Identifying the molecular targets of bioactive natural products (NPs) remains a critical bottleneck in drug discovery and the modernization of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM). Conventional target deconvolution strategies, such as affinity chromatography and activity-based protein profiling (ABPP), are often constrained by strict chemical modification requirements, incomplete proteome coverage, and difficulties in capturing weak or transient interactions. To overcome these limitations, this review highlights degradation-based protein profiling (DBPP), an emerging chemoproteomic strategy that applies proteolysis targeting chimera (PROTAC) technology to target identification. Unlike traditional occupancy-driven methods, DBPP employs an event-driven mechanism, converting complex physical binding events into amplified, detectable protein depletion signals via the ubiquitin-proteasome system. We systematically outline the core framework of DBPP, with particular emphasis on the rationally designed 'PROTAC toolbox', the probe-mixed strategy, and the dual-path orthogonal validation that integrates quantitative degradation proteomics with immunoprecipitation-mass spectrometry (IP-MS). Representative case studies involving NPs such as celastrol and artemisinin illustrate the potential of DBPP to identify elusive targets, including non-catalytic and weak-binding proteins, as well as reducing false positives through orthogonal validation. Finally, we discuss current methodological limitations and explore possible prospects for integrating DBPP with artificial intelligence (AI), single-cell omics, and spatial transcriptomics techniques as an effective way toward deciphering the polypharmacology of complex NPs.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos 82125034, 82330115), the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant Nos 2021YFA1300200, 2021YFA1302100), the Beijing Outstanding Young Scientist Program (Grant No. JWZQ20240101007), and the Beijing Frontier Research Center for Biological Structure.
Ethical statements
Not applicable.
Author contributions
The authors confirm their contributions to the work as follows: study conception: Rao Y; draft manuscript preparation: Rao Y, Ni Z, Shi Y. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Data availability
Data sharing is not applicable to this review as no datasets were generated or analyzed.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
| [1] |
Newman DJ, Cragg GM. 2020. Natural products as sources of new drugs over the nearly four decades from 01/1981 to 09/2019. Journal of Natural Products 83: 770-803
|
| [2] |
Wang Z, Zhang T, Wang B, Li S. 2025. TCM network pharmacology: new perspective integrating network target with artificial intelligence and multi-modal multi-omics technologies. Chinese Journal of Natural Medicines 23: 1425-1434
|
| [3] |
Atanasov AG, Zotchev SB, Dirsch VM, Supuran CT. 2021. Natural products in drug discovery: advances and opportunities. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 20: 200-216
|
| [4] |
Zhu Y, Ouyang Z, Du H, Wang M, Wang J, et al. 2022. New opportunities and challenges of natural products research: when target identification meets single-cell multiomics. Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B 12: 4011-4039
|
| [5] |
Wang S, Zhang Y, Yu R, Chai Y, Liu R, et al. 2024. Labeled and label-free target identifications of natural products. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 67: 17980-17996
|
| [6] |
Jiang X, Shon K, Li X, Cui G, Wu Y, et al. 2024. Recent advances in identifying protein targets of bioactive natural products. Heliyon 10: e33917
|
| [7] |
