Robust, self-adhesive, and low-contact impedance polyvinyl alcohol/polyacrylamide dual-network hydrogel semidry electrode for biopotential signal acquisition

Abstract

Herein, we fabricated a flexible semidry electrode with excellent mechanical performance, satisfactory self-adhesiveness, and low-contact impedance using physical/chemical crosslinked polyvinyl alcohol/polyacrylamide dual-network hydrogels (PVA/PAM DNHs) as an efficient saline reservoir. The resultant PVA/PAM DNHs showed admirable adhesive and compliance to the hairy scalp, facilitating the establishment of a robust electrode/skin interface for biopotential signal transmission. Moreover, the PVA/PAM DNHs steadily released trace saline onto the scalp to achieve the minimized potential drift (1.47 ± 0.39 mV/min) and low electrode–scalp impedance (18.2 ± 8.9 kΩ @ 10 Hz). More importantly, the application feasibility of real-world brain−computer interfaces (BCIs) was preliminarily validated by 10 participants using two classic BCI paradigms. The mean temporal cross-correlation coefficients between the semidry and wet electrodes in the eyes open/closed and the N200 speller paradigms are 0.919 ± 0.054 and 0.912 ± 0.050, respectively. Both electrodes demonstrate anticipated neuroelectrophysiological responses with similar patterns. This semidry electrode could also effectively capture robust P-QRS-T peaks during electrocardiogram recording. Considering their outstanding advantages of fast setup, user-friendliness, and robust signals, the proposed PVA/PAM DNH-based electrode is a promising alternative to wet electrodes in biopotential signal acquisition.

Keywords

brain–computer interface / dual-network hydrogel / electrocardiogram signals / electroencephalography signals / semidry electrode

References

[1] Gonzalez H, George R, Muzaffar S, et al. Hardware acceleration of EEG-based emotion classification systems: a comprehensive survey. IEEE Trans Biomed Circuits Syst. 2021;15(3):412-442.

[2] Nakamura T, Alqurashi YD, Morrell MJ, Mandic DP. Hearables: automatic overnight sleep monitoring with standardized in-ear eeg sensor. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2020;67(1):203-212.

[3] Wei C-S, Lin Y-P, Wang Y-T, Lin C-T, Jung T-P. A subject-transfer framework for obviating inter- and intra-subject variability in EEG-based drowsiness detection. Neuroimage. 2018;174:407-419.

[4] Wang Y, Luo J, Guo Y, Du Q, Cheng Q, Wang H. Changes in EEG brain connectivity caused by short-term BCI neurofeedback-rehabilitation training: a case study. Front Hum Neurosci. 2021;15:345.

[5] Dessy E, Mairesse O, van Puyvelde M, Cortoos A, Neyt X, Pattyn N. Train your brain? can we really selectively train specific EEG frequencies with neurofeedback training. Front Hum Neurosci. 2020;14:22.

[6] Nourmohammadi A, Jafari M, Zander TO. A survey on unmanned aerial vehicle remote control using brain–computer interface. IEEE Trans Human-Machine Syst. 2018;48(4):337-348.

[7] Allison BZ, Leeb R, Brunner C, et al. Toward smarter BCIs: extending BCIs through hybridization and intelligent control. J Neural Eng. 2011;9(1):013001.

[8] Wang RWY, Chang Y-C, Chuang S-W. EEG spectral dynamics of video commercials: impact of the narrative on the branding product preference. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):36487.

[9] Golnar-Nik P, Farashi S, Safari M-S. The application of EEG power for the prediction and interpretation of consumer decision-making: a neuromarketing study. Physiol Behav. 2019;207:90-98.

[10] Gaudry KS, Ayaz H, Bedows A, et al. Projections and the potential societal impact of the future of neurotechnologies. Front Neurosci. 2021;15:658930.

[11] Tallgren P, Vanhatalo S, Kaila K, Voipio J. Evaluation of commercially available electrodes and gels for recording of slow EEG potentials. Clin Neurophysiol. 2005;116(4):799-806.

[12] Lopez-Gordo M, Sanchez-Morillo D, Valle F. Dry EEG electrodes. Sensors. 2014;14(7):12847-12870.

[13] Fiedler P, Pedrosa P, Griebel S, et al. Novel multipin electrode cap system for dry electroencephalography. Brain Topogr. 2015;28(5):647-656.

