Engineering Escherichia coli for controlled autolytic release of intracellular proteins: bacteriophage lambda SRRz versus the 2PaT4L chimeolysin

Kingstone Nihaka , Gugulethu N. Z. Buthelezi , Marilize Le Roes-Hill , Tukayi Kudanga

Systems Microbiology and Biomanufacturing ›› 2026, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (6) : 159

PDF
Systems Microbiology and Biomanufacturing ›› 2026, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (6) :159 DOI: 10.1007/s43393-026-00550-9
Original Article
research-article
Engineering Escherichia coli for controlled autolytic release of intracellular proteins: bacteriophage lambda SRRz versus the 2PaT4L chimeolysin
Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Programmed cell autolysis can simplify the recovery of intracellular recombinant proteins, but differences in experimental conditions and evaluation criteria often limit direct comparisons of lysis systems. This study presents a multicriteria comparison of the two distinct lysis genes, the phage lambda SRRz cassette and the engineered 2PaT4L chimeolysin under identical IPTG-inducible conditions in Escherichia coli. The 2PaT4L outperformed the SRRz across multiple metrics, including cell viability, turbidity, protein release, and escape frequency. Using the inverse of escape frequency as a quantitative measure of lysis efficiency, 2PaT4L and SRRz reached (99.99 ± 0.012)% and (71.10 ± 7.370)% lysis, respectively. Protein release into the culture medium was also higher for 2PaT4L, reaching 1.62 mg/mL after 24 h compared with 1.35 mg/mL for SRRz. These results identify 2PaT4L as the more effective autolysis system under the conditions tested and highlight its potential for intracellular protein recovery. Techno-economic analysis and sensitivity analyses of lysis efficiency, autolysis duration, and inducer concentration indicated that optimizing these conditions can significantly reduce enzyme production costs.

Keywords

Cell autolysis / SRRz / 2PaT4L / Lysis efficiency / Techno-economic analysis / Process simulation

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Kingstone Nihaka, Gugulethu N. Z. Buthelezi, Marilize Le Roes-Hill, Tukayi Kudanga. Engineering Escherichia coli for controlled autolytic release of intracellular proteins: bacteriophage lambda SRRz versus the 2PaT4L chimeolysin. Systems Microbiology and Biomanufacturing, 2026, 6 (6) : 159 DOI:10.1007/s43393-026-00550-9

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Acuña JMB, De, Hidalgo-Dumont C, Pacheco N, Cabrera A, Poblete-Castro I. A novel programmable lysozyme-based lysis system in Pseudomonas putida for biopolymer production. Sci Rep, 2017, 7: 1-11.

[2]

Agmon N, Tang Z, Yang K, Sutter B, Ikushima S, Cai Y, et al. Low escape-rate genome safeguards with minimal molecular perturbation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2017, 114: E14709.

[3]

Bisen M, Kharga K, Mehta S, Jabi N, Kumar L. Bacteriophages in nature: recent advances in research tools and diverse environmental and biotechnological applications. Environ Sci Pollut Res, 2024, 31: 22199-242.

[4]

Cahill J, Rajaure M, Holt A, Moreland R, O’Leary C, Kulkarni A, et al. Suppressor analysis of the fusogenic Lambda spanins. J Virol, 2017, 91: 1-17.

[5]

Cai Z, Xu W, Xue R, Lin Z. Facile, reagentless and in situ release of Escherichia coli intracellular enzymes by heat-inducible autolytic vector for high-throughput screening. Protein Eng Des Sel, 2008, 21: 681-7.

[6]

Cárcel-Márquez J, Flores A, Martín-Cabello G, Santero E, Camacho EM. Development of an inducible lytic system for functional metagenomic screening. Sci Rep, 2019, 9: 1-8.

[7]

Chang F, Zhang X, Pan Y, Lu Y, Fang W, Fang Z, et al. Light induced expression of β-glucosidase in Escherichia coli with autolysis of cell. BMC Biotechnol, 2017, 17: 1-11.

[8]

D’Hondt E, Martín-Juárez J, Bolado S, Kasperoviciene J, Koreiviene J, Sulcius S et al. Cell disruption technologies. Microalgae-Based Biofuels Bioprod From Feed Cultiv to End-Products 2017;133–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-101023-5.00006-6

[9]

Danaeifar M. New horizons in developing cell lysis methods: A review. Biotechnol Bioeng, 2022, 119: 3007-21.

