Cu/TiO₂ Photocatalysts for CO₂ Reduction: Structure and Evolution of the Cocatalyst Active Form

Abstract

Extensive work on a Cu-modified TiO₂ photocatalyst for CO₂ reduction under visible light irradiation was conducted. The structure of the copper cocatalyst was established using UV–vis diffuse reflectance spectroscopy, high-resolution transmission electron microscopy, X-ray absorption spectroscopy, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. It was found that copper exists in different states (Cu⁰, Cu⁺, and Cu²⁺), the content of which depends on the TiO₂ calcination temperature and copper loading. The optimum composition of the cocatalyst has a photocatalyst based on TiO₂ calcined at 700 °C and modified with 5 wt% copper, the activity of which is 22 µmol/(h·g_cat) (409 nm). Analysis of the photocatalysts after the photocatalytic reaction disclosed that the copper metal on the surface of the calcined TiO₂ was gradually converted into Cu₂O during the photocatalytic reaction. Meanwhile, the metallic copper on the surface of the noncalcined TiO₂ did not undergo any transformation during the reaction.

Keywords

Photocatalysis / Photocatalytic CO₂ conversion / Visible light / Titanium dioxide / Copper / Copper oxides / Methane formation / Photocatalyst transformation

References

[1.] Velvizhi G, Jacqueline PJ, Shetti NP, et al.. Emerging trends and advances in valorization of lignocellulosic biomass to biofuels. J Environ Manage, 2023, 345,

[2.] Höök M, Tang X. Depletion of fossil fuels and anthropogenic climate change: a review. Energy Policy, 2013, 52: 797-809,

[3.] Lamb WF, Wiedmann T, Pongratz J, et al.. A review of trends and drivers of greenhouse gas emissions by sector from 1990 to 2018. Environ Res Lett, 2021, 16(7): 073005,

[4.] Kumar A, Singh P, Raizada P, et al.. Impact of COVID-19 on greenhouse gases emissions: a critical review. Sci Total Environ, 2022, 806(Pt 1),

[5.] Shi W, Yan C, Ren Z, et al.. Review on the development of marine floating photovoltaic systems. Ocean Eng, 2023, 286: 115560,

[6.] Seneviratne SI, Donat MG, Pitman AJ, et al.. Allowable CO₂ emissions based on regional and impact-related climate targets. Nature, 2016, 529(7587): 477-483,

[7.] Morseletto P, Biermann F, Pattberg P. Governing by targets: reductio ad unum and evolution of the two-degree climate target. Int Environ Agreem Polit Law Econ, 2017, 17(5): 655-676

[8.] Murali G, Iwamura T, Shai M, et al.. Future temperature extremes threaten land vertebrates. Nature, 2023, 615(7952): 461-467,

[9.] Steeneveldt R, Berger B, Torp TA. CO₂ capture and storage. Chem Eng Res Des, 2006, 84(9): 739-763,

[10.] Anwar MN, Fayyaz A, Sohail NF, et al.. CO₂ capture and storage: a way forward for sustainable environment. J Environ Manag, 2018, 226: 131-144,

[11.] Ma J, Miao TJ, Tang J. Charge carrier dynamics and reaction intermediates in heterogeneous photocatalysis by time-resolved spectroscopies. Chem Soc Rev, 2022, 51(14): 5777-5794,

[12.] Fang S, Rahaman M, Bharti J, et al.. Photocatalytic CO₂ reduction. Nat Rev Meth Primers, 2023, 3: 61,

[13.] Nakata K, Fujishima A. TiO₂ photocatalysis: design and applications. J Photochem Photobiol C Photochem Rev, 2012, 13(3): 169-189,

[14.] Leong S, Razmjou A, Wang K, et al.. TiO₂ based photocatalytic membranes: a review. J Membr Sci, 2014, 472: 167-184,

[15.] Li Z, Wang S, Wu J, et al.. Recent progress in defective TiO₂ photocatalysts for energy and environmental applications. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2022, 156: 111980,

[16.] Du S, Lian J, Zhang F. Visible light-responsive N-doped TiO₂ photocatalysis: synthesis, characterizations, and applications. Trans Tianjin Univ, 2022, 28(1): 33-52,

[17.] Nur ASM, Sultana M, Mondal A, et al.. A review on the development of elemental and codoped TiO₂ photocatalysts for enhanced dye degradation under UV–vis irradiation. J Water Process Eng, 2022, 47: 102728,

