Comparison of Perovskite Systems Based on AFeO₃ (A = Ce, La, Y) in CO₂ Hydrogenation to CO

Abstract

CO₂ is the most cost-effective and abundant carbon resource, while the reverse water–gas reaction (rWGS) is one of the most effective methods of CO₂ utilization. This work presents a comparative study of rWGS activity for perovskite systems based on AFeO₃ (where A = Ce, La, Y). These systems were synthesized by solution combustion synthesis (SCS) with different ratios of fuel (glycine) and oxidizer (φ), different amounts of NH₄NO₃, and the addition of alumina or silica as supports. Various techniques, including X-ray diffraction analysis, thermogravimetric analysis, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), scanning electron microscopy, energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, N₂-physisorption, H₂ temperature-programmed reduction, temperature-programmed desorption of H₂ and CO₂, Raman spectroscopy, and in situ FTIR, were used to relate the physicochemical properties with the catalytic performance of the obtained composites. Each specific perovskite-containing system (either bulk or supported) has its own optimal φ and NH₄NO₃ amount to achieve the highest yield and dispersion of the perovskite phase. Among all synthesized systems, bulk SCS-derived La–Fe–O systems showed the highest resistance to reducing environments and the easiest hydrogen desorption, outperforming La–Fe–O produced by solgel combustion (SGC). CO₂ conversion into CO at 600 °C for bulk ferrite systems, depending on the A-cation type and preparation method, follows the order La (SGC) < Y < Ce < La (SCS). The differences in properties between La–Fe–O obtained by the SCS and SGC methods can be attributed to different ratios of oxygen and lanthanum vacancy contributions, hydroxyl coverage, morphology, and free iron oxide presence. In situ FTIR data revealed that CO₂ hydrogenation occurs through formates generated under reaction conditions on the bulk system based on La–Fe–O, obtained by the SCS method. γ-Al₂O₃ improves the dispersion of CeFeO₃ and LaFeO₃ phases, the specific surface area, and the quantity of adsorbed H₂ and CO₂. This led to a significant increase in CO₂ conversion for supported CeFeO₃ but not for the La-based system compared to bulk and SiO₂-supported perovskite catalysts. However, adding alumina increased the activity per mass for both Ce- and La-based perovskite systems, reducing the amount of rare-earth components in the catalyst and thereby lowering the cost without substantially compromising stability.

Keywords

Perovskites / LaFeO₃ / CeFeO₃ / YFeO₃ / Solution combustion synthesis / CO₂ hydrogenation / Reverse water–gas reaction (rWGS)

References

[1.] Bhardwaj A, McCormick C, Friedmann J (2021) Opportunities and limits of CO₂ recycling in a circular carbon economy: techno-economics, critical infrastructure needs, and policy priorities. https://www.energypolicy.columbia.edu/publications/opportunities-and-limits-co2-recycling-circular-carbon-economy-techno-economics-critical/

[2.] Jia C, Gao J, Dai Y, et al. The thermodynamics analysis and experimental validation for complicated systems in CO₂ hydrogenation process. J Energy Chem, 2016, 25(6): 1027-1037.

[3.] Zhu M, Ge Q, Zhu X. Catalytic reduction of CO₂ to CO via reverse water gas shift reaction: recent advances in the design of active and selective supported metal catalysts. Trans Tianjin Univ, 2020, 26(3): 172-187.

[4.] Mirzakhani S, Yin BH, Masteri-Farahani M, et al. Heterogeneous catalytic systems for carbon dioxide hydrogenation to value-added chemicals. ChemPlusChem, 2023, 88(7): e202300157.

[5.] Yarbaş T, Ayas N. A detailed thermodynamic analysis of CO₂ hydrogenation to produce methane at low pressure. Int J Hydrog Energy, 2024, 49: 1134-1144.

[6.] Ebrahimi P, Kumar A, Khraisheh M. A review of CeO₂ supported catalysts for CO₂ reduction to CO through the reverse water gas shift reaction. Catalysts, 2022, 12(10): 1101.

[7.] González-Castaño M, Dorneanu B, Arellano-García H. The reverse water gas shift reaction: a process systems engineering perspective. React Chem Eng, 2021, 6(6): 954-976.

[8.] Cui L, Liu C, Yao B, et al. A review of catalytic hydrogenation of carbon dioxide: from waste to hydrocarbons. Front Chem, 2022, 10: 1037997.

[9.] Daza YA, Kuhn JN. CO₂ conversion by reverse water gas shift catalysis: comparison of catalysts, mechanisms and their consequences for CO₂ conversion to liquid fuels. RSC Adv, 2016, 6(55): 49675-49691.

[10.] Charisiou ND, Polychronopoulou K, Asif A, et al. The potential of glycerol and phenol towards H₂ production using steam reforming reaction: a review. Surf Coat Technol, 2018, 352: 92-111.

[11.] Adeniyi AG, Ighalo JO. A review of steam reforming of glycerol. Chem Pap, 2019, 73(11): 2619-2635.

[12.] Roslan NA, Abidin SZ, Ideris A, et al. A review on glycerol reforming processes over Ni-based catalyst for hydrogen and syngas productions. Int J Hydrog Energy, 2020, 45(36): 18466-18489.

[13.] Chilakamarry CR, Sakinah AMM, Zularisam AW, et al. Glycerol waste to value added products and its potential applications. Syst Microbiol Biomanuf, 2021, 1(4): 378-396.

[14.] Falkowski P, Scholes RJ, Boyle E, et al. The global carbon cycle: a test of our knowledge of earth as a system. Science, 2000, 290(5490): 291-296.

[15.] Mathew T, Saju S, Raveendran SN (2021) Survey of heterogeneous catalysts for the CO₂ reduction to CO via reverse water gas shift. Engineering solutions for CO₂ conversion. In Reina TR, Arellano-Garcia H, Odriozola JA (eds) Engineering solutions for CO₂ conversion. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, pp. 281–316

[16.] Zhao B, Yan B, Jiang Z, et al. High selectivity of CO₂ hydrogenation to CO by controlling the valence state of nickel using perovskite. Chem Commun, 2018, 54(53): 7354-7357.

[17.] Lindenthal L, Popovic J, Rameshan R, et al. Novel perovskite catalysts for CO₂ utilization – exsolution enhanced reverse water-gas shift activity. Appl Catal B Environ, 2021, 292: 120183.

[18.] Zhang J, Wang Y, Tian J, et al. Cu/LaFeO₃ as an efficient and stable catalyst for CO₂ reduction: exploring synergistic effect between Cu and LaFeO₃. AlChE J, 2022, 68(6): e17640.

[19.] Matveyeva AN, Omarov SO, Gavrilova MA, et al. CeFeO₃-CeO₂-Fe₂O₃ systems: synthesis by solution combustion method and catalytic performance in CO₂ hydrogenation. Materials, 2022, 15(22): 7970.

[20.] Matveyeva AN, Omarov SO, Gavrilova MA. Alumina and silica supported Ce-Fe-O systems obtained by the solution combustion method and their performance in CO₂ hydrogenation to syngas. Nanosystems Phys Chem Math, 2023, 14(6): 679-689.

[21.] Chen X, Chen Y, Song C, et al. Recent advances in supported metal catalysts and oxide catalysts for the reverse water-gas shift reaction. Front Chem, 2020, 8: 709.

[22.] Kim DH, Park JL, Park EJ, et al. Dopant effect of Barium zirconate-based perovskite-type catalysts for the intermediate-temperature reverse water gas shift reaction. ACS Catal, 2014, 4(9): 3117-3122.

[23.] Maiti D, Daza YA, Yung MM, et al. Oxygen vacancy formation characteristics in the bulk and across different surface terminations of La_{(1– x )}Sr _xFe_{(1− y )}Co _yO_{(3− δ )} perovskite oxides for CO₂ conversion. J Mater Chem A, 2016, 4(14): 5137-5148.

[24.] Peña MA, Fierro JL. Chemical structures and performance of perovskite oxides. Chem Rev, 2001, 101(7): 1981-2017.

[25.] Li F, Zhan H, Zhao N et al (2016) Copper-based perovskite design and its performance in CO₂ hydrogenation to methanol. In Pan L, Zhu G (eds) Perovskite materials – Synthesis, characterisation, properties, and applications, IntechOpen Limited, London, https://doi.org/10.5772/61520.

[26.] Goldwasser MR, Rivas ME, Lugo ML, et al. Combined methane reforming in presence of CO₂ and O₂ over LaFe_{1– x}Co _xO₃ mixed-oxide perovskites as catalysts precursors. Catal Today, 2005, 107–108: 106-113.