Zhang Y, Zhang J, Li M, Qiao Y, Wang W, et al. 2023. Target discovery of bioactive natural products with native-compound-coupled CNBr-activated Sepharose 4B beads (NCCB): applications, mechanisms and outlooks. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry 96: 117483
|
| [8] |
Song J. 2025. Applications of the cellular thermal shift assay to drug discovery in natural products: a review. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 26: 3940
|
| [9] |
Zhen X, Liu J, Ren Y. 2025. Recent advances in proteomic strategies for target identification of traditional Chinese medicine. Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis 00: 101516
|
| [10] |
Gao Y, Ma M, Li W, Lei X. 2024. Chemoproteomics, a broad avenue to target deconvolution. Advanced Science 11: e2305608
|
| [11] |
Liu TT, Zeng KW. 2025. Recent advances in target identification technology of natural products. Pharmacology & Therapeutics 269: 108833
|
| [12] |
Harding MW, Galat A, Uehling DE, Schreiber SL. 1989. A receptor for the immuno-suppressant FK506 is a cis-trans peptidyl-prolyl isomerase. Nature 341: 758-760
|
| [13] |
Sato SI, Murata A, Orihara T, Shirakawa T, Suenaga K, et al. 2011. Marine natural product aurilide activates the OPA1-mediated apoptosis by binding to prohibitin. Chemistry & Biology 18: 131-139
|
| [14] |
Li J, Casteels T, Frogne T, Ingvorsen C, Honoré C, et al. 2017. Artemisinins target GABAA receptor signaling and impair α cell identity . Cell 168: 86-100.e15
|
| [15] |
Zeng KW, Wang JK, Wang LC, Guo Q, Liu TT, et al. 2021. Small molecule induces mitochondrial fusion for neuroprotection via targeting CK2 without affecting its conventional kinase activity . Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy 6: 71
|
| [16] |
Niphakis MJ, Cravatt BF. 2024. Ligand discovery by activity-based protein profiling. Cell Chemical Biology 31: 1636-1651
|
| [17] |
Liu Y, Patricelli MP, Cravatt BF. 1999. Activity-based protein profiling: the serine hydrolases. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 96: 14694-14699
|
| [18] |
Porta EOJ, Steel PG. 2023. Activity-based protein profiling: a graphical review. Current Research in Pharmacology and Drug Discovery 5: 100164
|
| [19] |
Zhou YF, Zhang L, Niu ZL, Wang ZA. 2025. Targeting the reactive proteome: recent advances in activity-based protein profiling and probe design. Biomolecules 15: 1699
|
| [20] |
Wang Q, Du T, Zhang Z, Zhang Q, Zhang J, et al. 2024. Target fishing and mechanistic insights of the natural anticancer drug candidate chlorogenic acid. Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B 14: 4431-4442
|
| [21] |
He X, Wang C, Zhang Q, Yang T, Guo Q, et al. 2025. Identifying ENO1 as a protein target of chlorogenic acid to inhibit cellular senescence and prevent skin photoaging in mice. Aging Cell 24: e14433
|
| [22] |
Nie HJ, Fu YJ, Long S, Wang JY, Zhao WS, et al. 2025. Chemoproteomics reveals proteome-wide covalent and non-covalent targets of with aferin A . Acta Pharmacologica Sinica 46: 1782-1793
|
| [23] |
He X, Wang C, Zhang R, Wang Y, Zhang Y, et al. 2026. Parthenolide ameliorates inflammation in sepsis via covalently targeting Trim33 and inhibiting NF- κB pathway . Phytomedicine 153: 157862
|
| [24] |
Yuan S, Zhou YF, Ma B, Liu Y, Zhang J, et al. 2026. Chemoproteomics identifies STAT3 as a key target of baicalin in ameliorating liver fibrosis. National Science Review 13: nwag093
|
| [25] |
Tu Y, Tan L, Tao H, Li Y, Liu H. 2023. CETSA and thermal proteome profiling strategies for target identification and drug discovery of natural products. Phytomedicine 116: 154862
|
| [26] |
