Tailoring Iron-Ion Release of Cellulose-Based Aerogel-Coated Iron Foam for Long-Term High-Power Microbial Fuel Cells

Zhengyang Ni, Huitao Yu, Haoran Wang, Mengmeng Qin, Feng Li, Hao Song, Xiangyu Chen, Yiyu Feng, Wei Feng

Transactions of Tianjin University ›› 2024, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (5) : 436-447.

Transactions of Tianjin University ›› 2024, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (5) : 436-447. DOI: 10.1007/s12209-024-00410-4
Research Article

Tailoring Iron-Ion Release of Cellulose-Based Aerogel-Coated Iron Foam for Long-Term High-Power Microbial Fuel Cells

Author information +
History +

Abstract

The presence of iron (Fe) has been found to favor power generation in microbial fuel cells (MFCs). To achieve long-term power production in MFCs, it is crucial to effectively tailor the release of Fe ions over extended operating periods. In this study, we developed a composite anode (A/IF) by coating iron foam with cellulose-based aerogel. The concentration of Fe ions in the anode solution of A/IF anode reaches 0.280 μg/mL (Fe2+ vs. Fe3+  = 61%:39%) after 720 h of aseptic primary cell operation. This value was significantly higher than that (0.198 μg/mL, Fe2+ vs. Fe3+  = 92%:8%) on uncoated iron foam (IF), indicating a continuous release of Fe ions over long-term operation. Notably, the resulting MFCs hybrid cell exhibited a 23% reduction in Fe ion concentration (compared to a 47% reduction for the IF anode) during the sixth testing cycle (600–720 h). It achieved a high-power density of 301 ± 55 mW/m2 at 720 h, which was 2.62 times higher than that of the IF anode during the same period. Furthermore, a sedimentary microbial fuel cell (SMFCs) was constructed in a marine environment, and the A/IF anode demonstrated a power density of 103 ± 3 mW/m2 at 3240 h, representing a 75% improvement over the IF anode. These findings elucidate the significant enhancement in long-term power production performance of MFCs achieved through effective tailoring of Fe ions release during operation.

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Zhengyang Ni, Huitao Yu, Haoran Wang, Mengmeng Qin, Feng Li, Hao Song, Xiangyu Chen, Yiyu Feng, Wei Feng. Tailoring Iron-Ion Release of Cellulose-Based Aerogel-Coated Iron Foam for Long-Term High-Power Microbial Fuel Cells. Transactions of Tianjin University, 2024, 30(5): 436‒447 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12209-024-00410-4

