Multi-objective Design of Blending Fuel by Intelligent Optimization Algorithms

Abstract

Fuel design is a complex multi-objective optimization problem in which facile and robust methods are urgently demanded. Herein, a complete workflow for designing a fuel blending scheme is presented, which is theoretically supported, efficient, and reliable. Based on the data distribution of the composition and properties of the blending fuels, a model of polynomial regression with appropriate hypothesis space was established. The parameters of the model were further optimized by different intelligence algorithms to achieve high-precision regression. Then, the design of a blending fuel was described as a multi-objective optimization problem, which was solved using a Nelder–Mead algorithm based on the concept of Pareto domination. Finally, the design of a target fuel was fully validated by experiments. This study provides new avenues for designing various blending fuels to meet the needs of next-generation engines.

Keywords

Multi-objective optimization / Machine learning / Blending fuel

References

[1.] Emami-Taba L, Irfan MF, Wan Daud WMA, et al.. Fuel blending effects on the co-gasification of coal and biomass—a review. Biomass Bioenergy, 2013, 57: 249-263,

[2.] Arias B, Pevida C, Rubiera F, et al.. Effect of biomass blending on coal ignition and burnout during oxy-fuel combustion. Fuel, 2008, 87(12): 2753-2759,

[3.] Liu Y, Yang Z, Yu Z, et al.. Generative artificial intelligence and its applications in materials science: current situation and future perspectives. J Materiomics, 2023, 9(4): 798-816,

[4.] Liu Y, Yang Z, Zou X, et al.. Data quantity governance for machine learning in materials science. Natl Sci Rev, 2023, 10(7): nwad125,

[5.] Liu R, Liu R, Liu Y, et al.. Design of fuel molecules based on variational autoencoder. Fuel, 2022, 316,

[6.] Schütt KT, Arbabzadah F, Chmiela S, et al.. Quantum-chemical insights from deep tensor neural networks. Nat Commun, 2017, 8: 13890,

[7.] Kessler T, Sacia ER, Bell AT, et al.. Artificial neural network based predictions of cetane number for furanic biofuel additives. Fuel, 2017, 206: 171-179,

[8.] Li R, Herreros JM, Tsolakis A, et al.. Integrated machine learning-quantitative structure property relationship (ML-QSPR) and chemical kinetics for high throughput fuel screening toward internal combustion engine. Fuel, 2022, 307,

[9.] Li R, Herreros JM, Tsolakis A, et al.. Machine learning and deep learning enabled fuel sooting tendency prediction from molecular structure. J Mol Graph Model, 2022, 111,

[10.] Cengiz E, Babagiray M, Emre Aysal F, et al.. Kinematic viscosity estimation of fuel oil with comparison of machine learning methods. Fuel, 2022, 316,

[11.] Gilmer J, Schoenholz SS, Riley PF et al (2017) Neural message passing for quantum chemistry. In: Proceedings of the 34th international conference on machine learning, Sydney, Australia, vol 70, pp 1263–1272

[12.] Schweidtmann AM, Rittig JG, König A, et al.. Graph neural networks for prediction of fuel ignition quality. Energy Fuels, 2020, 34(9): 11395-11407,

[13.] Yaka H, Insel MA, Yucel O, et al.. A comparison of machine learning algorithms for estimation of higher heating values of biomass and fossil fuels from ultimate analysis. Fuel, 2022, 320,

[14.] Shi Y. Support vector regression-based QSAR models for prediction of antioxidant activity of phenolic compounds. Sci Rep, 2021, 11(1): 8806,

[15.] Najafi G, Ghobadian B, Moosavian A, et al.. SVM and ANFIS for prediction of performance and exhaust emissions of a SI engine with gasoline–ethanol blended fuels. Appl Therm Eng, 2016, 95: 186-203,

[16.] Ji Y, Yang H, Liu Z, Bi Q. Endothermic performance and mechanism of aviation kerosene HD-01 cracking by titanate coupling agents. Acta Petrol Sin, 2021, 37: 1114-1119

[17.] Liu Y, Zhang H, Pan L, et al.. High-energy-density gelled fuels with high stability and shear thinning performance. Chin J Chem Eng, 2022, 43: 99-109,

[18.] Deng Q, Zhang X, Wang L, et al.. Catalytic isomerization and oligomerization of endo-dicyclopentadiene using alkali-treated hierarchical porous HZSM-5. Chem Eng Sci, 2015, 135: 540-546,

[19.] Li Y, Zou JJ, Zhang X, et al.. Product distribution of tricyclopentadiene from cycloaddition of dicyclopentadiene and cyclopentadiene: a theoretical and experimental study. Fuel, 2010, 89(9): 2522-2527,

[20.] Zieliński A, Marset X, Golz C, et al.. Two-step synthesis of heptacyclo[6.6.0.02, 6.03, 13.04, 11.05, 9.010, 14]tetradecane from norbornadiene: mechanism of the cage assembly and post-synthetic functionalization. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl, 2020, 59(51): 23299-23305,

[21.] Li C, Zhang C, Liu R, et al.. Heterogeneously supported active Pd(0) complex on silica mediated by PEG as efficient dimerization catalyst for the production of high energy density fuel. Mol Catal, 2022, 520,

[22.] Rupakheti C, Virshup A, Yang W, et al.. Strategy to discover diverse optimal molecules in the small molecule universe. J Chem Inf Model, 2015, 55(3): 529-537,

[23.] Kanal IY, Owens SG, Bechtel JS, et al.. Efficient computational screening of organic polymer photovoltaics. J Phys Chem Lett, 2013, 4(10): 1613-1623,

[24.] Kwon Y, Lee J. MolFinder: an evolutionary algorithm for the global optimization of molecular properties and the extensive exploration of chemical space using SMILES. J Cheminform, 2021, 13(1): 24,

[25.] Olsson DM, Nelson LS. The Nelder-Mead simplex procedure for function minimization. Technometrics, 1975, 17(1): 45-51,

[26.] Luersen MA, Le Riche R. Globalized Nelder-Mead method for engineering optimization. Comput Struct, 2004, 82(23–26): 2251-2260,

[27.] Wang D, Tan D, Liu L. Particle swarm optimization algorithm: an overview. Soft Comput A Fusion Found Methodol Appl, 2018, 22(2): 387-408

[28.] Jiang Y, Hu T, Huang C, et al.. An improved particle swarm optimization algorithm. Appl Math Comput, 2007, 193(1): 231-239

[29.] Voorneveld M. Characterization of Pareto dominance. Oper Res Lett, 2003, 31(1): 7-11,

[30.] Asrari A, Lotfifard S, Payam MS. Pareto dominance-based multiobjective optimization method for distribution network reconfiguration. IEEE Trans Smart Grid, 2016, 7(3): 1401-1410,

[31.] Audet C, Hare W. . Derivative-free and blackbox optimization, 2017 Cham Springer,

[32.] Gunantara N. A review of multi-objective optimization: methods and its applications. Cogent Eng, 2018, 5(1): 1502242,

[33.] Deb K, Deb K. Burke EK, Kendall G. Multi-objective optimization. Search methodologies: introductory tutorials in optimization and decision support techniques, 2014 Boston Springer 403-449,