Optimization of linear plasmid expression system for protein production and secretion in Bacillus thuringiensis

Abstract

Bacillus thuringiensis, a safe bacterium widely used in agriculture for the biocontrol of pests, has great potential for protein production. The linear plasmid expression system, bacterial orthogonal DNA replication system constructed based on B. thuringiensis prophage GIL16, can achieve stable and high levels of gene expression in the absence of external selection pressure, facilitating development of B. thuringiensis chassis cells. However, the regulatory elements of gene expression and protein secretion suitable for the B. thuringiensis expression system are still lacking. Therefore, the development and optimization of different genetic tools are required. We constructed a promoter library containing 107 different-strength promoters (covering persistently high/intermediate/low level) by transcriptomic analysis of the cell at different growth stages and a signal peptide library (59 signal peptides from Bacillus subtilis and four endogenous signal peptides from B. thuringiensis) to enrich the genetic toolbox using alpha-lactalbumin (α-LA) as the characterization product. Then, a high-throughput microfluidic screening platform based on BacORep and self-assembled split fluorescent protein was developed to further optimize expression elements, resulting in an improved α-LA-producing B. thuringiensis. Finally, the maximum copy number of linear plasmids was 9.3 times higher than that of the original. The titer of α-LA reached 107.7 mg/L in a 3 L bioreactor, which was comparable to the highest yield reported in Komagataella phaffii. We substantially expanded the synthetic biology toolbox for linear plasmid expression systems and provided a strategy for creating efficient prokaryotic expression system.

Keywords

Bacillus thuringiensis / Linear plasmid / Promoter / Signal peptide / Microfluidics screening / Alpha-lactalbumin

References

[1] Crickmore N, Zeigler DR, Feitelson J, et al. . Revision of the nomenclature for the Bacillus thuringiensis pesticidal crystal proteins. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1998, 62(3): 807-13

[2] Van Frankenhuyzen K. Insecticidal activity of Bacillus thuringiensis crystal proteins. J Invertebr Pathol. 2009, 101(1): 1-16

[3] Ramamoorthy S, Gnanakan A, S SL, et al. . Structural characterization and anticancer activity of extracellular polysaccharides from ascidian symbiotic bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis. Carbohydr Polym. 2018, 190: 113-20

[4] Kondo S, Mizuki E, Akao T, et al. . Antitrichomonal strains of Bacillus thuringiensis. Parasitol Res. 2002, 88(12): 1090-2

[5] Ohba M, Mizuki E, Uemori A. Parasporin, a new anticancer protein group from Bacillus thuringiensis. Anticancer Res. 2009, 29(1): 427-33

[6] Peña G, Aguilar Jiménez FA, Hallal-Calleros C, et al. . In vitro ovicidal and cestocidal effects of toxins from Bacillus thuringiensis on the canine and human parasite Dipylidium Caninum. BioMed Res Int. 2013, 2013: 174619

[7] Hayakawa T, Otake N, Yonehara H, et al. . Isolation and characterization of plasmids from Streptomyces. J Antibiot (Tokyo). 1979, 32(12): 1348-50

[8] Kinashi H. Giant linear plasmids in Streptomyces: a treasure trove of antibiotic biosynthetic clusters. J Antibiot (Tokyo). 2011, 64(1): 19-25

[9] Tian R, Zhao R, Guo H, et al. . Engineered bacterial orthogonal DNA replication system for continuous evolution. Nat Chem Biol. 2023, 19(12): 1504-12

[10] Adrio JL, Demain AL. Microbial enzymes: tools for biotechnological processes. Biomolecules. 2014, 4(1): 117-39

[11] Yang S, Du G, Chen J, et al. . Characterization and application of endogenous phase-dependent promoters in Bacillus subtilis. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2017, 101(10): 4151-61

[12] Degering C, Eggert T, Puls M, et al. . Optimization of protease secretion in Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus licheniformis by screening of homologous and heterologous signal peptides. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010, 76(19): 6370-6

[13] Brockmeier U, Caspers M, Freudl R, et al. . Systematic screening of all signal peptides from Bacillus subtilis: a powerful strategy in optimizing heterologous protein secretion in Gram-positive bacteria. J Mol Biol. 2006, 362(3): 393-402

[14] Kasana RC, Salwan R, Yadav SK. Microbial proteases: detection, production, and genetic improvement. Crit Rev Microbiol. 2011, 37(3): 262-76

[15] Kračun SK, Schückel J, Westereng B, et al. . A new generation of versatile chromogenic substrates for high-throughput analysis of biomass-degrading enzymes. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2015, 8: 70

