Comparison of maximal strength, muscle morphology, and motor unit recruitment and firing rate patterns of the abductor digiti minimi in normal-fat and over-fat males
Lyric D. Richardson , Alex A. Olmos , Allen L. Redinger , Stephanie A. Sontag , Sunggun Jeon , Brenden L. Roth , Emma G. High , Breanne S. Baker , Jerome Hauselle , Michael A. Trevino
Sports Medicine and Health Science ›› 2026, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (2) : 163 -171.
Purpose: This study examined potential differences in strength, muscle morphology, and motor unit (MU) behavior of the abductor digiti minimi (ADM) between normal-fat (NF) and over-fat (OF) males.
Methods: Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry assessed percent body fat (%BF). Ultrasonography determined muscle cross-sectional area (CSA), echo intensity (EI), and subcutaneous fat (sFAT). MU behavior was assessed during isometric muscle actions at 50% of maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) by analyzing the y-intercepts and slopes for the MU action potential amplitude (MUAPAMP) vs. recruitment threshold (RT) relationships, the A and B terms for the mean firing rate (MFR) vs. RT relationships, and normalized electromyographic amplitude (N-EMGRMS). MU firing times and waveforms were validated with reconstruct-and-test and spike trigger average procedures.
Results: %BF was greater for OF (25.70% ± 5.40%) than NF (16.50% ± 2.20%; p < 0.001). MVC was greater for NF (27.13 ± 7.16) N than OF ([19.89 ± 4.96] N; p = 0.014). CSA was greater for NF (2.48 ± 0.39) cm2 than OF ([1.95 ± 0.47] cm2; p = 0.011). The y-intercepts for the MUAPAMP vs. RT relationships were greater for NF (0.283 ± 0.254) mV than OF ([-0.221 ± 0.659] mV; p = 0.004). The B terms for the MFR vs. RT relationships were greater for NF (−0.024 ± 0.003) pps/%MVC than OF ([-0.031 ± 0.009] pps/%MVC; p = 0.038). N-EMGRMS was similar between groups (p = 0.463).
Conclusion: Maximal strength, muscle size, and MU recruitment and firing rate patterns for a non-weight bearing muscle differed between normal-fat and over-fat males.
Abductor digiti minimi / Body fat / Electromyography / Motor unit / Ultrasonography
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |