Optimizing Average Electric Power During the Charging of Lithium-Ion Batteries Through the Taguchi Method

Mohd H. S. Alrashdan

Transactions of Tianjin University ›› 2024, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (2) : 152 -166.

PDF
Transactions of Tianjin University ›› 2024, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (2) : 152 -166. DOI: 10.1007/s12209-024-00385-2
Research Article

Optimizing Average Electric Power During the Charging of Lithium-Ion Batteries Through the Taguchi Method

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

In recent times, lithium-ion batteries have been widely used owing to their high energy density, extended cycle lifespan, and minimal self-discharge rate. The design of high-speed rechargeable lithium-ion batteries faces a significant challenge owing to the need to increase average electric power during charging. This challenge results from the direct influence of the power level on the rate of chemical reactions occurring in the battery electrodes. In this study, the Taguchi optimization method was used to enhance the average electric power during the charging process of lithium-ion batteries. The Taguchi technique is a statistical strategy that facilitates the systematic and efficient evaluation of numerous experimental variables. The proposed method involved varying seven input factors, including positive electrode thickness, positive electrode material, positive electrode active material volume fraction, negative electrode active material volume fraction, separator thickness, positive current collector thickness, and negative current collector thickness. Three levels were assigned to each control factor to identify the optimal conditions and maximize the average electric power during charging. Moreover, a variance assessment analysis was conducted to validate the results obtained from the Taguchi analysis. The results revealed that the Taguchi method was an effective approach for optimizing the average electric power during the charging of lithium-ion batteries. This indicates that the positive electrode material, followed by the separator thickness and the negative electrode active material volume fraction, was key factors significantly influencing the average electric power during the charging of lithium-ion batteries response. The identification of optimal conditions resulted in the improved performance of lithium-ion batteries, extending their potential in various applications. Particularly, lithium-ion batteries with average electric power of 16 W and 17 W during charging were designed and simulated in the range of 0–12000 s using COMSOL Multiphysics software. This study efficiently employs the Taguchi optimization technique to develop lithium-ion batteries capable of storing a predetermined average electric power during the charging phase. Therefore, this method enables the battery to achieve complete charging within a specific timeframe tailored to a specific application. The implementation of this method can save costs, time, and materials compared with other alternative methods, such as the trial-and-error approach.

Keywords

Lithium-ion batteries / Average electric power during charging / Taguchi method / COMSOL Multiphysics software / C rate / L27 orthogonal array

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Mohd H. S. Alrashdan. Optimizing Average Electric Power During the Charging of Lithium-Ion Batteries Through the Taguchi Method. Transactions of Tianjin University, 2024, 30(2): 152-166 DOI:10.1007/s12209-024-00385-2

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Costa CM, Barbosa JC, Gonçalves R, et al. Recycling and environmental issues of lithium-ion batteries: advances, challenges and opportunities. Energy Storage Mater, 2021, 37: 433-465.

[2]

Chen W, Liang J, Yang Z, et al. A review of lithium-ion battery for electric vehicle applications and beyond. Energy Procedia, 2019, 158: 4363-4368.

[3]

Soltani M, Beheshti SH A comprehensive review of lithium ion capacitor: development, modelling, thermal management and applications. J Energy Storage, 2021, 34: 102019.

[4]

Jin L, Guo X, Shen C, et al. A universal matching approach for high power-density and high cycling-stability lithium ion capacitor. J Power Sour, 2019, 441: 227211.

[5]

Weiss M, Ruess R, Kasnatscheew J, et al. Fast charging of lithium-ion batteries: a review of materials aspects. Adv Energy Mater, 2021, 11: 2101126.

[6]

Tomaszewska A, Chu Z, Feng X, et al. Lithium-ion battery fast charging: a review. eTransportation, 2019, 1: 100011.

[7]

Liu K, Hu X, Yang Z, et al. Lithium-ion battery charging management considering economic costs of electrical energy loss and battery degradation. Energy Convers Manag, 2019, 195: 167-179.

[8]

Ouyang Q, Wang Z, Liu K, et al. Optimal charging control for lithium-ion battery packs: a distributed average tracking approach. IEEE Trans Ind Inform, 2020, 16(5): 3430-3438.

[9]

Han T, Wang Z, Meng H End-to-end capacity estimation of Lithium-ion batteries with an enhanced long short-term memory network considering domain adaptation. J Power Sour, 2022, 520: 230823.