References

[1.]
SchröderU, HarnischF, AngenentLT. Microbial electrochemistry and technology: terminology and classification. Energy Environ Sci, 2015, 8(2): 513-519
CrossRef Google scholar
[2.]
BajracharyaS, SharmaM, MohanakrishnaG, et al. . An overview on emerging bioelectrochemical systems (BESs): technology for sustainable electricity, waste remediation, resource recovery, chemical production and beyond. Renew Energy, 2016, 98: 153-170
CrossRef Google scholar
[3.]
GuptaS, PatroA, MittalY, et al. . The race between classical microbial fuel cells, sediment-microbial fuel cells, plant-microbial fuel cells, and constructed wetlands-microbial fuel cells: applications and technology readiness level. Sci Total Environ, 2023, 879
CrossRef Google scholar
[4.]
SantoroC, ArbizzaniC, ErableB, et al. . Microbial fuel cells: from fundamentals to applications. A review. J Power Sources, 2017, 356: 225-244
CrossRef Google scholar
[5.]
WuZ, FengY, LongP, et al. . A three-dimensional composite anode based on nitrogen-doped graphene/iron foam. J Funct Polym, 2023, 36: 365-371
[6.]
KhanN, AnwerAH, SultanaS, et al. . Effective toxicity assessment of synthetic dye in microbial fuel cell biosensor with spinel nanofiber anode. J Environ Chem Eng, 2022, 10(2)
CrossRef Google scholar
[7.]
AdekunleA, RaghavanV, TartakovskyB. On-line monitoring of heavy metals-related toxicity with a microbial fuel cell biosensor. Biosens Bioelectron, 2019, 132: 382-390
CrossRef Google scholar
[8.]
DuX, LiP, GuanZ, et al. . Polyaniline/carbon nanotube-modified carbon felt for accelerating underwater microbial gas production to enhance power generation. ChemNanoMat, 2023, 9(4)
CrossRef Google scholar
[9.]
JananiP, MuruganS. Implementation of sea sand in microbial fuel cell for an energy harvesting system using LTC for underwater applications. J Geo-Mar Sci, 2018, 46: 2241-2249
[10.]
LiWW, YuHQ, HeZ. Towards sustainable wastewater treatment by using microbial fuel cells-centered technologies. Energy Environ Sci, 2014, 7(3): 911-924
CrossRef Google scholar
[11.]
GeZ, HeZ. Long-term performance of a 200 liter modularized microbial fuel cell system treating municipal wastewater: treatment, energy, and cost. Environ Sci: Water Res Technol, 2016, 2(2): 274-281
[12.]
VolchenkoNN, LazukinAA, MaslennikovSI, et al. . Application of benthic microbial fuel cells in systems of year-round monitoring of water environment parameters. Oceanology, 2023, 63(6): 915-924
CrossRef Google scholar
[13.]
BrunelliD, TosatoP, RossiM. Flora health wireless monitoring with plant-microbial fuel cell. Procedia Eng, 2016, 168: 1646-1650
CrossRef Google scholar
[14.]
TranHVH, KimE, JungSP. Anode biofilm maturation time, stable cell performance time, and time-course electrochemistry in a single-chamber microbial fuel cell with a brush-anode. J Ind Eng Chem, 2022, 106: 269-278
CrossRef Google scholar
[15.]
KuleshovaTE, IvanovaAG, GalushkoAS, et al. . Influence of the electrode systems parameters on the electricity generation and the possibility of hydrogen production in a plant-microbial fuel cell. Int J Hydrog Energy, 2022, 47(58): 24297-24309
CrossRef Google scholar
[16.]
JinS, FengY, JiaJ, et al. . Three-dimensional N-doped carbon nanotube/graphene composite aerogel anode to develop high-power microbial fuel cell. Energy Environ Mater, 2023, 6(3): 12373
CrossRef Google scholar
[17.]
SahariSK, ButitAM, NgainiZ, et al. . Bioelectricity generation from bamboo leaves waste in a double chambered microbial fuel cell. Sains Malays, 2023, 52(6): 1855-1864
CrossRef Google scholar
[18.]
LiuX, YeY, ZhangZ, et al. . Prophage induction causes Geobacter electroactive biofilm decay. Environ Sci Technol, 2023, 57(15): 6196-6204
CrossRef Google scholar
[19.]
LaiBL, XiaoZH, JiangPY, et al. . Two-dimensional Ag–Fe–N/C nanosheets as efficient cathode catalyst to improve power-generation performance of microbial fuel cells. ChemElectroChem, 2022, 9(6)
CrossRef Google scholar
[20.]
LongP, QinM, ZhangB, et al. . Nano-flower like CoFe-layered double hydroxide@reduced graphene oxide with efficient oxygen reduction reaction for high-power air-cathode microbial fuel cells. Carbon, 2023, 212
CrossRef Google scholar
[21.]
KotloskiNJ, GralnickJA. Flavin electron shuttles dominate extracellular electron transfer by Shewanella oneidensis. MBio, 2013, 4(1): e00553-e1512
CrossRef Google scholar
[22.]
KimM, LiS, KongDS, et al. . Polydopamine/polypyrrole-modified graphite felt enhances biocompatibility for electroactive bacteria and power density of microbial fuel cell. Chemosphere, 2023, 313
CrossRef Google scholar
[23.]
YanX, ZhuMJ. Enhanced bioelectricity generation in thermophilic microbial fuel cell with lignocellulose as an electron donor by resazurin-mediated electron transfer. Bioresour Technol, 2023, 388
CrossRef Google scholar
[24.]
AiyerKS. How does electron transfer occur in microbial fuel cells?. World J Microbiol Biotechnol, 2020, 36(2): 19
CrossRef Google scholar
[25.]