[18.] Wang J, Jing L, Xue L, et al.. Enhanced activity of bismuth-compounded TiO₂ nanoparticles for photocatalytically degrading rhodamine B solution. J Hazard Mater, 2008, 160(1): 208-212,

[19.] Jing L, Wang J, Qu Y, et al.. Effects of surface-modification with Bi₂O₃ on the thermal stability and photoinduced charge property of nanocrystalline anatase TiO₂ and its enhanced photocatalytic activity. Appl Surf Sci, 2009, 256(3): 657-663,

[20.] Goei R, Lim TT. Ag-decorated TiO₂ photocatalytic membrane with hierarchical architecture: photocatalytic and anti-bacterial activities. Water Res, 2014, 59: 207-218,

[21.] Meng A, Zhang L, Cheng B, et al.. Dual cocatalysts in TiO₂ photocatalysis. Adv Mater, 2019, 31(30): 1807660,

[22.] Kozlova EA, Parmon VN. Heterogeneous semiconductor photocatalysts for hydrogen production from aqueous solutions of electron donors. Russ Chem Rev, 2017, 86(9): 870-906,

[23.] Esrafili A, Salimi M, Jonidi Jafari A, et al.. Pt-based TiO₂ photocatalytic systems: a systematic review. J Mol Liq, 2022, 352: 118685,

[24.] Anderson PA. The work function of copper. Phys Rev, 1949, 76(3): 388-390,

[25.] Mitchell E, Mitchell J. The work functions of copper, silver and aluminium. Proc R Soc Lond A, 1951, 210(1100): 70-84,

[26.] Xu R, Xu H, Ning S, et al.. Coupling of Cu catalyst and phosphonated Ru complex light absorber with TiO₂ as bridge to achieve superior visible light CO₂ photoreduction. Trans Tianjin Univ, 2020, 26(6): 470-478,

[27.] Aman N, Mishra T, Hait J, et al.. Simultaneous photoreductive removal of copper (II) and selenium (IV) under visible light over spherical binary oxide photocatalyst. J Hazard Mater, 2011, 186(1): 360-366,

[28.] Zhai Q, Xie S, Fan W, et al.. Photocatalytic conversion of carbon dioxide with water into methane: platinum and copper(I) oxide co-catalysts with a core–shell structure. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl, 2013, 52(22): 5776-5779,

[29.] Wang W, Deng C, Xie S, et al.. Photocatalytic C–C coupling from carbon dioxide reduction on copper oxide with mixed-valence copper(I)/copper(II). J Am Chem Soc, 2021, 143(7): 2984-2993,

[30.] Kurenkova AY, Kremneva AM, Saraev AA, et al.. Influence of thermal activation of titania on photoreactivity of Pt/TiO₂ in hydrogen production. Catal Lett, 2021, 151(3): 748-754,

[31.] Kurenkova AY, Yakovleva AY, Saraev AA, et al.. Copper-modified titania-based photocatalysts for the efficient hydrogen production under UV and visible light from aqueous solutions of glycerol. Nanomaterials, 2022, 12(18): 3106,

[32.] Fairley N, Fernandez V, Richard-Plouet M, et al.. Systematic and collaborative approach to problem solving using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Appl Surf Sci Adv, 2021, 5: 100112,

[33.] Chernyshov AA, Veligzhanin AA, Zubavichus YV. Structural materials science end-station at the kurchatov synchrotron radiation source: recent instrumentation upgrades and experimental results. Nucl Instrum Meth Phys Res Sect A Accel Spectrometers Detect Assoc Equip, 2009, 603(1–2): 95-98,

[34.] Ravel B, Newville M. ATHENA, ARTEMIS, HEPHAESTUS: data analysis for X-ray absorption spectroscopy using IFEFFIT. J Synchrotron Radiat, 2005, 12(Pt 4): 537-541,

[35.] Saraev AA, Kurenkova AY, Gerasimov EY, et al.. Broadening the action spectrum of TiO₂-based photocatalysts to visible region by substituting platinum with copper. Nanomaterials, 2022, 12(9): 1584,

[36.] Markovskaya DV, Zhurenok AV, Kurenkova AY, et al.. New titania-based photocatalysts for hydrogen production from aqueous-alcoholic solutions of methylene blue. RSC Adv, 2020, 10(56): 34137-34148,

[37.] Sawicka-Chudy P, Sibiński M, Wisz G, et al.. Numerical analysis and optimization of Cu₂O/TiO₂, CuO/TiO₂, heterojunction solar cells using SCAPS. J Phys: Conf Ser, 2018, 1033: 012002

