Does longer-muscle length resistance training cause greater longitudinal growth in humans? A systematic review

Abstract

Background: This paper aimed to systematically review the literature regarding the effects of resistance training (RT) performed at longer-muscle length (LML) versus shorter-muscle length (SML) on proxy measurements for longitudinal hypertrophy.

Methods: We included studies that satisfied the following criteria: (1) be a resistance training intervention with a comparison of LML vs SML-RT; (2) assess both fascicle length (FL) and muscle size pre- and post-intervention; (3) involve healthy adults aged ≥ 18 years; (4) be published in an English-language journal, and; (5) have a minimum training intervention duration of 4 weeks. Three databases were searched in February 2024 (Google Scholar, PubMed/Medline, Scopus) for relevant articles, alongside 'forward' and 'backward' citation searching of articles included and additions via authors' personal knowledge. The results of studies were described narratively, compared, and contrasted. Eight studies met the inclusion criteria, totaling a sample size of 120.

Results: Our results suggest that both muscle size and fascicle length increases may be greater following LML-RT versus SML-RT, suggesting LML-RT may lead to greater longitudinal hypertrophy than SML-RT. Notably, evidence is largely mixed; no studies to date have attempted to estimate serial sarcomere number changes from LML versus SML-RT, and all but one study used linear extrapolation methods to estimate FL, which has questionable validity. Therefore, the structural adaptations underlying hypertrophy from LML-RT remain undetermined.

Conclusion: In conclusion, results suggest that LML-RT may be superior to SML-RT for inducing muscle hypertrophy and, more specifically, longitudinal growth, though evidence is mixed.

Keywords

Sarcomerogenesis / Lengthened partials / Range of motion / Strength training

Manuscript registration statement

The methods and reporting of results followed guidelines set forth by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). This systematic review was pre-registered on the Open Science Framework site (doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/3D9EZ).

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Milo Wolf: Writing - review & editing, Writing - original draft, Methodology, Conceptualization. Patroklos Androulakis Korakakis: Writing - review & editing, Methodology. Michael D. Roberts: Writing - review & editing, Methodology. Daniel L. Plotkin: Writing - review & editing, Methodology. Martino V. Franchi: Writing - review & editing, Methodology. Bret Contreras: Writing - review & editing, Methodology. Menno Henselmans: Writing - review & editing, Methodology. Stian Larsen: Writing - review & editing, Methodology. Brad J. Schoenfeld: Writing - review & editing, Writing - original draft, Methodology, Conceptualization.

Declaration of competing interest

BJS formerly served on the scientific advisory board of Tonal Corporation, a manufacturer of exercise equipment. The other authors report no competing interests.

References

[1] Krzysztofik M, Wilk M, WojdałaG, Gołás A. Maximizing muscle hypertrophy: a Systematic review of advanced resistance training techniques and methods. Int J Environ Res Publ Health. 2019; 16(24):4897. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16244897.

[2] Roberts MD, McCarthy JJ, Hornberger TA, et al. Mechanisms of mechanical overload-induced skeletal muscle hypertrophy: current understanding and future directions. Physiol Rev. 2023; 103(4):2679-2757. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00039.2022.

[3] Rindom E, Kristensen AM, Overgaard K, Vissing K, de Paoli FV.Estimation of p70S6K Thr389 and 4E-BP 1 Thr37/46 phosphorylation support dependency of tension per se in a dose-response relationship for downstream mTORC1 signalling. Acta Physiol. 2020; 229(1):4-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/apha.13426.

[4] Jorgenson KW, Phillips SM, Hornberger TA. Identifying the structural adaptations that drive the mechanical load-induced growth of skeletal muscle: a scoping review. Cells. 2020; 9(7):1658. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9071658.

[5] Wolf M, Androulakis-Korakakis P, Fisher J, Schoenfeld B, Steele J. Partial vs full range of motion resistance training: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Strength Cond. 2023; 3(1). https://doi.org/10.47206/ijsc.v3i1.182.

[6] Goto M, Maeda C, Hirayama T, et al. Partial range of motion exercise is effective for facilitating muscle hypertrophy and function through sustained intramuscular hypoxia in young trained men. J Strength Condit Res. 2019; 33(5):1286-1294. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000002051.