[27.] Dawa T, Sajjadi B. Exploring the potential of perovskite structures for chemical looping technology: a state-of-the-art review. Fuel Process Technol, 2024, 253: 108022.

[28.] Ma LH, Gao XH, Zhang JL, et al. Effects of metal doping on the catalytic performance of LaFe-based perovskites for CO₂ hydrogenation to light olefins. J Fuel Chem Technol, 2023, 51(1): 101-110.

[29.] Markova-Velichkova M, Lazarova T, Tumbalev V, et al. Complete oxidation of hydrocarbons on YFeO₃ and LaFeO₃ catalysts. Chem Eng J, 2013, 231: 236-244.

[30.] Sun W, Zheng L, Wang Y, et al (2022) Direct synthesis of dimethyl carbonate from CO₂ and methanol in dual supercritical phases over Y _xFe_1–xO catalysts. J CO2 Util 58 101912

[31.] Surendran A, Gupta NK, Aziz F et al (2020) Synthesis and characterization of Ce–Fe composite nanoparticles via sol-gel method. J Nano- Electron Phys 12(1) 1025–1–01025–3

[32.] Opuchovic O, Kreiza G, Senvaitiene J, et al. Sol–gel synthesis, characterization and application of selected sub-microsized lanthanide (Ce, Pr, Nd, Tb) ferrites. Dyes Pigm, 2015, 118: 176-182.

[33.] Robbins M, Wertheim GK, Menth A, et al. Preparation and properties of polycrystalline cerium orthoferrite (CeFeO₃). J Phys Chem Solids, 1969, 30(7): 1823-1825.

[34.] Ameta J, Kumar A, Ameta R, et al. Synthesis and characterization of CeFeO₃ photocatalyst used in photocatalytic bleaching of gentian violet. J Iran Chem Soc, 2009, 6(2): 293-299.

[35.] Pandya HN, Kulkarni RG, Parsania PH. Study of cerium orthoferrite prepared by wet chemical method. Mater Res Bull, 1990, 25(8): 1073-1077.

[36.] Deganello F, Tyagi AK. Solution combustion synthesis, energy and environment: best parameters for better materials. Prog Cryst Growth Charact Mater, 2018, 64(2): 23-61.

[37.] Siddique F, Gonzalez-Cortes S, Mirzaei A, et al. Solution combustion synthesis: the relevant metrics for producing advanced and nanostructured photocatalysts. Nanoscale, 2022, 14(33): 11806-11868.

[38.] Deganello F, Testa ML, La Parola V, et al. LaFeO₃-based nanopowders prepared by a soft–hard templating approach: the effect of silica texture. J Mater Chem A, 2014, 2(22): 8438-8447.

[39.] Scholz J, Etter M, Haas D, et al. Pore geometry effect on the synthesis of silica supported perovskite oxides. J Colloid Interface Sci, 2017, 504: 346-355.

[40.] Yu TF, Chang CW, Chung PW, et al. Unsupported and silica-supported perovskite-type lanthanum manganite and lanthanum ferrite in the conversion of ethanol. Fuel Process Technol, 2019, 194: 106117.

[41.] Voskanyan AA, Chan KY, Li CYV. Colloidal solution combustion synthesis: toward mass production of a crystalline uniform mesoporous CeO₂ catalyst with tunable porosity. Chem Mater, 2016, 28(8): 2768-2775.

[42.] Hare BJ, Maiti D, Daza YA, et al. Enhanced CO₂ conversion to CO by silica-supported perovskite oxides at low temperatures. ACS Catal, 2018, 8(4): 3021-3029.

[43.] Hare BJ, Maiti D, Ramani S, et al. Thermochemical conversion of carbon dioxide by reverse water-gas shift chemical looping using supported perovskite oxides. Catal Today, 2019, 323: 225-232.

[44.] Kharlamova TS, Urazov KK, Vodyankina OV. Effect of modification of supported V₂O₅/SiO₂ catalysts by lanthanum on the state and structural peculiarities of vanadium. Kinet Catal, 2019, 60(4): 465-473.

[45.] González-Cortés SL, Imbert FE. Fundamentals, properties and applications of solid catalysts prepared by solution combustion synthesis (SCS). Appl Catal A Gen, 2013, 452: 117-131.

[46.] Matveyeva AN, Omarov SO, Gavrilova MA, et al. CeO₂-supported Ni and Co catalysts prepared by a solution combustion method for H₂ production from glycerol: the effect of fuel/oxidizer ratio and oxygen excess. Catal Sci Technol, 2023, 13(18): 5387-5406.