[10]

Takyi-Aninakwa P, Wang S, Zhang H, et al. A hybrid probabilistic correction model for the state of charge estimation of lithium-ion batteries considering dynamic currents and temperatures. Energy, 2023, 273: 127231.

[11]

Roe C, Feng X, White G, et al. Immersion cooling for lithium-ion batteries—a review. J Power Sour, 2022, 525: 231094.

[12]

Lyu P, Liu X, Qu J, et al. Recent advances of thermal safety of lithium ion battery for energy storage. Energy Storage Mater, 2020, 31: 195-220.

[13]

Farhad S, Nazari A Introducing the energy efficiency map of lithium-ion batteries. Int J Energy Res, 2019, 43(2): 931-944.

[14]

Xu J, Chen Z, Qin J, et al. A lightweight and low-cost liquid-cooled thermal management solution for high energy density prismatic lithium-ion battery packs. Appl Therm Eng, 2022, 203: 117871.

[15]

Zhang Z, Zhang L, Hu L, et al. Active cell balancing of lithium-ion battery pack based on average state of charge. Int J Energy Res, 2020, 44(4): 2535-2548.

[16]

Li Y, Li K, Xie Y, et al. Optimized charging of lithium-ion battery for electric vehicles: adaptive multistage constant current–constant voltage charging strategy. Renew Energy, 2020, 146: 2688-2699.

[17]

Xu H, Shen M The control of lithium-ion batteries and supercapacitors in hybrid energy storage systems for electric vehicles: a review. Int J Energy Res, 2021, 45(15): 20524-20544.

[18]

Le Varlet T, Schmidt O, Gambhir A, et al. Comparative life cycle assessment of lithium-ion battery chemistries for residential storage. J Energy Storage, 2020, 28: 101230.

[19]

Takyi-Aninakwa P, Wang S, Zhang H, et al. A strong tracking adaptive fading-extended Kalman filter for the state of charge estimation of lithium-ion batteries. Int J Energy Res, 2022, 46(12): 16427-16444.

[20]

Song X, Yang F, Wang D, et al. Combined CNN-LSTM network for state-of-charge estimation of lithium-ion batteries. IEEE Access, 2020, 7: 88894-88902.

[21]

Naguib M, Kollmeyer P, Emadi A Lithium-ion battery pack robust state of charge estimation, cell inconsistency, and balancing: review. IEEE Access, 2021, 9: 50570-50582.

[22]

Kebede AA, Coosemans T, Messagie M, et al. Techno-economic analysis of lithium-ion and lead-acid batteries in stationary energy storage application. J Energy Storage, 2021, 40: 102748.

[23]

Zhou L, He L, Zheng Y, et al. Massive battery pack data compression and reconstruction using a frequency division model in battery management systems. J Energy Storage, 2020, 28: 101252.

[24]

He F, Fathabadi H Novel standalone plug-in hybrid electric vehicle charging station fed by solar energy in presence of a fuel cell system used as supporting power source. Renew Energy, 2020, 156: 964-974.

[25]

Esfandyari A, Norton B, Conlon M, et al. Performance of a campus photovoltaic electric vehicle charging station in a temperate climate. Sol Energy, 2019, 177: 762-771.

[26]

Chen Z, Xue Q, Xiao R, et al. State of health estimation for lithium-ion batteries based on fusion of autoregressive moving average model and Elman neural network. IEEE Access, 2019, 7: 102662-102678.

[27]

Jiang ZY, Li HB, Qu ZG, et al. Recent progress in lithium-ion battery thermal management for a wide range of temperature and abuse conditions. Int J Hydrog Energy, 2022, 47(15): 9428-9459.

[28]

Zhang T, Ran F Design strategies of 3D carbon-based electrodes for charge/ion transport in lithium ion battery and sodium ion battery. Adv Funct Mater, 2021, 31(17): 2010041.

[29]

Jiang X, Chen Y, Meng X, et al. The impact of electrode with carbon materials on safety performance of lithium-ion batteries: a review. Carbon, 2022, 191: 448-470.

[30]

Sangrós Giménez C, Schilde C, Froböse L, et al. Mechanical, electrical, and ionic behavior of lithium-ion battery electrodes via discrete element method simulations. Energy Tech, 2020, 8(2): 1900180.

[31]

Pai JY, Hsieh CT, Lee CH, et al. Engineering of electrospun polyimide separators for electrical double-layer capacitors and lithium-ion cells. J Power Sources, 2021, 482: 229054.

[32]

Lagadec MF, Zahn R, Wood V Characterization and performance evaluation of lithium-ion battery separators. Nat Energy, 2019, 4: 16-25.

[33]

Colclasure AM, Tanim TR, Jansen AN, et al. Electrode scale and electrolyte transport effects on extreme fast charging of lithium-ion cells. Electrochim Acta, 2020, 337: 135854.

[34]

Waldmann T, Hogg BI, Wohlfahrt-Mehrens M Li plating as unwanted side reaction in commercial Li-ion cells—a review. J Power Sour, 2018, 384: 107-124.

[35]

Deng X, Li W, Zhu M, et al. Synthesis of Cu-doped Li4Ti5O12 anode materials with a porous structure for advanced electrochemical energy storage: lithium-ion batteries. Solid State Ion, 2021, 364: 115614.

[36]

Zuo X, Song Y, Zhen M Carbon-coated NiCo2S4 multi-shelled hollow microspheres with porous structures for high rate lithium ion battery applications. Appl Surf Sci, 2020, 500: 144000.

[37]

Entwistle J, Ge R, Pardikar K, et al. Carbon binder domain networks and electrical conductivity in lithium-ion battery electrodes: a critical review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2022, 166: 112624.

[38]

Alrashdan MHS, Alnaanah M, Al-Qudah Z, et al. T-Shape MEMS PMPG design at low frequency range using Taguchi method. Microsyst Technol, 2023, 29(5): 745-754.

[39]

Taguchi G Quality engineering (Taguchi methods) for the development of electronic circuit technology. IEEE Trans Reliab, 1995, 44(2): 225-229.

[40]

Alrashdan MHS MEMS piezoelectric micro power harvester physical parameter optimization, simulation, and fabrication for extremely low frequency and low vibration level applications. Microelectron J, 2020, 104: 104894.

[41]

Alrashdan MHS Data relating to mems piezoelectric micro power harvester physical parameter optimization, for extremely low frequency and low vibration level applications. Data Brief, 2020, 33: 106571.

[42]

Alrashdan MHS, Hamzah AA, Majlis B Design and optimization of cantilever based piezoelectric micro power generator for cardiac pacemaker. Microsyst Technol, 2015, 21(8): 1607-1617.

[43]

Alrashdan MHS, Hamzah AA, Majlis BY Power density optimization for MEMS piezoelectric micro power generator below 100Hz applications. Microsyst Technol, 2018, 24(4): 2071-2084.

[44]

Sun J, Kainz J Optimization of hybrid pulse power characterization profile for equivalent circuit model parameter identification of Li-ion battery based on Taguchi method. J Energy Storage, 2023, 70: 108034.

[45]

Chen H, Zhang T, Zhang H, et al. Power parametric optimization of an electro-hydraulic integrated drive system for power-carrying vehicles based on the Taguchi method. Processes, 2022, 10(5): 867.

[46]

Sun T, Shen T, Zheng Y, et al. Modeling the inhomogeneous lithium plating in lithium-ion batteries induced by non-uniform temperature distribution. Electrochim Acta, 2022, 425: 140701.

[47]

Yan C, Zhang Q Towards the intercalation and lithium plating mechanism for high safety and fast-charging lithium-ion batteries: a review. Enlab, 2022, 1: 220011.

[48]

Gao T, Han Y, Fraggedakis D, et al. Interplay of lithium intercalation and plating on a single graphite particle. Joule, 2021, 5(2): 393-414.

[49]

Karunathilake D, Vilathgamuwa M, Mishra Y, et al. Degradation-conscious multiobjective optimal control of reconfigurable Li-ion battery energy storage systems. Batteries, 2023, 9(4): 217.

[50]

Singh M, Kaiser J, Hahn H Thick electrodes for high energy lithium ion batteries. J Electrochem Soc, 2015, 162(7): A1196-A1201.

[51]

Ellis BL, Lee KT, Nazar LF Positive electrode materials for Li-ion and Li-batteries. Chem Mater, 2010, 22(3): 691-714.

[52]

Chabot V, Farhad S, Chen Z, et al. Effect of electrode physical and chemical properties on lithium-ion battery performance. Int J Energy Res, 2013, 37(14): 1723-1736.

[53]

Zhu GL, He YY, Deng YL, et al. Dependence of separator thickness on Li-ion battery energy density. J Electrochem Soc, 2021, 168(11): 110545.

[54]

Choudhury R, Wild J, Yang Y Engineering current collectors for batteries with high specific energy. Joule, 2021, 5(6): 1301-1305.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

227

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/