[14] Grozea C, Voinescu CD, Fazli S. Bristle-sensors-low-cost flexible passive dry EEG electrodes for neurofeedback and BCI applications. J Neural Eng. 2011;8:025008.

[15] Guger C, Krausz G, Allison BZ, Edlinger G. Comparison of dry and gel based electrodes for P300 brain-computer interfaces. Front Neurosci. 2012;6:60.

[16] Li G, Wu J, Xia Y, et al. Towards emerging EEG applications: a novel printable flexible Ag/AgCl dry electrode array for robust recording of EEG signals at forehead sites. J Neural Eng. 2020;17:026001.

[17] Peng H-L, Liu J-Q, Dong Y-Z, Yang B, Chen X, Yang CS. Parylene-based flexible dry electrode for bioptential recording. Sens Actuator B-Chem. 2016;231:1-11.

[18] Fonseca C, Cunha JPS, Martins RE, et al. A novel dry active electrode for EEG recording. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2007;54:162-165.

[19] Shad EHT, Molinas M, Ytterdal T. Impedance and noise of passive and active dry EEG electrodes: a review. IEEE Sens J. 2020;20:14565-14577.

[20] Li GL, Wu JT, Xia YH, He QG, Jin HG. Review of semi-dry electrodes for EEG recording. J Neural Eng. 2020;17:051004.

[21] Mota AR, Duarte L, Rodrigues D, et al. Development of a quasi-dry electrode for EEG recording. Sens Actuator A-Phys. 2013;199:310-317.

[22] Xing X, Pei W, Wang Y, et al. Assessing a novel micro-seepage electrode with flexible and elastic tips for wearable EEG acquisition. Sens Actuator A-Phys. 2018;270:262-270.

[23] Peng H-L, Liu J-Q, Tian H-C, et al. A novel passive electrode based on porous Ti for EEG recording. Sens Actuator B-Chem. 2016;226:349-356.

[24] Pedrosa P, Fiedler P, Pestana V, et al. In-service characterization of a polymer wick-based quasi-dry electrode for rapid pasteless electroencephalography. Biomed Eng/Biomed Tech. 2018;63:349-359.

[25] Li G, Zhang D, Wang S, Duan YY. Novel passive ceramic based semi-dry electrodes for recording electroencephalography signals from the hairy scalp. Sens Actuator B-Chem. 2016;237:167-178.

[26] Martins AC, Moreira A, Machado AV, Vaz F, Fonseca C, Nóbrega JM. Development of polymer wicks for the fabrication of bio-medical sensors. Mat Sci Eng C. 2015;49(24):356-363.

[27] Wang F, Li G, Chen J, Duan Y, Zhang D. Novel semi-dry electrodes for brain–computer interface applications. J Neural Eng. 2016;13(4):046021.

[28] Pasion R, Paiva TO, Pedrosa P, et al. Assessing a novel polymer-wick based electrode for EEG neurophysiological research. J Neurosci Methods. 2016;267:126-131.

[29] Li G, Wang S, Li M, Duan YY. Towards real-life EEG applications: novel superporous hydrogel-based semi-dry EEG electrodes enabling automatically ‘charge–discharge’ electrolyte. J Neural Eng. 2021;18(4):046016.

[30] Gan D, Xing W, Jiang L, et al. Plant-inspired adhesive and tough hydrogel based on ag-lignin nanoparticles-triggered dynamic redox catechol chemistry. Nat Commun. 2019;10:1487.

[31] Han L, Lu X, Liu K, et al. Mussel-inspired adhesive and tough hydrogel based on nanoclay confined dopamine polymerization. ACS Nano. 2017;11(3):2561-2574.

[32] Hong YJ, Jeong H, Cho KW, Lu N, Kim D-H. Wearable and implantable devices for cardiovascular healthcare: from monitoring to therapy based on flexible and stretchable electronics. Adv Funct Mater. 2019;29(19):1808247.

[33] Liu L, Liu Y, Tang R, et al. Stable and low-resistance polydopamine methacrylamide-polyacrylamide hydrogel for brain-computer interface. Sci China Mater. 2022;65(8):2298-2308.

[34] Wang Q, Pan X, Guo J, et al. Lignin and cellulose derivatives-induced hydrogel with asymmetrical adhesion, strength, and electriferous properties for wearable bioelectrodes and self-powered sensors. Chem Eng J. 2021;414:128903.