[7] Pedrosa GF, Lima FV, Schoenfeld BJ, et al. Partial range of motion training elicits favorable improvements in muscular adaptations when carried out at long muscle lengths. Eur J Sport Sci. 2022; 22(8):1250-1260. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2021.1927199.

[8] Werkhausen A, Solberg CE, Paulsen G, Bojsen-Møller J, Seynnes OR. Adaptations to explosive resistance training with partial range of motion are not inferior to full range of motion. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2021; 31(5):1026-1035. https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.13921.

[9] Kassiano W, Costa D, Kunevaliki G, et al. Greater gastrocnemius muscle hypertrophy after partial range of motion training carried out at long muscle lengths. J Strength Condit Res. 2023; 37(9):1746-1753. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000004460.

[10] Pincheira PA, Boswell MA, Franchi MV, Delp SL, Lichtwark GA. Biceps femoris long head sarcomere and fascicle length adaptations after 3 weeks of eccentric exercise training. J Sport Health Sci. 2022; 11(1):43-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2021.09.002.

[11] Warneke K, Brinkmann A, Hillebrecht M, Schiemann S. Influence of long-lasting static stretching on maximal strength, muscle thickness, and flexibility. Front Physiol. 2022; 13:878955. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.878955.

[12] Williams PE, Catanese T, Lucey EG, Goldspink G. The importance of stretch and contractile activity in the prevention of connective tissue accumulation in muscle. J Anat. 1988; 158:109-114.

[13] Alway SE. Force and contractile characteristics after stretch overload in quail anterior latissimus dorsi muscle. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1994; 77(1):135-141. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1994.77.1.135.

[14] Andrews MHSAP, Gurchiek RD, et al. Multiscale hamstring muscle adaptations following 9 weeks of eccentric training. J Sport Health Sci. 2025; 14:100996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2024.100996.

[15] Damas F, Libardi CA, Ugrinowitsch C. The development of skeletal muscle hypertrophy through resistance training: the role of muscle damage and muscle protein synthesis. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2018; 118(3):485-500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-017-3792-9.

[16] Lieber RL, Fridén J. Muscle damage is not a function of muscle force but active muscle strain. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1993; 74(2):520-526. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1993.74.2.520.

[17] Nosaka K, Newton M, Sacco P, Chapman D, Lavender A. Partial protection against muscle damage by eccentric actions at short muscle lengths. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005; 37(5):746-753. https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0000162691.66162.00.

[18] Schoenfeld BJ, Androulakis-Korakakis P, Coleman M, Burke R, Pi-nero A. SMART-LD: A tool for critically appraising risk of bias and reporting quality in longitudinal resistance training interventions. Published online February 21, 2024. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/nhva2.

[19] Noork-oiv M, Nosaka K, Blazevich AJ. Effects of isometric quadriceps strength training at different muscle lengths on dynamic torque production. J Sports Sci. 2015; 33(18):1952-1961. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2015.1020843.

[20] Noork-oiv M, Nosaka K, Blazevich AJ. Neuromuscular adaptations associated with knee joint angle-specific force change. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2014; 46(8):1525-1537. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000000269.

[21] Mcmahon G, Morse CI, Burden A, Winwood K, Onambélé GL. Muscular adaptations and insulin-like growth factor-1 responses to resistance training are stretch-mediated. Muscle Nerve. 2014; 49(1):108-119. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.23884.

[22] McMahon G, Morse C, Burden A, Winwood K, Onambélé G. Valid resistance training protocols on muscle size,subcutaneous fat, and strength. J Int Soc Sports Nutr. 2014; 28(1):245-255. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e318297143a.

[23] Alegre LM, Ferri-Morales A, Rodriguez-Casares R, Aguado X. Effects of isometric training on the knee extensor moment-angle relationship and vastus lateralis muscle architecture. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2014; 114(11):2437-2446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-014-2967-x.

[24] Stasinaki AN, Zaras N, Methenitis S, et al. Triceps brachii muscle strength and architectural adaptations with resistance training exercises at short or long fascicle length. J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2018; 3(2):28. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk3020028.

[25] Valamatos MJ, Tavares F, Santos RM, Veloso AP, Mil-Homens P. Influence of full range of motion vs. equalized partial range of motion training on muscle architecture and mechanical properties. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2018; 118(9):1969-1983. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-018-3932-x.

[26] Akagi R, Hinks A, Power GA. Differential changes in muscle architecture and neuromuscular fatigability induced by isometric resistance training at short and long muscle-tendon unit lengths. J Appl Physiol. 2020; 129(1):173-184. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00280.2020.

[27] Franchi MV, Atherton PJ, Reeves ND, et al. Architectural, functional and molecular responses to concentric and eccentric loading in human skeletal muscle. Acta Physiol Oxf Engl. 2014; 210(3):642-654. https://doi.org/10.1111/apha.12225.

[28] Sarto F, Monti E, ŠimuničB, Pišot R, Narici MV, Franchi MV. Changes in biceps femoris long head fascicle length after 10-day bed rest assessed with different ultrasound methods. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2021; 53(7):1529-1536. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000002614.

[29] Franchi MV, Fitze DP, Raiteri BJ, Hahn D, Spörri J. Ultrasound-derived biceps femoris long head fascicle length: extrapolation pitfalls. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2020; 52(1):233-243. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000002123.

[30] Robinson E, Almiron-Roig E, Rutters F, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis examining the effect of eating rate on energy intake and hunger. Am J Clin Nutr. 2014; 100(1):123-151. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.113.081745.

[31] Nunes JP, Blazevich AJ, Schoenfeld BJ, et al. Determining changes in muscle size and architecture after exercise training: one site does not fit all. J Strength Condit Res. 2024; 38(4):787-790. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000004722.

[32] Kwah LK, Pinto RZ, Diong J, Herbert RD. Reliability and validity of ultrasound measurements of muscle fascicle length and pennation in humans: a systematic review. J Appl Physiol. 2013; 114(6):761-769. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.01430.2011.

[33] Raiteri BJ, Beller R, Hahn D. Biceps femoris long head muscle fascicles actively lengthen during the Nordic hamstring exercise. Front Sports Act Living. 2021; 3: 669813. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2021.669813.

[34] Blazevich AJ, Cannavan D, Coleman DR, Horne S. Influence of concentric and eccentric resistance training on architectural adaptation in human quadriceps muscles. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2007; 103(5):1565-1575. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00578.2007.

[35] Carmichael DS, Hickey JT, Tofari PJ, Bourne MN, Ward MR, Timmins RG. Effect of an isometric or eccentric hip extension exercise intervention on hamstring strength, architecture, and morphology. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2022; 54(12):2196-2207. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000003012.

[36] Timmins RG, Ruddy JD, Presland J, et al. Architectural changes of the biceps femoris long head after concentric or eccentric training. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016; 48(3): 499-508. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000000795.

[37] Baroni BM, Geremia JM, Rodrigues R, De Azevedo Franke R, Karamanidis K, Vaz MA. Muscle architecture adaptations to knee extensor eccentric training: rectus femoris vs. vastus lateralis. Muscle Nerve. 2013; 48(4):498-506. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.23785.

[38] Anousaki E, Zaras N, Stasinaki AN, Panidi I, Terzis G, Karampatsos G. Effects of a 25-week periodized training macrocycle on muscle strength, power, muscle architecture, and performance in well-trained track and field throwers. J Strength Condit Res. 2021; 35(10):2728-2736. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000004098.

[39] Zaras ND, Stasinaki ANE, Methenitis SK, et al. Rate of force development, muscle architecture, and performance in young competitive track and field throwers. J Strength Condit Res. 2016; 30(1):81. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000001048.

[40] Angleri V, Ugrinowitsch C, Libardi C. Crescent pyramid and drop-set systems do not promote greater strength gains, muscle hypertrophy and changes on muscle architecture compared with traditional resistance training in well-trained men. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2017; 117(2):359-369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-016-3529-1.

[41] Pareja-Blanco F, Rodríguez-Rosell D, Aagaard P, et al. Time course of recovery from resistance exercise with different set configurations. J Strength Condit Res. 2020; 34(10):2867-2876. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000002756.

[42] Santanielo N, Nóbrega SR, Scarpelli MC, et al. Effect of resistance training to muscle failure vs non-failure on strength, hypertrophy and muscle architecture in trained individuals. Biol Sport. 2020; 37(4):333-341. https://doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2020.96317.

[43] Ema R, Akagi R, Wakahara T, Kawakami Y. Training-induced changes in architecture of human skeletal muscles: current evidence and unresolved issues. J Phys Fit Sports Med. 2016; 5(1):37-46. https://doi.org/10.7600/jpfsm.5.37.