[47.] Wu L, Yu JC, Zhang L, et al. Selective self-propagating combustion synthesis of hexagonal and orthorhombic nanocrystalline yttrium iron oxide. J Solid State Chem, 2004, 177(10): 3666-3674.

[48.] Tao Y, Zhao G, Zhang W, et al. Combustion synthesis and photoluminescence of nanocrystalline Y₂O₃: Eu phosphors. Mater Res Bull, 1997, 32(5): 501-506.

[49.] Popkov VI, Almjasheva OV. Yttrium orthoferrite YFeO₃ nanopowders formation under glycine-nitrate combustion conditions. Russ J Appl Chem, 2014, 87(2): 167-171.

[50.] Bachina A, Ivanov VA, Popkov VI. Peculiarities of LaFeO₃ nanocrystals formation via glycine-nitrate combustion. Nanosystems Phys Chem Math, 2017, 8: 647-653.

[51.] Tarjomannejad A, Zonouz PR, Masoumi ME, et al. LaFeO₃ perovskites obtained from different methods for NO + CO reaction, modeling and optimization of synthesis process by response surface methodology. J Inorg Organomet Polym Mater, 2018, 28(5): 2012-2022.

[52.] Abazari R, Sanati S, Ali Saghatforoush L. A unique and facile preparation of lanthanum ferrite nanoparticles in emulsion nanoreactors: morphology, structure, and efficient photocatalysis. Mater Sci Semicond Process, 2014, 25: 301-306.

[53.] Boulahouache A, Benlembarek M, Salhi N, et al. Preparation, characterization and electronic properties of LaFeO₃ perovskite as photocatalyst for hydrogen production. Int J Hydrog Energy, 2023, 48(39): 14650-14658.

[54.] Varma A, Mukasyan AS, Rogachev AS, et al. Solution combustion synthesis of nanoscale materials. Chem Rev, 2016, 116(23): 14493-14586.

[55.] Erri P, Pranda P, Varma A. Oxidizer–fuel interactions in aqueous combustion synthesis 1 iron(III) nitrate–model fuels. Ind Eng Chem Res, 2004, 43(12): 3092-3096.

[56.] Wang H, Liu J, Zhao Z, et al. Comparative study of nanometric Co-, Mn- and Fe-based perovskite-type complex oxide catalysts for the simultaneous elimination of soot and NO from diesel engine exhaust. Catal Today, 2012, 184(1): 288-300.

[57.] Wang H, Fang Y, Liu Y, et al. Perovskite LaFeO₃ supported bi-metal catalyst for syngas methanation. J Nat Gas Chem, 2012, 21(6): 745-752.

[58.] Lian J, Fang X, Liu W, et al. Ni supported on LaFeO₃ perovskites for methane steam reforming: on the promotional effects of plasma treatment in H₂–Ar atmosphere. Top Catal, 2017, 60(12): 831-842.

[59.] Heidinger B, Royer S, Alamdari H, et al. Reactive grinding synthesis of LaBO₃ (B: Mn, Fe) perovskite; properties for toluene total oxidation. Catalysts, 2019, 9(8): 633.

[60.] Kucharczyk B, Adamska K, Tylus W, et al. Effect of silver addition to LaFeO₃ perovskite on the activity of monolithic La_{1− x}Ag _xFeO₃ perovskite catalysts in methane hexane oxidation. Catal Lett, 2019, 149(7): 1919-1933.

[61.] Jiang B, Li L, Zhang Q, et al. Iron–oxygen covalency in perovskites to dominate syngas yield in chemical looping partial oxidation. J Mater Chem A, 2021, 9(22): 13008-13018.

[62.] Tejuca LG. Temperature programmed desorption study of hydrogen adsorption on LaMO₃ oxides. Thermochim Acta, 1988, 126: 205-212.

[63.] Boateng IW, Tia R, Adei E, et al. A DFT+U investigation of hydrogen adsorption on the LaFeO₃(010) surface. Phys Chem Chem Phys, 2017, 19(10): 7399-7409.

[64.] Li Q, Yin Q, Zheng YS, et al. Insights into hydrogen transport behavior on perovskite surfaces: transition from the grotthuss mechanism to the vehicle mechanism. Langmuir, 2019, 35(30): 9962-9969.

[65.] Corberán VC, Tejuca LG, Bell AT. Surface reactivity of reduced LaFeO₃ as studied by TPD and IR spectroscopies of CO, CO₂ and H₂. J Mater Sci, 1989, 24(12): 4437-4442.

[66.] Grünbacher M, Köck EM, Kogler M et al (2016) Evidence for dissolved hydrogen in the mixed ionic–electronic conducting perovskites La_0.6Sr_0.4FeO_3−δ and SrTi_0.7Fe_0.3O_3−δ. Phys Chem Chem Phys 18(38) 26873–26884

[67.] Grünbacher M, Götsch T, Opitz AK et al (2018) CO₂ reduction on the pre-reduced mixed ionic–electronic conducting perovskites La_0.6Sr_0.4FeO_3−δ and SrTi_0.7Fe_0.3O_3−δ. Chem Phys Chem 19(1) 93 107

[68.] Li X, Zhao H, Liang J, et al. A-site perovskite oxides: an emerging functional material for electrocatalysis and photocatalysis. J Mater Chem A, 2021, 9(11): 6650-6670.

[69.] Dai XP, Li RJ, Yu CC, et al. Unsteady-state direct partial oxidation of methane to synthesis gas in a fixed-bed reactor using AFeO₃ (A = La, Nd, Eu) perovskite-type oxides as oxygen storage. J Phys Chem B, 2006, 110(45): 22525-22531.

[70.] Balachandran PV, Emery AA, Gubernatis JE, et al. Predictions of new ABO₃ perovskite compounds by combining machine learning and density functional theory. Phys Rev Materials, 2018, 2(4): 043802.

[71.] Wan HJ, Wu BS, Li TZ, et al. Effects of SiO₂ and Al₂O₃ on performances of iron-basedcatalysts for slurry Fischer-Tropsch synthesis. J Fuel Chem Technol, 2007, 35(5): 589-594.

[72.] Guntida A, Suriye K, Panpranot J, et al. Comparative study of Lewis acid transformation on non-reducible and reducible oxides under hydrogen atmosphere by in situ DRIFTS of adsorbed NH₃. Top Catal, 2018, 61(15): 1641-1652.

[73.] Rozanov VV, Krylov OV. Hydrogen spillover in heterogeneous catalysis. Russ Chem Rev, 1997, 66(2): 107-119.

[74.] Karim W, Spreafico C, Kleibert A, et al. Catalyst support effects on hydrogen spillover. Nature, 2017, 541(7635): 68-71.

[75.] Tan M, Yang Y, Yang Y, et al. Hydrogen spillover assisted by oxygenate molecules over nonreducible oxides. Nat Commun, 2022, 13(1): 1457.

[76.] Bettahar MM. The hydrogen spillover effect. A misunderstanding story Catal Rev, 2022, 64(1): 87-125.

[77.] Mosallanejad S, Dlugogorski BZ, Kennedy EM, et al. On the chemistry of iron oxide supported on γ-alumina and silica catalysts. ACS Omega, 2018, 3(5): 5362-5374.

[78.] Sato S, Takahashi R, Kobune M, et al. Basic properties of rare earth oxides. Appl Catal A Gen, 2009, 356(1): 57-63.

[79.] Scokart PO, Rouxhet PG. Comparison of the acid-base properties of various oxides and chemically treated oxides. J Colloid Interface Sci, 1982, 86(1): 96-104.

[80.] Chanda S, Saha S, Dutta A, et al. Magnetic and dielectric properties of orthoferrites La_{1– x} Pr _xFeO₃ (x = 0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4 and 0.5). J Alloys Compd, 2015, 649: 1260-1266.

[81.] Mahapatra AS, Mitra A, Mallick A, et al. Enhanced magnetic property and phase transition in Ho³⁺ doped LaFeO₃. Mater Lett, 2016, 169: 160-163.

[82.] Eyméoud P, Turquat C, Pardanaud C, et al. Raman spectroscopic detection of vacancies in LaFeO₃. Mater Lett, 2023, 330: 133296.

[83.] Wu S, Lin Y, Yang C, et al. Enhanced activation of peroxymonosulfte by LaFeO₃ perovskite supported on Al₂O₃ for degradation of organic pollutants. Chemosphere, 2019, 237: 124478.

[84.] Yang J, Hu S, Fang Y, et al. Oxygen vacancy promoted O₂ activation over perovskite oxide for low-temperature CO oxidation. ACS Catal, 2019, 9(11): 9751-9763.