[38.] Basnet P, Anderson E, Zhao Y. Hybrid Cu _xO–TiO₂ nanopowders prepared by ball milling for solar energy conversion and visible-light-induced wastewater treatment. ACS Appl Nano Mater, 2019, 2(4): 2446-2455,

[39.] Wang H, Xu JZ, Zhu JJ, et al.. Preparation of CuO nanoparticles by microwave irradiation. J Cryst Growth, 2002, 244(1): 88-94,

[40.] Balamurugan B, Aruna I, Mehta BR, et al.. Size-dependent conductivity-type inversion in Cu₂O nanoparticles. Phys Rev B, 2004, 69(16): 165419,

[41.] Suzuki K, Tanaka N, Ando A, et al.. Optical properties and fabrication of cuprous oxide nanoparticles by microemulsion method. J Am Ceram Soc, 2011, 94(8): 2379-2385,

[42.] Karthikeyan S, Kumar S, Durndell LJ, et al.. Size-dependent visible light photocatalytic performance of Cu₂O nanocubes. ChemCatChem, 2018, 10(16): 3554-3563,

[43.] Pedersen DB, Wang S. Surface plasmon resonance spectra of 2.8 ± 0.5 nm diameter copper nanoparticles in both near and far fields. J Phys Chem C, 2007, 111(47): 17493-17499,

[44.] Guo X, Hao C, Jin G, et al.. Copper nanoparticles on graphene support: an efficient photocatalyst for coupling of nitroaromatics in visible light. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2014, 53(7): 1973-1977,

[45.] Wöllner A, Lange F, Schmelz H, et al.. Characterization of mixed copper-manganese oxides supported on titania catalysts for selective oxidation of ammonia. Appl Catal A Gen, 1993, 94(2): 181-203,

[46.] Fedorov A, Saraev A, Kremneva A, et al.. Kinetic and mechanistic study of CO oxidation over nanocomposite Cu−Fe−Al oxide catalysts. ChemCatChem, 2020, 12(19): 4911-4921,

[47.] Fedorov AV, Kukushkin RG, Yeletsky PM, et al.. Temperature-programmed reduction of model CuO, NiO and mixed CuO–NiO catalysts with hydrogen. J Alloys Compd, 2020, 844: 156135,

[48.] McIntyre NS, Cook MG. X-ray photoelectron studies on some oxides and hydroxides of cobalt, nickel, and copper. Anal Chem, 1975, 47(13): 2208-2213,

[49.] Bukhtiyarov VI, Kaichev VV, Prosvirin IP. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy as a tool for in situ study of the mechanisms of heterogeneous catalytic reactions. Top Catal, 2005, 32(1): 3-15,

[50.] Moretti G. Auger parameter and Wagner plot in the characterization of chemical states: initial and final state effects. J Electron Spectrosc Relat Phenom, 1995, 76: 365-370,

[51.] Strohmeier B. Surface spectroscopic characterization of Cu/Al₂O₃ catalysts. J Catal, 1985, 94(2): 514-530,

[52.] Poulston S, Parlett PM, Stone P, et al.. Surface oxidation and reduction of CuO and Cu₂O studied using XPS and XAES. Surf Interface Anal, 1996, 24(12): 811-820,

[53.] Batista J, Pintar A, Mandrino D, et al.. XPS and TPR examinations of γ-alumina-supported Pd–Cu catalysts. Appl Catal A Gen, 2001, 206(1): 113-124,

[54.] Richter M, Fait MJG, Eckelt R, et al.. Gas-phase carbonylation of methanol to dimethyl carbonate on chloride-free Cu-precipitated zeolite Y at normal pressure. J Catal, 2007, 245(1): 11-24,

[55.] Kremneva AM, Fedorov AV, Saraev AA, et al.. In situ X-ray absorption spectroscopy studies of carbon monoxide oxidation in the presence of nanocomposite Cu–Fe–Al oxide catalysts. Kinet Catal, 2021, 62(1): 160-171,

[56.] Ghodselahi T, Vesaghi MA, Shafiekhani A, et al.. XPS study of the Cu@Cu₂O core-shell nanoparticles. Appl Surf Sci, 2008, 255(5): 2730-2734,

[57.] Foucher AC, Yang S, Rosen DJ, et al.. Synthesis and characterization of core-shell Cu–Ru, Cu–Rh, and Cu–Ir nanoparticles. J Am Chem Soc, 2022, 144(17): 7919-7928,