Zhang L, Wang Y, Zheng C, Zhou Z, Chen Z. 2024. Cellular thermal shift assay: an approach to identify and assess protein target engagement. Expert Review of Proteomics 21: 387-400
|
| [27] |
Molina DM, Jafari R, Ignatushchenko M, Seki T, Larsson EA, et al. 2013. Monitoring drug target engagement in cells and tissues using the cellular thermal shift assay. Science 341: 84-87
|
| [28] |
Savitski MM, Reinhard FBM, Franken H, Werner T, Savitski MF, et al. 2014. Tracking cancer drugs in living cells by thermal profiling of the proteome. Science 346: 1255784
|
| [29] |
Dziekan JM, Yu H, Chen D, Dai L, Wirjanata G, et al. 2019. Identifying purine nucleoside phosphorylase as the target of quinine using cellular thermal shift assay. Science Translational Medicine 11: eaau3174
|
| [30] |
Kirsch VC, Orgler C, Braig S, Jeremias I, Auerbach D, et al. 2020. The cytotoxic natural product Vioprolide A targets nucleolar protein 14, which is essential for ribosome biogenesis. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 59: 1595-1600
|
| [31] |
Zhang XW, Li L, Liao M, Liu D, Rehman A, et al. 2024. Thermal proteome profiling strategy identifies CNPY3 as a cellular target of gambogic acid for inducing prostate cancer pyroptosis. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 67: 10005-10011
|
| [32] |
Ren YS, Li HL, Piao XH, Yang ZY, Wang SM, et al. 2021. Drug affinity responsive target stability (DARTS) accelerated small molecules target discovery: principles and application. Biochemical Pharmacology 194: 114798
|
| [33] |
Lomenick B, Hao R, Jonai N, Chin RM, Aghajan M, et al. 2009. Target identification using drug affinity responsive target stability (DARTS). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106: 21984-21989
|
| [34] |
Xing Z, Cai X, He T, Li P, He J, et al. 2025. VCP's nuclear journey: initiated by interacting with KPNB1 to repair DNA damage. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 122: e2416045122
|
| [35] |
Feng L, Wang X, Guo X, Shi L, Su S, et al. 2024. Identification of novel target DCTPP1 for colorectal cancer therapy with the natural small-molecule inhibitors regulating metabolic reprogramming. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 63: e202402543
|
| [36] |
Yuan J, Tao Y, Wang M, Chen Y, Han X, et al. 2026. Astragaloside II, a natural saponin, facilitates remyelination in demyelination neurological diseases via p75NTR receptor mediated β-catenin/Id2/MBP signaling axis in oligodendrocyte precursor cells . Journal of Advanced Research 80: 577-591
|
| [37] |
Stanton BZ, Chory EJ, Crabtree GR. 2018. Chemically induced proximity in biology and medicine. Science 359: eaao5902
|
| [38] |
Crabtree GR, Schreiber SL. 1996. Three-part inventions: intracellular signaling and induced proximity. Trends in Biochemical Sciences 21: 418-422
|
| [39] |
Liu X, Ciulli A. 2023. Proximity-based modalities for biology and medicine. ACS Central Science 9: 1269-1284
|
| [40] |
Dikic I, Mayor-Ruiz C, Winter GE, Koch K, Ciulli A, et al. 2025. Opportunities in proximity modulation: bridging academia and industry. Molecular Cell 85: 3012-3022
|
| [41] |
Raina K, Forbes CD, Stronk R, Rappi JP Jr, Eastman KJ, et al. 2024. Regulated induced proximity targeting chimeras-RIPTACs-a heterobifunctional small molecule strategy for cancer selective therapies. Cell Chemical Biology 31: 1490-1502.e42
|
| [42] |
Krone MW, Crews CM. 2025. Next steps for targeted protein degradation. Cell Chemical Biology 32: 219-226
|
| [43] |
Békés M, Langley DR, Crews CM. 2022. PROTAC targeted protein degraders: the past is prologue. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 21: 181-200
|
| [44] |
Pike A, Lee ECY, Michaelides IN, Schade M, Sharma A, et al. 2026. Lessons learned in linking PROTACs from discovery to the clinic. Nature Reviews Chemistry 10: 117-132
|
| [45] |
Vetma V, O'Connor S, Ciulli A. 2025. Development of PROTAC degrader drugs for cancer. Annual Review of Cancer Biology 9: 119-140
|
| [46] |
Zhu B, Wu Z, Shou Y, Zhao K, Lu Q, et al. 2025. Harnessing the power of natural products for targeted protein degradation. Medicinal Research Reviews 45: 1466-1514
|
| [47] |
Li Y, Jia Y, Wang X, Shang H, Tian Y. 2023. Protein-targeted degradation agents based on natural products. Pharmaceuticals 16: 46
|
| [48] |
Liu Y, Liang J, Zhu R, Yang Y, Wang Y, et al. 2024. Application of PROTACs in target identification and target validation. Acta Materia Medica 3: 72-87
|
| [49] |
Spitz ML, Kashkush A, Benhamou RI. 2025. Advancing target validation with PROTAC technology. Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery 20: 551-563
|
| [50] |
Ni Z, Shi Y, Liu Q, Wang L, Sun X, et al. 2024. Degradation-based protein profiling: a case study of celastrol. Advanced Science 11: e2308186
|
| [51] |
Wu Y, Yang Y, Wang W, Sun D, Liang J, et al. 2022. PROTAC technology as a novel tool to identify the target of lathyrane diterpenoids. Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B 12: 4262-4265
|
| [52] |
Li Y, Zeng ZW, Chen D, Gu ZC, Yan WL, et al. 2023. Facilitated drug repurposing with artemisinin-derived PROTACs: unveiling PCLAF as a therapeutic target. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 66: 11335-11350
|
| [53] |
Chen S, Bi K, Liang H, Wu Z, Huang M, et al. 2024. PROTAC derivatization of natural products for target identification and drug discovery: design of evodiamine-based PROTACs as novel REXO4 degraders. Journal of Advanced Research 63: 219-230
|
| [54] |
Yu H, Chen Y, Wu M, Wang W, Qiu J, et al. 2026. Stability and degradation-based proteome profiling reveals cannabidiol as a promising CDC123-eIF2 γ inhibitor for colorectal cancer therapy . Journal of the American Chemical Society 148: 3712-3722
|
| [55] |
Nguyen T, Le H, Quinn TP, Nguyen T, Le TD, et al. 2021. GraphDTA: predicting drug-target binding affinity with graph neural networks. Bioinformatics 37: 1140-1147
|
| [56] |
Wang Y, Sui Y, Yao J, Jiang H, Tian Q, et al. 2024. Herb-CMap: a multimodal fusion framework for deciphering the mechanisms of action in traditional Chinese medicine using Suhuang antitussive capsule as a case study. Briefings in Bioinformatics 25: bbae362
|
| [57] |
Li F, Hu Q, Zhang X, Sun R, Liu Z, et al. 2022. DeepPROTACs is a deep learning-based targeted degradation predictor for PROTACs. Nature Communications 13: 7133
|
| [58] |
Zhang W, Roy Burman SS, Chen J, Donovan KA, Cao Y, et al. 2022. Machine learning modeling of protein-intrinsic features predicts tractability of targeted protein degradation. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics 20: 882-898
|
| [59] |
Xie L, Xie L. 2023. Elucidation of genome-wide understudied proteins targeted by PROTAC-induced degradation using interpretable machine learning. PLoS Computational Biology 19: e1010974
|
| [60] |
Liu J, Roy MJ, Isbel L, Li F. 2025. Accurate PROTAC-targeted degradation prediction with DegradeMaster. Bioinformatics 41: i342-i351
|
| [61] |
Zaidman D, Prilusky J, London N. 2020. PRosettaC: rosetta based modeling of PROTAC mediated ternary complexes. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 60: 4894-4903
|
| [62] |
Abramson J, Adler J, Dunger J, Evans R, Green T, et al. 2024. Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3. Nature 630: 493-500
|
| [63] |
Xue F, Zhang M, Li S, Gao X, Wohlschlegel JA, et al. 2025. SE(3)-equivariant ternary complex prediction towards target protein degradation. Nature Communications 16: 5514
|