[85.] Chen Y, Fan J, Liu T, et al. Theoretical study on the effect of an O vacancy on the hydrogen storage properties of the LaFeO₃ (010) surface. Int J Hydrog Energy, 2019, 44(11): 5374-5381.

[86.] Bahmanpour AM, Héroguel F, Kılıç M, et al. Cu–Al spinel as a highly active and stable catalyst for the reverse water gas shift reaction. ACS Catal, 2019, 9(7): 6243-6251.

[87.] Hadjiivanov K (2014) Identification and characterization of surface hydroxyl groups by infrared spectroscopy. Advances in Catalysis. Amsterdam: Elsevier: 99–318

[88.] Mironenko RM, Belskaya OB, Talsi VP, et al. Effect of γ-Al₂O₃ hydrothermal treatment on the formation and properties of platinum sites in Pt/γ-Al₂O₃ catalysts. Appl Catal A Gen, 2014, 469: 472-482.

[89.] Webber J, Zorzi JE, Perottoni CA, et al. Identification of α-Al₂O₃ surface sites and their role in the adsorption of stearic acid. J Mater Sci, 2016, 51(11): 5170-5184.

[90.] Onfroy T, Li WC, Schüth F, et al. Surface chemistry of carbon-templated mesoporous aluminas. Phys Chem Chem Phys, 2009, 11(19): 3671-3679.

[91.] Topsoe NY, Topsoe H. FTIR studies of Mo/Al₂O₃-based catalysts. J Catal, 1993, 139(2): 631-640.

[92.] Morrow BA, Cody IA. Infrared spectra of the isolated hydroxyl groups on silica. J Phys Chem, 1973, 77(11): 1465-1469.

[93.] Zhuravlev LT (2000) The surface chemistry of amorphous silica. Zhuravlev model. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Aspects 173(1–3):1–38

[94.] Hair ML. Hydroxyl groups on silica surface. J Non Cryst Solids, 1975, 19: 299-309.

[95.] Gierada M, De Proft F, Sulpizi M, et al. Understanding the acidic properties of the amorphous hydroxylated silica surface. J Phys Chem C, 2019, 123(28): 17343-17352.

[96.] Magnacca G, Spezzati G, Deganello F, et al. A new in situ methodology for the quantification of the oxygen storage potential in perovskite-type materials. RSC Adv, 2013, 3(48): 26352-26360.

[97.] Li Y, Fan J, Feng X, et al. Degradation of organics using LaFeO₃ as a persulfate activator under low-intensity ultra-violet-light irradiation: catalytic performance and mechanism. J Rare Earths, 2022, 40(7): 1043-1052.

[98.] Warsi MF, Ihsan A, Alzahrani FMA, et al. A cost-effective strategy to synthesize perovskite holmium doped LaFeO₃ and its composite with CNTs for wastewater treatment. Mater Sci Eng B, 2024, 301.

[99.] Gosavi PV, Biniwale RB. Pure phase LaFeO₃ perovskite with improved surface area synthesized using different routes and its characterization. Mater Chem Phys, 2010, 119(1–2): 324-329.

[100.] Ismail W, Belal A, Abdo W, et al. Investigating the physical and electrical properties of La₂O₃ via annealing of La(OH)3. Sci Rep, 2024, 14: 7716.

[101.] Razali N, McGregor J. Improving product yield in the direct carboxylation of glycerol with CO₂ through the tailored selection of dehydrating agents. Catalysts, 2021, 11(1): 138.

[102.] Stoerzinger KA, Wang L, Ye Y, et al. Linking surface chemistry to photovoltage in Sr-substituted LaFeO₃ for water oxidation. J Mater Chem A, 2018, 6(44): 22170-22178.

[103.] Stoerzinger KA, Comes R, Spurgeon SR, et al. Influence of LaFeO₃ surface termination on water reactivity. J Phys Chem Lett, 2017, 8(5): 1038-1043.

[104.] Lahiri N, Song D, Zhang X, et al. Interplay between facets and defects during the dissociative and molecular adsorption of water on metal oxide surfaces. J Am Chem Soc, 2023, 145(5): 2930-2940.

[105.] Polo-Garzon F, Yang SZ, Fung V, et al. Controlling reaction selectivity through the surface termination of perovskite catalysts. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl, 2017, 56(33): 9820-9824.

[106.] Sugunan S, Meera V. Acid-base properties and catalytic activity of ABO₃ (perovskite-type) oxides consisting of rare earth and 3d transition metals. React Kinet Catal Lett, 1997, 62(2): 327-332.

[107.] Manoilova O, Podkolzin S, Tope B, et al. Surface acidity and basicity of La₂O₃, LaOCl, and LaCl₃ characterized by IR spectroscopy, TPD, and DFT calculations. J Phys Chem B, 2004, 108: 15770-15781.

[108.] Rizzetto A, Piumetti M, Pirone R, et al. Study of ceria-composite materials for high-temperature CO₂ capture and their ruthenium functionalization for methane production. Catal Today, 2024, 429.

[109.] Liu J, Li Y, Liu H, et al. Transformation of CO₂ and glycerol to glycerol carbonate over CeO₂ ZrO₂ solid solution—effect of Zr doping. Biomass Bioenergy, 2018, 118: 74-83.

[110.] Cárdenas-Arenas A, Quindimil A, Davó-Quiñonero A, et al. Isotopic and in situ DRIFTS study of the CO₂ methanation mechanism using Ni/CeO₂ and Ni/Al₂O₃ catalysts. Appl Catal B Environ, 2020, 265.

[111.] Lahuri AH, Yarmo MA. Study of CO₂ adsorption time for carbonate species and linear CO2 formations onto bimetallic CaO/Fe₂O₃ by infrared spectroscopy. Sains Malays, 2022, 51(2): 507-517.

[112.] Kouva S, Andersin J, Honkala K, et al. Water and carbon oxides on monoclinic zirconia: experimental and computational insights. Phys Chem Chem Phys, 2014, 16(38): 20650-20664.

[113.] Zhang Z, Zhang L, Yao S, et al. Support-dependent rate-determining step of CO₂ hydrogenation to formic acid on metal oxide supported Pd catalysts. J Catal, 2019, 376: 57-67.

[114.] Li C, Sakata Y, Arai T et al (1989) Carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide adsorption on cerium oxide studied by Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy. Part 1.—formation of carbonate species on dehydroxylated CeO₂, at room temperature. J Chem Soc, Faraday Trans 1 85(4):929

[115.] Baltrusaitis J, Jensen JH, Grassian VH. FTIR spectroscopy combined with isotope labeling and quantum chemical calculations to investigate adsorbed bicarbonate formation following reaction of carbon dioxide with surface hydroxyl groups on Fe₂O₃ and Al₂O₃. J Phys Chem B, 2006, 110(24): 12005-12016.

[116.] Szanyi J, Kwak JH. Dissecting the steps of CO₂ reduction: 1. The interaction of CO and CO₂ with γ-Al₂O₂: an in situ FTIR study. Phys Chem Chem Phys, 2014, 16(29): 15117-15125.

[117.] Coenen K, Gallucci F, Mezari B, et al. An in situ IR study on the adsorption of CO₂ and H₂O on hydrotalcites. Phys Chem Chem Phys, 2018, 16:24-239.

[118.] Busca G, Lorenzelli V. Infrared spectroscopic identification of species arising from reactive adsorption of carbon oxides on metal oxide surfaces. Mater Chem, 1982, 7(1): 89-126.

[119.] Köck EM, Kogler M, Bielz T, et al. In situ FT-IR spectroscopic study of CO₂ and CO adsorption on Y₂O₃, ZrO₂, and yttria-stabilized ZrO₂. J Phys Chem C Nanomater Interfaces, 2013, 117(34): 17666-17673.

[120.] Wang X, Shi H, Kwak JH, et al. Mechanism of CO₂ hydrogenation on Pd/Al₂O₃ catalysts: kinetics and transient DRIFTS-MS studies. ACS Catal, 2015, 5(11): 6337-6349.

[121.] Su W, Zhang J, Feng Z, et al. Surface phases of TiO₂ nanoparticles studied by UV Raman spectroscopy and FT-IR spectroscopy. J Phys Chem C, 2008, 112(20): 7710-7716.

[122.] Baltrusaitis J, Schuttlefield J, Zeitler E, et al. Carbon dioxide adsorption on oxide nanoparticle surfaces. Chem Eng J, 2011, 170(2–3): 471-481.

[123.] Collins SE, Baltanás MA, Bonivardi AL. Infrared spectroscopic study of the carbon dioxide adsorption on the surface of Ga₂O₃ polymorphs. J Phys Chem B, 2006, 110(11): 5498-5507.