[35] Meng L, Fu Q, Hao S, Xu F, Yang J. Self-adhesive, biodegradable silk-based dry electrodes for epidermal electrophysiological monitoring. Chem Eng J. 2022;427:131999.

[36] Liu Y, Cheng Y, Shi L, Wang R, Sun J. Breathable, self-adhesive dry electrodes for stable electrophysiological signal monitoring during exercise. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2022;14(10):12812-12823.

[37] Yi J, Nguyen KCT, Wang W, et al. Mussel-inspired adhesive double-network hydrogel for intraoral ultrasound imaging. ACS Appl Bio Mater. 2020;3(12):8943-8952.

[38] Dai X, Long Y, Jiang B, et al. Ultra-antifreeze, ultra-stretchable, transparent, and conductive hydrogel for multi-functional flexible electronics as strain sensor and triboelectric nanogenerator. Nano Res. 2022;15(6):5461-5468.

[39] Peng W, Han L, Gao Y, et al. Flexible organohydrogel ionic skin with ultra-low temperature freezing resistance and ultra-durable moisture retention. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2022;608:396-404.

[40] Niazy B, Ghasemzadeh H, Keshtkar Vanashi A, Afraz S. Polyvinyl alcohol/polyacrylamide hydrogel-based sensor for lead (II) ion sensing by resonance Rayleigh scattering. React Funct Polym. 2022;175:105266.

[41] Blum MM, Ovaert TC. A novel polyvinyl alcohol hydrogel functionalized with organic boundary lubricant for use as low-friction cartilage substitute: synthesis, physical/chemical, mechanical, and friction characterization. J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater. 2012;100B(7):1755-1763.

[42] Ou K, Dong X, Qin C, Ji X, He J. Properties and toughening mechanisms of PVA/PAM double-network hydrogels prepared by freeze-thawing and anneal-swelling. Mater Sci Eng C. 2017;77:1017-1026.

[43] Xin F, Sui M, Liu X, Zhao C, Yu Y. Biodegradable poly(N-isopropylacrylamide-co-N-maleylgelatin) hydrogels with adjustable swelling behavior. Colloid Polym Sci. 2019;297(5):763-769.

[44] Wang S, Li M, Wu J, et al. Mechanics of epidermal electronics. J Appl Mech. 2012;79(3):031022.

[45] Gao Y, Wang Y, Xia S, Gao G. An environment-stable hydrogel with skin-matchable performance for human-machine interface. Sci China Mater. 2021;64(9):2313-2324.

[46] Pei W, Wu X, Zhang X, et al. A pre-gelled EEG electrode and its application in SSVEP-based BCI. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2022;30:843-850.

[47] Hua H, Tang W, Xu X, Feng DD, Shu L. Flexible multi-layer semi-dry electrode for scalp EEG measurements at hairy sites. Micromachines. 2019;10(8):518.

[48] Pedrosa P, Fiedler P, Schinaia L, et al. Alginate-based hydrogels as an alternative to electrolytic gels for rapid EEG monitoring and easy cleaning procedures. Sens Actuator B-Chem. 2017;247:273-283.

[49] Li G, Wang S, Duan YY. Towards gel-free electrodes: a systematic study of electrode-skin impedance. Sens Actuator B-Chem. 2017;241:1244-1255.

[50] Li G, Wang S, Duan YY. Towards conductive-gel-free electrodes: understanding the wet electrode, semi-dry electrode and dry electrode-skin interface impedance using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy fitting. Sens Actuator B-Chem. 2018;277:250-260.

[51] Ferree TC, Luu P, Russell GS, Tucker DM. Scalp electrode impedance, infection risk, and EEG data quality. Clin Neurophysiol. 2001;112(3):536-544.

[52] Shen G, Gao K, Zhao N, et al. A novel flexible hydrogel electrode with a strong moisturizing ability for long-term EEG recording. J Neural Eng. 2021;18(6):066047.

[53] Shen G, Gao K, Zhao N, Wang Z, Jiang C, Liu J. A fully flexible hydrogel electrode for daily EEG monitoring. IEEE Sens J. 2022;22(13):12522-12529.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2023 2023 The Authors. SmartMat published by Tianjin University and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.