FullerSJ, McMillanDGG, RenzMB, et al. . Extracellular electron transport-mediated Fe(III) reduction by a community of alkaliphilic bacteria that use flavins as electron shuttles. Appl Environ Microbiol, 2014, 80(1): 128-137
CrossRef Google scholar
[26.]
JiangX, WangX. Cytochrome C-mediated apoptosis. Annu Rev Biochem, 2004, 73: 87-106
CrossRef Google scholar
[27.]
XuS, LiuH, FanY, et al. . Enhanced performance and mechanism study of microbial electrolysis cells using Fe nanoparticle-decorated anodes. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 2012, 93(2): 871-880
CrossRef Google scholar
[28.]
WuZ, NiZ, QinM, et al. . High-power microbial-fuel-based hybrid cells with three-dimensional graphene-coated iron foam as an anode control Fe3+ release. SmartMat, 2024
CrossRef Google scholar
[29.]
WuD, XingD, LuL, et al. . Ferric iron enhances electricity generation by Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 in MFCs. Bioresour Technol, 2013, 135: 630-634
CrossRef Google scholar
[30.]
KikouamaOJR, BaldeL. From edible clay to a clay-containing formulation for optimization of oral delivery of some trace elements: a review. Int J Food Sci Nutr, 2010, 61(8): 803-822
CrossRef Google scholar
[31.]
LiY, RehbockC, NachevM, et al. . Matrix-specific mechanism of Fe ion release from laser-generated 3D-printable nanoparticle-polymer composites and their protein adsorption properties. Nanotechnology, 2020, 31(40)
CrossRef Google scholar
[32.]
OsetrovK, UspenskayaM, OlekhnovichR. The model pH-controlled delivery system based on gelatin-tannin hydrogels containing ferrous ascorbate: iron releasein vitro. Biomed Phys Eng Express, 2023, 9(2)
CrossRef Google scholar
[33.]
BuchmanJT, PhoT, RodriguezRS, et al. . Coating iron oxide nanoparticles with mesoporous silica reduces their interaction and impact on S. oneidensis MR-1. Chemosphere, 2019, 237
CrossRef Google scholar
[34.]
WangX, ZhangX, ZouF, et al. . Self-healing microcapsules modified by montmorillonite for modulating slow-release properties. Mater Chem Phys, 2022, 291
CrossRef Google scholar
[35.]
LiZ, ZhangM. Progress in the preparation of stimulus-responsive cellulose hydrogels and their application in slow-release fertilizers. Polymers, 2023, 15(17): 3643
CrossRef Google scholar
[36.]
QuY, HaverkampR, JinZ, et al. . Release kinetics of potassium, calcium, and iron cations from carboxymethyl cellulose hydrogels at different pH values. ChemPlusChem, 2023, 88(12)
CrossRef Google scholar
[37.]
BajpaiSK, DasP, SoniB. Copper nanoparticles loaded cellulose-g-poly acrylic acid fibers with antibacterial properties. J Ind Text, 2016, 45(4): 495-515
CrossRef Google scholar
[38.]
WangY, HeinzeT, ZhangK. Stimuli-responsive nanoparticles from ionic cellulose derivatives. Nanoscale, 2016, 8(1): 648-657
CrossRef Google scholar
[39.]
YangJ, GongD, LiG, et al. . Self-assembly of thiourea-crosslinked graphene oxide framework membranes toward separation of small molecules. Adv Mater, 2018, 30(16)
CrossRef Google scholar
[40.]
ZhangS, LiW, WangW, et al. . Reactive superhydrophobic paper from one-step spray-coating of cellulose-based derivative. Appl Surf Sci, 2019, 497
CrossRef Google scholar
[41.]
ZhangS, ChiM, MoJ, et al. . Bioinspired asymmetric amphiphilic surface for triboelectric enhanced efficient water harvesting. Nat Commun, 2022, 13(1): 4168
CrossRef Google scholar
[42.]
NiuX, LiuY, FangG, et al. . Highly transparent, strong, and flexible films with modified cellulose nanofiber bearing UV shielding property. Biomacromol, 2018, 19(12): 4565-4575
CrossRef Google scholar
[43.]
ZengQ, TianH, JiangJ, et al. . High-purity helical carbon nanotubes with enhanced electrochemical properties for supercapacitors. RSC Adv, 2017, 7(12): 7375-7381
CrossRef Google scholar
[44.]
McKerracherRD, Ponce de LeonC, WillsRGA, et al. . A review of the iron–air secondary battery for energy storage. ChemPlusChem, 2015, 80(2): 323-335
CrossRef Google scholar
[45.]
HangBT, ThangDH. Effect of additives on the electrochemical properties of Fe2O3/C nanocomposite for Fe/air battery anode. J Electroanal Chem, 2016, 762: 59-65
CrossRef Google scholar
[46.]
EgashiraM. Secondary batteries–metal-air systems | iron–air (secondary and primary). Encyclopedia of electrochemical power sources, 2009AmsterdamElsevier372-375
[47.]
Perez-GonzalezT, Jimenez-LopezC, NealAL, et al. . Magnetite biomineralization induced by Shewanella oneidensis. Geochim Cosmochim Acta, 2010, 74(3): 967-979
CrossRef Google scholar
[48.]
HanR, LiuT, LiF, et al. . Dependence of secondary mineral formation on Fe(II) production from ferrihydrite reduction by Shewanella oneidensis MR-1. ACS Earth Space Chem, 2018, 2(4): 399-409
CrossRef Google scholar
[49.]
TangYL, HeYT, YuPF, et al. . Effect of temperature on electricity generation of single-chamber microbial fuel cells with proton exchange membrane. Adv Mater Res, 2011, 393–395: 1169-1172
CrossRef Google scholar
[50.]
TakeuchiY, KhawdasW, AsoY, et al. . Microbial fuel cells using Cellulomonas spp. with cellulose as fuel. J Biosci Bioeng, 2017, 123(3): 358-363
CrossRef Google scholar

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/