[124.] Seyller T, Borgmann D, Wedler G. Interaction of CO₂ with Cs-promoted Fe(110) as compared to Fe(110)/K+CO₂. Surf Sci, 1998, 400(1–3): 63-79.

[125.] Yu Y, Bian Z, Wang J, et al. CO₂ hydrogenation to CH₄ over hydrothermal prepared ceria-nickel catalysts: performance and mechanism study. Catal Today, 2023, 424.

[126.] Graciani J, Mudiyanselage K, Xu F, et al. Highly active copper-ceria and copper-ceria-titania catalysts for methanol synthesis from CO₂. Science, 2014, 345(6196): 546-550.

[127.] Mudiyanselage K, Senanayake SD, Feria L, et al. Importance of the metal-oxide interface in catalysis: in situ studies of the water-gas shift reaction by ambient-pressure X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl, 2013, 52(19): 5101-5105.

[128.] Li C, Sakata Y, Arai T et al (1989) Adsorption of carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide on cerium oxide studied by Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy. Part 2.—formation of formate species on partially reduced CeO₂ at room temperature. J Chem Soc, Faraday Trans 1 85(6):1451

[129.] Bobadilla LF, Santos JL, Ivanova S, et al. Unravelling the role of oxygen vacancies in the mechanism of the reverse water–gas shift reaction by Operando DRIFTS and ultraviolet–visible spectroscopy. ACS Catal, 2018, 8(8): 7455-7467.

[130.] Millar GJ, Rochester CH, Howe C, et al. A combined infrared, temperature programmed desorption and temperature programmed reaction spectroscopy study of CO₂ and H₂ interactions on reduced and oxidized silica-supported copper catalysts. Mol Phys, 1992, 76(4): 833-849.

[131.] Solis BH, Cui Y, Weng X, et al. Initial stages of CO₂ adsorption on CaO: a combined experimental and computational study. Phys Chem Chem Phys, 2017, 19(6): 4231-4242.

[132.] Martín MA, García Fierro JL, Tejuca LG. Surface interactions between CO₂ and LaFeO₃. Z Für Phys Chem, 1981, 127(2): 237-249.

[133.] Köferstein R, Ebbinghaus SG. Synthesis and characterization of nano-LaFeO₃ powders by a soft-chemistry method and corresponding ceramics. Solid State Ion, 2013, 231: 43-48.

[134.] Ginés MJL, Marchi AJ, Apesteguía CR. Kinetic study of the reverse water-gas shift reaction over CuO/ZnO/Al₂O₃ catalysts. Appl Catal A Gen, 1997, 154(1–2): 155-171.

[135.] Fornero EL, Chiavassa DL, Bonivardi AL et al (2017) Transient analysis of the reverse water gas shift reaction on Cu/ZrO₂ and Ga₂O₃/Cu/ZrO₂ catalysts. J CO₂ Util 22:289–298

[136.] Fujita S. Mechanism of the reverse water gas shift reaction over Cu/ZnO catalyst. J Catal, 1992, 134(1): 220-225.

[137.] Goguet A, Meunier FC, Tibiletti D, et al. Spectrokinetic investigation of reverse water-gas-shift reaction intermediates over a Pt/CeO₂ catalyst. J Phys Chem B, 2004, 108(52): 20240-20246.

[138.] Zhang M, Zijlstra B, Filot IAW, et al. A theoretical study of the reverse water-gas shift reaction on Ni(111) and Ni(311) surfaces. Can J Chem Eng, 2020, 98(3): 740-748.

[139.] Chen L, Filot IAW, Hensen EJM. Elucidation of the reverse water–gas shift reaction mechanism over an isolated Ru atom on CeO₂(111). J Phys Chem C, 2023, 127(41): 20314-20324.

[140.] Su X, Yang X, Zhao B, et al. Designing of highly selective and high-temperature endurable RWGS heterogeneous catalysts: recent advances and the future directions. J Energy Chem, 2017, 26(5): 854-867.

[141.] Chen X, Su X, Liang B, et al. Identification of relevant active sites and a mechanism study for reverse water gas shift reaction over Pt/CeO₂ catalysts. J Energy Chem, 2016, 25(6): 1051-1057.

[142.] Tian G, Li Z, Zhang C, et al. Upgrading CO₂ to sustainable aromatics via perovskite-mediated tandem catalysis. Nat Commun, 2024, 15(1): 3037.