Tailoring Iron-Ion Release of Cellulose-Based Aerogel-Coated Iron Foam for Long-Term High-Power Microbial Fuel Cells

Abstract

The presence of iron (Fe) has been found to favor power generation in microbial fuel cells (MFCs). To achieve long-term power production in MFCs, it is crucial to effectively tailor the release of Fe ions over extended operating periods. In this study, we developed a composite anode (A/IF) by coating iron foam with cellulose-based aerogel. The concentration of Fe ions in the anode solution of A/IF anode reaches 0.280 μg/mL (Fe²⁺ vs. Fe³⁺  = 61%:39%) after 720 h of aseptic primary cell operation. This value was significantly higher than that (0.198 μg/mL, Fe²⁺ vs. Fe³⁺  = 92%:8%) on uncoated iron foam (IF), indicating a continuous release of Fe ions over long-term operation. Notably, the resulting MFCs hybrid cell exhibited a 23% reduction in Fe ion concentration (compared to a 47% reduction for the IF anode) during the sixth testing cycle (600–720 h). It achieved a high-power density of 301 ± 55 mW/m² at 720 h, which was 2.62 times higher than that of the IF anode during the same period. Furthermore, a sedimentary microbial fuel cell (SMFCs) was constructed in a marine environment, and the A/IF anode demonstrated a power density of 103 ± 3 mW/m² at 3240 h, representing a 75% improvement over the IF anode. These findings elucidate the significant enhancement in long-term power production performance of MFCs achieved through effective tailoring of Fe ions release during operation.

References

[1.] Schröder U, Harnisch F, Angenent LT. Microbial electrochemistry and technology: terminology and classification. Energy Environ Sci, 2015, 8(2): 513-519.

[2.] Bajracharya S, Sharma M, Mohanakrishna G, et al. . An overview on emerging bioelectrochemical systems (BESs): technology for sustainable electricity, waste remediation, resource recovery, chemical production and beyond. Renew Energy, 2016, 98: 153-170.

[3.] Gupta S, Patro A, Mittal Y, et al. . The race between classical microbial fuel cells, sediment-microbial fuel cells, plant-microbial fuel cells, and constructed wetlands-microbial fuel cells: applications and technology readiness level. Sci Total Environ, 2023, 879,

[4.] Santoro C, Arbizzani C, Erable B, et al. . Microbial fuel cells: from fundamentals to applications. A review. J Power Sources, 2017, 356: 225-244.

[5.] Wu Z, Feng Y, Long P, et al. . A three-dimensional composite anode based on nitrogen-doped graphene/iron foam. J Funct Polym, 2023, 36: 365-371

[6.] Khan N, Anwer AH, Sultana S, et al. . Effective toxicity assessment of synthetic dye in microbial fuel cell biosensor with spinel nanofiber anode. J Environ Chem Eng, 2022, 10(2,

[7.] Adekunle A, Raghavan V, Tartakovsky B. On-line monitoring of heavy metals-related toxicity with a microbial fuel cell biosensor. Biosens Bioelectron, 2019, 132: 382-390.

[8.] Du X, Li P, Guan Z, et al. . Polyaniline/carbon nanotube-modified carbon felt for accelerating underwater microbial gas production to enhance power generation. ChemNanoMat, 2023, 9(4,

[9.] Janani P, Murugan S. Implementation of sea sand in microbial fuel cell for an energy harvesting system using LTC for underwater applications. J Geo-Mar Sci, 2018, 46: 2241-2249

[10.] Li WW, Yu HQ, He Z. Towards sustainable wastewater treatment by using microbial fuel cells-centered technologies. Energy Environ Sci, 2014, 7(3): 911-924.

[11.] Ge Z, He Z. Long-term performance of a 200 liter modularized microbial fuel cell system treating municipal wastewater: treatment, energy, and cost. Environ Sci: Water Res Technol, 2016, 2(2): 274-281

[12.] Volchenko NN, Lazukin AA, Maslennikov SI, et al. . Application of benthic microbial fuel cells in systems of year-round monitoring of water environment parameters. Oceanology, 2023, 63(6): 915-924.

[13.] Brunelli D, Tosato P, Rossi M. Flora health wireless monitoring with plant-microbial fuel cell. Procedia Eng, 2016, 168: 1646-1650.

[14.] Tran HVH, Kim E, Jung SP. Anode biofilm maturation time, stable cell performance time, and time-course electrochemistry in a single-chamber microbial fuel cell with a brush-anode. J Ind Eng Chem, 2022, 106: 269-278.

[15.] Kuleshova TE, Ivanova AG, Galushko AS, et al. . Influence of the electrode systems parameters on the electricity generation and the possibility of hydrogen production in a plant-microbial fuel cell. Int J Hydrog Energy, 2022, 47(58): 24297-24309.

[16.] Jin S, Feng Y, Jia J, et al. . Three-dimensional N-doped carbon nanotube/graphene composite aerogel anode to develop high-power microbial fuel cell. Energy Environ Mater, 2023, 6(3): 12373.

[17.] Sahari SK, Butit AM, Ngaini Z, et al. . Bioelectricity generation from bamboo leaves waste in a double chambered microbial fuel cell. Sains Malays, 2023, 52(6): 1855-1864.

[18.] Liu X, Ye Y, Zhang Z, et al. . Prophage induction causes Geobacter electroactive biofilm decay. Environ Sci Technol, 2023, 57(15): 6196-6204.

[19.] Lai BL, Xiao ZH, Jiang PY, et al. . Two-dimensional Ag–Fe–N/C nanosheets as efficient cathode catalyst to improve power-generation performance of microbial fuel cells. ChemElectroChem, 2022, 9(6,

[20.] Long P, Qin M, Zhang B, et al. . Nano-flower like CoFe-layered double hydroxide@reduced graphene oxide with efficient oxygen reduction reaction for high-power air-cathode microbial fuel cells. Carbon, 2023, 212,

[21.] Kotloski NJ, Gralnick JA. Flavin electron shuttles dominate extracellular electron transfer by Shewanella oneidensis. MBio, 2013, 4(1): e00553-e1512.

[22.] Kim M, Li S, Kong DS, et al. . Polydopamine/polypyrrole-modified graphite felt enhances biocompatibility for electroactive bacteria and power density of microbial fuel cell. Chemosphere, 2023, 313,

[23.] Yan X, Zhu MJ. Enhanced bioelectricity generation in thermophilic microbial fuel cell with lignocellulose as an electron donor by resazurin-mediated electron transfer. Bioresour Technol, 2023, 388,

[24.] Aiyer KS. How does electron transfer occur in microbial fuel cells?. World J Microbiol Biotechnol, 2020, 36(2): 19.

[25.] Fuller SJ, McMillan DGG, Renz MB, et al. . Extracellular electron transport-mediated Fe(III) reduction by a community of alkaliphilic bacteria that use flavins as electron shuttles. Appl Environ Microbiol, 2014, 80(1): 128-137.

[26.] Jiang X, Wang X. Cytochrome C-mediated apoptosis. Annu Rev Biochem, 2004, 73: 87-106.

[27.] Xu S, Liu H, Fan Y, et al. . Enhanced performance and mechanism study of microbial electrolysis cells using Fe nanoparticle-decorated anodes. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 2012, 93(2): 871-880.

[28.] Wu Z, Ni Z, Qin M, et al. . High-power microbial-fuel-based hybrid cells with three-dimensional graphene-coated iron foam as an anode control Fe³⁺ release. SmartMat, 2024,

[29.] Wu D, Xing D, Lu L, et al. . Ferric iron enhances electricity generation by Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 in MFCs. Bioresour Technol, 2013, 135: 630-634.

[30.] Kikouama OJR, Balde L. From edible clay to a clay-containing formulation for optimization of oral delivery of some trace elements: a review. Int J Food Sci Nutr, 2010, 61(8): 803-822.