[10]

Dentovskaya SV, Vagaiskaya AS, Platonov ME, Trunyakova AS, Kotov SA, Krasil’nikova EA, et al. Peptidoglycan-free bacterial ghosts confer enhanced protection against Yersinia pestis infection. Vaccines, 2022, 10: 1-17.

[11]

Diao W, Guo L, Ding Q, Gao C, Hu G, Chen X, et al. Reprogramming microbial populations using a programmed lysis system to improve chemical production. Nat Commun, 2021, 12: 1-14.

[12]

Dong C, Cui S, Ren J, Gong G, Zha J, Wu X. Engineering of bacteria towards programmed autolysis: why, how, and when?. Microb Cell Fact, 2024, 23: 293.

[13]

Dvorak P, Chrast L, Nikel PI, Fedr R, Soucek K, Sedlackova M, et al. Exacerbation of substrate toxicity by IPTG in Escherichia coli BL21(DE3) carrying a synthetic metabolic pathway. Microb Cell Fact, 2015, 14: 1-15.

[14]

Gallagher RR, Patel JR, Interiano AL, Rovner AJ, Isaacs FJ. Multilayered genetic safeguards limit growth of microorganisms to defined environments. Nucleic Acids Res, 2015, 43: 1945-54.

[15]

Gomes L, Monteiro G, Mergulhão F. The impact of IPTG induction on plasmid stability and heterologous protein expression by Escherichia coli biofilms. Int J Mol Sci, 2020, 21: 576.

[16]

Guo X, Luo G, Hou F, Zhou C, Liu X, Lei Z, et al. A review of bacteriophage and their application in domestic animals in a post-antibiotic era. Sci Total Environ, 2024, 949: 174931.

[17]

Islam MS, Aryasomayajula A, Selvaganapathy PR. A review on macroscale and microscale cell lysis methods. Micromachines, 2017, 8: 83.

[18]

Jilani SB, Olson DG. Rapid expression of pyruvate decarboxylase from Zymomonas mobilis in E. coli BL21 LysY/Iq. BioRxiv, 2025, 242: 20250525654064.

[19]

Li S, Xu L, Hua H, Ren C, Lin Z. A set of UV-inducible autolytic vectors for high throughput screening. J Biotechnol, 2007, 127: 647-52.

[20]

Lin Z, Cai Z. Cell lysis methods for high-throughput screening or miniaturized assays. Biotechnol J, 2009, 4: 210-5.

[21]

Liu B, Guo Q, Li Z, Guo X, Liu X. Bacteriophage endolysin: a powerful weapon to control bacterial biofilms. Protein J, 2023, 42: 463-76.

[22]

Raj A, van Oudenaarden A. Nature, nurture, or chance: stochastic gene expression and Its consequences. Cell, 2008, 135: 216-26.

[23]

Resch S, Gruber K, Wanner G, Slater S, Dennis D, Lubitz W. Aqueous release and purification of poly(β-hydroxybutyrate) from Escherichia coli. J Biotechnol, 1998, 65: 173-82.

[24]

Rosano GL, Ceccarelli EA. Recombinant protein expression in Escherichia coli: Advances and challenges. Front Microbiol, 2014, 5: 172.

[25]

Rosano GL, Morales ES, Ceccarelli EA. New tools for recombinant protein production in : a 5-year update. Protein Sci, 2019, 28: 1412-22.

[26]

Valencia-Toxqui G, Ramsey J. How to introduce a new bacteriophage on the block: a short guide to phage classification. J Virol, 2024, 98: e0182123.

[27]

Xu L, Li S, Ren C, Cai Z, Lin Z. Heat-inducible autolytic vector for high-throughput screening. Biotechniques, 2006, 41: 319-23.

[28]

Zha J, Liu Z, Sun R, Gong G, Dordick JS, Wu X. Endolysin-based autolytic E. coli system for facile recovery of recombinant proteins. J Agric Food Chem, 2021, 69: 3134-43.

Funding

Durban University of Technology

Rights & permissions

The Author(s)

PDF

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/

〈 〉