prospective detection of early lung cancer in patients with COPD in regular care by electronic nose analysis of exhaled breath. Chest, 2023, 164(5): 1315-1324

[46.] WijbengaN, HoekRAS, MathotBJ, et al. . The potential of electronic nose technology in lung transplantation: a proof of principle. ERJ Open Res, 2022, 8(3): 48-2022

[47.] MoorCC, OppenheimerJC, NakshbandiG, et al. . Exhaled breath analysis by use of eNose technology: a novel diagnostic tool for interstitial lung disease. Eur Respir J, 2021, 57(1): 2002042

[48.] SinghTS, SinghP, YadavaRDS. Perspectives for electronic nose technology in green analytical chemistry. Green polymer chemistry and composites, 20211LondonApple Academic Press167-201

[49.] Alzate-CarvajalN, Luican-MayerA. Functionalized graphene surfaces for selective gas sensing. ACS Omega, 2020, 5(34): 21320-21329

[50.] DhimishM, ZhaoX. Enhancing reliability and lifespan of PEM fuel cells through neural network-based fault detection and classification. Int J Hydrog Energy, 2023, 48(41): 15612-15625

[51.] MoshayediAJ, Sohail KhanA, HuJ, et al. . E-nose-driven advancements in ammonia gas detection: a comprehensive review from traditional to cutting-edge systems in indoor to outdoor agriculture. Sustainability, 2023, 15(15): 11601

[52.] AouadiB, ZaukuuJLZ, VitálisF, et al. . Historical evolution and food control achievements of near infrared spectroscopy, electronic nose, and electronic tongue—critical overview. Sensors, 2020, 20(19): 5479

[53.] GalvanD, AquinoA, EfftingL, et al. . E-sensing and nanoscale-sensing devices associated with data processing algorithms applied to food quality control: a systematic review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr, 2022, 62(24): 6605-6645

[54.] SharmaC, BarkatakiN, SarmaU. A deep neural network with electronic nose for water stress prediction in Khasi Mandarin Orange plants. Meas Sci Technol, 2023, 34(12): 125152

[55.] Guo X (2023) Electronic nose design for respiratory disease detection: flow delivery, sensing mechanism, and machine learning recognition algorithm. Mechanical Engineering, University of Akron, US

[56.] LiuT, GuoL, WangM, et al. . Review on algorithm design in electronic noses: challenges, status, and trends. Intell Comput, 2023, 2: 0012

[57.] BieganowskiA, JózefaciukG, BanduraL, et al. . Evaluation of hydrocarbon soil pollution using E-nose. Sensors, 2018, 18(8): 2463

[58.] ZhuL, JiaH, ChenY, et al. . A novel method for soil organic matter determination by using an artificial olfactory system. Sensors, 2019, 19(15): 3417

[59.] TieleA, WicaksonoA, AyyalaSK, et al. . Development of a compact, IoT-enabled electronic nose for breath analysis. Electronics, 2020, 9(1): 84

[60.] RobbianiS, LotesoriereBJ, DellacàRL, et al. . Physical confounding factors affecting gas sensors response: a review on effects and compensation strategies for electronic nose applications. Chemosensors, 2023, 11(10): 514

[61.] ChengL, MengQH, LilienthalAJ, et al. . Development of compact electronic noses: a review. Meas Sci Technol, 2021, 32(6): 062002

[62.] ŁabańskaM, Ciosek-SkibińskaP, WróblewskiW. Critical evaluation of laboratory potentiometric electronic tongues for pharmaceutical analysis—an overview. Sensors, 2019, 19(24): 5376

[63.] BeauchampJ, ZardinE. Odorant detection by on-line chemical ionization mass spectrometry. Buettner A Springer Handbook of Odor, 2017ChamSpringer49-50

[64.] LiuZ, WangM, WuM, et al. . Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from plants: from release to detection. Trac Trends Anal Chem, 2023, 158: 116872