[31.] Li Y, Rehbock C, Nachev M, et al. . Matrix-specific mechanism of Fe ion release from laser-generated 3D-printable nanoparticle-polymer composites and their protein adsorption properties. Nanotechnology, 2020, 31(40,

[32.] Osetrov K, Uspenskaya M, Olekhnovich R. The model pH-controlled delivery system based on gelatin-tannin hydrogels containing ferrous ascorbate: iron releasein vitro. Biomed Phys Eng Express, 2023, 9(2,

[33.] Buchman JT, Pho T, Rodriguez RS, et al. . Coating iron oxide nanoparticles with mesoporous silica reduces their interaction and impact on S. oneidensis MR-1. Chemosphere, 2019, 237,

[34.] Wang X, Zhang X, Zou F, et al. . Self-healing microcapsules modified by montmorillonite for modulating slow-release properties. Mater Chem Phys, 2022, 291,

[35.] Li Z, Zhang M. Progress in the preparation of stimulus-responsive cellulose hydrogels and their application in slow-release fertilizers. Polymers, 2023, 15(17): 3643.

[36.] Qu Y, Haverkamp R, Jin Z, et al. . Release kinetics of potassium, calcium, and iron cations from carboxymethyl cellulose hydrogels at different pH values. ChemPlusChem, 2023, 88(12,

[37.] Bajpai SK, Das P, Soni B. Copper nanoparticles loaded cellulose-g-poly acrylic acid fibers with antibacterial properties. J Ind Text, 2016, 45(4): 495-515.

[38.] Wang Y, Heinze T, Zhang K. Stimuli-responsive nanoparticles from ionic cellulose derivatives. Nanoscale, 2016, 8(1): 648-657.

[39.] Yang J, Gong D, Li G, et al. . Self-assembly of thiourea-crosslinked graphene oxide framework membranes toward separation of small molecules. Adv Mater, 2018, 30(16,

[40.] Zhang S, Li W, Wang W, et al. . Reactive superhydrophobic paper from one-step spray-coating of cellulose-based derivative. Appl Surf Sci, 2019, 497,

[41.] Zhang S, Chi M, Mo J, et al. . Bioinspired asymmetric amphiphilic surface for triboelectric enhanced efficient water harvesting. Nat Commun, 2022, 13(1): 4168.

[42.] Niu X, Liu Y, Fang G, et al. . Highly transparent, strong, and flexible films with modified cellulose nanofiber bearing UV shielding property. Biomacromol, 2018, 19(12): 4565-4575.

[43.] Zeng Q, Tian H, Jiang J, et al. . High-purity helical carbon nanotubes with enhanced electrochemical properties for supercapacitors. RSC Adv, 2017, 7(12): 7375-7381.

[44.] McKerracher RD, Ponce de Leon C, Wills RGA, et al. . A review of the iron–air secondary battery for energy storage. ChemPlusChem, 2015, 80(2): 323-335.

[45.] Hang BT, Thang DH. Effect of additives on the electrochemical properties of Fe₂O₃/C nanocomposite for Fe/air battery anode. J Electroanal Chem, 2016, 762: 59-65.

[46.] Egashira M Secondary batteries–metal-air systems | iron–air (secondary and primary). Encyclopedia of electrochemical power sources, 2009 Amsterdam Elsevier 372-375

[47.] Perez-Gonzalez T, Jimenez-Lopez C, Neal AL, et al. . Magnetite biomineralization induced by Shewanella oneidensis. Geochim Cosmochim Acta, 2010, 74(3): 967-979.

[48.] Han R, Liu T, Li F, et al. . Dependence of secondary mineral formation on Fe(II) production from ferrihydrite reduction by Shewanella oneidensis MR-1. ACS Earth Space Chem, 2018, 2(4): 399-409.

[49.] Tang YL, He YT, Yu PF, et al. . Effect of temperature on electricity generation of single-chamber microbial fuel cells with proton exchange membrane. Adv Mater Res, 2011, 393–395: 1169-1172.

[50.] Takeuchi Y, Khawdas W, Aso Y, et al. . Microbial fuel cells using Cellulomonas spp. with cellulose as fuel. J Biosci Bioeng, 2017, 123(3): 358-363.