[16] Hu CD, Chinenov Y, Kerppola TK. Visualization of interactions among bZIP and Rel family proteins in living cells using bimolecular fluorescence complementation. Mol Cell. 2002, 9(4): 789-98

[17] Blakeley BD, Chapman AM, McNaughton BR. Split-superpositive GFP reassembly is a fast, efficient, and robust method for detecting protein-protein interactions in vivo. Mol Biosyst. 2012, 8(8): 2036-40

[18] Ishikawa H, Meng F, Kondo N, et al. . Generation of a dual-functional split-reporter protein for monitoring membrane fusion using self-associating split GFP. Protein Eng Des Sel. 2012, 25(12): 813-20

[19] Errasti-Murugarren E, Rodríguez-Banqueri A, Vázquez-Ibar JL. Split GFP complementation as reporter of membrane protein expression and Stability in E. Coli: A Tool to engineer Stability in a LAT Transporter. Methods Mol Biol. 2017, 1586: 181-95

[20] Cabantous S, Terwilliger TC, Waldo GS. Protein tagging and detection with engineered self-assembling fragments of green fluorescent protein. Nat Biotechnol. 2005, 23(1): 102-7

[21] Cabantous S, Waldo GS. In vivo and in vitro protein solubility assays using split GFP. Nat Methods. 2006, 3(10): 845-54

[22] Kamiyama D, Sekine S, Barsi-Rhyne B, et al. . Versatile protein tagging in cells with split fluorescent protein. Nat Commun. 2016, 7: 11046

[23] Knapp A, Ripphahn M, Volkenborn K, et al. . Activity-independent screening of secreted proteins using split GFP. J Biotechnol. 2017, 258: 110-6

[24] Isozaki A, Nakagawa Y, Loo MH, et al. . Sequentially addressable dielectrophoretic array for high-throughput sorting of large-volume biological compartments. Sci Adv. 2020, 6(22): eaba6712

[25] Schütz SS, Beneyton T, Baret JC, et al. . Rational design of a high-throughput droplet sorter. Lab Chip. 2019, 19(13): 2220-32

[26] Hu J, Ma L, Liu X, et al. . Superfine grinding pretreatment enhances emulsifying, gel properties and in vitro digestibility of laccase-treated α-Lactalbumin. LWT. 2022, 157: 113082-113082

[27] Yang F, Zhang M, Rong Y et al. A novel SNPs in Alpha-Lactalbumin Gene effects on Lactation traits in Chinese holstein dairy cows. Anim (Basel). 2019;10(1).

[28] Booij L, Merens W, Markus CR, et al. . Diet rich in α-lactalbumin improves memory in unmedicated recovered depressed patients and matched controls. J Psychopharmacol. 2006, 20(4): 526-35

[29] Zhang XZ, Cui ZL, Hong Q, et al. . High-level expression and secretion of methyl parathion hydrolase in Bacillus subtilis WB800. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005, 71(7): 4101-3

[30] Wu Y, Chen T, Liu Y, et al. . Design of a programmable biosensor-CRISPRi genetic circuits for dynamic and autonomous dual-control of metabolic flux in Bacillus subtilis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020, 48(2): 996-1009

[31] Mortazavi A, Williams BA, McCue K, et al. . Mapping and quantifying mammalian transcriptomes by RNA-Seq. Nat Methods. 2008, 5(7): 621-8

[32] Sun G, Wu Y, Huang Z, et al. . Directed evolution of diacetylchitobiose deacetylase via high-throughput droplet sorting with a novel, bacteria-based biosensor. Biosens Bioelectron. 2023, 219: 114818

[33] Keasling JD. Synthetic biology for synthetic chemistry. ACS Chem Biol. 2008, 3(1): 64-76

[34] Blazeck J, Alper HS. Promoter engineering: recent advances in controlling transcription at the most fundamental level. Biotechnol J. 2013, 8(1): 46-58

[35] Yuan F, Li K, Zhou C, et al. . Identification of two novel highly inducible promoters from Bacillus licheniformis by screening transcriptomic data. Genomics. 2020, 112(2): 1866-71

[36] Kong LH, Xiong ZQ, Song X, et al. . Characterization of a panel of strong constitutive promoters from Streptococcus thermophilus for fine-tuning gene expression. ACS Synth Biol. 2019, 8(6): 1469-72

[37] Kanhere A, Bansal M. Structural properties of promoters: similarities and differences between prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33(10): 3165-75

[38] Perron GG, Whyte L, Turnbaugh PJ, et al. . Functional characterization of bacteria isolated from ancient arctic soil exposes diverse resistance mechanisms to modern antibiotics. PLoS ONE. 2015, 10(3): e0069533

[39] Chen M, Nagarajan V. The roles of signal peptide and mature protein in RNase (barnase) export from Bacillus subtilis. Mol Gen Genet. 1993, 239(3): 409-15

[40] Mori A, Hara S, Sugahara T, et al. . Signal peptide optimization tool for the secretion of recombinant protein from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biosci Bioeng. 2015, 120(5): 518-25

[41] Freudl R. Signal peptides for recombinant protein secretion in bacterial expression systems. Microb Cell Fact. 2018, 17(1): 52

[42] Watanabe K, Tsuchida Y, Okibe N, et al. . Scanning the Corynebacterium glutamicum R genome for high-efficiency secretion signal sequences. Microbiol (Reading). 2009, 155(Pt 3): 741-50

[43] Guo X, Chai C, An Y, et al. . Rational design of signal peptides for improved MtC1LPMO production in Bacillus amyloliquefaciens. Int J Biol Macromol. 2021, 175: 262-9

[44] Arora N, Ahmad T, Rajagopal R, et al. . A constitutively expressed 36 kDa exochitinase from Bacillus thuringiensis HD-1. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2003, 307(3): 620-5

[45] Wang D, Zhang N, Guo S. Structure and function analysis of protein HD73_0859 produced by Bacillus thuringiensis. Biomed Mater Eng. 2014, 24(6): 3891-6

[46] Kostichka K, Warren GW, Mullins M, et al. . Cloning of a cryv-type insecticidal protein gene from Bacillus thuringiensis: the cryv-encoded protein is expressed early in stationary phase. J Bacteriol. 1996, 178(7): 2141-4

[47] Estruch JJ, Warren GW, Mullins MA, et al. . Vip3A, a novel Bacillus thuringiensis vegetative insecticidal protein with a wide spectrum of activities against lepidopteran insects. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996, 93(11): 5389-94

[48] Snapp E. Design and use of fluorescent fusion proteins in cell biology. Curr Protoc Cell Biol 2005;Chap 21, 21.4.1–21.4.13.

[49] Hong J, Ye X, Zhang YH. Quantitative determination of cellulose accessibility to cellulase based on adsorption of a nonhydrolytic fusion protein containing CBM and GFP with its applications. Langmuir. 2007, 23(25): 12535-40

[50] Gordon CL, Archer DB, Jeenes DJ, et al. . A glucoamylase::GFP gene fusion to study protein secretion by individual hyphae of Aspergillus Niger. J Microbiol Methods. 2000, 42(1): 39-48

[51] Delvigne F, Pêcheux H, Tarayre C. Fluorescent reporter libraries as useful tools for optimizing Microbial cell factories: a review of the current methods and applications. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2015, 3: 147

[52] Waldo GS, Standish BM, Berendzen J, et al. . Rapid protein-folding assay using green fluorescent protein. Nat Biotechnol. 1999, 17(7): 691-5

[53] Pedelacq JD, Cabantous S. Development and applications of Superfolder and Split fluorescent protein detection systems in Biology. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(14).

[54] Fornelos N, Browning DF, Pavlin A, et al. . Lytic gene expression in the temperate bacteriophage GIL01 is activated by a phage-encoded LexA homologue. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46(18): 9432-43

[55] Fornelos N, Butala M, Hodnik V, et al. . Bacteriophage GIL01 gp7 interacts with host LexA repressor to enhance DNA binding and inhibit RecA-mediated auto-cleavage. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43(15): 7315-29

[56] Joshi SH, Yong C, Gyorgy A. Inducible plasmid copy number control for synthetic biology in commonly used E. Coli strains. Nat Commun. 2022, 13(1): 6691

[57] Rouches MV, Xu Y, Cortes LBG, et al. . A plasmid system with tunable copy number. Nat Commun. 2022, 13(1): 3908

[58] Tyrrell EA, Macdonald RE, Gerhardt P. Biphasic system for growing bacteria in concentrated culture. J Bacteriol. 1958, 75(1): 1-4

[59] Chen L, Zhu B, Ru G, et al. . Re-engineering the adenine deaminase TadA-8e for efficient and specific CRISPR-based cytosine base editing. Nat Biotechnol. 2023, 41(5): 663-72

Funding

National Science Fund for Excellent Young Scholars(32222069)

National Natural Science Foundation of China(32172349)

Foundation for Innovative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China(32021005)

National Key Research and Development Program of China(2020YFA0908300)

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Jiangnan University