Assessing fundamental movement skills using the Test of Gross Motor Development (TGMD): Challenges and solutions to comparability and standardization

Abstract

Proficiency in fundamental movement skills in children is linked to numerous positive physical, behavioral, and cognitive outcomes. The Test of Gross Motor Development is a widely used tool in research to measure this outcome. However, its application faces several limitations and challenges, such as subjectivity in rater judgements, limitation in data precision, and inconsistencies in score aggregations. In this commentary, we discuss these issues and explore how new technology might help address some of the challenges. Nonetheless, a consensus to how scores should be aggregated is still needed, and this could only be achieved through further discussions among researchers in the field.

Keywords

TGMD / Motor skills / Assessment / Performance / Score aggregation

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Johan Y.Y. Ng: Writing - original draft. Shan Jiang: Writing - review & editing, Conceptualization. Cecilia H.S. Chan: Writing - review & editing. Amy S. Ha: Writing - review & editing.

Declaration of competing interest

Authors declare on conflict of interest.

References

[1] Lubans DR, Morgan PJ, Cliff DP, Barnett LM, Okely AD. Fundamental movement skills in children and adolescents: review of associated health benefits. Sports Med. 2010; 40:1019-1035. https://doi.org/10.2165/11536850-000000000-00000.

[2] Holfelder B, Schott N. Relationship of fundamental movement skills and physical activity in children and adolescents: a systematic review. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2014; 15:382-391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2014.03.005.

[3] Jyl€anki P, Mbay T, Hakkarainen A, S€a€akslahti A, Aunio P. The effects of motor skill and physical activity interventions on preschoolers' cognitive and academic skills: a systematic review. Prev Med. 2022; 155:106948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106948.

[4] Hulteen RM, Morgan PJ, Barnett LM, Stodden DF, Lubans DR. Development of foundational movement skills: a conceptual model for physical activity across the lifespan. Sports Med. 2018; 48:1533-1540. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-018-0892-6.

[5] Gallahue DL, Ozmun JC, Goodway JD. In: Understanding Motor Development: Infants, Children, Adolescents, Adults. seventh ed.ed. McGraw-Hill; 2012.

[6] Ulrich DA. In: Test of Gross Motor Development. second ed.ed. Pro-ed Publishers; 2000.

[7] Ulrich DA. In: Test of Gross Motor Development. third ed.ed. Pro-ed Publishers; 2019.

[8] Bisi MC, Pacini Panebianco G, Polman R, Stagni R. Objective assessment of movement competence in children using wearable sensors: an instrumented version of the TGMD-2 locomotor subtest. Gait Posture. 2017; 56:42-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.04.025.

[9] Lander N, Nahavandi D, Mohamed S, Essiet I, Barnett LM. Bringing objectivity to motor skill assessment in children. J Sports Sci. 2020; 38:1539-1549. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2020.1747743.

[10] Chow DHK, Cheng WHW, Tam SSM. A video-based classification system for assessing locomotor skills in children. J Sports Sci Med. 2020;19:585-595.

[11] Ha AS, Cheng J, Chan CHS, Jiang G, Yang Y, Ng JYY. Examining the criterion validity of two scalable, information technology-based systems designed to measure the quantity and quality of movement behaviours of children from Hong Kong primary schools: a cross-sectional validation study. BMJ Open. 2022; 12:e060448. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060448.

[12] Donath L, Faude O, Hagmann S, Roth R, Zahner L. Fundamental movement skills in preschoolers: a randomized controlled trial targeting object control proficiency. Child Care Health Dev. 2015; 41:1179-1187. https://doi.org/10.1111/cch.12232.

[13] Foulkes JD, Knowles Z, Fairclough SJ, et al. Effect of a 6-week active play intervention on fundamental movement skill competence of preschool children. Percept Mot Skills. 2017; 124:393-412. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031512516685200.

[14] Fu Y, Burns RD, Constantino N, Zhang P. Differences in step counts, motor competence, and enjoyment between an exergaming group and a non-exergaming group. Game Health J. 2018; 7:335-340. https://doi.org/10.1089/g4h.2017.0188.

[15] Robinson LE, Veldman SLC, Palmer KK, Okely AD. A ball skills intervention in preschoolers: the CHAMP randomized controlled trial. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2017; 49: 2234-2239. https://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0000000000001339.

[16] Adamo KB, Wilson S, Harvey AL, et al. Does intervening in childcare settings impact fundamental movement skill development? Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016; 48:926-932. https://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0000000000000838.

[17] Chow AF, Leis A, Humbert L, Muhajarine N, Engler-Stringer R. Healthy Start-D_epart Sant_e: a pilot study of a multilevel intervention to increase physical activity, fundamental movement skills and healthy eating in rural childcare centres. Can J Public Health. 2016; 107:e312-e318. https://doi.org/10.17269/cjph.107.5279.

[18] Staiano AE, Newton RL, Beyl RA, et al. mHealth intervention for motor skills: a randomized controlled trial. Pediatrics. 2022; 149. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2021-053362.

[19] Roach L, Keats M. Skill-based and planned active play versus free-play effects on fundamental movement skills in preschoolers. Percept Mot Skills. 2018; 125:651-668. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031512518773281.

[20] Webster EK, Kepper MM, Saha S, et al. Painted playgrounds for preschoolers' physical activity and fundamental motor skill improvement: a randomized controlled pilot trial of effectiveness. BMC Pediatr. 2023; 23:455. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-023-04260-2.

[21] Engel A, Broderick C, van Doorn N, et al. Effect of a fundamental motor skills intervention on fundamental motor skill and physical activity in a preschool setting: a cluster randomized controlled trial. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2022; 34:57-66. https://doi.org/10.1123/pes.2021-0021.

[22] Zhang D, Soh KG, Chan YM, Zaremohzzabieh Z. Effect of intervention programs to promote fundamental motor skills among typically developing children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2024; 156:107320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2023.107320.